I like it!

Every morning when I check the price is a bit lower! Might be the good moment to buy, not sure it will be able to break the 400 floor no?

I'm not saying everything he says is right (I don't understand everything) but I like the part about the halving is already priced! After all it's something everyone expect so maybe is already priced.
But that doesn't mean price will crash and btc is ended xD

Maybe the price won't rise much more until the halving, even lower a bit after the halving because everyone will dump.

Well I don't know much and it will only go like this if the price is high enough for miners to make profit after the halving of course!

350 seems really hard to reach indeed. And I'd bet that if price ever reached 350$ in those conditions it would crash even further because most people would loose trust in btc. But I don't see how it could drop so low, thousands of people are frustrated enough to have missed the opportunity to buy at 300, they will take any opportunity around 400 so it won't breack this floor.

I believe it's the first time we agree on something JayJuanGee 

How much for a potential hero or sr member account?

And for the cheap full hero account?

Yeah seems like blocks are full only from time to time, it's not a global phenomenon. So we won't see a problem in transaction yet!

Toi t'as jamais entendu parler de la méthode probably fair non?

Les deux clés? Don't une que tu génères toi et l'autre qui est secrète? La combinaison des deux te permettant de vérifier en temps réel?

Et ta théorie n'a aucun fondement. Tu peux prouver tes dires?

You're saying that but what's the difference between someone buying at 1200 and the people buying at 450 few days ago? In both cases there was a huge rise without anything to back it and if the price seems stable it could have dropped a lot! And it may drop to 300$ in just a few hours, you can't know with btc...

Is it FUD attempt to have doubt? It would be to yell everywhere "sell sell now it's too dangerous" but just saying that it's a complicated situation where one's faith could be damaged is not FUD...

That's right, it's more or less a question of faith when it comes to bitcoin...

I lost mine years ago but it doesn't mean others will too 

Interesting articles. I like the idea of humanity being able to control the global climate of Earth 

But as you said in a previous post, most of the problem is to make whole humanity advance in the same direction. This would need an international government, the discussion between countries can't lead to anything.

I still think it's better to try something than just sitting here saying "meh, we can't know, it won't work"

And about what you said about politics robbing people and missusing money: it's not a proof of anything. Politicians rob the people all the time for everything, you can't say that because they don't do things well things shouldn't be done. If you take that into account then let me be straight: we shouldn't do anything. Any law voted at the moment was made by and for the rich. Banks lead the world and the three richest families decide of everything.

But if you want to actually discuss you got to ignore those facts, otherwise you can't conclude anything else but "we should take them, hang them, then think again about what we can do" 

True one. As much as I hate FN, it doesn't change the fact that if a party is supported by 27% of the population, they should be represented in a proportionnal way. If people are dumb enough to vote FN, let them burn themselves!

It was not meant to be rigged, not everything is a hidden attack 

Of course the idea was "significant"! But you're misled in my attempt. What I wanted to show is not that human have a significant impact.

Only two solution:
-we have a significant impact. Then it's important to control this impact and to be aware of it. Thus your position is a bit weird as you promote the inaction or at least the non coordinated action.
-We don't have a significant impact, then why not letting us trying to control it? It won't hurt anyone to try to be ecolo friendly even is it might be a bit useless no?

It's a bit like the Pascal bet, but with much less flaws 

Joule count of human fuel was not the question I was talking about, it was merely a philosophical question I'm not claiming anything.

What I am asking is: do you really believe that humans have no global impact on environment?

It's an easy Yes or No question man 

Why giving the info of how much blocks are filled? I don't really understand the impact and the point of such information? And I absolutely don't see the link with bitcoin trading though it's probably because of my ignorance 

Such awful writing common sense. Le sigh

*You* didn't say it but YOU quoted it without putting it in any other context. Which means that you take the "guru" assertion for yourself. If I quote Franklin saying "Those who give up their liberty for more security neither deserve liberty nor security" without adding anything, it means that I take what he said as an assertion I approve.

And I see that you fire a lot on Marx or socialism (though you can actually be neither marxist nor fascist you know, it's not FN or Communism, some people actually think in the middle) but you take caution to not answer anything else on the fascist part or the fact that the Le Pen are rather similar to dictators in their party or the fact that they use a brand (FN) for the political party, which allows them to earn a freaking amount of money.

But I suppose spitting on socialism and immigrants is always easier than seeing what banks and capitalism do to you and our country every day =)

by the way "Ce n'est pas parce qu'ils sont nombreux à avoir tort qu'ils ont raison" Coluche.

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? What is that???

That's freaking cool xD

Though I feel a bit insulted, it's just too funny 

So you say. But I'm not so sure about it. Maybe btc is secretly really backed by its use in blackmarket. It would explain the volatility that is truly inherent to the bitcoin!

So you're trying to convince me that because 42% of French vote fn (which is not the case, 42% French who voted voted fn, but with 50% of abstention it really puts the thing in perspective) that it's not a freaking facist group? So that's how you define facism? When enough people want it it's no longer facism?

Well sorry but when a political party is led only by one of the richest French family (FN is a brand you know? It belongs to the Le Pen and they earn money every time it's printed somewhere, they take the money from the political party but that doesn't make people think twice about giving their money) where you get kicked out if you ever question the leader, I call that a fascist party. It's the very definition of fascism in fact, nothing to do with racism which is something else though as stupid as fascism.

And you're saying Marechal Le Pen is like a “guru or a mystic”? Waouh! I really want to vote for her now, let's all vote for the great guru Marechal!  

I see no difference between those people and the godwin point or Donald Trump for example, they're quite similar in fact.

Yes, thanks for removing it! We get enough of this nazi show during the elections, no need to impose it on a daily basis 

We don't. That's a whole stupid scheme. It's a nonsense and non reliable way of doing things. Those people are going to get scammed at a moment or another for sure...