Either way you're doing DRK/Evan no favors here. As you say, it will play out how it plays out. Best to let it happen quietly.
I'm attempting to negate misunderstanding and misperception that's leading to acrimony and self victimisation. I'm speaking what I know to be true and valid. There is merit (I believe) in what I'm saying. And many people from DRK/DASH have attempted to be empathetic too, but without much success. How you and other people here choose to view what I'm doing is of course of your own deciding. I certainly mean no harm but try to break people's mesmerism that entraps them so badly when it is obviously overpowering them like it is with arielbit. The lack of success should tell you -- and quite objectively so -- that your approach is totally dysfunctional and misguided. Stuff like "why don't you ask your own developer" comes off as hostile frankly. Making statements that basically amount to "we bought it, get over it" comes off as arrogant and not going to "negate any misunderstanding." I think they "understand" quite well what you are tying to do and they don't like it one bit. If people here want to continue their project, they will, if they don't they won't. If anything you are just encouraging them to do whatever is the opposite of what they think you want. But hey, I have plenty of popcorn, so if you want to continue with this attempt at DRK's version of diplomacy, carry on. Well in your previous posting you counselled Best to let it happen quietly.
and in this last one you've said But hey, I have plenty of popcorn, so if you want to continue with this attempt at DRK's version of diplomacy, carry on.
They seem to be in opposing directions. I'll just follow the first one. Good night (or morning or afternoon) smooth. |
|
|
|
Either way you're doing DRK/Evan no favors here. As you say, it will play out how it plays out. Best to let it happen quietly.
I'm attempting to negate misunderstanding and misperception that's leading to acrimony and self victimisation. I'm speaking what I know to be true and valid. There is merit (I believe) in what I'm saying. And many people from DRK/DASH have attempted to be empathetic too, but without much success. How you and other people here choose to view what I'm doing is of course of your own deciding. I certainly mean no harm but try to break people's mesmerism that entraps them so badly when it is obviously overpowering them like it is with arielbit. |
|
|
|
Evan has acquired the name from someone who wanted to sell it. It's a perfectly valid commercial undertaking.
Actually no. You (and probably Evan) really need to learn something about trademarks. You can't "acquire a name." It doesn't work that way. You (apparently) acquired a github repo and maybe some websites. Enjoy them. If you actually had an enforceable trademark you could, at some point in the future, demand that the dashcoin community stop using it. I personally doubt that will ever happen, but you never know anything is possible. Until then people who have already been using the name in their own dealings are free to continue doing so. You can acquire "a name" that is a trademark or a brand name (and the intellectual property that goes with it). No you can not. You can acquire a product (or product line) that has a brand name. Furthermore, even if a trademarked product line is acquired, people who have legally acquired items produced by the previous trademark owner can continue to trade those items under their existing name. I'm not required to remove the brand from my Chrysler just because Chrysler has been sold. Application of this principle to virtual property is something you can work out on your own, I believe. This all doesn't work anything like the way you think it works, and the fact that you can't actually "acquire" a decentralized open source project or a decentralized cryptocurrency at all complicate things further. The best thing for you to do here is leave the dashcoin community alone before you do even more damage to the reputation of your project and your leader with this relentless bullying. This all doesn't work anything like the way you think it works, and the fact that you can't actually "acquire" a decentralized open source project or a decentralized cryptocurrency at all complicate things further.
None of this stuff in crypto works the way most people think it does. There are numerous areas that haven't had precedents set yet. There are legal minefields that haven't even been laid yet. But Evan has worked very hard on the Darkcoin project and he's not just going to throw it all away. There are many challenges yet to come but this isn't one of the big ones. with this relentless bullying.
"bullying"...oh pleeaase! Where in any of my posts have I bullied anyone here? I have not used words or phrases that would come even close to qualify for bullying. You really need to take that back as I write with considerable care to avoid degrading or abusive language as it's not in my nature. |
|
|
|
Evan has acquired the name from someone who wanted to sell it. It's a perfectly valid commercial undertaking.
