The site looks like another one-world site, trying to combine the various races, and with government at the head. Planetary Ethics DOES exist wherever people exist. It is said, easily, by saying the Golden Rule, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." We all like the idea of having a bit of a social life, while at the same time not being crowded too hard. All we need to do is to apply that desire of ours to all other people, and we have the planetary ethic in place already.  Well, surprise, you live in one world. You don't live on another planet, about damn time you learned to coexist! Being racist doesn't have anything to do with coexisting or not. We both are racist if we don't agree with each other. Government is racist because it wants to be the only other race, and is trying to make all the rest of us to be of the same race. You can find all kinds of people of different races from around the world, who, if they lived right next door to you, you would want to get rid of, simply because you couldn't stand the way they live. Keep the races. And keep them separate. But allow them to coexist on the planet. So you're about Separate but Equal huh? A Jefferson era segregationist. You would fit in well with 19th century politicians. Also, there is only one race, the human race. We are all descendants of the same lineage. Even Christians believe that (Even if they believe we are the product of incest). |
|
|
|
I'm sure a majority of the people that chill around the sig campaign threads are also minors, since they can't find full time employment elsewhere. This thread is going to attract all the pedophiles of the forum.
VOD was here. Didn't you see him already. You guys are still on about that? |
|
|
|
at last i was waiting for this coin for so long  Still making Bill Cosby jokes in 2016? Also, I agree, 2.5 billion is way too much, it would just cause inflation and lower the value of the coin. |
|
|
|
|
This thread is going to attract all the pedophiles of the forum.
|
|
|
|
It's an arrow pointing to your genitals, so there is no confusion for your partner when they've had a bit too much...
That still does not explain why businessmen, lawyers, and corporate employees wear them. |
|
|
|
|
No no no guys, I have been involved in sports betting in the past, let him keep going for about a month, if he has made a profit, we'll know he can be trusted. Otherwise, you can just join those fakeass "tipsters" who are all over the internet.
|
|
|
|
The site looks like another one-world site, trying to combine the various races, and with government at the head. Planetary Ethics DOES exist wherever people exist. It is said, easily, by saying the Golden Rule, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you." We all like the idea of having a bit of a social life, while at the same time not being crowded too hard. All we need to do is to apply that desire of ours to all other people, and we have the planetary ethic in place already. Well, surprise, you live in one world. You don't live on another planet, about damn time you learned to coexist! |
|
|
|
The article describes Aryans ranging from Europe over India to Nepal though.
Well, that is the problem with open source encyclopedias. Aryan people once lived in such places thousands of years ago. But they were breed out and today just mongrel races live there. The problem here is the lack of racial awareness of who produced that definition. Aryans are just really "white people", from the sun tanned Mediterranean to the milk skin Nordic, from the strong eastern European to the Auburn haired Irish and Icelander. Ok so I guess you are taking it back that the wiki article is correct. Can you explain me then if being aryan is based on genectics or language? Because if I remember correct around year 0-1000 most Europeans were living in caves while we already had high civilization in Asia, Africa and south America? It is based on both, language and biology (which includes genetics). Aryans had dominated different forms of technology for several years before recorded history. This book is mind blowing, it presents an interesting thesis: http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/1496168771“Chronicles from pre-Celtic Europe” is a factual account of European and Asian pre-history as described in an ancient manuscript discovered in the Netherlands in 1867. The old chronicles tell of an advanced European civilisation that existed more than 4000 years ago; a civilisation unknown to or denied by historians to this day. The manuscript is compared to numerous authors from antiquity and tested against modern sciences such as archaeology, paleoclimatology, genetics, linguistics and many more. Undeniable evidence proves that this highly controversial but captivating document, Europe’s “Rosetta Stone”, is true in every respect. It shows that West European Civilisation pre-dates Greek and Roman societies by millennia and that many milestones which were in the past attributed to the Greeks, Romans, Phoenicians, Egyptians and others should, in fact, be accredited to North-Western Europe. The old manuscript which became known as “The Oera Linda Book” is still rejected by certain Dutch academics as a “Hoax” or a “Deception Conspiracy” by unidentified pranksters and without a clear motive; their opinions and theories based on no more than intuition. The Oera Linda manuscript relates the memoirs and eye witness accounts of men and women from Western Europe who suffered the biggest catastrophe in the recorded history of man; the event that killed millions and came down to us as “Noah’s Flood”. The pioneers from Europe’s Western seaboard founded the ancient civilisations from Greece to Persia. They introduced the world to carbonised steel, chariot warfare and cavalry charges. They gave man the “Greek” alphabet, “Indo-Arabian” numerals, democracy, free enterprise, monotheism, linen, paper and so much more. It is time to set the record straight. There is not a definitive answer for where exactly Aryans come from. However, today we know that Aryans are totally different from other races, thus it is quite likely Aryans never came from Negroes. That is actually really mind blowing. MayBe Atlantis was build by them? Not sure what I should say now.  Do you also have a theory why the south east Asian population has the highest iq in all living populations? Shouldn't Aryans haver it because they are the supreme race? Are you kidding? South East Asians have higher IQ levels than the UK or the United States with their double digit IQs! Seriously, stop getting all your "facts" from Alex Jokes. |
|
|
|
Lmao, I love how you parodied his and Wilikon's exact same style of using 13pt font with a clickbait question title, hahahah. |
|
|
|
Also, when you use the N word, are you referring to black people in particular? Every human being, regardless of skin color, can trace their roots to the African continent, white people didn't just plop from the sky, despite what followers of White Jesus would have you believe. Saying "all races practiced slavery" neither excuses white supremacy, nor does it negate the fact that white people ran the slave trade in America.
