Sepertinya dikunci OP. Saya tidak mengunci thread tersebut dan kemungkinan besar Sapta juga tidak.
Thread tsb di lock oleh seorang administrator, bukan moderator.
Sedikit membingungkan tentang alasan kenapa thread tsb dilock oleh admin.
Makasih gans infonya. Mungkin bisa tanya juga ke rumput yang bergoyang *lul Serius jawaban ini di luar ekspektasi ane, ane pikir ada pelanggaran apa gitu... PS. ane tanya cuma karena gemes belum sempat ninggalin jejak sudah dikunci, bukan curiga konspirasi Rheumason. |
|
|
|
@Ifra24 Ane bantu share yang menurut ane bermutu: Sedikit menambahkan lagi bahwasanya HF Ethereum Constantinopel ini mereka akan mengembangkan 5 Ethereum Improvement Proposals bukan hanya tentang masalah jaringan dan hadiah para penambang, akan tetapi semua diperbaiki. Nah pengembangan ini melalui sebuah proposal yang disebut (EIPs), dalam hal ini EIPs akan menjelaskan mengenai beberapa masalah seperti biaya, kecepatan, fungsionalitas, dan masalah penambang yang akan diperbarui melalui Hardfork Ethereum Constantinopel. Berikut saya kutipkan gambaran dari Hardfork Ethereum Constantinopel. -snip- Posting yang lain lumayan lah tapi " not quite my tempo", lanjutgan! |
|
|
|
Saya setuju dengan pendapat agan
Ane lebih tertarik kenapa username ETFbitcoin tidak mendukung Bitcoin ETF ( mindfuck), mungkin dahulu pernah mendukung lantas berubah pikiran? |
|
|
|
LOL, I hope so dude! But it's too early to fap. Let's see if it could reach $4k or not.  Source: coindesk |
|
|
|
Decentralization is an ambiguous word. I'm afraid this problem is more "political" than technical. It's about what kind of device (money) that you are willing to invest or include in the bitcoin network. The bigger the block, the more infrastructure you need to be able to process the block. The current system where every user is a network node is not the intended configuration for large scale. That would be like every Usenet user runs their own NNTP server. The design supports letting users just be users. The more burden it is to run a node, the fewer nodes there will be. Those few nodes will be big server farms. The rest will be client nodes that only do transactions and don't generate. Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=532.msg6306#msg6306Above is Satoshi's opinion. Core team might have a different opinion about this matter, but I'm not interested in politics. "Big blocker" and "small blocker" could be correct at the same time. Let's see what will happen in the next few years. |
|
|
|
|
It's about trading strategy. If you are sure that the project you are investing in is a good project, then you might dump and buy back later when the price is low.
Why would you hold if you are sure that the dumping is inevitable? Both smart investors and smart hunters dump and buyback.
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, elections affect the market because they can impose new macroeconomics policies that may or may not favorable to the investors. However, it only affects local (one country), not global, with the exception of US and China.
For example, if the US FED raises the interest rate (stops QE), there is a strong probability that the global market will slow down.
Since India's influence is not that significant, global market such as cryptocurrency is not going to be affected that much.
|
|
|
|
That is, in your opinion, the use of my author's photo for the purpose of causing moral damage and trolling is a "Fair Use"?
Depends, example:  Stop it, just click "Report to moderator" and type your reason as doxing or privacy violation. Let mods decide. But if you scam people, your odds are small. AFAIK |
|
|
|
I recently posed a question to Satoshi and I've realized that the 'NOUR' post may actually be the correct answer.
Could you please give us some enlightenment related to this matter? This newbs want to learn. Please.. |
|
|
|
Plagiarism is the use of my photos without my knowledge and the main thing is editing them as my own, applying inscriptions.
Wrong. Definition of plagiarize: to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own : use (another's production) without crediting the source Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarizingYour copyrighted work can be used without your permission if it classified as fair use. What Is Fair Use?
In its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and “transformative” purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner. In other words, fair use is a defense against a claim of copyright infringement. If your use qualifies as a fair use, then it would not be considered an infringement. Source: https://fairuse.stanford.edu/overview/fair-use/what-is-fair-use/Your problem isn't about copyright, but about privacy and doxing. |
|
|
|
@anu1908 I humbly step down from your challenge. Source: coindesk #beer |
|
|
|
Bump #500Merits Looking back to the past, I never think that I will reach 500 merits with only 406 activities. I think this guide pretty much sums up how to get here from nothing. What I learned from the past one and a half years: - I think I have made some improvement with my written English. - Definitely more knowledgeable about Bitcoin and some altcoins (still newbs though). - Can spot obvious scam projects. - A lot of interaction with good people here. - Put shitposters to the ignore list. - Click "report to moderators" link. - Can spot alts accounts. Special thanks to the merit sources, and see you again in "#1000Merits" bump in 2021 2023 lol " Stay hungry, stay foolish" - Steve Jobs |
|
|
|
|
The answer lies on the Dogecoin price. LoL
But you might also consider market inefficiency as a part in the variables that affect price movement.
|
|
|
|
Firstly every destroyed bitcoin, is a bitcoin actually lost forever, meaning available bitcoin are even less than theoretically available, thus increasing value of remaining bitcoins.
I think I read somewhere that we can recover the lost bitcoin later in the future (20+ years), oh here: Cryptanalysis never get worse, it always get better with time. One day, the current algorithms used to secure bitcoin could get old and weak enough. It will probably be, as it typically is with cryptanalysis, a gradual process. First there will be some unpractical, but theoretically possible attacks, then some practical, if not too hard or improbable, then with a good equipment and enough money it will be possible to spend those coins and finally everyone will be able to do that with their PC. This whole process will probably take years of slowly advancing cryptanalysis.