Actually no. You (and probably Evan) really need to learn something about trademarks. You can't "acquire a name." It doesn't work that way. You (apparently) acquired a github repo and maybe some websites. Enjoy them. If you actually had an enforceable trademark you could, at some point in the future, demand that the dashcoin community stop using it. I personally doubt that will ever happen, but you never know anything is possible. Until then people who have already been using the name in their own dealings are free to continue doing so. You can acquire "a name" that is a trademark or a brand name (and the intellectual property that goes with it). It happens in commercial transactions all over the planet thousands of time every year. The open source code of course can't be acquired but the dev's repo can. Time will tell as to how it all plays out but one thing I know for sure, Evan Duffield is not an underhanded person who engages in dubious transactions. Nor is he a fool. |
|
|
|
I have read it. I have made question: Why? to those, who say: "you are asking the wrong person" Probably, there are too many wrong persons. I suppose, they are mute, blind and deaf. apparently greed can make a person, mute, blind and deaf  another one there  you are talking about greedy darkcoiners, and that the price is not everythig a coin makes and so on ... but in the end you are the one who is greedy, or why do you want to get a buyout of your dashcoin from DASH? PS: Funfact, you are talking about DASH is trying to destroy dashcoin, if anyone intends to do that, why is dashcoin still traded at poloniex? Wouldn't it be the first thing to start bribing exchanges to unlist if you want to kill a coin?  and irrational too lol my opinion is a buyout would be fair at least, while buying(can i use the word bribing?) the dev, leaving dashcoin community to rot and stealing the name must be fair for you? PS: Funfact, are you trying to make an argument about this? lol... what did i say?......oh apparently greed can make a person, mute, blind, deaf and irrational too edit: a buyout in DRK would be nice so i'll have the pleasure of dumping it. Arielbit, I've read just about all of your posts on here & the DRK/DASH thread, including your responses to DRK/DASH people and your ongoing overall expressions of unfairness and upset over what you perceive to be an attempt by Darkcoin to destroy Dashcoin. There's a part of me that has some empathy for the situation you've found yourself in but it's rapidly being completely overtaken by a sense of indifference because of the never ending determination you have to label DRK/DASH as this heinous aggressor who has come and "attacked" Dashcoin and tried to destroy it. So attached to this line of thinking are you, you might as well be saying DRK/DASH is trying to destroy YOU personally! You just keep going on and on and on and on with the same line, the same determined questioning of why DRK/DASH has acquired Dashcoin's code & name and the same outrage directed at virtually everyone that's identified themselves from the DRK/DASH community. Yet, I don't think I've read one post where you're openly speaking to slb and asking him or her "Why have you sold out?" or "Why did you decide to abandon us, your Dashcoin community?" or "Why have you given up on Dashcoin?" Not one! It's like you've identified that DSH/DARK people are there, they're living, breathing and they're responsive so you're going to just go on and on and on and on and on with these never ending complaints and accusations of foul play and underhandedness towards DRK/DASH because....well because....because the Dashcoin dev is gone so "I have to find someone else to blame and DRK/DASH is it damn it!" But as I've pointed out numerous times now, it's not DRK/DASH that you should be directing your rage to. Dashcoin still exists, it's still functioning, it's still being traded (at multiples of its previous price) and it's still a working crypto. Nothing has changed except slb decided to sell out which means you no longer have a dev and, if Dashcoin is to continue being developed, someone has to step forward, fork the existing code base and move on with a new dev or group of devs. Nothing has been "destroyed", nothing has been taken from you that you legally owned and you have no legal claim to the intellectual property or brand of Dashcoin because it isn't yours to own (just like I own the value of the physical money in my pocket, but the design of the coins and notes and the manner in which they work I have no claim on; they're the property of the issuer). That's it. There's nothing more. This never ending acrimony against DRK/DASH and accusations of unfairness/underhandedness is completely pointless. It has no logic to it. It has no potential to rectify your loss or even just your feeling of