No I believe that unique visitor and unique impression is understood at the same level

the problematic stay the same if it is the advertiser who chose the ad space or a-ads system.
At my eyes...
I do not understand why for 2 ad spaces almost at the same place on a page the different income for the publisher and of course then so much difference for the advertising who pay.

Someone wrote me and said:
do not put more than 1 a'ads on your page because the second does not make money...
it this is in mind of many publisher,they will go to concurrance compagnies.
And if advertisers think that the banners are not wiewed by unique visitors,then they will not pay for it.

If you visit the investment graphic page you can see:


this means that if your own pending investment is 0.0046788360BTC you get 10% of the dividends offered.

let's suppose that now a new investor invest 0.0467883600BTC
then he will get 50% of the dividends and the one who has 0.0046788360BTC he will have 5%

You can see that it is all in full transparence in a real econnomic situation.

Why it is definitively not a ponzi sheme?
because the profit comes NOT from investors money but from site's income.

You can follow the profit of each investor and in your mind you can see if you have done well or not investing or not investing.
After it is easy to see...
The game is to bet on profit...
As it is said:
you can only win...a little or more...but you cannot lose.

I do not ask you to invest:
I propose you to analyse if it is profitable for you.
The more people will analyse,the more investors will have dividends.
If you believe that many people will analyse,then it is perhaps profitable for you to invest.
If many analysts and few investors,then it is good for investors.
If many investors and few analysts,then the pie to divide will be small.

If something is not clear...feel free to ask.

I'm now testing a-ads with 15 banners displaid on my sites.
I feel something wrong.
The system is certainly ok,but it is not understood by the advertisers.
(by the publishers certainly not undertand too,but I will only talk about advertisers)

The question is:
Are advertisers not manage well the a-ads system?
or
Is the a-ads system not enough  informative or do the information mislead the advertisers?

Example:(it's only an example)
I have on my site 2 banners almost at the same place.
For one a-ads say:100 unique views.
for the other close at it 10 unique views.
The advertisers are almost not interested by the 10 unuque.
All advertisers pay for the 100 unique
and almost nothing for the 10 unique.
For me if I see a page...with 2 banner spaces at the same place,the both spaces are worth the same.
But a-ads say indirectly to the advertisers that one is seeing 10 time more by unique visitors.

If I compare a-ads with other ads companies the difference is till bigger.
I have for two close spaces more advertisers and more incomes by other ads compagnies.
Why?
Certainly because if I have 5 banner spaces viewed by 100 unique visitors and a advertiser see 100 for 4 banner spaces and only 10 for one...he will pay for the 100 and not for the 10.

Banner spaces are not unlimited on a page...webmaster will go there where it is the best paid by advertisers...normal...
I believe if the difference I see on my sites is so big,it is why a-ads informations for advertisers is misunderstood and advertisers go to other compagnies...

which assurance can I give?
is over 20 years hold promises not enough?
do you think I will start to scam for few satoshi?

I have exactly the same as above...can someone help me?

It's clear:
it's a ponzi sheme.
But everyboddy is warnt:


If with this investors are not warnt it will not be your warnings who can do more.

IT'S A GAME.
Why are you so preoccuped about players money?

You can prove black of white that it is a risky game...
because it is a game where players can win...people will play...
it is so...you cannot go against:the game's love is stronger than all your warnings.

The first investors have already got back 60%

The cashback is given to take the investment game more "dynamic".

As already said:
If you believe that the cashback is to much important...re-invest it.

Total time logged in: 11 days, 14 hours and 8 minutes.

Page comportant des logiciels indésirables !

virus?

thanks nickaizoku for your trust.

if we analyse the graphics we can see on 2 graphics that the profit can become worth if a big investment is done.

it is why we cannot know even if the grapf says :better...better...better.. it can change if the situation changes.

I repeat it:
It is not only an simple investment system,it is a investment game where you are in front of real econnomic situations.
And we are till at the start.(it is why I talk about start-up)

Remember that you have cash back.
After each cash back (sent or not sent to you) your investment  is decreasing but not your investment rate.
Your investment rate only decreases if a new investment is done.

I can only give you the investment rate per line...because I do not know who own the lines.
if you invest 0.001BTC and at the end you earn 1000 satoshi (it's an example)
it's not 0.001BTC who have make 1000 satooshi because before the end of plan you have got back 90% of your investment.

So far i sent back packs of 10%
if in the future more have invested...I will perhaps send back paks of 20% or 30%
Only rule:
100% + dividend before 100 days.

so far:
for the first investors in 30 days 50% has already been sent back.










 

I do not know if it is water...
but if fish are in it...then certainly.

My investors have not the problem:
withdrawals are made by me...
if it is not done then I'm a scammer and no need to discuss about during years...

For Xapo it is sure... but I read something about many wallets...i do not remember
but i have so far 3 wallets on xapo and it is fee free

(lol)
We have now the "stuck"
1 stuck = 1 euro.

https://www.facebook.com/lestuckstrasbourg

Day after day I'm more satidfied about Xapo

yes from:
faucets
ad spaces
referral commission.

Total time logged in: 11 days, 11 hours and 52 minutes.

So far good  "money doubler" have never exist do not exist and have never exist...

Return profit?
All my sites and i have so many that i do even not know how much I own...
all my sites return profit...why not this one?
Have you already visited this site where you can invest?
yes?
then you have certainly returned profit.(in average yes)
no?
then you have perhaps returned profit.
funny not?
Someone will perhaps read your message and go on this site and then investors will perhaps earn cash...
if i'm wrong...i will pay it from my poket...but i'm seldomly wrong...and so far you can be sure i'm not wrong...
what you see on investors account will be paid.
I know the past...I manage about the past...
i do not know the future...it is why You will never see about future profit.
The graphic pages you see on the site are past and present...that be sure I assume.

when you see that a site is scam,then it is already to late.
If you say it before you see it,then it is to soon (lol)