|
Send > look at the lower left of the highlighted window > click Advanced Send > Scroll down til you see "Transaction Fee" > Adjust the fee > Next step > Send.
|
|
|
|
|
Mining using a GPU has long been dead (for BTCitcoin) and nowadays people use ASIC mining rigs instead (they have massive amounts of hashing powers in comparison to GPU's), so look for those instead.
Cloud mining on the other hand, it's a big "NO" since almost all of them turn out to be scams along the way so don't invest there.
If you don't have thousands of dollars to invest in best and efficient mining rigs out there, I would advice to just buy BTCitcoin directly instead of acquiring it through mining (which depending on what you use, might take a while to earn some).
|
|
|
|
Are there fewer empty blocks?
No, that's irrelevant. Have transaction fees increased?
Yes, before the halving, the norm was around 60 Satoshi per byte but now is at 90-100 Satoshi (as of late). Have any miners dropped out?
Yes, there was some overall hashing drops after the halving which makes sense: less reward and profit ratio = more miners stopping the process. Is there a consolidation with some miners buying other mining companies?
I think you meant rigs instead of companies. As long as it would be efficient enough to make a profit then yes, but very minimal. Has the price of mining hardware dropped?
The older ones always drop whenever a much more efficient miner comes out plus whenever they turnout to have lesser profit over time. Is there any indication of future changes that miners will adopt?
Time will tell... |
|
|
|
Why have you send the 0.01 BTC to the donation address instead of mine?
WinBIts could you delete the donation address, it's clearly misleading users. Update:Thank you, I appreciate it. |
|
|
|
I would like to confirm being chosen to be the escrow for the two mentioned jackpot games: http://bitcoin-gamez.com/ 1 BTC and 0.1 BTC jacpot games. My BTCitcoin address: 1Gm5K2H2fjD2oiTn4rWC5GwQMn2xMUBc5g -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I, SFR10 of bitcointalk.org, would like to confirm being chosen to be the escrow for the two mentioned jackpot games (today is 12/13/2016): http://bitcoin-gamez.com/ 1[btc] and 0.1[btc] jacpot games.
Address to be sent to: 1Gm5K2H2fjD2oiTn4rWC5GwQMn2xMUBc5g
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Gm5K2H2fjD2oiTn4rWC5GwQMn2xMUBc5g
H3SnPLBgMOq1EQ/huEGb+V96+t3Px9kaAa/fF4mH/YhJFisezYLYGLK0XJvVenRLavhneVJxggPw+LhrUA9lWjQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Spreadsheet for 1BTC JackpotSpreadsheet for 0.1BTC Jackpot |
|
|
|
I would like to inform everyone that 0.07 BTC is in escrow now (my fee is also included in it, so 38 27 13 users would be safe for the 1st week since there's some bonuses as well): -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is SFR10 from bitcointalk.org and today is 12/13/2016. I would be acting as escrow provider for "zahra4577 forum posting job thread". 0.07 BTC has been sent to my address: https://blockchain.info/tx/f92a27017e6309cc91e815d1ad0616d4ec585512e35bd24ff6677485f2daef93
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Gm5K2H2fjD2oiTn4rWC5GwQMn2xMUBc5g
IBIohyP96Wqqa4jmEl+bm3kT+C3AZM3Rog6x3oe0G8tVPeuGqwDkYRtg8e32p2tcxxNXvoJo0N50qXscHX5u4W8=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Sorry for miscalculations, only 27 users are safe instead of my mistake of 38 users initially. Unedited version: http://archive.is/YoYAFUpdate:Quoted for future reference I am considering to increase the rates and have asked the escrow's advice for the same.If SFR10 agrees,we will pay double of current rate per comment.
But due to limited budget,this would requires us to reduce the number of participants.
Those who have already applied will stay.
But according to my calculation we would only need 13 participants then from current 27
EDIT: SFR10 has approved the changes but with slight modification.We can now accommodate only 13 users.
Op has been updated with new pay rates
|
|
|
|
Here's my entry  |
|
|
|
|
Although I support your suggestion (which it makes everything well organized than it's now), It's highly unlikely that there would be any added sub-board to services board since there's isn't enough active threads for such cases, considering when there was a similar proposal for signature campaigns (with more active threads), it never got implemented.
