|
Hehe senses and perception hehe
|
|
|
|
|
PM me if your selling your bands music in Bitcoins, I'm looking to broadcast Bitcoin music I can have the rights to broadcast to so mainly interested in people wanting to get their music out there.
|
|
|
|
Xenland, I'd like to put up your podcasts at BitBrew so my customers can listen and comment while enjoying their coffee if that's cool with you.
I insist  go right on a ahead. Here they are: http://bitbrew.net/xenlands-bitcoin-podcast/I took the liberty of including links to the topics you cover. Xenland, I do believe you may have found your calling. These are very good for an amateur.  Tiz lots of fun  |
|
|
|
Listening back on my last podcasts, I'll try to cut down my uhhs and umms in further podcasts. Thanks for listening everyone |
|
|
|
Xenland, I'd like to put up your podcasts at BitBrew so my customers can listen and comment while enjoying their coffee if that's cool with you.
I insist go right on a ahead. |
|
|
|
Yes id imagine that the molecules in your body would be inable to continue their normal process and the vibrational patterns would dissipate and your body would then break up(and dissolve) into the universe
Xenland you know I love you like a brother, but "vibrational patterns?" WTF? Has anyone mentioned "entropy" yet? I guess i went too quantum for you... Okay so basically when bacteria/organisms in your body can't get energy the molecules that make up the bacteria/oragnisms in your body them selves don't exchange energy and thus the vibrational patterns(energy exchange) to sustain creatures assistance will dissipate into the ground/air instead of pumping blood blood or filtering food or liquids. Excuse me but the "vibrational patterns" thing is nonsense, and what has "quantum" to do with that? W/e mate neither of us are scientists i've got stuff to attend to then the accuracy of my words with a language that already has many ambigiousness to it to begin with. What you said makes sense, the part that doesn't make sense is the "vibrational patterns" thing Oh, from my understanding every thing is a vibration, happyness comes and goe, sadness comesand goes, life comes and goes. The white blood cells vibrational pattern would be to grow and live, contain bacteria inside it self, then self destruct(killing everything inside). All those examples could be represented in a wave(like the stock market type of wave) but they all go back down to zero representing death or no more vibration. Although atoms vibrate and constantly move(according to science) so everything is a vibration even if we as a person dies. Thinking back on it i think i said vibrational patterns becuase its easyer for me to explain then to say "the X organisms in your body cease to obtain energy through food or liquids by means of putting it into your body with your arms" but that sounds contridictory and most people die by organ failure not starvations so i went with vibrational patterns. |
|
|
|
|
Next podcast soon, been playing catch up the passed couple of days.
|
|
|
|
Yes id imagine that the molecules in your body would be inable to continue their normal process and the vibrational patterns would dissipate and your body would then break up(and dissolve) into the universe
Xenland you know I love you like a brother, but "vibrational patterns?" WTF? Has anyone mentioned "entropy" yet? I guess i went too quantum for you... Okay so basically when bacteria/organisms in your body can't get energy the molecules that make up the bacteria/oragnisms in your body them selves don't exchange energy and thus the vibrational patterns(energy exchange) to sustain creatures assistance will dissipate into the ground/air instead of pumping blood blood or filtering food or liquids. Excuse me but the "vibrational patterns" thing is nonsense, and what has "quantum" to do with that? W/e mate neither of us are scientists i've got stuff to attend to then the accuracy of my words with a language that already has many ambigiousness to it to begin with. |
|
|
|
Religion was mentioned on the internet. What did you expect?
Yeah its alot eaiser to discuss with out the restricted perception of text this is a weird form of discussion if you ask me haha |
|
|
|
|
Well I can agree to disagree, but i think we can all agree we high-jacked this thread.
|
|
|
|
Faith is belief without evidence or proof. Belief is the acceptance of what you understand. Belief is not necessarily truth.
Scientists have faith that dark matter exists. Galaxies are held in place by mass they can't see. The so called mass holding galaxies in place is not necessarily dark matter.
with that in mind then I think I just realised I am arguing something else. |
|
|
|
is being an atheist a religion?
My favorite youtube channel of all time: http://www.youtube.com/user/nonstampcollectorIf atheism is a "religion",...
then Not Collecting Stamps is a "hobby".
If atheism is a "religion", ...
then Not Playing Football is a "sport".
If atheism is a "religion", ...
then 'OFF' is a "TV channel".
If atheism is a "religion", ...
then "Abstinence" is a "sex position".
Collecting stamps is only just a hobby? (Could be for profit) Playing foot ball is "just a sport" (could be a hobby or for excersize) "On" is a TV channel? (could be static playing) "having Sex" is a sex position? Sounds like fallacies |
|
|
|
My conclusion is believing in only what you see is just as bad as believing in things you don't see or can't prove, There should be a balance.