loss. It has no likelihood of "fixing" anything because it's entirely the wrong tree you're barking up. Evan Duffield is not your enemy. All those DRK/DASH people you're having such heated debate with aren't your enemy. DRK/DASH itself is not your enemy. I am not your enemy. Your enemy is ignorance and the consequences of it. That's where you need to be focussing your attention; your own lack of comprehension and thoroughness on what it means to invest in a cryptocoin with an anonymous dev who can walk at any moment leaving you holding coins that then have a dubious future unless someone takes over. Honestly arielbit, that's who your enemy is. That's where you should be directing all this anger and angst towards; your own lack of understanding as to how this stuff works and what it is you've really bought when you purchase cryptocoins. Demonising DRK/DASH people and trawling through a thousand hypotheses around how slb selling out to DRK/DASH isn't right and getting all upset and pissed off with people like me writing postings like this may give you a feeling of self righteousness but it's not going to fix anything because (and I know you hate hearing this but there's never been anything quite as true) WE ARE THE WRONG PEOPLE YOU SHOULD BE DIRECTING YOUR QUERIES TO. Dashcoin's dev is who you need to be challenging, not DRK/DASH. It's Dashcoin's dev that's decided to stop being the dev and sell what he's produced to Evan Duffield. That's the reality of the situation and all this anger and rage towards DRK/DASH and its community isn't going to help one little bit. (But I'm expecting you'll dig your heels in even further and respond to this post with a whole lot of angry rhetoric that once again totally misses the fundamental issue here on where your upset and unanswered questions should be directed and why that is so). Another "wrong people" here lol Thought you're gonna say something new here with your very long post. And please don't post here another of your short story.they suck.i think i'm gonna lose my mind here. Perhaps if you read it and take in the logic of what I'm talking about you'll have less feeling of losing your mind. Another "wrong people" here lol
You can keep repeating "the world is flat, the world is flat" till you're blue in the face. It doesn't make it true |
|
|
|
Yet, I don't think I've read one post where you're openly speaking to slb and asking him or her "Why have you sold out?" or "Why did you decide to abandon us, your Dashcoin community?" or "Why have you given up on Dashcoin?" Not one!
Imagine that! An actual decentralized open source project that doesn't worship its dev as some kind of deity. Maybe they don't actually care about this 'slb' character (especially now) and are really only interested in the project and the coin itself. You still don't get it. Open source projects are not companies, and the dev does not "own" the project. Anyone can contribute, and if new people want to join the project and take the place of slb who seems to be gone now, they can certainly do so, just as many abandoned or mismanaged open source projects have been adopted by new developers. I have no idea if this is actually going to happen, but if dashcoin supporters want to keep going, I say go for it. Evan Duffield might not be the enemy be he has treated the dashcoin community with disdain and disrespect, and as nothing more than a pawn in his supposedly more important plans. You're not helping matters either. Oh I "get it" smooth, way way more than you are perceiving. I know what open source is, I've worked in amongst it for decades. I know slb is only the original developer (well, of his parts....not the original original) and that anyone can take over. That's the core essence of open source but it's not the core essence of a brand name which can be "owned" hence bought and sold. And that's all that's happened here, a commercial transaction has taken place. Evan has acquired the name from someone who wanted to sell it. It's a perfectly valid commercial undertaking. But now you guys need to demonstrate YOUR understanding of open source and that devs are not "some kind of deity" and stop tarnishing and slandering Evan. Just get on with your own stuff and focus on the future for your project! |
|
|
|
I'm not DASH
No you're not. You're sangoku. (Glad that was clarified). |
|
|
|
