No, it's because I purchased 13 750 ti's and all I can mine is uber crap coins (Jackpot is junk, everyone knows it, it will be dead in a few months), earlier, they were releasing updates. Now, it appears only release once a coin is ground down. Closed miners also aren't good for coins, as I'm sure if the miner is good they'd have no problem overpowering a network. So, Monero, as of right now is completely insecure. Essentially centralized.
Anyway, They can do what they want of course. Just regret buy some nvidia cards. Can't really sell them without a loss. So, that's that. Mistake 30000.
1) Jackpot isn't junk. It's fun to mine at. And it's a very secure coin. 2) Enough time for you to ROI, no? Even at 0.005BTC/day/gpu. 750ti's aren't that expensive. |
|
|
|
I don't know what is wrong with TAC, but I think it looks OK now, it's the same as dwarfpool's calc: http://dwarfpool.com/tac/calcI think I found the bug. I had JHA set as 2100kh  (copypasta from X11, forgot to change speed *blush*) New results: http://pastebin.com/Cdrq8VwZ(Also, by the time you're reading it, the situation will be different, so TAC will not be the same anymore  ) Thanks for producing that list... that is a great thing overall to keep updated. So wondering is this a page you are going to update every day or so? Is this part of the output of the program you were working on? I haven't looked too much into the profit switcher you were posting, but you have now peaked my interest... so if I need to download and start messing with it to get this kind of data I will go that route. Appreciate any plans or direction on where this will go.... Wasn't so interested at this point in the profit switching, but am going to jump in head first if I need to. Yep, it's part of the profit switcher. But I'm glad I asked for help in here, found some other bugs, added checking for myriad-groestl and dmd-groestl (you'll need to use my ccminer for that ), etc... So I'll not update it everyday, but I can quickly make one at request. I could even give you an exe if you'd want it, pm me for that, but no user-controls, that's the last stage And no revelation of my source code either, it's a mess too. EDIT: Oh well, scratched something together for everyone to enjoy  Just need a correct cointweak and coinwarz api key, but you can leave it blank if not needed (only gets stats from Nicehash and Whattomine then). Feel free to use, but even this simple program could be bugged, so use at your own risk: https://mega.co.nz/#!MAkWHCJK!PUYcTzerHVTdFeHuypfdYw5vF755NA_pb_5BsfKq4KIOh, btw, the one making it feel slow is Cryptsy I have to load in a shitload of data I don't really need, just a tiny portion of it. Oh well, I'm doing it another thread in the real program. |
|
|
|
So, it appears this is a closed source project now? Why is this thread still going. They stated they've improved x11 and can mine monero. So what is the point of this, if no releases anymore..
you can earn TalkCoin, JackpotCoin at great advantage over AMD. Why the complaints? Yes we mine XMR, BBR and make a killing. Not ready to share yet. We're not even using ccminer for this. Christian Yep, releasing GPU miners for them would increase difficulty way too high all of a sudden. CPU miners will probably have a hard time competing with us Nvidia miners and since most GPU miners are AMD, not many of them either would be able to keep track on our pace. Not a good idea. Just wait till AMD has their miners and release it then, will be the same time as you not being able to make a killing anymore So I fully support you there! But for X11... I still would love that groestl boost ^^" It's not like it matters that much anymore, X11 will have only a few coins left in a few weeks. |
|
|
|
I am getting 500~550tac/day at 26MHash/s; the 750ti is doing 4.8MHash so 1 750ti should be doing 92~100Tac/day  I think you have the same algo used by certain multipool to attract miners I don't know what is wrong with TAC, but I think it looks OK now, it's the same as dwarfpool's calc: http://dwarfpool.com/tac/calcI think I found the bug. I had JHA set as 2100kh (copypasta from X11, forgot to change speed *blush*) New results: http://pastebin.com/Cdrq8VwZ(Also, by the time you're reading it, the situation will be different, so TAC will not be the same anymore ) |
|
|
|
How should you get 133 TAC with ONE 750ti? That seems to be wrong.
