Bitcoin Forum
July 07, 2024, 02:52:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 [281] 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 ... 2309 »
5601  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 30, 2022, 06:28:43 PM
2 Bitcoin Mining Pools Command More Than 53% of BTC’s Total Hashrate



Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/2-bitcoin-mining-pools-command-more-than-53-of-btcs-total-hashrate/

Miners can switch any time they want to switch.

The only time this is an issue is if 1 pool phsically has 52% of the gear in their mine on their pool.

That would be a true issue since they would truly control BTC.

until that happens do not worry be happy.



I guess the motive of the blog is to address *possible* centralization rather than miners going off.

back in the early years we had cex.io with 51-53% of the whole network we thinned out from that and spread hash around.

The issue here is foundry is 31% and is kind of private. I suppose that hash can be very much in the same hands which means they could gain complete control of the network down the road apiece. 

I am not a hobby miner but my 300k usd in gear is merely a drop in the bucket as I am well under 1/10 of 1% of the btc network.


5602  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 30, 2022, 05:37:52 PM
2 Bitcoin Mining Pools Command More Than 53% of BTC’s Total Hashrate



Source: https://news.bitcoin.com/2-bitcoin-mining-pools-command-more-than-53-of-btcs-total-hashrate/

Miners can switch any time they want to switch.

The only time this is an issue is if 1 pool phsically has 52% of the gear in their mine on their pool.

That would be a true issue since they would truly control BTC.

until that happens do not worry be happy.

5603  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: new ltc/doge scrypt hashblade on: December 30, 2022, 03:08:28 PM
I like the concept of a GPU form factor ASIC miner but, like Phillip said, too good [to be true].
It has to be made with available ASIC chips so the power claims are obviously out of line.

Shame as they use Norway as an honest country with good rules. Since I am 25% Norwegian descent I feel sullied a bit by their pitch on youtube.

Besides the earliest they will release it will be Dec 2023.

If it is real hashrate will rise like mad.
And it will be sabotaged like a mofo by bitmain.

I did put my name on their list to be notified.

But I very likely would not get them.

well thats my problem, thats why im skeptic and think it migth be a scam.

current asic chips arent eficient enough, if they were you would see better and cheaper asics by now.


tech evolution currently is slowing down due to the world problems, covid, lockdowns, that impacted directly the chips manufacturers.

and using norway as a "safe" and trust us slogan isnt enough.

in the next years maybe we will see better chips, more eficient and probably cheaper, but i think we still got a long way to go.

mining nowadays isnt for all specialy btc and algoritms that are heavy, that need more hash power and for that reason use more watts, mining of btc, ltc even kda become too centralized, not what satoshi intended in first place.

hoping for better days, with less huge mining farms, less companies profiting, but im guessing for that to happen it would be need a time machine hahaha.


time will tell if this tech is real or just a very bad gimmick.

If it does what they said they were stupid to launch it this way. They needed 1 investor. They needed to build 10,000 of them and launch it that way.

The tech will get reverse engineered if it is real. This method of launching it makes it more sure that copies will be on the market quickly rather than a 3-6 month window were they are selling a killer machine.

thus another reason not to get involved or hopeful with this tech.
5604  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 30, 2022, 02:11:11 PM
HERE is some fun news on the last business day of the year.:


Quote
https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/we-have-more-work-to-do-the-complete-story-behind-the-feds-historic-shift-in-2022-114004343.html

Yahoo Finance
'We have more work to do': The complete story behind the Fed's historic shift in 2022
Jennifer Schonberger
Jennifer Schonberger·Senior Reporter
December 22, 2022
The year 2022 will be remembered as one of the most consequential in Federal Reserve history.

The central bank raised interest rates by a cumulative 4.25% this year, the most since 1980.

Stay ahead of the market
Between June and November, the central bank raised its benchmark interest rate by 0.75% at four consecutive meetings. Not since 1994 had the Fed raised rates by 0.75% at even a single meeting.

"Over the course of the year, we have taken forceful actions to tighten the stance of monetary policy," Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in a December news conference.

"We have covered a lot of ground, and the full effects of our rapid tightening so far are yet to be felt," Powell added. "Even so, we have more work to do."



...