I have read it. I have made question: Why? to those, who say: "you are asking the wrong person" Probably, there are too many wrong persons. I suppose, they are mute, blind and deaf. apparently greed can make a person, mute, blind and deaf another one there you are talking about greedy darkcoiners, and that the price is not everythig a coin makes and so on ... but in the end you are the one who is greedy, or why do you want to get a buyout of your dashcoin from DASH? PS: Funfact, you are talking about DASH is trying to destroy dashcoin, if anyone intends to do that, why is dashcoin still traded at poloniex? Wouldn't it be the first thing to start bribing exchanges to unlist if you want to kill a coin? and irrational too lol my opinion is a buyout would be fair at least, while buying(can i use the word bribing?) the dev, leaving dashcoin community to rot and stealing the name must be fair for you? PS: Funfact, are you trying to make an argument about this? lol... what did i say?......oh apparently greed can make a person, mute, blind, deaf and irrational too edit: a buyout in DRK would be nice so i'll have the pleasure of dumping it. Arielbit, I've read just about all of your posts on here & the DRK/DASH thread, including your responses to DRK/DASH people and your ongoing overall expressions of unfairness and upset over what you perceive to be an attempt by Darkcoin to destroy Dashcoin. There's a part of me that has some empathy for the situation you've found yourself in but it's rapidly being completely overtaken by a sense of indifference because of the never ending determination you have to label DRK/DASH as this heinous aggressor who has come and "attacked" Dashcoin and tried to destroy it. So attached to this line of thinking are you, you might as well be saying DRK/DASH is trying to destroy YOU personally! You just keep going on and on and on and on with the same line, the same determined questioning of why DRK/DASH has acquired Dashcoin's code & name and the same outrage directed at virtually everyone that's identified themselves from the DRK/DASH community. Yet, I don't think I've read one post where you're openly speaking to slb and asking him or her "Why have you sold out?" or "Why did you decide to abandon us, your Dashcoin community?" or "Why have you given up on Dashcoin?" Not one! It's like you've identified that DSH/DARK people are there, they're living, breathing and they're responsive so you're going to just go on and on and on and on and on with these never ending complaints and accusations of foul play and underhandedness towards DRK/DASH because....well because....because the Dashcoin dev is gone so "I have to find someone else to blame and DRK/DASH is it damn it!" But as I've pointed out numerous times now, it's not DRK/DASH that you should be directing your rage to. Dashcoin still exists, it's still functioning, it's still being traded (at multiples of its previous price) and it's still a working crypto. Nothing has changed except slb decided to sell out which means you no longer have a dev and, if Dashcoin is to continue being developed, someone has to step forward, fork the existing code base and move on with a new dev or group of devs. Nothing has been "destroyed", nothing has been taken from you that you legally owned and you have no legal claim to the intellectual property or brand of Dashcoin because it isn't yours to own (just like I own the value of the physical money in my pocket, but the design of the coins and notes and the manner in which they work I have no claim on; they're the property of the issuer). That's it. There's nothing more. This never ending acrimony against DRK/DASH and accusations of unfairness/underhandedness is completely pointless. It has no logic to it. It has no potential to rectify your loss or even just your feeling of loss. It has no likelihood of "fixing" anything because it's entirely the wrong tree you're barking up. Evan Duffield is not your enemy. All those DRK/DASH people you're having such heated debate with aren't your enemy. DRK/DASH itself is not your enemy. I am not your enemy. Your enemy is ignorance and the consequences of it. That's where you need to be focussing your attention; your own lack of comprehension and thoroughness on what it means to invest in a cryptocoin with an anonymous dev who can walk at any moment leaving you holding coins that then have a dubious future unless someone takes over. Honestly arielbit, that's who your enemy is. That's where you should be directing all this anger and angst towards; your own lack of understanding as to how this stuff works and what it is you've really bought when you purchase cryptocoins. Demonising DRK/DASH people and trawling through a thousand hypotheses around how slb selling out to DRK/DASH isn't right and getting all upset and pissed off with people like me writing postings like this may give you a feeling of self righteousness but it's not going to fix anything because (and I know you hate hearing this but there's never been anything quite as true) WE ARE THE WRONG PEOPLE YOU SHOULD BE DIRECTING YOUR QUERIES TO. Dashcoin's dev is who you need to be challenging, not DRK/DASH. It's Dashcoin's dev that's decided to stop being the dev and sell what he's produced to Evan Duffield. That's the reality of the situation and all this anger and rage towards DRK/DASH and its community isn't going to help one little bit. (But I'm expecting you'll dig your heels in even further and respond to this post with a whole lot of angry rhetoric that once again totally misses the fundamental issue here on where your upset and unanswered questions should be directed and why that is so). |
