|
I also want to support dkbit98's proposal. I know him as a responsible participant in the Croatian section. I remember his investigations into detecting scam projects in the Scam Accusations. Really respect dkbit98 for her firm position. I have no doubt that a fair merit-source will come out of dkbit98, which will be able to correctly evaluate worthy posts.
Dkbit98, I wish you the best of luck!
|
|
|
|
leogamdridTokens with a new system called defi have become a topic of conversation in the crypto world today. Where price movements are more expensive than BTC, of course this is a special attraction to see further how this token will move and what the movement will look like in the long term. Let's take a look at YFI's price movements today
When you look on all altcoins, that are tradeable on binance futures , YFI and TRX are the only two altcoins, that are still holding above 21 daily MA. YFI is still moving in downtrend corrective channel, we have big bullish divergence on 4hr RSI + we will be testing very strong support very soon. After I see some decent bounce, I will be checking lower timeframes for LONG.[ archive ] Original with an earlier datehttps://www.tradingview.com/chart/YFIUSDT/nTpBNF0A-YFI-USDT-the-strongest-altcoin/
|
|
|
|
hello legendary, my bitcointalk account not multiple. I am changed my twitter facebook account. many user used my profile his man cheaterer. is not me.please tust me.and withdraw my red tust.
Looks interesting to hear, so who is the account using the same ETH address, if you do not have many accounts here. I have a slightly different opinion about the two accounts. Please note that the social networks of salma700 were different until May 2018. And with them, there are no intersections with any account on the forum. A year later, this account wakes up. And new social networks and wallet numbers appear. These social networks and wallet numbers are shared between the two accounts. My opinion is that the salma700account was either sold or hacked, but today it is an alternative mohiulbd |
|
|
|
============================================================================================= Ban evasion.oklik Autoban user111ruble bannedETH 0xfD42695fF979F132b66021c540a772e749E8e206
ETH address: 0xfD42695fF979F132b66021c540a772e749E8e206
[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.nguyennhahn Autoban userrisk1988 banned[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.BitSat Autoban userBitSat19 banned[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.Yarsk Autoban usercizatext banned[ archive ] |
|
|
|
Both of them are in the control of the same social media accounts.
Perhaps today you will create a new rule. Every day I come across many alternative accounts, one of which was previously marked with a red tag. What are the owners of these accounts doing? They just create a new account. And it's all. Until today, I have not met anyone with a red tag for this. By the way, I already asked about it. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg54867987#msg54867987Maybe it's time to discuss this rule? I agree that we understand that the second accounts are created by the same people. That is, nothing changes. But since against the newly created accounts, I can't find any reason to flag them, I just post them to this thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg55186652#msg55186652 |
|
|
|
Most likely, this is different. Rkss4 account is marked with a red tag. By the way, his accusation is identical to this. To be honest, I see no reason to punish someone for having two accounts. If they don't register with the same company, then there is no crime. The owner is now creating another account as some bounty companies do not accept accounts with a red tag. And today it is inactive. OP your investigation could be moved to this topic. In order not to create dozens of topics for each case of searching for alternative accounts. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0 |
|
|
|
Do you believe in coincidences? Your Facebook name is the same as the other two.  Go ahead, look at the profile[ archive ]  And finally the third account. Watch the names carefully.
Are you sure there is no match?[ archive ] 
|
|
|
|
It's probably because they are already tired. Countless efforts on participating on different bounties but will not receive any good amount of profit from their work. Who's not gonna get tired if this kind of a not so good faith keep happens to you? Bounties that are not worth to put any effort keeps on popping, no good return on the bounty hunter leading them to a conclusion to leave this crypto space.
I really hope that some worthy bounty to come up and atleast give those bounty hunters what they deserved.
