Auction will happen privately if no one wants to participate publicly, its up to you guys.
|
|
|
Hello yes, I'd like one mining please. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fc2.staticflickr.com%2F8%2F7377%2F13938631213_347a358785.jpg&t=663&c=pneePygSSuCGFQ)
|
|
|
Hi dogie,
1) Do you happen to know the make/model or airflow of the fan included in the cube? I'm thinking of upgrading the fan with one that has more airflow when I reverse the fan direction. But, I am also concerned if the 3-pins on the cube can handle a higher airflow fan that draws more current.
2) Would there be any benefit to hashrate by adding additional cooling in the form of a second fan attached to the front of the cube?
1) Its a generic fan, impossible to tell. The 3 pin header will be fine, you'll only ever be asking 3W even with a OTT fan.
|
|
|
Hi, would be great if you could always add who offers the best $/Ghs rate of in-hand hardware.
What about all the Chinese poping up like Garden BTC or Dragon Miner or whatnot?
BTCGarden will go up once more people have hardware (so we know what its failure rate is like). I never added the dragon because its being sold by 1000 different methods from 10 different factories. There is no one company so there is no guarantee that anyone even gets their product. Its a terrible business model.
|
|
|
They'll be difficulty 1 so no.
|
|
|
BFL most likely did the same thing to 65nm customers.
+1 I thought the same thing last year after waiting over a YEAR for my Singles. Surely the network would have been small enough at the time to have seen 1000s of singles hiding somewhere?
|
|
|
With BFGminer it goes dead after about 24 hours. ![Cry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cry.gif) I'm doing this on a RPi. How do I install the Zadig part for cgminer or is it not needed? Not needed on pi
|
|
|
3 on the 1200 is common and fine.
|
|
|
Yes, dont use anything. Let it do its own thing.
Wait, are you saying the 270 command shouldn't be on there either? I thought it had to be set as one or the other? Take it off. See the OP, its not there.
|
|
|
looking for configuration guidance. i tried a couple things with bridging, etc, but not having any success. i have my s1 running with a wireless network connection. i would like to bridge or forward the wired network port to the wireless active connection. ie: i would like to plug in a raspberry pi on the wired port and piggyback/share the wireless connection the s1 is using. this way i can run my older technology miners (butterfly 60ghash boxes) which are noisy and hot in the garage where they belong ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) any configuration suggestions? i'm fine with static ip numbers for the wired connection, the raspberry pi isn't dependent on dhcp. but either is fine. thanks! ps: yes, i *could* get a usb wifi adapter for the raspberry pi but that would a) cost more money - i'm that cheap, and b) use up a precious usb port that the miner boxes need, and c) not tickle my rube goldberg genes enough ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Get a $5 usb hub off amazon and then you have many usb ports on your pi
|
|
|
Do you have any proof that could substantiate any of the claims laid out, even a bit? A uniform badge with your forum ID for example?
|
|
|
Relevent ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi660.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu329%2FThresholdsDream%2FPerfume%2Feaumy_zps0cf8f608.jpg&t=663&c=QgDjKqYRFJfQhg)
|
|
|
You're running these way past spec, and again the OCing does NOT work, do not attempt it. Its not as simple as a number.
@ dogie, so, i should use 270? this still produced HW errors... can you give me the specific speed or correct number for these R-Box? thanks a lot EDIT: i read your comment on the previous page to exclude even the 270 frequency in the batch file... at this point, the twins are running @ stock. i'll observe the HW error performance then i'll feedback later...
thanks...Yes, dont use anything. Let it do its own thing.
|
|
|
i noticed that the HW error is so high. is this normal for the R-Box or any ASIC based miner? even if i'll run the twins @ stock (270 MHz), the HW error rate is still high... or this is CGminer related? i also observed this in using my Antminer US2 but not when I will use BFGminer... the U2s are all running w/ 0 HW errors on BFGminer. tried the latest BFGminer (w/ R-Box) support last night and it is unstable... some times it will run but at a low hash rate... only 25 Gh/s and most of the time, the R-Box will not run... ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi105.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fm206%2Flloyd_opol%2FR-Box_HWerror_zps183ca6c5.jpg&t=663&c=k9jctd4i9EORSA) You're running these way past spec, and again the OCing does NOT work, do not attempt it. Its not as simple as a number.
|
|
|
I recommendation is not to use BFGminer at this point. Every single person who is having a problem - its with BFGMiner.
|
|
|
It requires such little airflow it makes no difference, and you risk damaging the connectors mounting them on their sides.
|
|
|
|