|
Currently, no there isn't any that I can think of.
In the future, there will be.
I checked out your site and think it will be quite tricky for you as you seem to accept visa, neteller, and other fiat forms of payment.
|
|
|
|
|
@BlackMamba
I'm not sure what you're getting at. I presented evidence and facts to go along with my case and instead of addressing it, they resorted to libel at the time.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you please post an album link instead of having huge pictures in this main thread?
|
|
|
|
|
^ Not really cool posting *private* messages
|
|
|
|
I had a slight hope that this bitcoin price surge would attract some people back to SWC, maybe some old players who had vanished for a while ...
But each time I log in, there are very few tables playing. It would be nice to see SWC try some sort of promoting again (I know this has been said many times) ... there were holiday free rolls, weeks of double and triple krill, etc, and now it seems there is nothing new (or even old-but-it-works) to draw anyone in.
Happy Pokering. Hope everyone is well.
I'd play there pretty much every single day if I wasn't afraid that the software would crash in the middle of my open face games. |
|
|
|
** I am involved with Moneypot.com that is considering adding Poker in the future
As an individual, thank you for putting this list together.
From my experience, SWC is usually more in the 6-24 hours range, but is one of my favourite poker rooms (despite occasional crashes).
I'd recommend a '5' level for well beyond 24 hours. BCP (while having an amazing amount of traffic from the WPN network) has always been at least 24 hours but more like an average time of 3-5 days.
Ideally, I'd like to see ONE big poker hub, even if it meant several sites each connecting to the same network.
Too many with low amount of visitors makes it discouraging to expect to always have a game when you want to.
That's awesome. Do you know what you're doing for software? I just checked out cyberdecks desktop client earlier, seemed decent and they have all your favorite draw/ofc game. No games so i didn't bother depositing. ty for update on cashouts, How do these look? 1)Instant 2)1-6 hours 3)6 - 24 hours 4)1-3 days 5)4+ days *snip* Those options look good. As for software, still undecided as of now (plus it's a little further down on the development list). I have a few software companies that I'd prefer, but the most important thing to start with is network traffic imo. |
|
|
|
|
If you were to get this bet going, I highly recommend that you get a lawyer to outline the terms and conditions of the wager in great detail.
|
|
|
|
|
What will bets per second be?
|
|
|
|
|
** I am involved with Moneypot.com that is considering adding Poker in the future
As an individual, thank you for putting this list together.
From my experience, SWC is usually more in the 6-24 hours range, but is one of my favourite poker rooms (despite occasional crashes).
I'd recommend a '5' level for well beyond 24 hours. BCP (while having an amazing amount of traffic from the WPN network) has always been at least 24 hours but more like an average time of 3-5 days.
Ideally, I'd like to see ONE big poker hub, even if it meant several sites each connecting to the same network.
Too many with low amount of visitors makes it discouraging to expect to always have a game when you want to.
|
|
|
|
Didn't know that Brian was Chief Scientist. Can't wait to hear him speak. Btw -- thanks for saving me $100  |
|
|
|
hey DOGEDIGITAL, thanks for your interest We are launching the simple Flip the Coin game soon where you can play against others or a computer. Let's argue is going to be great in our opinion and we hope to launch it within the next week as well. You know .... to feed the trolls haha  It terms of security we are using www.p2nex.co, which is our proprietary wallet, debit card, trading and payment solution with patent pending secuirty features. Be sure to check out more about the payment system on the website! Please do not hesitate to ask us more questions. The Wagga team Yes, I understood that p2nex was taking care of the transactions. I couldn't find much more information other than secured by SHA-512 and being in experimental mode though. Anyways, good luck with the site! I'll be back for Let's argue! |
|
|
|
|
Interesting. Would like to definitely try out 'Let's Argue' hehe.
Is there anything above and beyond that makes it the 'most secure wallet'?
|
|
|
|
Not wanting to discuss the situation any further, but it's not as clear cut as you may think and judge.
There's a huge difference between helping someone right their wrongs and helping someone scam. Which one do you honestly think happened?
Anyways, back to the issue at hand, You have 0 transactions other than CanaryintheMine and the rest are all negative. What exactly makes you trusted or eligible to be on the list?