Frankly speaking, participation in bounty campaigns was not limited to one account in the past. Each bounty hunter had several alternatives. Today, bounty requirements have become tough, and a lot of people on the forum are tracking cheating. From here, you can calculate the real number of people that could have been on the forum in the past, if by that time you apply today's conditions. |
|
|
|
These three accounts are subscribed to a Twitter company run by manager @yahoo62278. At the request of the manager, participation of multi-accounts is not allowed. Anyone trying to join with 2 accounts(1btctalk acct multiple twitter accts, or 1 twitter acct multiple btctalk accts) will be banned with no pay
The owner of three accounts, a very absent-minded person. His reports show how often he mixes up his alternate accounts. breaking the company's bounty rules3 Accounts Connected:1. Saddam Bin Delowar2. Ruma 3. SumaiyaSamu
Proof:
[ archive ] [ archive ] [ archive ] ##PROOF OF AUTHENTICATION##
Bitcointalk Username: Ruma
Telegram Username : @Ruma303
Campaign : Twiter
Spreadsheet # : 206
Ethereum Wallet Address : 0xa12a839f76eFe1eBfC05132387D5F37606B1463b
[ archive ]  The cheater logged in with the wrong account.  BCT Name: Saddam Bin Delowar
[ archive ] [ archive ] [ archive ] Here I mixed up the bounty reports Related Addresses:https://mobile.twitter.com/BinDelowar
https://m.facebook.com/faria.faru.566
SumaiyaSamu
Campaign : Facebook
Bitcointalk Username: Ruma
Facebook Account: samia samu
[ archive ]  Also, one account violates ban evasion.Ban evasion.NABILA AKTER SHILA Autoban userNadiya Akther[ archive ] |
|
|
|
Возможно Засад переусердствовал с тем, что описал эту загадку на свой лад? Если следовать его описанию, для меня это выглядит так (О):Я буду с вами спорить и докажу вам обратное
(У):Хорошо, только при одном условии
(О):При каком? При условии ,что вы говорите правду. Или другими словами "вы честный"? |
|
|
|
|
Everyone who is in DT today should understand that by leaving their tag, they are doubly responsible. Since their correct remark in the user's trust should either warn that all connections with a particular account can be dangerous. Or vice versa, by leaving a positive review, they thereby support the one to whom the tag was left.
The most obligatory note is that a reference link must always be left with proof. Simply writing "good person" or vice versa is not correct for members of the DT.
I agree that the review must contain convincing information.
And also everyone who has not yet become a member of the DT should understand that after the expiration of time, it is possible that they can become DT. All previously left reviews will be visible to all forum members. What information will be there? Really loyal and correct, it will reflect on the reputation of the member of the DT who leaves the tag. And also to wonder if this could be called a "breach of trust" in the future.
|
|
|
|
============================================================================================= Ban evasion.hanif90 Autoban userRehan47 bannedERC20 Wallet Address: 0xffd3eDdD39F8D22d0B60e2F8d7247e1bc95AEC07
ERC20 wallet address: 0xffd3eDdD39F8D22d0B60e2F8d7247e1bc95AEC07
[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.auchit Autoban userdhakadhak5 bannedETH Address: 0x059f3d99f6E62dC289739DcB667DaAAC2DE895B4
ETH Wallet Address- : 0x059f3d99f6E62dC289739DcB667DaAAC2DE895B4
[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.Ray155 Autoban userRocky93 banned[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.kochua Autoban userBazlu bannedETH address: 0x25bdb269612Da6e25F05700f0597289bf6CDB996
ETH Address: 0x25bdb269612Da6e25F05700f0597289bf6CDB996
[ archive ] ============================================================================================= Ban evasion.Chauhuy Autoban userZilata bannedETH ERC20 WALLET:0xd3c304f68bE3CfCc898aAc52BA776904b2497D2b
Wallet erc20: 0xd3c304f68bE3CfCc898aAc52BA776904b2497D2b
[ archive ] |
|
|
|
Don't know how exchanges can still trace those tainted bitcoins. If that time will ever come, these hackers will be very happy.
Most exchanges already have an anti-fraud monitoring system. And the cryptocurrencies entered by the user are checked for origin. At the slightest suspicion, the source of origin is specified, if it is not there, then the cryptocurrency is returned. Can a cryptocurrency pass through mixers be considered clean by exchanges? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