That work is expected to include further rate hikes next year, with the federal funds rate now forecast to top 5% in 2023. Meanwhile, unemployment is set to rise and growth will remain sluggish, a scenario Powell insisted earlier this month would not constitute a recession.

Wall Street, meanwhile, has penciled in a downturn in the U.S. economy for early next year.

When the year started, interest rates stood in a range of 0%-0.25% as the Fed hadn't yet begun pulling back pandemic-era policies aimed to help the economy through an unprecedented challenge. As the year ends, the Fed is making its strongest effort in four decades to slow down the economy.

How the central bank's actions, words, and forecasts changed is a story investors aren't likely to forget anytime soon.


...


'Soon be appropriate'

Powell started off the year setting the stage to raise rates, telegraphing that it would “soon be appropriate” to increase rates following the central bank's first meeting of 2022. At that meeting, the central bank elected to keep interest rates unchanged in a range of 0%-0.25%.

The scale of the changes to come would rock markets all year.

By January, inflation was running well above the Fed’s 2% target and price pressures had broadened.

“While the drivers of higher inflation have been predominantly connected to the dislocations caused by the pandemic, price increases have now spread to a broader range of goods and services,” Powell said.

The Fed’s thinking at the time was that they expected inflation to decline over the course of the year, though Powell said, “we will remain attentive to risks, including the risk that high inflation is more persistent than expected.” This was the era when a debate over whether inflation would prove "transitory" still took place.

Inflation had been largely absent since the financial crisis and thought by the central bank to be transitory when it started moving higher following the pandemic in the wake of backed-up supply chains stymied by COVID. But transitory soon proved persistent.

By March, Russia was waging a war in Ukraine, causing oil prices to spike, and headline inflation measured by the consumer price index shot up to a 40-year high of 8.5%. Excluding food and energy, inflation was running at 6.5%, unacceptably high for the Fed's 2% target.

...

Acknowledging that inflation was no longer transitory, the Fed moved to raise rates by 0.25% in March after having held the federal funds rate at near-zero since the beginning of the pandemic.

Still, the Fed projected a more modest forecast for inflation than what came to be, forecasting inflation of 4% for 2022 with rates estimated to rise to 1.9% and further to 2.8% in 2023 and hold at that level through 2024. Forecasts that would look dramatically different by year-end.

The start of 'expeditious' increases

By May, with a surge in oil prices and other commodities from Russia’s invasion pushing up inflation, the Fed raised rates by 0.50%, noting for the first time it anticipated "ongoing increases" in rates.

“We are on a path to move our policy rate expeditiously to more normal levels," said Powell. "There is a broad sense on the Committee that additional 50-basis-point increases should be on the table at the next couple of meetings."

Powell noted inflation had surprised to the upside and that further surprises could be in store.

Consumer prices accelerated by June on a headline basis, prompting the Fed to pull the trigger on what would be the first of four 0.75% rate hikes in a row, an unprecedented action since the Fed started explicitly targeting the fed funds rate in the late 1980s that matched the largest single meeting move since 1994.

...

Yahoo Finance
'We have more work to do': The complete story behind the Fed's historic shift in 2022
Jennifer Schonberger
Jennifer Schonberger·Senior Reporter
December 22, 2022
The year 2022 will be remembered as one of the most consequential in Federal Reserve history.

The central bank raised interest rates by a cumulative 4.25% this year, the most since 1980.

Stay ahead of the market
Between June and November, the central bank raised its benchmark interest rate by 0.75% at four consecutive meetings. Not since 1994 had the Fed raised rates by 0.75% at even a single meeting.

"Over the course of the year, we have taken forceful actions to tighten the stance of monetary policy," Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said in a December news conference.

"We have covered a lot of ground, and the full effects of our rapid tightening so far are yet to be felt," Powell added. "Even so, we have more work to do."


That work is expected to include further rate hikes next year, with the federal funds rate now forecast to top 5% in 2023. Meanwhile, unemployment is set to rise and growth will remain sluggish, a scenario Powell insisted earlier this month would not constitute a recession.

Wall Street, meanwhile, has penciled in a downturn in the U.S. economy for early next year.

When the year started, interest rates stood in a range of 0%-0.25% as the Fed hadn't yet begun pulling back pandemic-era policies aimed to help the economy through an unprecedented challenge. As the year ends, the Fed is making its strongest effort in four decades to slow down the economy.

