Fomo will increasingly give a negative tension and this often happens when panic becomes unnatural with some mistakes in making orders, but on the other hand, delaying trade does not have a good effect, unless the trader actually follows the road map of each coin observation. at one time, scalping went well, I was more used to it than waiting for a prolonged momentum.

1$ will be deducted from the total trading fee, and if you are lucky it can be accumulated regularly, but still more difficult than thought, minimum capital must be greater than that because many coins in the market have a minimum number of trades above 1$ (per token). there is no other way than to increase capital.

independently it is true, but it is abstractive because the government cannot monitor it. Investment and skills, these two things play an important role in determining its users, although every day new users will emerge, but will not be able to move on a large scale, most will return to unemployment or find other jobs.

decentralization will not run perfectly until any time, human beings have their own interests and even include committing crimes, and that is where all things are created centrally with the aim of being a monitor and balancer. But in reality it does not become more fair. Crypto provides many things to be stronger in building a system that actually returns to an economy based on human resources and real transparency. The government must indeed be involved because they are only reliable regulatory determinants even though there are some impacts that are not in line with the initial expectations.

many new smartphones are thinking about crypto wallet implementations, but they are not connected with brands that are popular and familiar throughout the world. Samsung has answered it quite well, the most significant impact is that its supporting partners also have a beneficial impact on the market, we can see how ENJ's movements are truly unexpected. I hope that what Samsung does is able to spread to various other smartphone brands.

What is important to me is the market where the coin can be traded, especially for markets with competitive volumes. Then is analyzing the supply of coins they provide and compared to market capitalization. the third is the development of these coins in their long-term plans. developer activities in their coins are also highlighted by market analysts.

the amount of exchange will make the variable more attractive in accordance with the objectives of each party, but if it is not proportional to the quality, it will be very weak in gaining volume. But in the end there will be competition that leads to a more popular and reliable market and that's where the real quality will emerge.

the desire to find ways to reduce the loss ratio is obtained from many factors. for example by following certain signals and then researching them personally. so it can't be instant to memorize all available methods. But many traders make mistakes in speculating profit ratios and how to handle coins that must be sold immediately because of inappropriate momentum, this experience must be explored because daily trading sometimes runs erratically outside the target

ICO quality is currently not supported by strong partners. there must be a classification level in this case and must be applied directly to third party operators such as direct exchange markets. looking for investors is not too complicated, but the quality of a bad project / promotion will also destroy many things that are actually good.

excessive stress is also not good, market capitalization that is still high still opens crypto hopes for a better return, but will move slower because the market is also still looking for opportunities to at least move at an accurate support point in the market, and at the same time must trying to analyze earnings in altcoins.

Op is just a little annoyed by phone verification, etc. Many users like binance because it's not too strict about verification for transactions below 1 btc. But I think almost all markets still apply the same system except those mentioned by Op. This also happened in Huobi Pro, and I chose a more conditional market.

Check asset prices do not need to log in on the exchange market and only need to use the related application. They use the same update base as CMC. I also use smartphones for trading related to other work activities, but good specifications are also important because trading requires a rather large amount of memory.

many ICOs are almost perfect in the whitepaper and in the basis of the proposal, but if further explored by direct communication with the parties related to the project, differences will be seen between each other. There are already some members of this forum who seem to help analyze some ICOs that appear more authentically, we just need to be more subjective afterwards to the developers directly

several times the momentum occurred for speculation to rise, but it still seems that the market has not been optimistic to step higher and only rely on medium profits in accordance with their capital. prices have not touched the bottom, and the possibility of more falls can occur, but some of the correction prices that occur indicate many who want the opposite and continue to try to meet the optimal point at the current price.

comfortable looking for the best moments in market conditions and happy to be in it will make more profit ratios. Maybe you should try it and continue to add technical improvisation. I'm really tired of waiting, but it's not too bad to at least stay active, occasional breaks are needed to reduce stress.

2018 is not the only price comparison, at least we can look for a longer comparison, slow market movements are supportive to determine the level of correction, but if this continues, market speculation is feared to be sharper down, At least if there are not too many Fud, I am sure that price increases will also be progressive again if it is fundamentally good.

usually there is one momentum for each special pump and it must be analyzed correctly, many traders take this opportunity with maximum capital, and this is not classified as greed, I understand this after much chatting with them because market conditions also get good short-term reactions to profit target.

the quality of chat from the project community also needs to be considered after paying attention to the details that we consider valid, don't be fooled by a large number of members because it can enlarge directly from the airdrop program etc. We also have to look at the analysis of prospective investors because they will be very influential in many things that can be done after the ICO has happened and the next process is on the market.

Improve personal quality to analyze the projects you want to follow, it is rather futile to complain because not all have good prospects. Sales failure also determines and this is still a vital phase that is very decisive. This can be further strengthened like what happened at the IPO, but there is no such thing.

strange if escrow accepts offers from projects that structurally have data obscurity, especially those involving teams and developers. reputation will be at stake if escrow makes a blunder with details of the project that are not strong even though they act as guarantor. I am sure there are special considerations from those who accept the offer and can be considered right based on their perspective.