|
|
|
i can already foresee what the naj sayers to bitcoin will say : ''what if an alien civilization comes by, picks up our bitcoin satellites and run off with our bitcoins ?'' Given they'll "escape" at the speed of light they'll be travelling into the future so as soon as the theft has occurred mankind just needs to fork the current chain and dem aliens will be on the wrong fork without even knowing it! |
|
|
|
Finally! Having a currency centralized on the same planet is a big argument against it! First coin with a full node on Mars gets my investment! [lonecrouton'sContinuedRantsAboutMiningPools] "Yes but it's still within the solar system and that's its biggest weakness. All it takes is one decent Klingon attack and it's toast. Until there are nodes on Alpha Centauri too, all it will take is one mining base on the moon to go awol and we've lost control of the whole thing...." [/lonecrouton'sContinuedRantsAboutMiningPools] |
|
|
|
I was gonna try, but I swear my face hurst from so much laughter with that link !!! I'll have to recompose for a while... Can we at least agree it's funny because of the guy himself, not because of the (fake) subtitles?  Any topic would've worked with that performance  I've seen that video used in multiple scenarios. The altcoin one is the best so far. I'd like to know what he's really saying and what it is that's so funny. Absolutely infectious laughter! Someone said he tells an actually pretty lame story about him finding a pan on a beach. That's about all I can remember. I think you find that version to be the funniest simply because you can relate to it the most. True. It's like when Camosoul had his massive dummy spit about how the MN guides weren't any good many months back and someone took the classic Hitler segment and made a version with Camosoul ranting about masternode start commands and stuff. That was soooo funny because it was so relevant. Someone made one about the paycoin saga with Hitler complaining and screaming to his men to dump his hashlets and them telling him they're not worth anything. That was very funny too. Of course if you spoke German it wouldn't be at all funny. Understanding german is terrible for these videos. I had to force myself and it took me quite a while to disconnect audio meaning from visual meaning. Simply turning it mute destroys the atmosphere. I can imagine This is the Camosoul one: https://youtu.be/EadVJzppOC4Still very funny even now when camosoul's not around here on this thread. To anyone that doesn't know who Camosoul is and wasn't around mid last year, it's almost impossible to explain except to say that most of "Hitler's" words in this video are direct quotes from Camosoul's last rant! |
|
|
|
I was gonna try, but I swear my face hurst from so much laughter with that link !!! I'll have to recompose for a while... Can we at least agree it's funny because of the guy himself, not because of the (fake) subtitles? Any topic would've worked with that performance I've seen that video used in multiple scenarios. The altcoin one is the best so far. I'd like to know what he's really saying and what it is that's so funny. Absolutely infectious laughter! Someone said he tells an actually pretty lame story about him finding a pan on a beach. That's about all I can remember. I think you find that version to be the funniest simply because you can relate to it the most. True. It's like when Camosoul had his massive dummy spit about how the MN guides weren't any good many months back and someone took the classic Hitler segment and made a version with Camosoul ranting about masternode start commands and stuff. That was soooo funny because it was so relevant. Someone made one about the paycoin saga with Hitler complaining and screaming to his men to dump his hashlets and them telling him they're not worth anything. That was very funny too. Of course if you spoke German it wouldn't be at all funny. |
|
|
|
I was gonna try, but I swear my face hurst from so much laughter with that link !!! I'll have to recompose for a while... Can we at least agree it's funny because of the guy himself, not because of the (fake) subtitles? Any topic would've worked with that performance I've seen that video used in multiple scenarios. The altcoin one is the best so far. I'd like to know what he's really saying and what it is that's so funny. Absolutely infectious laughter! |
|
|
|
-snip-
well here it is. i squeezed it out from you guys..thank you.