|
|
|
|
The only advice I could give you in regards to navigation (in case you got lost), is to always go back to "Home tab or Bitcoin Forum (located at the top left of the screen)" and find your way from there or use the search option from there (so it could search all the database). less "bulky" version or way to view this forumProfile > Ignore Boards Preferences > Check boards you wish not to see and click Change profile > less "bulky" version Furthermore, this thread could help you with some future questions: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1217042.0 |
|
|
|
Here's a sample of how the table could be a bit more compact. Current table: | | | | | | | | | | | A | | | | Campaign | | | Term | | | Legendary | | | Hero | | | Senior | | | Full | | | Member | | | Junior | | | Newbie | | | Min | | | Max | | | Escrow | | | | | | 777Coin | | | post/weekly | | | ** | | | ** | | | ** | | | 0.00017 | | | 0.00012 | | | 0.00006 | | | x | | | 20/w | | | 80/w | | | Y/N | | | | | | WhyFuture | | | post/weekly | | | 0.00032 | | | 0.00032 | | | 0.00027 | | | 0.0002 | | | 0.00012 | | | 0.00006 | | | 0.00005 | | | 15/w | | | 45/w | | | Y | | |
Proposed table: | | | | | | | | | | | A | | | | Campaign | | | Term | | | L | | | H | | | S | | | F | | | M | | | J | | | N | | | Min-Max║Escrow | | | | | | 777Coin | | | p/w | | | ** | | | ** | | | ** | | | .00017 | | | .00012 | | | .00006 | | | x | | | 20/w-80/w║Y/N | | | | | | WhyFuture | | | p/w | | | .00032 | | | .00032 | | | .00027 | | | .0002 | | | .00012 | | | .00006 | | | .00005 | | | 15/w-45/w║Y | | |
Changes:1. Changed post/weekly to p/w (suggested by alani123 and kotwica666)
2. Changed rank names to their first letters only
3. Combined the last three columns into a single column
4. Removed the 0 before the decimal point
The 2nd and 3rd (modified with shorena's suggestion) table fits perfectly up to 1024 x 768 resolution.
Update:May I suggest not to cram Min-Max and Escrow in the same field?
Sure, here's the modification with your suggestion: | | | | | | | | | | | A | | | | Campaign | | | Term | | | L | | | H | | | S | | | F | | | M | | | J | | | N | | | Min-Max | | | Escrow | | | | | | 777Coin | | | p/w | | | ** | | | ** | | | ** | | | .00017 | | | .00012 | | | .00006 | | | x | | | 20/w-80/w | | | Y/N | | | | | | WhyFuture | | | p/w | | | .00032 | | | .00032 | | | .00027 | | | .0002 | | | .00012 | | | .00006 | | | .00005 | | | 15/w-45/w | | | Y | | |
Changes: 1. Reverted back the last column into two columns (suggested by shorena)
|
|
|
|
~Snipped~
I don't have time this morning to review posting habit changes. Can anyone verify/discredit this?
I would like to verify the habit changes on the involved account (different style of posts), even though "Joel_Jantsen" has a point about possible sell of the account, it's also somehow suspicious for the user to start posting at exactly a year after it went off (known behavior in most hackers that try to get away since the dates will look similar and some might miss the year being different due to both connecting posts being at November month). Personally I think it's more of a hacked account, rather than a newly sold account. |
|
|
|
~Snipped~
It won't be listed here since they pay " ICOBID Token" and all of the campaigns that are listed here, are those that pay in BTCitcoin. |
|
|
|
No, VPN usage doesn't conflict with the transaction procedure (in any way). The issue is, due to the usage of an unconfirmed input (2nd link). In other words, that transaction should receive confirmation first prior to the transaction you posted here (that's making it's confirmation process to delay). Update:~Snipped~
Yes, it does mean you send an unconfirmed amount of bitcoin first (that was the error a while ago), but everything is fine now ( the transaction has confirmation already). Sending the appropriate fee together with usage of confirmed inputs would be the solution (information for fees are mentioned by MartinL in below post, hope it helps). |
|
|
|
What is the normal amount of bitcoins transactions in queue? Currently it is close to 30000 transactions.
I have a transaction waiting for over 16 hours now. It has a fee, so am I guarenteed that it will be confirmed?
I don't think there's an specific amount of transactions in queue to be considered normal but as of late, it's usually around the 30k mark. Usually the fee gives the assurance of receiving the confirmations later on but judging by your situation (16 hrs and counting), it seems you've used a fee lower than recommended and that's why it doesn't have a confirmation yet. Would you mind posting the transaction link? |
|
|
|
1ij5jZSQzuP2E76roJYpoGTpxvtjsNkiQ
please send to this bitcoin adress it is linked to my neteller acc.am really sorry for disturbing you a lot
Please release 0.1 to Prince V and return rest to 1XUTqKQyBwgmTz2vZKiwMepQ6fptxFKhq and thank you for resolving a complex situation
Released: https://blockchain.info/tx/f3f94c9327832785378e1df155e437fa20dc298d5beda42b40c53c254cba6db2
Would like to also thank everyone that helped in solving this dispute, I appreciate it.
Locking the thread now. |
|
|
|
|
Since the only thing that is stopping the deal to go through with the agreement of 0.1BTC for prince V, is him changing the hosting details of laura007, then I would appreciate if prince V would send the new details to laura007 (in private / PM), so we could wrap this up. Once I receive a confirmation of laura007 having his hosting account back, I'll be releasing the respective funds to both of you (according to the agreement).
|
|
|
|
Yes, I'm well aware of the situation and understand (everything is posted in the 1st link of the thread), but he no longer wants to continue working with you (due to previous breaches). its ok pay me 0.1 cant expect anything more.
I won't be releasing any funds until both of you come to exactly the same agreement (in terms of the amount), since it still differs from each other. I'll be monitoring the situation until there's a definite agreement between both of you, then that's when I'll be releasing funds. Currently waiting for laura007 to respond here. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
