Excellent. It seems that beginners can be advised to learn the test to always know and not forget about the rules. Are there talents that can put this into music? In this case, repetition and frequent listening will completely discourage the desire to do something to the detriment of the forum.  |
|
|
|
I can imagine the chagrin of a blocked bounty hunter who managed to earn merit today, and the next action was to block. It's a shame, isn't it? It's so easy to get merit, while for two years there hasn't even been an attempt to read the forum rules. Your recent question was asked too late. Hello friends!
Do you know how to earn Merit?
CryptopreneurBrainboss is clearly in good spirits today. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5292805.msg55674065#msg55674065 |
|
|
|
Unfortunately, I did not see a bonus in my transaction. There is only this 0.00517973 BTC:) You were wrong with the month.
Week 45 (November 18, 2020 - November 24, 2020)
Week 46 (November 25, 2020 - October 01, 2020)
To be continued...[/center]
Thank you. |
|
|
|
Another account that participates in this company. Now he is evading the ban.============================================================================================= Ban evasion.bravehearth0319 Autoban userjcpone Autoban usercherrygandaERC-20 Address: 0xCeC008Cc1bA8cDEAF54c271e85A0758f2123c8bE
ETH Wallet Address: 0xCeC008Cc1bA8cDEAF54c271e85A0758f2123c8bE
[ archive ] BTC Address: 328VhdNoWaqCMLthJS8Y6sTXAy1raWZV5z
BTC Address: 328VhdNoWaqCMLthJS8Y6sTXAy1raWZV5z
[ archive ] 
|
|
|
|
And Google team claimed that Google store is scam free?
Can you point us to your source that says Google made this claim? Not sure if they'd make such a bold claim knowing how exceptionally false it is even at whatever angle you look at it. I think it's true, there was a time when too many fake apps are available on playstore and they are been flushed out one by one, there was a statement made at the time that google play store is now safe 🤔, that's a very long time ago, not sure I can dig anything up about this again, anyways its getting more risky to install apps through stores now, better start downloading from official websites The two of you are affirming something that never happened. Google is gaining negative "popularity" every day. All we can do to keep ourselves safe is to stop using Google Play entirely. It is another matter when, on the contrary, many experts warn that Google Play is becoming a dangerous source of viruses. Earlier in November, Spanish cybersecurity researchers from NortonLifeLock and the IMDEA Software Institute named the most dangerous source of mobile viruses. According to experts, most often malicious files get to Android smartphones through the Google Play app store. In total, experts studied 34 million mobile programs, from 10 to 24 percent of the applications were found to be malicious or unwanted. https://usnewslatest.com/an-expert-reveals-a-way-to-calculate-the-hacking-of-an-android-smartphone/ |
|
|
|
I have not violate any rule and doc submitted to wapinter and wapinter/Hhampuz decided to remove me from bounty but Zahidmoon will stay in bounty.
I request you please remove negative trust, thank you.
The fact that you have provided documents, I can also send you a photo of my family, call my neighbor a brother, and even a photo of a cat. Using one wallet when registering is a red flag talking about an alternative account. Have you read company rules before? Here's another one with two of your accounts registered, and of course it's not difficult to create a second wallet. 🚀🔥🚀[Bounty:$350k] BBOD - First Zero-fee Crypto Derivatives Exchange 🚀https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XQJLCTLIUNvNdsphN1zRsi8d3RvoRe23AEPDQTX5bFs/edit#gid=856058495
4. Using multiple accounts, cheating and spamming are not allowed. You will be disqualified from the bounty program immediately and all of your accounts will be banned permanently. Please note that any offensive or inappropriate behavior will lead to immediate disqualification from the campaign.
|
|
|
|
have you informed bounty managers about that? you seem to be doing their job for them, and maybe it doesn't matter to them, they just want to have the most successful campaign possible.
Well Yes both accounts are connected but both wallets not belongs to 1 person and I will give explanation to Hhampuz.
feel free to tell us too or share Hhampuz answer here. Yes, I informed the manager. I don't think managers are indifferent to their rules. I respect Hhampuz, and I understand that he has a very large amount of work. Sometimes it is simply not in his power to check every account. But I would like to clarify for everyone who has been tagged, as well as for future found cheaters. They write a lot of letters to me in PM and accuse me of heartlessness. Immediately, everyone has large families and poor children who have nothing to eat. Let's start with the fact that the bounty rules were not invented by me. And it's not me who prohibits alternative accounts from participating in subscription campaigns. You don't need to blame your mistakes on a pandemic. Otherwise, you can allow scammers to create fraudulent projects, and also write in the rules that the participation of cheaters in the bounty is allowed and encouraged. I don't like double standards. If there are violations, then they are in fact, and the pandemic has nothing to do with it. |
|
|
|
October 21, 2020, 07:00:59 AMCampaign finished. We are waiting for the first update from you.
November 21, 2020, 01:08:46 PM Many of the users who posted on this page have already been accused of bounty cheating. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5277165.1000When forum users automatically stamp bounty reports and do not follow the events in the topic, this is also wrong. The warning was made several times! I ask that these facts be taken into account when making a decision! I can explain to you since you are not familiar with this topic. After a newbie gets negative feedback for it, he goes and registers another account. I assure you it works 95 percent. What happens next? Now two accounts are being deceived in the bounty, and so on according to the scheme. Anyone who has tried to work with one account starts participating with two or three accounts. Some bounties accept accounts with red feedback. The most surprising thing is that for those who have a review that he is a bot, it is almost difficult to find other violations. Therefore, by leaving a neutral review, we do not provoke a person to create even more such accounts. If he sees a neutral response, then he is unlikely to repeat the same mistake another time. |
|
|
|
|
You're right. I also leave negative feedback for such actions. I do not think that we should make lists of such users, since such accounts increase in arithmetic progression. The cheaters have their plans, which are trying to confuse the detectives, and in the future to accuse other users of cheating. I can say that they will fail.
