Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 05:36:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 82 »
561  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 11:40:25 AM
witness to photo is usually getting someone known to the person for a long enough time, where the witness hold employment in a role that shows they are less likely to make a false claim as it would hurt their own reputation.

its not simply find 5-1000 strangers and just say 'my names frank, sign this to say you know im frank'

we are already seeing that voting and passports are based on more of a honour system of combining several sources of documentation make a strong case that the id is legit. but still not 100% 'proof' which is where some false voting, fake passports and such still occur.

so dont treat the ability of creating ID as something easy and effortless and something to brush under the carpet, as its the ID part that is actually the hardest part to document/allocate compared to transaction data of labour.

in short making a 'time' ledger is easy. having it public/privately key secured to an ID is easy. but to allocate and lock it to a physical human securely (digital to analog) is the hard part

So my brother is sleeping atm, but I would have him come on cam and be like yah this is Michael yada yada yada, I known him my whole life and worked on a farm with him for 20+ years, etc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySvcUDimAk0 Get a video with my doctor, yah this is my patient Mike yada yada yada or dentist. It will really help to tap into the medical systems, but not necessarily needed. I mean I would do it if I could.

I trust a video document of someone giving birth locked into a blockchain on video or even afterbirth the kids eyes and or fingerprint in the blockchain. Honestly fingerprint should be enough.

I will tell you why fingerprint is better than eyescan, and it is because of shit like this. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eenscggz-Pk granted this is a meme video, but having things like your face and eyes for facebook to have is dangerous, anyone can take a database of people and light them up with drones with cams and guns on them. You can just wear gloves to hide your fingerprints, granted some people have no hands we are going to have to use a picture of their eyes and face but who is going to use the drones to just kill people with no hands. I don`t see it.

Most people do not realize those street cams are logging our faces and eyes anyways. This is what they have if not better already.|

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dkw15LkZ_Kw China’s "Social Credit System" Has Caused More Than Just Public Shaming (HBO)
It is coming here you won`t be able to buy a bus ticket because your bad credit score or a plane ticket.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNf4-d6fDoY China: "the world's biggest camera surveillance network" - BBC News
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_yKga54tx6U China's surveillance cameras can recognize you

They already link you to social media stuff I bet, your car to your face to your online profile to your medical records to your police records, everything is exposed.

I am going to start wearing a full burqa.
562  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Where can I pay with Bitcoin? on: June 11, 2019, 11:11:51 AM
Soooo... any other places where I can shop with BTC aside from these five? https://cryptotradernews.com/insights/5-places-where-you-can-pay-with-bitcoin/

Would love to transition all of my family expenses to crypto!

Thanks in advance!

That site list gyft, on gyft you can get ebay cards, they used to have amazon cards not sure why they stopped, you can get pretty much anything on ebay though.

https://www.coindesk.com/canadian-municipality-set-to-accept-bitcoin-for-property-tax-payments if you lived in Canada in that city you could pay your taxes with btc.

Also check out this store https://bitswift.shop/ ask the shop owner Paul if he will accept your btc or altcoin of choice as payment if it used on a major exchange I am sure he would accept any mainstream coin.
https://bitswift.shop/tools/mps/product-category/Desktop+Computers you can get a gaming computer if you want.
https://bitswift.shop/tools/mps/product-category/Notebooks or check out some notebooks.

I think he was accepting btc, ltc, ardr, bits, cdn-ecoin, ignis and a few others at one point.
563  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 08:42:53 AM
here is a eye captcha https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4x0vOAu0lQ
you can do the same with fingerprint

1. and as you get older you get cataracts and suddenly the funds you saved for retirement you cant access
2. and as you get older you cut ur finger from paper cuts or work as a janitor using harmful chemicals, bye bye fingerprint

some even envision DNA as a identity. but with the whole new disruptive science community working on stem cells and dna cures using virals, DNA can change too

this is why passports dont rely on just retina scans but use 'witnesses' to a photo, signed documents like birth certificates, retina, and others COMBINED to reduce the chance of faking a passport.

Well in the case where something changes, it will be documented and updated to your chain and address. We can make digital passports quite easy with file sharing and digital birth certs combined into the same system. It is not like everything is set in stone, just like with other documents. If the network agrees or the assigned let`s say 1000 random people for blockCOURT (still better than 1). Things can be changed in the system by the community and participants in the system.

There will be even be problems let us say with like conjoint twins, are they one or two people, same eyes, or same fingerprints possibly? or people with no hands for fingerprints etc etc, I am sure I can come up with a work around for every single case in humans. (they already do in the current system).

There will need to be physicality`s put up in all the major city`s to get people into the system slowly and properly (people joining late get a back cap on the duration they missed, from birth) But as home cams/phone cams get better I am sure everyone can do everything from home soon. (the entire network will be there to witness).
564  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 05:10:19 AM
People will lose faith of overinflated fiat first before they destroy bitcoin using the strategy you pointed out.
I think everyone has already lol, they are all driving cars on artificial gas, not even the fumes of real gas, just on the blood, sweat and tears of real working people.