How the central bank's actions, words, and forecasts changed is a story investors aren't likely to forget anytime soon.

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell holds a news conference following the announcement that the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by half a percentage point, at the Federal Reserve Building in Washington, U.S., December 14, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
Federal Reserve Board Chairman Jerome Powell holds a news conference following the announcement that the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by half a percentage point, at the Federal Reserve Building in Washington, U.S., December 14, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
'Soon be appropriate'

Powell started off the year setting the stage to raise rates, telegraphing that it would “soon be appropriate” to increase rates following the central bank's first meeting of 2022. At that meeting, the central bank elected to keep interest rates unchanged in a range of 0%-0.25%.

The scale of the changes to come would rock markets all year.

By January, inflation was running well above the Fed’s 2% target and price pressures had broadened.

“While the drivers of higher inflation have been predominantly connected to the dislocations caused by the pandemic, price increases have now spread to a broader range of goods and services,” Powell said.

The Fed’s thinking at the time was that they expected inflation to decline over the course of the year, though Powell said, “we will remain attentive to risks, including the risk that high inflation is more persistent than expected.” This was the era when a debate over whether inflation would prove "transitory" still took place.

Inflation had been largely absent since the financial crisis and thought by the central bank to be transitory when it started moving higher following the pandemic in the wake of backed-up supply chains stymied by COVID. But transitory soon proved persistent.

By March, Russia was waging a war in Ukraine, causing oil prices to spike, and headline inflation measured by the consumer price index shot up to a 40-year high of 8.5%. Excluding food and energy, inflation was running at 6.5%, unacceptably high for the Fed's 2% target.


Acknowledging that inflation was no longer transitory, the Fed moved to raise rates by 0.25% in March after having held the federal funds rate at near-zero since the beginning of the pandemic.

Still, the Fed projected a more modest forecast for inflation than what came to be, forecasting inflation of 4% for 2022 with rates estimated to rise to 1.9% and further to 2.8% in 2023 and hold at that level through 2024. Forecasts that would look dramatically different by year-end.

The start of 'expeditious' increases

By May, with a surge in oil prices and other commodities from Russia’s invasion pushing up inflation, the Fed raised rates by 0.50%, noting for the first time it anticipated "ongoing increases" in rates.

“We are on a path to move our policy rate expeditiously to more normal levels," said Powell. "There is a broad sense on the Committee that additional 50-basis-point increases should be on the table at the next couple of meetings."

Powell noted inflation had surprised to the upside and that further surprises could be in store.

Consumer prices accelerated by June on a headline basis, prompting the Fed to pull the trigger on what would be the first of four 0.75% rate hikes in a row, an unprecedented action since the Fed started explicitly targeting the fed funds rate in the late 1980s that matched the largest single meeting move since 1994.


With inflation surprising to the upside, the Fed forecasted a steeper path of rate hikes, further raising its estimates for interest rates for the year — up to 3.4% from 1.9% previously. Officials revised higher their expectations for inflation to 5.2% over the course of 2022, up from 4.3% forecast in March.

Powell noted that a 75 basis point rate increase was an “unusually large one,” and that he did not expect moves of that size to be common. “Either a 50 basis point or a 75 basis point increase seems most likely at our next meeting,” said Powell.

Six weeks later in July, the Fed was hiking again by 75 basis points and would do so for two more meetings through November.

'Pain' at Jackson Hole

Fed Chair Jerome Powell repeatedly reinforced that the Fed’s resolve to quell inflation wouldn’t be without pain—first in May at a press event, then in August at the Fed’s annual confab in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and subsequently at post-FOMC press conferences in the fall.

“While higher interest rates, slower growth, and softer labor market conditions will bring down inflation, they will also bring some pain to households and businesses,” Powell said at Jackson Hole. “These are the unfortunate costs of reducing inflation. But a failure to restore price stability would mean far greater pain.”

Fed Chair Powell’s commitment to “keep at it until the job is done,” earned him comparisons to former Fed Chair Paul Volcker, acclaimed for taking a relentless stance on fighting inflation pushing interest rates up to double digits.

Powell himself invoked the former Fed Chair, showing the seriousness of his resolve in the fight against inflation at Jackson Hole.