You couldn't squeeze an orange. Let's have a simple case study on contract law. Offer and acceptance between a willing seller and willing buyer, with a little consideration to make things legally tight. Bob: Hey, Alice I wanna buy your buns. (offer) Alice: Sure, 1 BTC. (consideration) Bob: Are you sure? (terms) Alice: Yes. Let's sign a contract. (acceptance and signed terms, aka contract) Bob: OK, Alice. Deal. Here is your 1 BTC. Let me play with your buns. (consideration passed) Alice: Thanks, Bob. (done, deal. watertight). Alice & Bob. Happy Hey, where's Fernando when you need him? your a comics guy, me too here i'll show you my comics too before i sleep  ....i'm no short story type, sorry renegademan There are thousands of failed altcoin projects by now, the names are starting to be like old domain names. The development team acquired the rights to the name from a small abandoned crypto project "Dashcoin" although it was never intended to use the suffix "coin". Thus we are now DASH, but thanks for watching our backs, it is all taken care of though. day 1 person a: what is DASH? dark guy: digital cash..etc. etc. person a: what is digital cash? dark guy: well.....it is a cryptocurrency like bitcoin and litecoin person a: so it is a coin? dark guy:...yyyyyyes.. day 2 person a: hey person b i heard there is a coin out there named DASH, it claims to be anonymous etc. person b: so how much is this DASH coin? a piece?.. person a: 3 bucks..... (person b buys) day 3 person b: hey person c i bought some DASHcoin it is 3 bucks a piece, bought 10..that's 30 bucks person c: WHAT! fucking rip off...i bought 10 million dashcoins for 1$ at poloniex.com LOL btw i removed the logo it seems that people are only looking at it hmm so you are afraid that someone invests on dashcoin because he thinks its dash? - isn't that just positiv for your dashcoin? Why the fear than? the comics is about stealing a name and trying to kill a coin for its name....you guys always point to market cap, investment, price etc., your business practices makes me loose faith in cryptos overall. alright, that's enough..going to bed now. Make sure you get plenty of rest. Tomorrow the husband at the new neighbour's place might be home. You'll be able to go and demand that he tell you why the old neighbours sold. And if he keeps telling you to take it up with the old neighbours tell him you're going to keep asking until they tell you why the old neighbours sold. Just keep the pressure on. I mean there's simply no valid reason why the new neighbours shouldn't know the private thoughts of the old neighbours and why they chose to sell. Keep harassing them. |
|
|
|
Other than Darkcoin being changed to ↄash, are there any exciting developments happening that could make the price jump this or next month?
Fixed it for you Fixed your name for you...  That's SOOOO WICKED. Thanks I hadn't thought of that. Forget everything bad I've ever said about Aussies (You'll still lose the world cup this year). Ha! So what bad things have you been saying about us Coins? (come on....I'll have you.....whadda ya got huh?) In all honesty though, as much as I can see what you're trying to do with the backwards C (and your enthusiasm is commendable) to me it just looks like a backwards C and I don't read into it anything relating to a D.....sorry, but that's just what I see every time you "fix" Dash.....(and if you do it to this one I've just written it will be the same....looks like nothing more than a backwards C) PS - Yes, we will most likely lose the world cup. |
|
|
|
Other than Darkcoin being changed to ↄash, are there any exciting developments happening that could make the price jump this or next month?
