Bitcoin Forum
June 07, 2024, 08:18:33 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 [275] 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 »
5481  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Organizing Proper Cold Wollet Storage on: October 22, 2017, 12:02:00 PM
Do I miss something?
What are possible attack vectors here? 

One big attack vector would probably be the most obvious. Physical access. Until you are not living in a bunker and depending on the amount you store this would be an efficient attack vector.
Since your plan does not mention any backups a "simple theft" of your harddrive would be an option.
Another way to gain access over your private keys is to infect your pc which is connected with the internet.
If you have a big amount stored and an attacker is targeting at you it probably wouldn't be that hard to get malware on your pc which will infect the usb stick.
And once USB is infected and you plug it into your cold pc to sign the TX the private keys could be copied over to the usb without you noticing it.
And the next time you connect it to a pc with internet connection (e.g. when you want to push the TX) the malware automatically pushes a TX of all your coins to his address even before you can start pushing your TX.

Of course this is more theoretical nature. But its definetly possible. Noone would put so much effort into it for 1-2 coins.
But 100 BTC are pretty attractive. Big Big Holders should definetly be careful about giving too much personal information away.
5482  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: How many phone wallets been hacked? on: October 22, 2017, 11:41:05 AM
In fact there aren't too much reports about hacked mobile wallets. I think the majority of all BTC owners dont have big amounts on their hot wallets.
This leads to a low potential amount an attacker could steal. In addition to that mobile wallets usually dont have more security issues than standard desktop wallets.
And its a lot easier to get malware spread around windows user with new exploits poping up every day than to spread it through the app store.
An attacker (who is looking to profit) is probably going for the (slightly) easier and (obviously) more profitable way, targeting desktop user.
5483  Economy / Computer hardware / Re: Ledger Authenticator app for iOS not available on UK AppStore on: October 22, 2017, 10:46:56 AM
- has this always been the case or has this app been recently taken off the AppStore?

Unfortunately i dont know anything about the UK version of this App. Therefore i cant give you detailed information.
But the Ledger app has not been taken off the Appstore in other countries as far as i know.


- if this is normal, how do you suggest I circumvent this problem?

You could either search for the App online and verify signature after downloading it (to be sure you have the original, and not modified, version).
Or you use your security card which should be delivered with your Nano.
If there is no security card this probably means you bought your Nano from a non-official seller?
If thats the case i would not use this Wallet.. cant be sure if you got a manipulated firmware.

But if you just lost your security card i think there is a tool which you can download which creates a new security card based on your ledger nano.
5484  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Raspberry Pi + Wallets + Raspbian (linux) on: October 22, 2017, 10:08:15 AM
Thanks for all the answers!

The idea is not to run a node or sync the blockchain.
It's just to have a few wallets to generate private keys and store them on keepass.
Just trying to do it the safest I can and with some degree of compatibility/easy to use.
Any suggestion is welcome.


Your idea of a offline Raspberry Pi works. If you are completely offline (and also via cable, not WiFi) signing Transactions and relaying them to your online PC.
But in terms of usability.. i would recommend you a hardware wallet.
There are quite a few on the market which can hold different Cryptocurrencies.
And for a few (which cant be hold by HW wallets, because of too less of adoption) you can use your offline RASP.
The RASP is definetly more "complex to use" and not that "error forgiving" as a hardware wallet (e.g. trezor or ledger)
5485  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Question concerning cold storage (Bitcoin) on: October 22, 2017, 09:47:05 AM
1. Will it for sure create a new address?

Yes, electrum will always be able to creates a new address. Electrum generates a seed from which tons of addresses can be made of.

2. Are all addresses created unique? For sure?

Addresses created are random. They are not unique "for sure". But the possibility of finding a private key, someone else already found are almost 0.
Meaning if every PC on this planet would create addresses 24/7.. there probably wouldnt be a collision until whole mankind dies. (Including Birthay paradox)

3. Do I have to hurry to put BTC into the offline created address, before anyone else gets it in a hot wallet?

Theoretically you dont have to worry. But the earlier its in your offline generated wallet.. the faster its in a "safe place".
If you are using Windows and you are browsing / reading mails on your PC.. its probably not a good idea to keep them in a normal wallet on your desktop.
5486  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Had a 1st time Payment in my new wallet - NEED HELP on: October 22, 2017, 09:40:30 AM
Open a block explorer of your choice (e.g. https://blockchain.info), then search for your "recieve-"address you gave to your curstomer(?).
If you dont find any transactions onto this address, ask your customer to send you the transaction ID.
Afterwards you can check the TX ID on blockchain.info to see if its the right recieving address.
If so, you should additionally check the tx fee and wait until at least 1-3 confirmations until you process his payment.
If your address doesnt show any TX and your customer cant give you a valid TX ID, he is probably trying to scam you.
5487  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Bitcoin fork - new coin? on: October 21, 2017, 05:19:45 PM
You should never be storing your coins on a online wallet / exchange.
There is no guarantee coinbase is going to pay you those BTG out.
Coinbase has the control over your private keys (the real bitcoins). You only have an account on their website which gives you "the right" to send coins.
In case of a fork coinbase is in charge of the BTG coins. They may give them to you.. or they dont.
I would recommend to download a wallet for your PC (you can download a light weight wallet e.g. electrum)