“The successful Volcker disinflation in the early 1980s followed multiple failed attempts to lower inflation over the previous 15 years,” said Powell. “A lengthy period of very restrictive monetary policy was ultimately needed to stem the high inflation and start the process of getting inflation down to the low and stable levels that were the norm until the spring of last year. Our aim is to avoid that outcome by acting with resolve now.”

...

Inflation proved to be much more of a problem than it has been for the previous four decades, and the Fed is determined to avoid the mistake of the early 1980s, when it cut rates too soon, allowing inflation to come back up fast. That mistake resulted in two recessions close to each other—an outcome the Fed would very much like to avoid this time.

By September, the Fed was upping their estimates for rate hikes yet again, and this time pledging to hold rates at a higher level for longer. Officials saw the fed funds rate rising to 4.4% by the end of the year and 4.6% by the end of 2023 — up from 3.4% and 3.8% respectively.

A time to 'moderate'

By November, the Fed had again raise interest rates by 75 basis points, while hinting at a potential slower pace in the future.

“In determining the pace of future increases in the target range the committee will take into account the cumulative tightening of monetary policy, the lags with which monetary policy affects economic activity and inflation and economic and financial developments," the policy statement said.

Powell set the table for a 50-basis point rate hike at the Fed's December policy meeting, saying in a speech at the Brookings Institution two weeks before the meeting it makes sense to "moderate" rate hikes as the Fed approaches its estimated peak in benchmark interest rates.

“It makes sense to moderate the pace of our rate increases as we approach the level of restraint that will be sufficient to bring inflation down,” Powell said. “The time for moderating the pace of rate increases may come as soon as the December meeting.”

...

Two weeks later the Fed acted on those comments, pledging to continue raising rates at a slower pace, but yet again raise rates higher than estimated and hold them there longer than previously expected. This as inflation remained high and showed only tentative signs of coming back down.

Powell said inflation data in October and November — pointing to cooling numbers on the consumer price index — are a welcome decline, but will take substantially more evidence to gain confidence inflation is on a sustained downward path.

Fed Chair Powell said that the committee is not at a sufficiently restrictive policy stance yet and that it’s possible officials could raise estimates for rates even higher if inflation continues to be sticky. Powell said he doesn’t see the Fed considering cutting rates unless the central bank is confident inflation is coming down.

While Fed Chair Powell has stopped short of saying a recession is needed to bring down inflation, he noted that reducing inflation will likely require a sustained period of “below trend growth.” The Fed lowered its growth forecast against this month, and now expects just half a percentage of GDP growth next year and 1.6% in 2024.

Officials also now see rates rising to 5.1% next year — with five officials projecting rates could rise as high as 5.25% and two projecting 5.6%. Though the pace of rate hikes is likely to move in 50 or 25 basis point increments, the Fed has repeatedly raised estimates this year for how high rates could go. In September, officials estimated rates would top out at 4.6% before revising these estimates higher.

“[Interest rate projections] show overwhelmingly FOMC participants believe inflation risks are to the upside,” Powell said at his December press conference. “So I can’t tell you confidently that we won’t move up our estimate of the peak rate again at the next SEP. It will depend on future data.”

Click here for the latest economic news and economic indicators to help you in your investing decisions

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Download the Yahoo Finance app for Apple or Android

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, and YouTube


So next Jump according to the above will be .25 or .50 and come on Feb 1.

we are about 4.5 they seem to predict we top 5. this means say a .50 on feb 1 and maybe a .25  in mid march. time will tell but no short-term relief is in site for these rates.

So many are simply betting on bonds. the 5 year rate is 3.94 on fed t-bill it starts to look like a safe bet to shift into them then hope for a fed pivot.

the two year t-bill is 4.34%.

These number are attracting players that are looking for a pivot in 2023.
5605  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: lowest hashrate that hit a block in the last 3 years on: December 30, 2022, 01:35:16 PM
Currently all solo on a pool that's under development.

I have been asked to not give info out on this pool so I will say 1 thing I am pointing 1 s19 pro to his pool.
5606  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor on: December 30, 2022, 01:27:37 PM
maybe he can do something to fix what happened.

Personally, I can't find a scenario where the hacker would find it beneficial to return the funds.

On my end, I still doubt the administrator's good faith. It seems completely insane to not check the address associated with the coinbase after a random server reboot.

I'm waiting to see, but I'm not optimistic.