Just create an archive in which they use someone else's data. If by chance the feedback offends innocent users, there is always an opportunity to discuss and fix it.
|
|
|
|
I didn’t record this account, as it was banned.  The second link is very interesting. Thanks as always YOSHIE |
|
|
|
|
I looked at this account, there is nothing useful in it, except for reports on rewards, but I see no other violations. The account is not detected for the presence of alternative accounts. And there is also no indication that this account is Ban evasion.
These are the criteria most often used for the bounty hunter tag. As for the review left to him, SPQRCoin is famous for such feedback
If you ask everyone's opinion specifically, I disagree.
If you follow the "reputation" thread, this question about SPQRCoin feedback comes up regularly. And for some, it changes the tag to neutral.
I think it's easier to give neutral feedback at first.
|
|
|
|
Yes, according to post history and self-statements it's pretty sure that account has compromised. Either it has sold or hacked, but change hands. Left negative feedback and let's see what excuse he provide. Alt connected and using the same ETH address. Are they connected in some other way? I mean had they abused any campaign directly? I think neutral feedback for other accounts would appropriate unless they abuse any campaign. In addition to the fact that he wrote to me in the PM, that I made his life difficult, he did not deny anything. And I don’t think it’s a big loss for him. Since, judging by past Ratimov investigations, this account belongs to a very large farm. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5191960.msg52721107#msg52721107I will take time to unravel this tangle even more. And if we talk about the accounts that YOSHIE discovered, then they all evade the ban. Thanks to YOSHIE for help. I will submit a report to the moderators. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2613277.msg55652785#msg55652785 |
|
|
|
============================================================================================= Ban evasion.sonytv85 Autoban userLitecoin347 banned[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.Lekatoo Autoban userSamunto bannedbellokudi bannedAbdulbc bannedEth Address: 0x77585bD467ceA7B76A6B5C2Aa0ea44F328342134
ETH (ERC20) Address: 0x77585bD467ceA7B76A6B5C2Aa0ea44F328342134
[ archive ] ETH address: 0x77585bD467ceA7B76A6B5C2Aa0ea44F328342134
[ archive ] ETH address: 0x77585bD467ceA7B76A6B5C2Aa0ea44F328342134
[ archive ] |
|
|
|
Plagiarism (copy paste).paraphrasingUser: Towerbreeze Post link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5248463.msg54431070#msg54431070[ archive ] Right now I'm not seeing any other top exchanges tackling hackers than binance, this makes me feel that binance team will do a wonderful job on coinmarketcap soon
Gone are the days when hackers could just stroll off into the nightfall with their plunder, as did the individual who took 850,000 bitcoin from Mt. Gox in 2014. Wallet delivers connected to suspected programmers are presently labeled, and exchanges for the most part freeze any assets originating from these wallets on the off chance that they show up on their servers.
At soon after 16:00 UTC Wednesday, bot Twitter account Whale Alert cautioned Binance which has recently dedicated to freezing any assets coming from the hack that approximately 137 ether worth around $27,000 at press time had moved from a location connected to the Upbit programmer gathering to its wallets.
In January 2019, Binance additionally solidified funds connected to the $16 million Cryptopia hack
CZ (Binance CEO) tweeted not long after that the assets had been effectively solidified and that the cash would in no time be transferred back to Upbit.
If all other exchanges can start giving hackers this tough tackle like binance is doing hackers won't roam freely
original source https://www.coindesk.com/binance-upbit-hacker 
|
|
|
|
Plagiarism (copy paste).User: DDantePost link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5235572.msg54098667#msg54098667[ archive ] Neo released a total of 1,660,865 NEO worth approximately $11 million, with 27,800,303 NEO ($190 million) still remaining and this makes few people spreading bad news that this will kill NEO, well I think you are wrong.
Neo, originally known as AntShares, is a blockchain platform based on BFT, a distributed Proof of Stake (dPoS) consensus algorithm.
While it also supports tokens, the platform appears to be shifting its focus toward mainstream applications. This is also seen in its programming environment, which supports traditional languages such as C++ and JavaScript, as opposed to custom languages like Solidity.
The project hasn’t often been in the spotlight recently, as it focuses on relaunching its blockchain for Neo 3.0. In early 2019, roadmap predictions placed its launch in Q2 2020.
NEO co-founder, Da Hongfei, focused on the importance of blockchain at Blockshow Asia in improving the Internet’s data privacy, suggesting that this a potential development direction for Neo.
In September, Neo joined Microsoft’s .NET Foundation as the first blockchain member.
It's really not easy to get to where NEO is today on CMC and that is 22th position, I believe NEO plans to continue their development even further this time around, NEO is no nonsense project
sourcehttps://cointelegraph.com/news/neo-releases-11-million-from-cold-wallet-to-fund-itself-through-2020
|
|
|
|
Is bitcointalk forum not about learning and sharing ideas anymore? My posts are removed and the posts are good enough, are admins going strict on members of the forum because of something else? Here is an example of a good post of mine but still removed and my account was ban for it, I know the difference between contributing posts and junk posts, what is going on?  Why aren't you posting from your main account? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2650466 And this is not the place for such a topic. Move it to "META" In addition, I can't say that your post opened something new, probably someone complained about it. Try to write more productively. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