Those people will be coming for heads I tell yah what, pretty soon. Read some of the comments, youtube: ROTHSCHILD DEATH AND READ THE COMMENTS ON ANY VIDEO!

I do not dance with these comments, I think it is sad when any being dies, I pray every time I step on ant by accident, say sorry to the ant and ask to become the ant I killed. I made a system, kind of well a theory of one that can fix everything please look into it. So no one has to die.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5151153.0 (time stuff)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141142.0 (bitcoin 2.0)(not bitcoin2 wtf that is)
565  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 04:54:32 AM
@Khaos77: you misread the post, which said in POW blockchains, nodes validate back to the genesis block---not that a 51% attacker can actually roll back to the genesis block. even aside from centralized checkpoints, the point is that POW (at least with a network as secure as bitcoin) implies great costs to "roll back" the chain. the further an attacker tries to roll back, the greater the cost because they must mine a longer chain than honest miners.

if your protocol depends on developers adding checkpoints, you don't have decentralized consensus. there is little point in using a blockchain at all. the developers are enforcing the blockchain state, not the economic incentives intended to overcome the byzantine generals problem.

^ You all assume the attacker wants something to do with bitcoin after the ATTACK or ATTACKS, reroll or regorg to a old checkpoint, they put the hashing power on that chain. RIP AGAIN.

Let us make the assumption instead of the person wanting bitcoin after, they don`t. Let us also make the assumption the person has enough money to take 51% of the hashing power of any network.

maybe you could walk us through an example? how would this work, and what are the incentives at play?

Two ways to fuck btc over by them.

1)Print a shit load of money, buy a bunch of btc, sell at a loss to make btc price in fiat 0 or low, so people lose faith in it.
2)Print a shit load of money, buy a bunch of asic farms, control the network and fuck it over, so people lose faith in it. (they can move to whatever chain you do with their hashing power)

The incentive is that fiat wins, bitcoin dies, they control the market of markets again. #ENDTHEFED #STOPALLFIAT

anyways can we all agree time > fiat https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5151153.0 thanks!
everyone making the supply > a few people
everyone voting > a few people
everyone have a job > a few people
everyone owns the equal the same amount of hashing power > a few people
566  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 04:46:50 AM
One question arises, who would be stupid enough to spend millions of dollars to dominate a PoS network just so they can attempt to destroy it, it would be the same as getting all of your money and setting it on fire, no real point.

The FED and there is a point, so bitcoin dies and fiat wins.
567  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 04:42:27 AM
^ You all assume the attacker wants something to do with bitcoin after the ATTACK or ATTACKS, reroll or regorg to a old checkpoint, they put the hashing power on that chain. RIP AGAIN.

Let us make the assumption instead of the person wanting bitcoin after, they don`t. Let us also make the assumption the person has enough money to take 51% of the hashing power of any network.
568  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Why does your Country suck? on: June 11, 2019, 04:33:25 AM
IMO you are just a whiny baby, if you live in Canada, you are living in better conditions than a ton of people, you have every opportunity to do whatever you want there, if you haven't accomplished anything, it's on you, anyone can do almost anything, whether you are a man/woman, poor/rich, etc.

I rather live on a remote island or the amazon under no rule of law, then these double standard laws where groups do not have to follow but everyone else does. I do not have every opportunity to do what I want here if you read the top of the post, I cannot sell weed, I cannot sell booze, I can`t grow certain things on my land, My farm lands cannot be built on because they are zoned "green belt" The government tells me what I can and can not grow or what I can and cannot do with my land.  I have accomplished more than most people, I`ve fed millions if not billions in my 31 years and kept more people alive than all religious leaders and politicians combined. I have made over 50 homes for people to live in. I donated over 10k to charity last year gave 1/2 of all my income to sick kids in a 3rd world country (gamingforgood). I still rather live in butt fuck nowhere than here so I don`t need to get assaulted another 10times by my police force, that I pay. I rather not fund war machines and have to give up 30% of my WORK! to murders, enslavers, thugs and the mob.
569  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 04:00:13 AM
But there are already large numbers of companies and governments that have large quantities of fingerprints, eye scans, and IDs, plus anyone who steals any of these can create many accounts, and who is going to verify which account for a person is real?

Ideally it would be nice to connect to the healthcare systems so we can tie into some birth certs and other data.

You cannot do a live fingerprint captcha, eye captcha (video live stream and not be the person there). If a amazing video editor even created a fake person we could check the birth cert to it.