Today I downloaded electrum wallet,but i am confused there is a address tab and i can see there are many address listed there,Those are my address?or this wallet changes address every time i want to receive bitcoins.I have made 2fa verification on there does that cost me extra money if so how much it will be,
I am new could anyone help?

Yes, those are all your addresses.
Electrum generates a new address for every transaction (for privacy reasons).
Those are all addresses which you are in control of.
5488  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The KRACK Wi-Fi attack...precautions? on: October 21, 2017, 05:12:35 PM
So, question: My operating systems have all been patched (Windows 7SP1, 8 and 10). Does that mean that my PCs are safe to use normally, or am I still vulnerable because of the router?

If your PC is patched and your router is still vulnerable to this attack then it depends on which device initiates the handshake.
One direction of your data stream can be decrypted (decrypted in terms of WPA2). If you are still encrypting your information with TLS (https) then you are completely safe.
The KRACK attack puts you in a situation comparable with a free wifi hotspot in a public place.
If your PC is clean and you are communicating via https (valid signatures from website provider) you are safe.

Thanks for the info. If I understand correctly, anything sent over https is safe from this attack. So, that should cover all my bases -- my banking sites, email, crypto exchanges, charting sites and Bitcointalk are all sent over an https connection.


Thats true if you are looking at the security aspect. Noone can steal your banking information or let you visit a phishing site (as long as you use a standard browser which shows https certificates).
But its possible to read out meta data. This means an attacker could theoretically see packets arriving (or being sent; depending on the wpa handshake).
Information like IP-Addresses (Websites visited) and duration of "interacting" with the website can be reviewed by an attacker.

But the KeyReinstallationAttaCK is a targeted Attack, meaning the attacker has to be in your wifi range and he has to be specific aiming at you.
5489  Economy / Speculation / Re: This guy predicts bitcoin to be $20,000 in 2 years. What do you think? on: October 21, 2017, 04:54:15 PM
I personally dont think Bitcoin will hit 20k $ (and also i dont think ether will hit 15k).
Bitcoin probably will rise, yes. But not in this dimensions. If bitcoins shows some indication to be able to rise that high that fast.. it probably will get
regulatet/forbidden by governments to make sure there is not too much money out of their control.


Well,  why not believe  it?  Bitcoin is very  volatile  and unpredictable that's  why for me it is possie that in the next 2 years bitcoin will hit $10,00. Japan now is doing some legality if bitcoin exchange and this is a good sign that more countries will also do the same. With this, more people will trust and invest in  bitcoin. So the higher the demand,  what will to the price then? Smiley

In case of nothing unexpected happening (which would destroy BTC completely) i dont see why bitcoin should drop 10 $ in 2 years.
5490  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Shall I buy BTC now to get the free BTG? on: October 21, 2017, 04:50:08 PM
You are probably not the only one with this idea. A lot of people had this thought.
Noone can predict what will happen with BTC / BTG. It can be either a good idea to buy BTC now to recieve BTG.
But on the other hand this could also lead to a loss of capital. It may be the case BTC drops together with BTG and you will either cut your losses
or keep holding until it will recover again to take your investment out.
5491  Bitcoin / Hardware wallets / Re: Send BTC from a particular address? (Ledger Nano S) on: October 20, 2017, 05:43:52 PM
Not sure if this would work, but it's worth the try.

1. Import your Ledger Nano S in Electrum;
2. Select the "Addresses" tab; (if it's not showing: View -> Show Addresses)
3. Right click the address you want to spend the coins and choose "Spend from";

Please report here if it worked.

This, actually, is the only way this works.
Ledger Wallet software does not support sending from specific chosen addresses.
Of course there is quite a big risk contained in exporting/importing your private keys.
Theoretically it shouldn't matter from which address you send. Do you have a reason?
5492  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Is My Address Hanging Out?? on: October 20, 2017, 04:58:29 PM
1: By just creating a watch only wallet.  Does this expose my bitcoin address, (thus tying my public key to my IP address)? Is anything "transmitted" or is this passive?

2: As long as my local blockchain is up to date, can I do step 1 (create unsigned trans.) without being on line? If so does my local blockchain need to be fully caught up or just past my last transaction?

3: To sum up, can I get to where I ONLY expose my Bitcoin address at #3.

I'm not really asking how to mask my IP (Tor, I2P, VPN, Starbucks...) but if someone has a great idea on that I'm all ears.  Mostly I just need to know WHEN to mask my IP.