Fixed it for you Fixed your name for you... |
|
|
|
using these products analogy is simply retarded.. crypto currency is closer to stocks than products like big mac, banana etc.
nope, crypto currency is legally property as is a big mac. Neither convey any legal rights other than under property law. Shares on the other hand convey rights under company law including a share of ownership of the actual brand. (look at it like shares are property with additional rights under company law, crypto currencies don't have those as they are just property) i am not a lawyer..but why do i feel that darkcoin is destroying my property and creating confusion by buying and selling their property under my property's name? FFS GO AND TALK TO YOUR DEV!!!!! Dev's done a runner? Well there's no one to talk to then. This is what happens with anon devs. DRK is not "destroying your property"!!! Man oh man...this is just becoming SOOOO tedious! why buy our dev, github and other accounts? what is the purpose? unless dash dev go out on a selling spree like a sidewalk vendor (slb:dash github for sale..anybody?) You're asking the wrong people! This is similar to you being on holidays and returning home to find the neighbours next door who you've have a fond relationship with have suddenly sold up and left without any word and there are new people in that house. So, instead of contacting your old neighbours and asking them what's happened and why did they leave without any warning, you're at the front door of the house banging on it continually saying "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" And then when the new people say "You really need to take it up with your old neighbours" you say "I don't know where they've gone and I can't contact them" and then start repeating all over again "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" Can you see how futile this is? You need to direct your queries to the Dashcoin dev and if you can't contact him then you need to decide whether to exit your DSH position (which is now about 4 time more valuable than it was just a week ago as a result of all of this) or continue on with DSH on a forked version. That's what you bought into when you bought a crypto from an anonymous developer. bought a crypto from an anonymous developer turning cryptos to big macs again?..myfarm has a better analogy on housing, read back a few pages. nonsensical reply that's void of anything relating to the core concept I just laid out for you i.e. for these, your questions: why buy our dev, github and other accounts? what is the purpose?
I'll re-iterate it again: "you're asking the wrong people" It's that simple. it is my right to ask, if you think you are the "wrong people to ask" then do not reply to me. why buy our dev, github and other accounts? what is the purpose? evan why? So arielbit after returning home from his vacation to find his favourite neighbours have up and left while he was gone without even a word, decided to go and confront the new neighbours and demand they tell him why the old neighbours left. He bangs on the door and the new neighbour opens the door, a lady of 35 or so years. "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" he demands. The lady, somewhat taken aback and perplexed says "You really need to take it up with your old neighbours" and arielbit tells her he doesn't know where they've gone or have any contact details for them. There's a brief pause between the two conversing, and the new neighbour lady looking at arielbit as if to say 'Well, that's not my problem....sorry but I can't help you as to why they chose to sell their house'. The pause lasts for ten or so seconds when arielbit just starts repeating again "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??". The new neighbour lady, with some level of incredulity that this guy thinks she knows what the old neighbours they bought the house from were thinking when they sold, says "I'm sorry, I can't help you, you're talking to the wrong person". At this point arielbit absolutely digs his heels in because he's going to get to the bottom of this shit even if he has to chuck a massive tantrum right there at their front door. So he looks past Mrs new neighbour who's standing in the doorway, trying to peer into the house to see if he can see her husband. Then continuing to look in and not at her he calls out. "Mr new neighbour! Are you there? Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??"....no answer is forthcoming and Mrs new neighbour is finding the whole episode quite comical by now (if not bordering on psycho). He calls out into the void again "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??". Nothing.....she's looking at him like he's a complete dick head now. No matter....he's not giving up.....he calls out again......and again....the same line "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" Any second now he's going to start stamping his feet and chucking a tantrum. And won't they be upset then!! Yes sir, they will! |
|
|
|
using these products analogy is simply retarded.. crypto currency is closer to stocks than products like big mac, banana etc.