Again, more uneducated responses. I've done a good amount of transactions on this forum in the past when I've needed to. And you can see proof of *some* of them in the positive feedback I've left for other people. Your just talking out of your ass without researching. I've slowed down my trading due to the shadiness that has overcome this forum, and your scamming buddy contributes to that. Your welcome to try and help out scammers if you want. And I'm welcome to not trust you because of it. The guy is linked to people that have scammed multiple times (BabbaD/SuperSTAR777/JosIzem/HarshitPeer/etc) But sure, I guess you will be the one to convert the scammer to a good person by giving him a free no-neg account. And what did he do with the free account you gave him? Well, he first signed up to a signature campaign, of course.And then he applied for multiple loans, attempting to use his new account as collateral. (denied, LUCKILY) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1311386.msg13421158#msg13421158https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1311531.msg13422373#msg13422373And the ONE lender that accepted his loan and confirms a re-payment ends up being confirmed as a HACKED account and the original 'letyoulearn' states it to be hacked "before a while" (bad english, I take this to mean its been hacked for a while). https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1280455.msg13422445#msg13422445hacked: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1339269.msg13660788#msg13660788I do not trust you because of all of this, your still defending him, and the more you keep defending him just makes you look worse. Your lucky its neutral. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt, which I probably shouldn't be doing because its against my better judgement. I didn't add myself to the trust list so your asking the wrong person. I believe my feedback has always been accurate, and I assume that's why I am on the DT list. Why would you define my response as uneducated? Seems like a funny thing to say when the person claiming it doesn't seem to know the difference between 'your' and 'you're'. It is a fact that currently your only positive feedback left on your account is from CanaryintheMine, a member which was allegedly caught selling off trust into the default lists. Do you deny that this true? - If you do, please show me how it is not - If you don't, would you like to rescind your talking out ass and uneducated response comments? Again, I think most of your feedback is accurate and I more than believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. My only gripe is that your account holds power and you refuse to admit you made a mistake and would rather make it personal and embellish untrue statements to fit your own agenda. |
|
|
|
|
Site is now back up. Did not notice that it was down.
|
|
|
|
People don't get added to DT because of their trust score; that would open the door for abuse. People are added to DT because a DT1 member sees their feedback and considers it to contribute to the forum.
*snip*
... and/or buys trust from Canaryinthemine ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990074.0). Since you seem uneducated in the situation, you should know that my DT status was removed, like all others added by Canary, when Canary was taken off of DT. That's how the system works. I was added back in later. You can keep trying to troll me though, its all good. You do seem really upset at me, but I'm not the one that decided to do repeated business with a known scammer. Even giving him a free no-neg account after he had been publicly called out as a scammer, and IMO your supporting his scam behaviors. And after you find out about this, you get defensive and try to defend supporting a scammer. It is not my fault you've chosen to be shady. Also quoting for more libel and lies. Where did I ever defend his actions? Where did I state that I had repeated business with him after his actions were presented to me? You don't even know if or when I found out that he had red trust and what that was connected to. You are making rash generalizations and assumptions to try and fit your agenda. Stop. You can have whatever opinion you'd like about me. That's your right. But when an account is in DT, you carry a responsibility... A responsibility that you are abusing. |
|
|
|
|
Not wanting to discuss the situation any further, but it's not as clear cut as you may think and judge.
There's a huge difference between helping someone right their wrongs and helping someone scam. Which one do you honestly think happened?
Anyways, back to the issue at hand, You have 0 transactions other than CanaryintheMine and the rest are all negative. What exactly makes you trusted or eligible to be on the list?
|
|
|
|
People don't get added to DT because of their trust score; that would open the door for abuse. People are added to DT because a DT1 member sees their feedback and considers it to contribute to the forum.
*snip*
... and/or buys trust from Canaryinthemine ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=990074.0). |
|
|
|
|
Just a headsup/fair warning.
Yo-bit just recently introduced 'REP' on their market. It isn't rep, it isn't IOU, it is republiccoin.
Just so you don't confuse it with being Augur Rep and think you're getting a massive deal.
|
|
|
|
Are you serious? https://i.imgur.com/4CqAz6o.pngWhat's your deal? It's quite clear that you don't have the best intentions of the community at heart. You're just trying to make this personal. It's not even close to being a legendary account and I don't even remember if it was Hero at the time. Furthermore, nowhere did I openly state that I'd continue doing business with him. You're resorting to lies now to try and embellish your unwarranted accusations? Blatant trust system abuse IMO. |
|
|
|
|
This is beyond stupid.
First off, there are no rules against buying/selling accounts, of which I didn't even do. Furthermore there are no rules or even suggested action to mark all accounts that are transferred.
There are however specific guidelines for leaving negative trust which you did not follow.
This guy (who seems to be a kid) was broke, looking to to be hired for services so that he could work honestly and pay back everybody that he owes (which should be personal information).
He was asking for anything and asked if he could use a spare account to make some money through signature campaigns.
I was at first a bit uneasy about handing an account over to him and had explicitly warned him not to do anything. However, I never once had a problem with him on his services when I had ordered graphics from him (when I didn't see any type of accusations made against him) and he made me a what I believed to be a sincere promise not to (which I believe he kept [all his red trust comes from affiliation]).
If I had reason to believe that he would use the account solely for malicious purposes, I wouldn't have given it to him.
So unless you want to keep the cop charade up and think that I am this person, I ask that you kindly remove your unwarranted negative feedback on my profile.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