If anyone knows the right formula, please feel free to modify: public double CoinsPerDay(double hashRateKh, bool use24HDiff)
{
if (IsNiceHash) return (hashRateKh / 1000000);
double targetBits = Math.Pow(2,32);
if (Algo == HashingAlgo.Algo.Quark) targetBits = Math.Pow(2, 24);
double coinsPerDay = BlockReward / (Difficulty * targetBits / (hashRateKh * 1000) / 3600 / 24);
if (use24HDiff) coinsPerDay = BlockReward / (Last24HDifficulty * targetBits / (hashRateKh * 1000) / 3600 / 24);
return coinsPerDay;
} It'll probably be those targetBits all over again (like with quark) but I can't find where I can find that in the respective sourcecode  |
|
|
|
New profitability output  http://pastebin.com/KAmrKpk4And yes, it will also monitor the miners @ work. But you'll need to have patience, problems like these are arising continuously Crypto is a strange beast. How comes that JPC's profit is only 1/2 of TAC and some X11 clone coin? You get the wrong diff for JPC, right? Or wrong price? Check it, dude. Diff shooting around, exchange prices shooting around. Meh, again :p http://pastebin.com/hUVDyyXyJPC was on top of the list yesterday but it seems like diff is increasing ^^ : http://bitinfocharts.com/comparison/hashrate-jpc.html |
|
|
|
As I've told in here before, I'm making a profit-switcher for cudaminer/ccminer. I've almost completely finished reading and analyzing loads of api's: whattomine, cointweak & coinwarz for diff, blockreward, etc & the prices are grabbed directly from either mintpal, cryptsy or bittrex (using the largest volume for defining the price). But for Quark, I've stumbled upon a problem; my BTC guesstimate is way too lowfor what Coinwarz and my experience with Quark predicts. For the other Coins, it seems right. Anyone care to figure out what's the problem? Pastebin with results for one gtx750ti, Quark coins are at the bottom: http://pastebin.com/RMBUFNZNEDIT: I opened a new topic here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=645845.msg7217731#msg7217731500TAC bounty Problem fixed ^^" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=645845.msg7218700#msg7218700It should've been Math.Pow(2,24)  New profitability output http://pastebin.com/KAmrKpk4And yes, it will also monitor the miners @ work. But you'll need to have patience, problems like these are arising continuously Crypto is a strange beast. |
|
|
|
Anyone knows of a monitoring programs for CudaMiner / ccMiner ? Something in the style of cgwatcher / cgremote ?
Currently using CudaManager, but it's only good as a fail switch really.
Look above your post. I (and some others independently lol) are busy working on it ^^" So not yet, but it's in the making. |
|
|
|
Might be a problem of conversion between khash and Mhash, seems like you've got a 1 000 factor missing.
Nah, it seems correct for other algo's. Here's a new (trimmed) list also showing the coins per day: http://pastebin.com/S3H5vq1mHere is a CoinWarz with all the hashrates for 750ti already filled in: http://bit.ly/UoDd2NSo it's like quark has some mystery to it's diff calc  I'd like to know that one. Edit: Found it! 500TAC has been sent |
|
|
|
Hey guys! I've been busy with writing a profit-switcher for ccminer/cudaminer, in C#, will be opensourced, and I've just finished the part where I could read from different web API's for info like difficulty, blockreward and exchange prices. I set up a test with the hashrates of a GTX750TI as used hashrates, and it calculates it nicely for most algo's. Scrypt(-n), keccak and X11 are the same on other profit calculators like coinwarz. But Quark (like classic Quark and Securecoin) end up way too low. My own experience already showed me that Quark is a lot more profitable, and so says Coinwarz. Hell, even Securecoin is on top on Coinwarz, but at the bottom on my list: http://pastebin.com/RMBUFNZNCode used: public double CalcBtcPerDay(double hashRateKh)
{
CoinsPerDay = BlockReward/(Difficulty*(Math.Pow(2,32))/(hashRateKh*1000)/3600/24);
return BtcPerDay = CoinsPerDay*BestExchange.BtcPrice;
} Anyone care to take a look at this and tell me what I'm doing wrong? I'm mining ATM at a SRC pool, and after half an hour I'm already having as much unconfirmed coins as my calc said I would have over a day 500TAC (Talkcoin, 0.015BTC) bounty for the one who solves this riddle ^^" |
|
|
|
As I've told in here before, I'm making a profit-switcher for cudaminer/ccminer. I've almost completely finished reading and analyzing loads of api's: whattomine, cointweak & coinwarz for diff, blockreward, etc & the prices are grabbed directly from either mintpal, cryptsy or bittrex (using the largest volume for defining the price). But for Quark, I've stumbled upon a problem; my BTC guesstimate is way too lowfor what Coinwarz and my experience with Quark predicts. For the other Coins, it seems right. Anyone care to figure out what's the problem? Pastebin with results for one gtx750ti, Quark coins are at the bottom: http://pastebin.com/RMBUFNZNCode used: public double CalcBtcPerDay(double hashRateKh)
{
if (IsNiceHash) return (hashRateKh / 1000000) * BestExchange.BtcPrice;
CoinsPerDay = BlockReward/(Difficulty*(Math.Pow(2,32))/(hashRateKh*1000)/3600/24);
return BtcPerDay = CoinsPerDay*BestExchange.BtcPrice;
} EDIT: I opened a new topic here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=645845.msg7217731#msg7217731500TAC bounty |
|
|
|
Anyone wanna share the settings for jpc in ccminer for gtx690. Cant get both gpus to work. -t 2 doesnt work
Don't use -t, use -d to specifically use their devicenumbers. (like -d 0,1), it's more accurate . GTX690 needs ccminer30.exe Can you explain what's happening? Are you getting errors? Is it not even starting? Or is it showing abnormal hashrate without any accepts by the pool? |
|
|
|
I'm amazed you could get 3.8Mhs for each 750ti.