If someone has already registered there eye/finger or kyc, The system will check the existence database and see it is a copy and will not allow a duplicate account to be created. The community of the network would verify. See blockCOURT https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5141142.0

Let me make a video for you for example for when this happens (I could do it on a live stream) and blockcourt needs to get involved (the system would be able to do this normally but lets say someone does register before I can with my data), brb

https://youtu.be/ySvcUDimAk0
570  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Crypto news website CCN going to be shutdown due to google on: June 11, 2019, 01:52:11 AM
Who cares Google sucks, same with Microsoft, centralized search browser and OS, That sell your data.

CCN should start up on steem it or dlive or something.

some CCN articles were complete horse shit most of the time just talking about price. Take a look at their page now, 8/9 articles on the front page about price. You will not be missed CCN.
571  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: If Satoshi came out with bitcoin2.0 would you use it? let`s say he used his keys on: June 11, 2019, 01:45:01 AM
I want to use a metaphor for this because I don`t think 2 people understood in the polls.
Keep in mind Bitcoin 2.0 is not Bitcoin2 I have no clue what that is

Bitcoin = Playstation 1
Bitcoin 2.0 = Playstation 2

Bitcoins = the games

You can use ps1 games in a ps2. Why would you not accept a ps2 for free? LOL
572  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 11, 2019, 01:33:44 AM
the rich get richer in the future with bitcoin, also there is no future for the people born after 2045, they don`t get a chance to mine! What kind of distribution is that?

No point somewhere in the whitepaper that bitcoin is created to be an equalizer for the rich and the poor, only a tool to help people be their own banks and a digital currency at best. If this is about equality, you must be on the wrong universe, my friend.

We have 100 people in a gym.

Sally has 51% of the hashing power and wants to play basketball (shes a rich bitch) this girl on my left

The other 99 people have 49% of the hashing power and want to play soccer

GG WP, great because of 1 fuck we are stuck playing basketball.



THANKS SALLY!

Nice try explaining this but honestly, Sally wouldn't be able to do what she wants to do in the long run if those 99 people left the gym and she has no one to play with. Having said that, in bitcoin, if someone went insane and has 51% of the hashing power and tried to fuck with the network, most people would surely dump before huge changes are made in the blockchain. By then, the 51% attack would be rendered useless because the coins are essentially worthless since everyone left.

I think a 51% attack is impossible for global networks like Bitcoin. Nobody can hold that kind of power alone.

Well at some point in time, some asshole had it, but decided not to because they know what the results of their action will be.

In addition, even if this attack is carried out on a network like Bitcoin, everyone will lose it, including the attacker!

Exactly.

I mean if you are going to make a money supply, make it fair or KYS!

I think you are all missing the point the attacker (fed banker) could not give a shit about bitcoin or money profit and be a billionaire/trillionaire already, and ruin the network for the rest of us. So there money supply FIAT can prevail in the markets. (what will you do when they have 51% of the hashing power) START ANOTHER CHAIN? THEY WILL FUCK THAT ONE AS WELL!

You all assume the attacker wants something to do with bitcoin after the ATTACK. Ever seen a JIHAD bomber?

:THINKING:
573  Other / Off-topic / Re: Flat Earth on: June 10, 2019, 12:35:52 PM
there is gravitation dude, we all know that hehe

The current rendition of gravity is a theory based on relativity (1905) and it's been falsified by experiment (1939 D&P replication of Sagnac). The static aether and Coulomb's Law are the reality proven by experiment.




I am not sure what this picture of zues from the game smite has to do with gravity?
574  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Did we actually really land on moon? on: June 10, 2019, 12:32:41 PM


WikiLeaks ( JULIAN ASSANGE ) Releases MOON LANDING Cut Scenes Filmed In Nevada Desert (A MUST WATCH) -- https://youtu.be/Z3FJ2dhr-aA

Like everything else you've posted on this forum in the last 5 years, this is utter horseshit. Wikileaks didn't release this "found footage"; most of it is taken from "behind the scenes" footage of a film (fiction, Hollywood production) called Capricorn One. It was converted into black and white and interspersed with actual NASA footage and sound.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMPJwA_lNXQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Z9yNHIolnM&feature=youtu.be&t=1164

Really I continue to be amazed by people who seem smart enough to understand at least some of what bitcoin is about but then slurp up utterly retarded nonsense like this video and believe it actually has ANYTHING to do with Wikileaks or the moon landing being a hoax.

Ok that video might be b.s. but so was the moon rock they gave Holland
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/6105902/Moon-rock-given-to-Holland-by-Neil-Armstrong-and-Buzz-Aldrin-is-fake.html

I just have a feeling the moon landing was fake because of the fact Buzz himself says they did not go to a little girl, Theo Von who has met Buzz said it did not really seem like he went to the moon. There is nothing about retro reflectors in the transcripts Nasa released and I seen many images where the shadows do not make any sense. That is enough for me to question it at least. -Notaflatearther
575  Other / Politics & Society / Re: What's your opinion of gun control? on: June 10, 2019, 10:01:47 AM
Two options

1. either ban all the guns world wide (kind of bad if we get attacked by aliens or another country or people within our own country)
2. let everyone own a firearm if they want to (so long as they know it is for self defense)

2 seems a little better
576  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Beating down the U.S. Dollar on: June 10, 2019, 07:41:16 AM
Can BTC restructure a new financial order? Can BTC or another kind of cryptocurrency beat down the U.S. dollar? What's your opinion?