Ultimately the pool op is responsible. One miner lost just over 6 coins and maybe the reward of 0.18 also belongs to him.

Its close to $100,000 loss for that miner. The rest of us lost maybe 1 or 2k split between us.

My loss is 0.011 just under 200 usd and I was not on the pool when the block was hit so I did not get the reward.

As for the hacker giving the coin back you never know. Stranger things have happened.

My s17 is pointed to the pool but is rolling over at the moment to the secondary pool.
5607  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: How badly can natural disasters stop mining operations? on: December 29, 2022, 10:03:44 PM
I read an article which says that Bitcoin mining hashrate fell more than 13% in one single day, but yeah it recovered back since and is almost near to where it was. Bitcoin mining difficulty reached an ATH of 35.36T and it's being said that it may drop to more than 7-10% due to the US winter storms.

On Chrismas eve, BTC’s hash rate fell over 40% because major miners in the U.S. had shut operations due to the winter storm. While the hash rate soon recovered on Christmas day, peaking at around 247.87 EH/s, it has gradually declined since.*

The above mentioned statement shows that natural calamities can definitely hinder towards the growth of mining industry and even show such big plunges in the numbers. Do you think that some day, if miners are to stop their mining for a longer period, maybe a week or a month (very least/rare chances of this to happen), will it become an opportunity for small miners to merge and mine and try their luck at finding a block when the big numbers are out of the game for some time?


*Source

No. China cut hash rate by 50% in April of 2021 all that happened was 1 very slow diff period of 20 days or so and a price drop,

then when gear was relocated we had a second diff rally and price rise.



5608  Other / Meta / Re: This forum will need explicit rules on the use of AI. on: December 29, 2022, 09:58:42 PM
I agree with @philipma1957, all we need is just explicit disclaimer. If usage of AI can improve post or discussion quality on this forum, i'd welcome such AI.

Also, it is straightforward to detect GPT3 content, there are AI detection sites that do just that.

Do we know how reliable such website? Does it work against specific user input (such as using certain writing style) or have low false positive?

Well look at my difficulty thread  if it says any are AI it is not accurate as I do not do AI and I think no one else does so on that thread.

I think the problem is if you put those posts  at least 10% would test as AI.

In order to not test as AI you need a lot of original thought vs combining 3 posts and voicing an opinion on them.

If you were to go to my difficulty thread

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5378628.0

There is a ton of variation on a common theme. (the difficulty)

for instance

Quote

https://www.bitrawr.com/difficulty-estimator

Latest Block: ? ? ?

blah blah blah
blah blah blah

..... quote


happens over and over and over in that thread.

It is not ai or google but it is a lead source of DIFF stats

and will be repeated thousands of times.

I would love to see how that thread does on AI testing.

we have done them for years
2022
2021
2020 and many more
5609  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: mmpool.org - 1.5% fee DGM/PPS - tx fees/vardiff/merge mine/tor on: December 29, 2022, 08:22:20 PM
maybe he can do something to fix what happened.
5610  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: Bitcoin's Future: What Happens When the Block Reward is Lower Than Fees? on: December 29, 2022, 02:24:53 PM
My question on this topic is what is the role of whales in such a situation?

I mean how would whales who own thousands of bitcoins worth millions of dollars react when they see mining rewards drop and miners abandon their machines as the price of bitcoin continues to drop?
Will they be content to watch their bitcoins collapse in value in front of their eyes? Or will they do everything they can to raise the price of Bitcoin again?

I think it's an important question.

Duh whales will move to doge.


 Doge has endless legs as the 10000 coin reward never ends.

So the supply is not limited like BTC, but the 'printing' of coins interns of percent gets smaller every year.

ie:

year 1  x coins
year 2 2x coins 100% inflation rate.

year 5 5x coins
year 6 6x coins 20% inflation rate

year 10 10x coins
year 11 11x coins 10% inflation rate

year 20 20x coins
year 21 21x coins 5% inflation rate

year 50 50x coins
year 51 51x coins         this is 2013 + 51 = 2063

rewards for btc would be about 0.00305 in 2064 see below





All of above is why I said we should go to 8 year ˝ ing to stretch the dropping of rewards out over a longer time.

same 21 mill coins but making 20 minute block times and 72 blocks a day gives system more time to adjust to the drop-off.