nope, crypto currency is legally property as is a big mac. Neither convey any legal rights other than under property law. Shares on the other hand convey rights under company law including a share of ownership of the actual brand. (look at it like shares are property with additional rights under company law, crypto currencies don't have those as they are just property) i am not a lawyer..but why do i feel that darkcoin is destroying my property and creating confusion by buying and selling their property under my property's name? FFS GO AND TALK TO YOUR DEV!!!!! Dev's done a runner? Well there's no one to talk to then. This is what happens with anon devs. DRK is not "destroying your property"!!! Man oh man...this is just becoming SOOOO tedious! why buy our dev, github and other accounts? what is the purpose? unless dash dev go out on a selling spree like a sidewalk vendor (slb:dash github for sale..anybody?) You're asking the wrong people! This is similar to you being on holidays and returning home to find the neighbours next door who you've have a fond relationship with have suddenly sold up and left without any word and there are new people in that house. So, instead of contacting your old neighbours and asking them what's happened and why did they leave without any warning, you're at the front door of the house banging on it continually saying "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" And then when the new people say "You really need to take it up with your old neighbours" you say "I don't know where they've gone and I can't contact them" and then start repeating all over again "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" Can you see how futile this is? You need to direct your queries to the Dashcoin dev and if you can't contact him then you need to decide whether to exit your DSH position (which is now about 4 time more valuable than it was just a week ago as a result of all of this) or continue on with DSH on a forked version. That's what you bought into when you bought a crypto from an anonymous developer. bought a crypto from an anonymous developer turning cryptos to big macs again?..myfarm has a better analogy on housing, read back a few pages. nonsensical reply that's void of anything relating to the core concept I just laid out for you i.e. for these, your questions: why buy our dev, github and other accounts? what is the purpose?
I'll re-iterate it again: "you're asking the wrong people" It's that simple. |
|
|
|
using these products analogy is simply retarded.. crypto currency is closer to stocks than products like big mac, banana etc.
nope, crypto currency is legally property as is a big mac. Neither convey any legal rights other than under property law. Shares on the other hand convey rights under company law including a share of ownership of the actual brand. (look at it like shares are property with additional rights under company law, crypto currencies don't have those as they are just property) i am not a lawyer..but why do i feel that darkcoin is destroying my property and creating confusion by buying and selling their property under my property's name? FFS GO AND TALK TO YOUR DEV!!!!! Dev's done a runner? Well there's no one to talk to then. This is what happens with anon devs. DRK is not "destroying your property"!!! Man oh man...this is just becoming SOOOO tedious! why buy our dev, github and other accounts? what is the purpose? unless dash dev go out on a selling spree like a sidewalk vendor (slb:dash github for sale..anybody?) You're asking the wrong people! This is similar to you being on holidays and returning home to find the neighbours next door who you've have a fond relationship with have suddenly sold up and left without any word and there are new people in that house. So, instead of contacting your old neighbours and asking them what's happened and why did they leave without any warning, you're at the front door of the house banging on it continually saying "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" And then when the new people say "You really need to take it up with your old neighbours" you say "I don't know where they've gone and I can't contact them" and then start repeating all over again "Why did you buy this house!!?? Why?? I feel like you've destroyed my relationship with my old neighbours!! Why did you do this!!??" Can you see how futile this is? You need to direct your queries to the Dashcoin dev and if you can't contact him then you need to decide whether to exit your DSH position (which is now about 4 time more valuable than it was just a week ago as a result of all of this) or continue on with DSH on a forked version. That's what you bought into when you bought a crypto from an anonymous developer. |
|
|
|
using these products analogy is simply retarded.. crypto currency is closer to stocks than products like big mac, banana etc.
nope, crypto currency is legally property as is a big mac. Neither convey any legal rights other than under property law. Shares on the other hand convey rights under company law including a share of ownership of the actual brand. (look at it like shares are property with additional rights under company law, crypto currencies don't have those as they are just property) i am not a lawyer..but why do i feel that darkcoin is destroying my property and creating confusion by buying and selling their property under my property's name? FFS GO AND TALK TO YOUR DEV!!!!! Dev's done a runner? Well there's no one to talk to then. This is what happens with anon devs. DRK is not "destroying your property"!!! Man oh man...this is just becoming SOOOO tedious! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