BTC will replace Gold, Time will replace Fiat
577  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why is using 51% hashing power stronger than using 51% of the people? on: June 10, 2019, 04:25:12 AM
Obviously hastage power is very strong here. 51% people is not very important here, important is their honesty in their work. But in hastage 51%, it has 100% honesty by blockchain if we input correctly. It is totally impossible to dishonesty in blockchain by hastage to here 51% hastage is more stronger than 51% people.

We have 100 people in a gym.

Sally has 51% of the hashing power and wants to play basketball (shes a rich bitch) this girl on my left

The other 99 people have 49% of the hashing power and want to play soccer

GG WP, great because of 1 fuck we are stuck playing basketball.



THANKS SALLY!
578  Other / Meta / Re: If you're banned because of plagiarism, you can't create another account (?) on: June 10, 2019, 04:04:13 AM
In this past weeks, I've seen different users here in the meta section appealing because they have been banned for plagiarism. Some of them are just appealing but they know already their fault.

One of the rules here is when you get banned thru plagiarism, you can't create another account in this forum and it will be a read-only mode anymore for them.

My question is: For ex. I have been banned for plagiarism and I want to create another account even though I know that it is prohibited here, I can create anytime without saying it to the public. How are the moderators and admins of the forum detect if the banned user really didn't create another account here because I'm thinking that some of the banned users here just created another account without telling it to anybody unless there are something that mods and admins do to prevent this to happen.

P.S. I'm not as active as the other users here. I'm just creating this thread out of curiosity.  Wink Wink

Change a piece of ram take 1 out, if it is a hardware ban, change your browser and clear your cache, use a vpn, make another account they cannot stop you. Unless they light you up in person ^_^
With my system blockPOP (before blockstream yanked that term from me) there would be a way to permaban you  Grin

blockPOP stands for PROOF OF PERSON or PROOF OF POPULATION
It requires your picture (eyes) and fingerprint to Identify you, Actually I have over 30 ways now to make blockPOP verify it is you.

1FA: Password (key)
2FA: Phone msg  
3FA: I.D Picture  (file sharing)
4FA: Fingerprint (file sharing)
5FA: Iris/Eye Scan (file sharing)
6FA: Fingerprint/Iris scan Captcha (move finger prints around and look around with eyes)
7FA: Blood
8FA: Sweat
9FA: Footprint
10FA: Piss
11FA: Skin (flakes)
12FA: Spit
13FA: Shit
14FA: Video of you (file sharing)
15FA: Height
16FA: Carbon imprint (Breathalyzer2.0)
17FA: Weight
18FA: Skin color code
19FA: Hair color code
20FA: Eye colour code
21FA: Sperm
22FA: teeth imprint

I mean I can keep going if you want.

joint accounts can take both husband and wife to cosign with eyes

I got some cool new ones I thought of, that are less intrusive, but lets be real you give up all that shit every time you go in public.
579  Other / Meta / Re: Can we make a bitcoin talk with no mods? on: June 10, 2019, 03:48:36 AM
8ch.net would probably fit your needs better.

You multipost a lot so I'd guess that's one of the reasons for your deleted posts. Multiple posts in a row by the same user in the same thread within 24h are not allowed. Use the Edit button.
There is a bunch that have not been multi post but
yah sorry
I am a gamer this is how we type
I will try and keep it cleaner

every try and play starcraft, cs, rts, fps or moba`s? and type and play lol you don`t have time, bad habit growing up playing video games my entire life since atari.
580  Other / Meta / Re: Can we make a bitcoin talk with no mods? on: June 10, 2019, 03:41:27 AM
Can we have a section that is decentralized? That does not interfere with freedom of speech.

To have such a system internally on the forum is impossible for a multitude of reasons. Out of curiosity, what is this about?

Well it appears many users are targeted and post are removed and moved, Users even get banned.

Right to say what you feel and the only retribution
Is another citizen can disagree; ain't nobody removing post
All made equal, in the eyes of our creator
And the shit we don't agree with, we can change it later

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZWivmrZL2ow YTCracker - Home (Sweet Home)

is there a undernet version of btctalk?

There is a website to show how many of my post have been deleted and moved, ridiculous amounts that pertain to the discussion they are in. (I admit some of them should be moved, as I may of posted them in the wrong directory)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [29] 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ... 82 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!