I would argue the  worst things for btc are

1) 4 year ˝ ing
2) is only 8 digits not 10
3) LN
4) block size should go up on a regular basis we can get to 32 we are at 2

those four things make doge look really good in 2064
5611  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 29, 2022, 02:14:19 AM
Buddy almost has me back in range for a 16.5 4x dca buy.

Come buddy just a bit more.

we are waiting on a  S19j pro as part of my btc gear.

and we have the Friday nite dca in effect.

So Nov and Dec of 2022 have been golden for accumulation.


Here's hoping for a very slow sideways descent for 2 more months.

Then maybe a slow sideways lift for 2 more months.  Basically 4 months in the 14.8k to 18k slot would get me nicely setup. I would have added a lot more hashing. And a lot more Coins.

5612  Other / Meta / Re: This forum will need explicit rules on the use of AI. on: December 29, 2022, 01:47:03 AM
Here is the rule you are asking for.  Posting plagiarized content is not allowed.

In that case, we need admins to explicitly state on the rules that the use of artificial intelligence for the creation of content here is considered plagiarism. Otherwise, someone could argue that there was no connection between the AI and the old rule itself.

I would suggest the administration to ban AI for the "writing" of posts here on the forum unless it is clearly being used for reviewing or entertainment purposes, being mandatory for anyone to share the link to the AI used, after quoting the AI -generated text.



AI is not plagiarism.

Many people do not understand plagiarism.

You need a new rule to ban AI or to list the post as AI generated.

I would prefer making sure All AI is simply marked as such.

And all unmarked AI that is found is banned for hiding the fact it is banned.


My reasoning is if I do a google search and list the info here as a googled found item it is okay to do this.

Thus if AI is a better google allow it if marked as such.


@ mprep I guess simply saying it is ai is much the same as saying a google search is the source of the info.


5613  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: 2022 Diff thread. on: December 28, 2022, 03:52:19 AM
Quote
https://www.bitrawr.com/difficulty-estimator


Latest Block:   769195  (8 minutes ago)

Current Pace:   89.5809%  (1100 / 1227.94 expected, 127.94 behind)

Previous Difficulty:   34244331613176.18                            
Current Difficulty:   35364065900457.12                            
Next Difficulty:   between 31694346291721 and 32388199153975
Next Difficulty Change:   between -10.3770% and -8.4149%
Previous Retarget:   December 19, 2022 at 10:12 AM  (+3.2698%)
Next Retarget (earliest):   January 3, 2023 at 5:12 PM  (in 6d 18h 21m 18s)
Next Retarget (latest):   January 4, 2023 at 1:16 AM  (in 7d 2h 25m 23s)
Projected Epoch Length:   between 15d 7h 0m 42s and 15d 15h 4m 47s
Copy stats to clipboard


so we are now 128 behind

we should have done 318 blocks since Mikey posted we did

285

so 318/285 = 1.1157-1 or 11.57% off the pace over the last 2.2 days

or 89.5406% turned into 89.5809%

at this rate 31.4 t could be new diff

BTC price is under heavy pressure.

The rare price follows diff move could be developing.

Last time was when china cut miners off 40-50% and diff tanking was followed by price tanking.
5614  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 28, 2022, 03:48:25 AM
What's up Wall Observers,

I'd like to reach out to my Lightning Network channel peers.

Due to the recent revelation of the data breach of LastPass, I have decided to shut down my node. I'm a customer of theirs, and even though I'm confident my password is strong enough to withstand any brute-force attempt, I've decided to change everything I had stored with them. Without disclosing too much, that affects my lightning node as well.

Oh well, before shutting down, let's share some statistics.



My node has a total capacity of 10.76 btc among 110 channels.

The node has been up for 193 days. During those days I've routed 150 BTC, and the profit is 730k sats (0.0073 BTC). On average I've routed 1 BTC per day over the past 90 days. My record in one day is 2.6 BTC and over 1,000 routing events.

Anyway. Once I'm all set, I'll start a new node and open a new channel to my fellow WO LN-operators (you guys know who you are)

so 0.0073 x 16,700= 121.71 profit over 193 days so about 63 cents a day profit.


do you define the 0.0073 profit from all fees you collected?

I don't care about power cost
I don't care about the hardware cost
I don't care about the software cost.

