|
Hello. Can anyone tell how many tokens the project’s founders put up for sale on pre-sale?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. I don’t really understand why you need brokers and exchanges in the project and how investors can work with them?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello, can anyone suggest how the BTC exchange rate will depend on? I would like to know, with the rate of which exchange will be linked its value on your platform.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi. I like taking part in amateur tournaments but they always got problem when it comes to payments. How long payments are going to take in this platform?
|
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon. You’re going to keep 15 million tokens in reserve. What fate will they meet and what will they be spent on?
|
|
|
|
|
Salute. Tell me, if I sell my products on Hamster, will you let me open a campaign to raise funds on Kickstarter?
|
|
|
|
Hello, comrades. Do the founders of iBuildApp Network plan to sell all 100 million tokens during the sale?
Hello. No, there will be only 15 million IBA coins at the upcoming sale. |
|
|
|
|
Good day. Can you somehow confirm that there will be really reliable information about the company’s income in the “Income wallet”. It’s desired to be some kind of official documentation, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon. What are the network contacts via which users will be able to learn about existing of new useful mini-apps?
|
|
|
|
|
The most important thing concerning any land issues is the legitimacy, legitimacy of transactions, my friends. How is this introduced here?
|
|
|
|
|
BenQ generates the lease price in the platform automatically. But what if lessor or lessee doesn’t accept it? can they just negotiate it on their own?
|
|
|
|
|
Hello. There was a point that token holders will have access to numerous metrics in order to track the development of the Storiqa platform. Does anyone know what metrics will be available? Tell me please, it’s very interesting to me)
|
|
|
|
Hi. I’ve noticed that undergoing KYC is mandatory. Will people who are 18 years old be able to take part in it?
I believe that the decisions will be made for each participant personally. On the other hand, if you’re already 16, then you can submit your passport data and check it out. |
|
|
|
Good afternoon. I can’t understand: on the one hand, the tokens of your platform are positioned as crypto currency, and on the other - the majority of users will prefer to pay for the necessary services in a fiat currency. How will this affect the value of the token?
As you have correctly noticed, this is a crypto currency, but its liquidity is provided 100% by a platform, and there’re no probable prerequisites for a drastic price reduction in the near future. In addition, the deficit of CAN tokens is a scenario close to fantastic. Why do you think so? If a person pay for services with tokens, and the performer wants to withdraw funds from the platform in a fiat currency, we can observe a tight linkage to the market value of services. This option will be popular until the crypto currency is used everywhere. First, if the performer wants to exchange tokens to fiat means, he will need to go to the stock exchange and sell them at a market price. Secondly, the demand for tokens will constantly grow, as soon they will become the only currency in the turnover of the platform. Thanks for explanation. I just assumed for some reason that the conversion would be occurred in the app itself, without involving third-party exchanges. But if the price of the token is dictated by the market, then there shouldn’t be any problems. |
|
|
|
Good afternoon. I can’t understand: on the one hand, the tokens of your platform are positioned as crypto currency, and on the other - the majority of users will prefer to pay for the necessary services in a fiat currency. How will this affect the value of the token?
As you have correctly noticed, this is a crypto currency, but its liquidity is provided 100% by a platform, and there’re no probable prerequisites for a drastic price reduction in the near future. In addition, the deficit of CAN tokens is a scenario close to fantastic. Why do you think so? If a person pay for services with tokens, and the performer wants to withdraw funds from the platform in a fiat currency, we can observe a tight linkage to the market value of services. This option will be popular until the crypto currency is used everywhere. |
|
|
|
|
Good afternoon. I can’t understand: on the one hand, the tokens of your platform are positioned as crypto currency, and on the other - the majority of users will prefer to pay for the necessary services in a fiat currency. How will this affect the value of the token?
