Just a heads up and a word to the wise. ... HR, You are right in keeping an eye on this guy. Made a coin... a miner... with closed source which only works on a certain pool... I was thinking about doing groestl but this is giving me some bad thoughts as well. |
|
|
|
Is there anything like that for linux? Sorry, no. According to a friend of mine who is into linux "it does not have any stinking GUI in the OS". Last time I checked X had more kernel code than the kernel itself but anyway... I was thinking about porting the core to linux (it is highly portable) with no GUI but I don't see it being a priority. |
|
|
|
What software are you using for mining? I'm using spg-sgminer, and it's ~4.6Mh on Qubit If you want to mine Qubit on AMD GCN and you run Windows 7, what you really want to do is running M8M-376. You might need to overwrite presentation.js. Seriously, the kernels included in sph-sgminer for Qubit are very far from efficient and pretty much the worse it could happen on AMD architecture. |
|
|
|
|
They don't and to be completely clear, they have no reason to. GPL violations are tolerated here as well as imposed fees or modified servers so you can only mine to them... you can see a few examples live now on this forum.
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible there is a GPU cryptonight implementation which is much faster (4-8x faster) but we can only speculate about it.
|
|
|
|
It's not a problem actually, we can try to find some heavy hash alghorithm which require huge amount of memory (bye-bye asics) and which are very inconvinient for GPUs. Inconvenient for something which usually has twice the bandwidth, twice the processing power, can be equipped twice as easily and can reduce latency to one hundredth. Let me put this in a way everybody can understand: CPU massive processing is dead, it has been dead long time, either you acknowledge the fact or lie about it... and then get your ass kicked big way when the GPU advantage is unlocked. The anti-GPU stance is a position only ignorants can defend. |
|
|
|
|
Please accept my apologies, it was my understanding you forked it from some sgminer branch.
It turns out I was really thinking about the modified X11 miner.
|
|
|
|
This is what the author of Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner is doing now,charging 5% fee or 0% fee with 10% less hashrate Yes, I know... and why nobody has recompiled it without the fee? because it has protection to prevent that and no1 has been able to break that protection. Then just remove the protection from source and recompile... reply to the question. Why nobody recompiled it without fee? |
|
|
|
The phonetic equivalence (IPA: ˈkrɪptənʌɪt) and near-exact spellings of Cyptonite/Cryptonight and Cryptonote are confusing noobs, and it's just going to get worse as XCN gains exposure. 100% agreed thank you for pointing out the difference, let me tell you google considers them already equivalent. To further exacerbate the issue, alts still targeting enthusiasts will fail. You don't write a manual assuming the reader already knows. Actually, I don't agree. Sure, Cryptonite might be confusing for a few, but it's no reason to avoid the coin? And if they read like 1 minute of the first post, they'll understand that this coin is not about anonymity. Also, if they read the title of the the thread, it clearly states: "1st mini-blockchain coin", if that doesn't spark their interest, what will? If you take a step down from your ivory tower you'll understand nobody not being an enthusiast sees values in that. It's like talking about the difference between a V8 and a typical utility car engine. Stuff for car enthusiasts. |
|
|
|
|
I assume you just paid for one of your 270x, keep doing that for at least 6 months then you can talk about profit.
Unless you got them all for free.
|
|
|
|
- Habituation;
- Stubbornness;
- Vested interest and emotional attachment (it's hard to sell when you have to take a loss, but at some point there will be no other choice). You know devphp, considering how the concept of cryptocurrency is a disruptive innovation, I am very surprised by how those users want to keep the status quo. Posted the very same concept on reddit only a couple hours ago. I still hold litecoin to the death if needs be, wish me luck all  Good luck... NutJob?  |
|
|
|
As for hashrate hardware data, you mean how different hardware acts while mining different algos & their configuration? Yes, exactly. If so then absolutely. We need to create a central location for people to record their hardware settings and performance results to help everyone out. Anyone have any ideas on the best way to do this? The Litecoin & Bitoin wikis & wikipedia articles were very helpful in the past to record this data. I always found the wikis pretty rough. Google spreadsheet allows sorting per-column, greatly improving usefulness. MYR switched to those a few days ago, have a look on their website (I'm not linking in respect of your work). |
|
|
|
The phonetic equivalence (IPA: ˈkrɪptənʌɪt) and near-exact spellings of Cyptonite/Cryptonight and Cryptonote are confusing noobs, and it's just going to get worse as XCN gains exposure. 100% agreed thank you for pointing out the difference, let me tell you google considers them already equivalent. To further exacerbate the issue, alts still targeting enthusiasts will fail. You don't write a manual assuming the reader already knows. |
|
|
|
|
Please keep us informed on temperatures!
|
|
|
|
This is what the author of Claymore CryptoNote GPU Miner is doing now,charging 5% fee or 0% fee with 10% less hashrate Yes, I know... and why nobody has recompiled it without the fee? |
|
|
|
No one knows where the bottom is, but it has a chance to return if you want to risk, and to buy and waiting for a good price for sale The question is why should you go for LTC at that when you have - MYR, with several times the potential, doing real innovation, which you can buy at super low price.
- VTC, which is committed to be ASIC-proof and shipping with stealth addresses.
- Some CryptoNote coin, which are a whole new world.
All those hold more potential than LTC and you can buy them for less than LTC, besides adding something important to the mix. |
|
|
|
Hello! I see there are about 600 blocks left! For those planning to hash Qubit, please try a new experimental miner. Caution advised: higher temperatures have been reported. Thanks for posting, we will give this a whirl & report back. Thank you! I figured out maybe it's worth noticing it's Win 7 only and AMD GCN only. BTW, are you going to share hashrate hardware data with MYR? They would sure use some help! |
|
|
|
Hello! I see there are about 600 blocks left! For those planning to hash Qubit, please try a new experimental miner. Caution advised: higher temperatures have been reported. |
|
|
|
Miner won't be shared until all profitability is gone.
why not?I think the author can charge some fee for his work. Thereby violating GPL status. WTF dudes, what's wrong with you. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