I am trying to understand the actual profit these nodes are doing.

Since we will need 1 million or more of them if btc succeeds .
5615  Other / Serious discussion / Re: Can anyone tell this thing how is that possible on: December 28, 2022, 01:49:48 AM
Can anyone tell how is that possible that so many people
Are possesed by devil.
Experts who can detect those ones have detected there alot of them.
Question is did they born this way ? Did they learn this or did they did some spefic rituals to get evil spirirt inside of them.
And how come they are so motivated to do evil but they act like they Are friendly and Nice but actualy they are not.

Can any experts of here can explain about this

There is a good book on the subject.

People of the Lie by M. Scott Peck

https://www.amazon.com/People-Lie-Hope-Healing-Human/dp/0684848597/ref=asc_df_0684848597/?

I read it years ago.
5616  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 27, 2022, 03:11:04 PM
It seems like the market is keeping its eyes on Grayscale at the moment. Rumors are starting to circulate that they could fall and have to liquidate their holdings, which would likely send the Bitcoin price down below $10K. We’ve reached the gambling part of the bottom. Will the dominoes continue falling or is this peak market fear and time to buy. I guess we’ll have to wait and see how 2023 goes to get our answer.

What source for that rumor do you have?
5617  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 27, 2022, 04:09:11 AM
Bitcoin has been stuck between $16,000-$17,000 for one week.




Please quote my post...

done
5618  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 27, 2022, 04:07:46 AM
WELP, they destroyed The Witcher, don't even try to watch it unless you want to puke.

Even though I know it's Henry Cavill's last season on it, I'm not even about to watch that hot mess, or ever again. Nor any of the "spin offs".

Season 2 was bad enough.

It's about sending a message. Full boycott.

Down with the bullshit agenda that Hollywoke is pushing.

good to read this as I quit after season 1.
5619  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 27, 2022, 01:28:27 AM
Just received below SMS... only if it was BTC...


It's a trap!!!

To me, it looks like you are richie.    Wink

<snip>..sorry it was becoming too long to quote
[edited out]
In addition: my IRAs and bitcoin would, hopefully, provide the bulk of the future cash flows.

Sure there is going to be some variance in the timeline on a lot of these matters, and for sure, the longer that any of us had contributed into a system, then we might have become reliant upon being able to get some income stream from various work-related retirement systems that we had invested into.

Attacks on the pension systems had surely gone into higher modes since the 80s, and yes it seems that there was borrowing against and mal-investment in regards to social security systems too - since those systems should have been self-sustaining, except that the government was allowed to borrow against that particular system - and yeah of course other health and welfare benefits have been juggled in a variety of ways too... to contribute towards difficulties in keeping them solvent.  

So, yes some of those systems have decent chances of imploding..

Of course, many of us in bitcoin have considered that bitcoin is a way to supplement or to replace some of the other directions that we might have otherwise been able to receive cashflow after we are no longer ready, willing and/or able to work.

Some of us may have been contributing more heavily into bitcoin, and it may have not even been for reasons of believing that we were going to need bitcoin to supplement our status quo cashflow areas, but then maybe in more recent times, including since March 2020, it has become more apparent (to some folks) that various aspects of status quo and traditional systems are imploding faster and more severely than we thought to be likely or possible.

I am not sure if 20 BTC is going to be enough to supplement the cashflow of any person, even though it seems that something like 100 BTC right now would be enough - yet of course, devil is in the details in regards to how much we need and when we need it..

I guess when I mentioned 100 BTC being enough, it is building on Phillipma's assertion from a month ago or so that 100BTC would not be enough for a 50-year old right now, and saying dumb shit about that 50-year old needing to sell some of his BTC blah blah blah.. which just seemed bonkers to me... actually to me it seems that around 82 BTC would be more than enough to be in entry-level fuck you status as long as you are able to wait until the BTC price returns above $24.4k - assuming that at some point in the coming 3-12 months or so that BTC prices will return above the 200-week moving average that is currently at $24.4k.

Anyway, of course, money management.. and of course no guarantees.. and surely by the time we start to get into our 50s or later, then it would seem that many of us shoudl have already created and maintained some investment portfolio that goes beyond merely having BTC and perhaps taking our other income sources, whether social security, pension, 401ks and/or other sources like that with a grain of salt... but still the various uncertain sources of income likely have greater than zero present value.. unless you really are assigning high values to Armagaeddon scenarios.