How can i get 2.8Mhs ? Help pls.
He was talking about JPC algorithm You can check some benchmarks here: http://cudamining.cc/url/releasesAnd yes, CPU matters for ccminer. Sad but true Also, christian, while you're at many new algo's, what about this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=595357.0And plox, give us a peek at you're newest improvements It's not like the few of us will raise the diff that high  * Bombadil just added 6 months till next release |
|
|
|
actually if someone want to make X13, there is just to write hamsi I guess, he could just start from the opencl code of the amd and rewrite into cuda (and from what I have been told, there isn't much difference) Well, you actually need to write the algo implementation, or however you'd call it, too. So the actual algorithm can be almost just copypasted, you'll need to write the handling too, which will be different. I tried writing handlers for skein, keccak and blake in ccminer, but I failed at all of them. It isn't just copypasta |
|
|
|
Nothing really special. If cudaminer/ccminer had real failover support, ... it will be console or windows forms app? Did you see CGWatcher? Windows Forms Everyone likes a nice UI. I'm actually writing it for myself, but I think everyone else might like it too, so that's why I'll be releasing it. Yep, I saw CGWatcher, it's one of my inspirations, next to CUDAManager, but I'm writing it from scratch. I'm still wondering how I could implement the profit switching by multipool. OK, I could use the api from poolpicker to pick the most profitable pool over X days, but only for scrypt. I'm unsure if that's still worth it. |
|
|
|
Nothing really special. If cudaminer/ccminer had real failover support, you could easily set a failover with the price in your nicehash password. They're all in the hype of their algorithm-changing on-the-fly for sgminer. Anyways, I myself am working on my own profit switcher in C#. 3 modes: failover only, profit by coin & profit by multipool (24h average or when there are promotions like bcpool's giveaways). I will add Nicehash as a "coin", backed by their API to switch over. It will also use benchmarks to normalize your hashrates, maybe even factor in your power usage. I'm almost there, just need a nice gui, actually saving my settings, overheat-protection, etc... but I've been busy with it for quite some time now as I'm only a hobby programmer. So expect at least another 2 week (if someone beats me to it, feel free ^^" ) I will not release it before I can actually present you something nice & tested (else someone else will beat me faster to it ) Also, at this point, I'm still open to feature requests Don't expect me to hastily code something after I released it (but I may, don't know what the future will bring ) |
|
|
|
What's on it? Strangely cudamining.cc is blocked by my company's filter, bitcointalk isn't |
|
|
|
What is your hashrate for keccak on a single 750Ti ?
With this configuration:
cudaminer.exe -a keccak -l auto -o pool -u username -p password
I'm getting ~28 Mh with stock clocks.
Is it OK, too low, or ... ?
I'm using this on the 32bit (x86) version: cudaminer.exe -l T640x24 -a keccak -m 1 -i 0 -H 2 -o stratum+tcp://... Yields me around 160-170MH/s IIRC, |
|
|
|
hi, i have nvidia 9600 zotac, which version of cudaminer i should use? to many version make me dizzy
btw i'm using windows
9600 is a compute 1.1 gpu. You can't use any ccminer for it. I tried to compile & hack my way to that, but it doesn't work. You could use it with cudaminer (so, not ccminer, but classic cudaminer), any would be fine. But you can only mine Scrypt (and variations like Scrypt-N) and Keccak with that But, a 9600 is so old, it would have a hard time competing with the other GPU's and ASIC's for Scrypt. You could try at keccak, but don't expect wonders. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