The bitcoin community will probably adapt a new algorithms which will require a new generation of addresses when the current algorights will be close to be broken, but the old coins will remain insecure as long as they are on old addresses. That will probably require users to transfer their coins to the new-generation addresses to secure their BTC. If that will be the case, the lost BTC will remain on the old addresses, where they will be vulnerable to retrieval. It will result with a new enterprise of retrieving those coins, which will therefore return into circulation. Source: https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/57654/curious-about-lost-bitcoinBut you are correct it is a bull case because, in the not-that-long run, BTC supply will get more pressure. |
|
|
|
Pertanyaan yang ambigu dengan berbagai jawaban yang ambigu. Dengan mengabaikan aneka variabel seperti cryptocurrency yang mana*, bagaimana cara mengakses jaringan (tor, vpn, dll), uang tunai yang seperti apa, maka menurut ane memang uang tunai secara umum lebih sukar untuk dilacak** *Kripto berbasis mw menghapus intermediary information[1]**Uang tunai masih bisa dilacak dengan serial number atau berbagai teknik lain [2]Kalau tentang anonimitas bitcoin, sudah dijawab oleh Satoshi: ....
We don't want to lead with "anonymous". (I've been meaning to edit the homepage)
"The developers expect that this will result in a stable-with-respect-to-energy currency outside the reach of any government." -- I am definitely not making an such taunt or assertion.
....
Sumur: [1] https://github.com/mimblewimble/grin/blob/master/doc/grin4bitcoiners.md[2] https://www.google.com/search?q=marked+bill&pws=0 |
|
|
|
|
IMO, Even though Zeux seems like a much better project than 99% of shitty projects here, you shouldn't use another person image to "hide" those Chinese Citizens. It can be considered a crime (if those are not public domain stock photos). This practice deserves a red tag in our community, whether your project is really a scam or not.
I'm afraid there is nothing you can do to recover your reputation in this forum. Perhaps AMA could help, but I'm skeptical it could convince eight DT members to untag you since you already "lie."
Actually, it's better if you exclude those two members from the beginning (or keep it anonymous) instead of using someone photos without permission. This is the rule in this forum, nothing to do about your intention to scam people or not.
|
|
|
|
Untuk mengetahui efek opini publik yang muncul dan beredar dalam bisnis trading. Sehingga para pelaku trader lebih memperhatikan manfaat pembentukan opini.
...
Pemberitaan seputar Bitcoin ini sedikit banyak mempengaruhi pergerakan arah pasar
...
Berdasarkan pemaparan contoh diatas saya berpendapat perlu pembentukan opini yang positif terhadap bitcoin.
...
Pernyataan yang ane cetak tebal sudahkah dilakukan tinjauan pustaka gan? Ane sudah pernah mencari tahu tentang hal ini, berikut ini hasil temuannya: Public interest is negatively and significantly associated with weekly returns.
Negative publicity is not significantly associated with returns. Sumber: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169556Berdasarkan tinjauan pustaka di atas, buzz malah memiliki hubungan negatif dan signifikan dengan return. Kemudian, berita negatif tidak memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan return. Ane tidak mengatakan hal ini juga berlaku sekarang ya karena penelitian itu dipublikasikan di 13 Januari 2017. Tetapi silahkan agan cari dulu penelitian serupa yang paling baru yang mendukung hipotesis agan. Silahkan di baca pada jurnal tersebut faktor apa saja yang memiliki hubungan positif dan signifikan dengan return  |
|
|
|
By the way, what is disadvantage of KYC for bounty hunter? Did they have posibility use our data for bad thing?
Your data is expensive since it can be used to manipulate many things. For example, about consumer database. A bad company can pass your data as if you are its consumer to inflate its reputation and stuff. This unethical practice is quite common, and I consider this not that severe by the way. The more severe case is that a bad actor can use your data to launder money (and tax evasion), or sold it to black markets (to create fake IDs to illegal immigrants). How about project who have starting ICO in exchange platform? Such as LATOKEN.. Did they have more succeed percentage comparing with regular ICO?
It helps a little bit, but not much. Even small exchanges can provide "some" liquidity. It won't really help if the project is shit. Fundamental is the king! |
|
|
|
Menurut saya Peraturan ketat gak bakal menghambat kemajuan suatu forum sih. justru disini member dituntut untuk disiplin dalam mentaati peraturan. Hasilnya ya forum yang rapi bersih dari thread yang kurang bermutu. Maaf sekedar pendapat pribadi  Menurut saya Peraturan ketat gak bakal menghambat kemajuan suatu forum sih. justru disini member dituntut untuk disiplin dalam mentaati peraturan. Hasilnya ya forum yang rapi bersih dari thread yang kurang bermutu. Maaf sekedar pendapat pribadi Betul sekali, Forum sudah memberi peraturan yang terbaik. Peraturan ketat itu penting sekali agar para member lebih disiplin dan dituntun kearah yang lebih baik. Ane kira sudah cukup ya bahas-bahas peraturannya, masih ada dua soal yang belum ane jawab: 3. Banyak tuyul, banyak rejeki
Pernyataan ini bisa dikaitkan dengan game theory - zero-sum game dan tragedy of the commons
4. Futures bukanlah instrumen untuk mengatasi volatilitas
Apa itu forward contract, futures contract, dan volatilitas? Formula yang populer digunakan adalah black-scholes
Akan ane jawab pada bulan ini dan thread ini akan ane kunci. Untuk yang ingin dapat merit, silahkan sebelum ane akhiri challenge ini. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