|
|
|
|
It should be really interesting at the start of the marketplace’s operation: unknown manufacturers with cool and useful goods, excellent competition and much more. But what will happen over time? Vendors will develop to the level of "big" players and then new small manufactures won’t be able to win their competition in Hamster. Then Hamster will turn into what Amazon is now, and lose its main idea ((
And do you know that Hamster isn’t a permanent marketplace for companies? The developers position it as an intermediate stage between Kikcstarter and Amazon. It means that when certain results are achieved, the manufacturer leaves Hamster and moves to a site like Amazon in order to offer his products to a wider audience. Therefore, there will be no problems with the development of new small producers. And how will the process of transition of an already large company from Hamster to Amazon take place? Will it be compulsory or by choice? If a manufacturer has a choice, can a company go to Amazon and at the same time stay on Hamster? After all, who wants to lose potential buyers, even if there’re little of them... Good afternoon. It seems to me I’ve heard that the process of leaving Hamster will be forced. So when the vendor reaches certain financial results, he is asked to leave the marketplace, in order to prevent him to hamper the development of other young companies. Therefore, the platform should be supported by constant competition between small companies, large organizations don’t belong here. It is very interesting at what financial results will the company be "expelled" from Hamster. Friends, does anyone have this information? This point became really interesting to me))) No one has said anything about it yet, but I think that it is still difficult for developers to predict this. They need somehow to actually evaluate everything and then make a decision. In this case you can use math a little: first, companies pay 20% of each sale in the form of a commission, and then can switch to a monthly fee of $ 25,000 per year, when the amount of the commission for the same period exceeds this amount. Let's say the average cost of a product is $ 100. Vendor pays a commission of $20 per sale. He needs to sell 1250 products per year or a little more than 100 of them per month to accumulate $ 25,000. With this nember of sales the company won’t be kicked out of the marketplace. As a matter of principle, 100 sales per day is not much. Therefore, I believe that vendors can be excluded from the platform with sales volume of approximately 2500-3500 units per year. But this is only my subjective opinion, let's see how it will turn out. You provide us with very interesting calculations. But it seems to me that the vendor who has just arrived to the site will find it difficult to compete with those who already make 100 sales a per month. Therefore, they can spend much more money on marketing than beginners. Yes that’s right. I think that developers will make some restrictions on the use of marketing tools to at least somehow level the capabilities of manufacturers. For example, each vendor will be able to raise their ads no more than 3 days in advance. Then everyone will have time to do it and get their clientele. That would be really cool! By the way, is there still no information about the full list of marketing tools that will be available in Hamster? I’ve just heard only about highlighting ads and coloring them in the list. |
|
|
|
It should be really interesting at the start of the marketplace’s operation: unknown manufacturers with cool and useful goods, excellent competition and much more. But what will happen over time? Vendors will develop to the level of "big" players and then new small manufactures won’t be able to win their competition in Hamster. Then Hamster will turn into what Amazon is now, and lose its main idea ((
And do you know that Hamster isn’t a permanent marketplace for companies? The developers position it as an intermediate stage between Kikcstarter and Amazon. It means that when certain results are achieved, the manufacturer leaves Hamster and moves to a site like Amazon in order to offer his products to a wider audience. Therefore, there will be no problems with the development of new small producers. And how will the process of transition of an already large company from Hamster to Amazon take place? Will it be compulsory or by choice? If a manufacturer has a choice, can a company go to Amazon and at the same time stay on Hamster? After all, who wants to lose potential buyers, even if there’re little of them... Good afternoon. It seems to me I’ve heard that the process of leaving Hamster will be forced. So when the vendor reaches certain financial results, he is asked to leave the marketplace, in order to prevent him to hamper the development of other young companies. Therefore, the platform should be supported by constant competition between small companies, large organizations don’t belong here. It is very interesting at what financial results will the company be "expelled" from Hamster. Friends, does anyone have this information? This point became really interesting to me))) No one has said anything about it yet, but I think that it is still difficult for developers to predict this. They need somehow to actually evaluate everything and then make a decision. In this case you can use math a little: first, companies pay 20% of each sale in the form of a commission, and then can switch to a monthly fee of $ 25,000 per year, when the amount of the commission for the same period exceeds this amount. Let's say the average cost of a product is $ 100. Vendor pays a commission of $20 per sale. He needs to sell 1250 products per year or a little more than 100 of them per month to accumulate $ 25,000. With this nember of sales the company won’t be kicked out of the marketplace. As a matter of principle, 100 sales per day is not much. Therefore, I believe that vendors can be excluded from the platform with sales volume of approximately 2500-3500 units per year. But this is only my subjective opinion, let's see how it will turn out. You provide us with very interesting calculations. But it seems to me that the vendor who has just arrived to the site will find it difficult to compete with those who already make 100 sales a per month. Therefore, they can spend much more money on marketing than beginners. |
|
|
|
Of course, innovation is great, but why should one use a platform like CREDITS, if there are no differences between it and traditional solutions besides the use of crypto-currencies and smart contracts. So there’re just financial services that can be arranged in other services, too.
And according to you, the use of crypto-currencies and smart contracts is just a minor difference. CREDITS service reduces the possibility of fraud to zero due to this approach, while there’re a lot of scammers in traditional tools. In addition, everyone can get services cheaper, faster and better in CREDITS. And why services will become cheaper, faster and better? And in general, it seems to me, it is just a myth. If the project will provide maximum security, the cost of services should increase, too. Maximum security is achieved with the help of the use of smart contracts. You don’t need large resources to create them. With regard to reducing the cost of services, this is achieved via the work of the platform on the peer-to-peer principle which means the absence of any intermediaries. Your answers are well founded, I’ve even got interested in some points, so I'll follow this project and I'll see how it will develop. I’ve noticed an interesting point, it is said there that the system will have a completely "peer-to-peer structure". Can you explain what it is? |
|
|
|
|
I don’t fully understand: will you collect funds only for new enterprises, or will those ones that need modernization also be able to participate? It’s very important for me.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