1. Not really, depending on what kind of a criminal you are. Your watch-only wallet communicates with the internet and sends/recieves packages containg your address (httpPOST/GET methods).
If you are communicating via https, its secured. If not and the police is already observing you.. there is a chance they will get proofs you "watched" this address.
In case you are not a big boy criminal.. no.. there is no database or anything which keeps an eye on which ip is observing which address.

2. Yes this works. Your Blockchain doesn't even have to be up to date. Creating unsigned TX's is easy.

3. Yes
5493  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The KRACK Wi-Fi attack...precautions? on: October 20, 2017, 04:27:14 PM
So, question: My operating systems have all been patched (Windows 7SP1, 8 and 10). Does that mean that my PCs are safe to use normally, or am I still vulnerable because of the router?

If your PC is patched and your router is still vulnerable to this attack then it depends on which device initiates the handshake.
One direction of your data stream can be decrypted (decrypted in terms of WPA2). If you are still encrypting your information with TLS (https) then you are completely safe.
The KRACK attack puts you in a situation comparable with a free wifi hotspot in a public place.
If your PC is clean and you are communicating via https (valid signatures from website provider) you are safe.



5494  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Service Discussion (Altcoins) / Re: Who supports Bitcoin Gold? on: October 20, 2017, 03:39:11 PM
Noone can guarantee you to get your Bitcoin Gold if you keep it on an exchange.
Bitcoin Gold will be a different coin (with same block history until block x) as Bitcoin.
If you want to be safe while fork occurs you need to backup your private keys. Since exchanges only "credit you a btc amount to spend" you dont have control over the private keys holding your BTC.
I would strongly recommend to install an offline wallet (a leightweight wallet doesn't need a lot of space e.g. electrum) and move your funds to your wallet.
You will be completely safe when the fork occurs and noone can "steal" your bitcoin gold.
5495  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: is it better to invest in bitcoin or ethereum ? on: October 18, 2017, 06:33:09 PM
This depends on your plan and on the risks you are willing to take.
Bitcoin is the first crypto currency. It is Bitcoin.
If you want to stay safe then go for BTC and see your money accumulate.
On the other hand if you like to take risks and believe in ethereum then go for it and invest into it.
I would really recommend to read into both of those coins/platforms and then decide based on your new knowledge.
I, personally would invest in both. With the majority of my investment in BTC's.
5496  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi controlling 500'000 BTC on: October 18, 2017, 06:29:19 PM
No, bro. Satoshi controls more than 1 millions bitcoin and they spread in around 100-200 addresses. Well, He is the father of bitcoin and therefore, I believe that he will never do such thing that can harm bitcoin such as selling all bitcoin at a time. Therefore, there is nothing you need to worry in this case. maybe he is holding it like a gift or something like that

I think even if he started to move 1 small satoshi from his (watched) addresses.. this will harm the market pretty strong.
I think the best would be if those coins would never be touched by anyone.
If all of those coins would be put on an exchange the price would immediately drop (extremely).
5497  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can cryptocurrency make real money disappear? on: October 18, 2017, 06:25:52 PM
I am pretty sure cryptocurrencies will replace fiat in the near future. I dont think it will be BTC or any other decentralized cryptocurrency.
It probably will be a coin "based on blockchain technology" which wont be decentralized and will be in "full control" from governments/financial institutions.
Like russia started to roll out the Crypto Rubel.. i think a lot of countries will follow soon.
I hope they wont see BTC as a threat to them and start banning it everywhere.
5498  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SPV wallets AREN'T safe for the upcoming segwit2x attack on: October 18, 2017, 06:23:20 PM
Full control means a full node, end of story. Anything else is a compromise where you are trusting X to do Y: not good.

Thats not true at all. As long as you are in control of your private keys (doesnt matter if they have been generated by a core wallet or by any other wallet)
you are fine and can decide for yourself which "chain you follow".
And additionally al ot of wallets provide both chains (e.g. electrum if im not mistaken).
5499  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Need help identifying crypto secret key on: October 18, 2017, 06:14:51 PM
3x3 numbers have a coding power of 10^9 (= 10.000.000.000).
I dont think this is related to a private key/seed anyhow.
Any android mobile could bruteforce those "keys" in a very small time.
Maybe its just a reminder for a password or anything? or for a word? each number = letter in alphabet?
5500  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: btc gold to exchanges or wallets only? on: October 18, 2017, 06:03:32 PM
It is possible you will get your BTG from a exchanger.
But there is also the possibility they just wont. The only way to ensure you are really going to get your BTG is to be in control of your private keys.
Since a web wallet only provides you an account on their site with BTC value to spend.
If they want to keep their BTG's, they dont have to give it to you.
Pages: « 1 ... 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 [275] 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!