82x16800= 1,377,600 while it may be a nice chunk of change it is not entry level fuck you status.

5620  Economy / Speculation / Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion on: December 27, 2022, 01:00:32 AM
[edited out]
How the fuck do you write so much ?

I don't know.  It just seems to happen to happen.



Not complaining as I post like a mofo but not with the precise writing that you try to do.

Fair enough.

I tend  to write like James Joyce just let it rip.

Stream of consciousness style.

Will have to keep that in mind for the next time that I am working towards critiquing something in your direction... .and maybe say:  "fuck that James Joyce bullshit" or whatever might be the critique.

I have a USA based theory of why the gov does these games with interest.

Surely you should be able to appreciate that we go beyond the USA in this thread and in this forum - even though we are talking about the USD as the other side of the trading pair listed in OP.

I base it on the Long Island railroad retirement system.

see below:

My step dad is 90 years old.
He worked for the Long Island Railroad from the age of 22  to 52

he has been in retirement for 38 years. 8 years longer than he worked.

his son my stepbrother is 60
he got a job in 1984 or 1985 with the long Island railroad he was 22 or 23.

He retired at 55 he is on pension for 7 years.

his son is 25 he is working at the Long Island railroad for 3 years.

The model above does not work cannot work if every family in the USA was setup the way they are it all falls apart.

Why would you want to lock yourself into some model that has been undergoing all kind of changes over several generations, and even the design of work evolved within previous work/employee/retirement plan systems.

Some of those kinds of guaranteed pension jobs still exist - but they are so fucking rare that it makes little sense to base your thinking on those kinds of systems, or even proclamations that certain kinds of jobs are disappearing and blah blah blah. 

There are a lot of kinds of industries that exist, and there are various kinds of changes in world dynamics too - in terms of how WWI and WWII had played out that put the USA into a kind of advantaged position that is undergoing changes, and sure there might be some possibilities that the USD might be able to hang onto dominance in one or two more 12 year cycles?  and even the cycles are changing and the dynamics from within trying to keep all of the balls in the air could come crashing down... or maybe not any time soon.. but still consider ways to be prepared for various kinds of balls-crashing-down scenarios.

So the feds play pendulum with war ,interest rates ,unemployment . In an effort to keep it all from imploding.

Now I would argue it has not fully imploded since 1929-1939 which they fixed with WWII.

I am hoping they avoid the next full implosion better than they did back then.

We will have a much better idea by 2024 Nov just how fucked the USA will be.

In a general way, I cannot disagree with any of that.. except that I still believe that when we get into specifics and your various ways of trying to prognosticate short term matters
 - especially how it pertains to my lil precious, you come to all kinds of weird and inaccurate conclusions, and still wondering why the fuck does any presidential election matter as much as you are suggestion of how much importance you seem to be putting within a stupid-ass timeline involving USA presidential politics? Maybe you should flesh out your hypothesis a bit - even though it is likely to just lead to more nonsense and even contribute towards my throwing up my Christmas meal from yesterday because you will be trying to outline specifics that you likely currently believe but you are just NOT currently stating.

The Long Island railroad model is only an illustration of the issue.

how bout this.

  USA go to school in 1975 lots of good cheap colleges get out at 21-22 zero debt get a job blank blank blank..

USA go to school in 1996 not as many good cheap colleges get out at 23-24 as you need a masters to compete with the ones that graduated in 1975 and you have a small loan maybe 25k


USA go to school in 2017 almost any college cost at least 60k more like 200k get out at 23-24 you better have a masters to compete with the ones that graduated in 1975 and 1996 and you have a larger loan over 100k.


that is the education twist on the Long Island Railroad example I gave.


As to why I use USA simple USA is still the fiat standard (how long does it have?)

and USA so far was able to heavily fuck the world market by raising % rates for the dollar.

Which is many countries are trying to do BTC and which is why the dems let SBF shit all over (JJG you will love this) BTC using FTX and all the shitcoins (other than LTC + Doge).

Does this clarify it a bit more.


Please remember it is always or almost always just written in stream of consciousness.

Pages: « 1 ... 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 [281] 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 ... 2309 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!