We already disagree by the first sentence. You can't prove that God doesn't want me to kill your family. I can't prove that Jesus never came back to life. Take a logic class and learn about "burden of proof" If you tunnel vision any sentence you can make it sound illogical... I said Believing in only what you see is just as bad.... Maybe we should go to school together I'll take a logic class and you take a "how to listen" class. I'm pointing out that burden of proof you know oh so much about.... I'm asking to proove what your eyes see then tell me about proof of all other reality. We don't know crap about how our brains work or how to reconstruct a biological eye(yet) but until this -- every theism(including atheism) or any belief or thought of true experience is just speculation and should be taken as of. |
|
|
|
Cool music. Quite enjoyable production. This could be good. I really like the smooth low volume background music while you talk. It gives a pulse and a beat to the podcast. Make a list of the topics you're going to cover. Announce the list of topics at the start of the podcast. You announce each topic as you're about to start it. This is good. Keep it up, stick to it like glue. Next up: "Open Transactions." -> "Allright that was open transactions." Next up: "Gavin Andresen has a proposal for credits for testing changes to the Bitcoin Client." Next up: "The London Bitcoin Conference." Neat, but make this list known at the very start of the episode, preferably before the first musical segment to catch the listeners attention. Would be good if you announce the name of the artist and the song you're about to play in advance, like, you know, on radio. Clear your voice in advance, drink a hot cup of tea and warm up your vocal cords, try to avoid coughing in the mic several times every minute. (When you need to cough, mute the mic, cough, unmute. Live radio always has a cough button. For good reason.) You have a really nice smooth voice, but you could be more focused and "less laid back". Make an effort to sound like what you are saying is important, and it will sound like it is. Project your voice, think of a radio host, try to speak more like a radio host, do a quick dry run, warm up mentally. Get in the zone before you go live. Keep a fixed distance to the mic, lean more towards the mic perhaps. Perhaps record each session in several segments, if this doesn't mess with the music. You could cut and paste the segments together, add music in post production. This way you can do a retake if you stumble or mumble or stop. --> Less... like... uhms, and uhhhs... and uhh.... small pauses. Finally, do a recap / outtro / see you next time at the end. That was pretty much everything, and this is quickly starting to sound too much like actual work so I'll be sure to stop here. Really promising start. I'm looking forward to the next episode! Yay! Go you! Whoa, great constructive criticisms thank you very much, these are all great I will keep them in mind for the next pod cast. |
|
|
|
|
My conclusion is believing in only what you see is just as bad as believing in things you don't see or can't prove, There should be a balance.
And if you want to bring good or evil into this good luck that a whole another debate in it self. For an atheist that only believes in what he sees there is no such thing as good or bad -- its just what is there. lol Just because suicide bombers had a religious belief doesn't mean that all religious people are evil, just as if all those suicide bombers would have yelled "In the name of NO GOD I KILL YOU ALL" then blow up the place... would be equally as bad. Faith has nothing to do with actions, your actions have to do with actions.
True reality in your perspective says "We are just what science proves to be", with this kind of thinking in mind, I suicide bombers would even have a better excuse to kill people.... "WE ARE JUST ATOMS HERE IS THE PROOF!!!" -- BOOOM.
I'm asking you joelkatz whats the difference between faith and action or no-faith and action? Because the way i see it-- people are going to blow stuff up based on intentions of something not the belief of something. My intentions are to make everyone a happy person, those suicide bombers intentions (might have been) were to get to a better place(because their current situation doesn't allow for such enjoyment so its just more enjoyable to go die somewhere) yes maybe some suicide bombers "truly believe" they are pleasing their god. Or maybe some people are using a gods words to get other less educated people from their country to get them to blow shit up-- We really don't know the real situation, you say joelkatz that you only believe in only your perceptual experience...
Do you know any suicide bombers that surely believe in a faith that asks them to blow them selves up and they actually did it or is all your information on faith and suicide bombers based on what you read or hear about in the news or a friend? In my perspective, if you've never actually experienced the whole thing go down you are basing your "Scientific reality" on the faith of another person accuracy of reporting accurate news and concluding that those with faith are comparable to suicide bombers, if you've never experienced it your self then you are believing with your faith that what you are reading about suicide bombers are all true and accurate.
All im saying is if you push a mouse into a corner of a maze that has a piece of cheeese on a mouse trap-- its going to eat it regardless of its beliefs, it was forced into that situation to eat and die or eat and starve and die.. We must remember situations are more pressing on a persons intentions then anything.
|
|
|
|
|
Looks like analytics says it found 3 unique IP addresses per podcast. Not bad, I shall continue to do this daily -- its kind of fun actually.
|
|
|
|
Too put it simply  |
|
|
|
Our perception is 100% consistent with reality because reality is all there is. The idea of an "inconsistency" with reality is meaningless.
Is it? what if we are assuming we are walking forward yet we are walking left. That would not matter in the slightest. At all. In any way. Since everyone perceives the same direction, and there is no evidence to the contrary, it simply would not matter if it was "wrong" in the eyes of an undetectable deity. Again with the FSM. What if you are assuming that there is no flying spaghetti monster, but there is? What if your senses telling you that there is no FSM are wrong? What if he changes the results of science with his invisible noodly appendage? Answer: nothing. What if...? nothing. It doesn't change how we live. What if there is a deity urging me to become a suicide bomber? I'm assuming there isn't, but what if there is? its just an idea or a suggestion if you will, i dont believe that we walk forward and we are really going left. Im simply concluding that with out the search of a higher power or conciousness , we will limit our selfs to a dull view of what could be maybe proven to be a wonderful and beautiful system of reailty we live in. But i guess i am getting a little too philosophical for an mind that runs on purely observation. I guess with my belif that we a brain in a vat(an infinite beings brain that is) there is no proving tome otherwise not to search or believe their is something bigger and more inteligent then me. In my persepctive with out the search for a more intelligent conciouness is just egotistical and self indulging that you as a human wouldnt consider a higher power or inteligent then the working universe or even bigger(or perhaps smaller). If reality is infinite everything is possible with out a doubt with out contradiction. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