That is just a hypothesis, it has not been even proven true. Go figure out, you are not not well versed in the subject for a serious discussion at the moment. All you are doing is find an excuse to justify the genocide of the Aryan people in their own homelands. Lmfao, it's "just a hypothesis"? What? And your claims that black people only come from Africa are implying what, that white people were just created from magical fairy dust by some imaginary deity in six days? Seriously? It was a definitive and conclusive study. You don't even know how science works. Here, I got something that'll cheer you up:  |
|
|
|
You realize that The Freethought Project is anti-Nationalism, and anti religion right? Which is a good thing, but it completely contradicts your views. Are you trying to say that they are lying about this story? Not at all, I'm trying to help you be more consistent in your ideology. I see you follow The Freethought Project, but don't believe in free thought, ironic. |
|
|
|
I love how a topic I made back in 2014 is still managing to piss people off Not people, just BADecker. Most of the pages of this thread are just full of BADecker preaching so he doesn't have to burn eternally after death (Isn't God so loving?) He clearly has nothing better to do all day, so he has to get his jollies from trolling forums I wonder if I am doing you a disfavor by presenting God to you on a regular basis. I mean, God, Himself, says that those who don't have as much opportunity to be saved, will be punished less than those who have great opportunity to be saved, and yet aren't saved. I guess all that I am doing is helping you to lock yourself into everlasting punishment a bit more firmly. But, if your attitude doesn't change, who in the world would want you in Heaven, anyway? I dare you to go on any other subsection and do them the "favor" of "presenting God on a daily basis", they won't tolerate you for even five posts. The problem with christians like BADlogic is... He thinks he's doing us a favor by being an asshat... When in reality, he's a selfish jackass... (his motivation is to brown-nose to god... which he thinks will make god reward him... entirely selfish) Any god worth his salt would hate BADlogic for being such a worthless troll Rather than spread lies and propaganda all day... wouldn't god like it better if you volunteered at a homeless shelter or food bank? Some more of your anti-God faulty thinking. Did you ever stop to think, "What would god want me to do?" I can't imagine an immortal being would want his followers to sing songs and tell lies that are contradictory to science and logic... Or pretend they are better than people who don't sing songs and tell fairy tales... God doesn't want any of his creatures to tell lies or promote fairy tales as reality. Yet you, one of God's creatures, are doing this every time you suggest that God doesn't exist. The awkward moment when "An invisible sky fairy created everything over the course of six days, but despite being omnipotent and all powerful, still needed to "rest" on the seventh day, and created plants before making the Sun" is considered "reality", but disbelief in such absurdity is considered a fairy tale. |
|
|
|
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
I mean Negroes. By the time of Darwin the Africans were capturing and slaving their own people to sell to the "white supremacists". Europeans had barely done any capturing of savage tribes in the Africa continent. Moreover, If was not by the slave trade many Negroes would be still living among their primitive ancestors today. Every descendant of Africans living in an Aryan nation should be extremely grateful for what Aryans did for their welfare. Your definition of "Aryan" is a bit off, and Hitleresque. Also, if you are born to American parents, it doesn't make you a descendant of Africans. You seem to have everything mixed up. "Africans" did not run the slave trade, white people did. Do they teach anything in Catholic school? It does as the genes of a Negro will always be traced back to the African continent. Thus why the usual term African Americans. Yes, Africans did run the slave trade among themselves. This is well documented and a simple Google search will provide you the details. Slave trade has been practiced by all races, not just Aryans. Moreover, you did not answer the question of what race was Cleopatra. So it seems you are not well versed in such subject. So I will not insist on it. I will finally say that whatever is your excuse to label Aryans as "white supremacists", none justify the planned mass immigration into Aryan nations. It is genocide and you are just looking for a pretext to justify it. Cleopatra wasn't white. Also, when you use the N word, are you referring to black people in particular? Every human being, regardless of skin color, can trace their roots to the African continent, white people didn't just plop from the sky, despite what followers of White Jesus would have you believe. Saying "all races practiced slavery" neither excuses white supremacy, nor does it negate the fact that white people ran the slave trade in America. |
|
|
|
You realize that The Freethought Project is anti-Nationalism, and anti religion right? Which is a good thing, but it completely contradicts your views. |
|
|
|
At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology.
Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry!
I mean Negroes. By the time of Darwin the Africans were capturing and slaving their own people to sell to the "white supremacists". Europeans had barely done any capturing of savage tribes in the Africa continent. Moreover, If was not by the slave trade many Negroes would be still living among their primitive ancestors today. Every descendant of Africans living in an Aryan nation should be extremely grateful for what Aryans did for their welfare. Your definition of "Aryan" is a bit off, and Hitleresque. Also, if you are born to American parents, it doesn't make you a descendant of Africans. You seem to have everything mixed up. "Africans" did not run the slave trade, white people did. Do they teach anything in Catholic school? |
|
|
|
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in. Just in case you do not know: Egyptian civilization was a small part of the African continent and they were not even "black". In other words, the African people where ruled and slaved by another race while living in Egypt. What race you think was Cleopatra, the last pharaoh? African is not synonymous with black. Just stop talking on this topic, please, save yourself from the embarrassment. Just so you guys know, I've dealt with the exact same arguments for over 7 yearsYou did not answer my question: what race you think was Cleopatra? When I said African were savages, I meant racially Africans, the races of African people. They never developed any civilization. You then implied they developed Egyptian civilization. So, who developed Egyptian civilization and how that proves that Africans are not most savages at the time Darwin wrote his book? At the time Darwin wrote his book, Black people were being enslaved by the white people, so clearly, we can see who was the real savage of his time. By "racially African", do you mean "black people"? If so, just say it, don't be ashamed of the terminology, be ashamed of the ideology. Egyptians developed Egyptian civilization, not some blond guy with blue eyes, sorry! |
|
|
|
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in. Just in case you do not know: Egyptian civilization was a small part of the African continent and they were not even "black". In other words, the African people where ruled and slaved by another race while living in Egypt. What race you think was Cleopatra, the last pharaoh? African is not synonymous with black. Just stop talking on this topic, please, save yourself from the embarrassment. Just so you guys know, I've dealt with the exact same arguments for over 7 years |
|
|
|
|
This is a rap song I wrote when I was a kid and had nothing better to do with my life (I still don't, but I'm still not as creative)
Featuring Snoopy Canines
I decided to make it politically correct to prevent criticism from social democrats ('liberals'), environmentalists, and feminists
Hello guys,
What's up
I like engaging in sexual intercourse with women
Only if they consent to it first of course
I make a lot of money
But I pay my taxes so they can build the roads
I like speeding in my luxury vehicle,
But I make sure I use Hybrid/Electric cars,
I also never go above the speed limit,
When I do, however, I make sure I know my rights when I'm ticketed
This is what I enjoy doing
Making all the money,
Well not all the money, that would be monopoly
I like smoking marijuana,
Only for medicinal purposes of course
I like having sex with promiscuous women that engage in consensual sexual activities for money,
But I make sure to stay safe by using condoms,
If they get pregnant, I pay for their abortions
I consume alcohol in moderation,
But not on election day, that's when I'm voting for Obama
~Quiz Khalifa (Awesome31312)
|
|
|
|
He was correct at the time he wrote that. The majority of Africans were just savages, no signs of civilization ever found among them. That explain how the Egyptians where able to survive for 3000 years
Boy, are you going to be in for a big surprise when you find out what continent Egypt is in. |
|
|
|
I am using a self-created system which guarantees a chance of about 63-67% to win a bet with even (or higher) odds
My system is specialized on goal markets in live football (soccer) events
And i will teach you how its done
All you need is a good basic knowledge on sports betting and espacially live-betting markets
Write me a message if you re interested in a coaching
Anybody who claims to have a "guarantee" in any kind of gambling game whatsoever is trying to sell you something. So, what is it that you are trying to sell to us? Also, 67% would put you on the 99th percentile on the winnings range, congratulations, what are you doing on Bitcointalk? You should just be using that to make yourself some good money. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
