Partial Repayment confirmed. Previous due was: 0.03762771 BTC+ fee 0.0011288313 BTC Total: 0.0387565413 BTC, repayment done 0.0163 BTCDue now: 0.0224565413 BTC, Thanks. Loan Amount: 0.59 ETH Loan Purpose: Personal Loan Repay Amount: 0.69 ETH Loan Repay Date: 24 May 2019 or earlier Type of Collateral: No Escrow profile Link: Na Ethereum Address: 0xBe7EF3035b38Dd34f9F14F173e90083C0A595978
This is the same address as last time. Do i need sign a message again with my bitcoin address?
Loan request accepted. ETH sent. TRX: https://etherscan.io/tx/0xf4291209a22773a4bb953573376b0a68a712d90492d8d055c050aa6f41ade0b5Repayemnt address: 0x032e9A4385e850C7cC912Ff59B1f47B71B9C75BE Please repay on or before deadine.
|
|
|
For 10%, 5%, 15% there is a figure right? Example 0.1 btc, 0.2 btc 0.05 btc. So, cant we ask the exact amount when we want to trade? As you don't have negative trust and higher rank I can't say that you are a scammer. But when you told the previous two people not interested to trade and trying to increase post then I can't say anything except which I told you. Anyway, still interested. If you are interested then quote the exact amount of those coins and the exact amount of BTC. I rarely post on trade section If I do not want to trade/help someone/aware someone. And you also mentioned two people I thought I was on that as I wasn't on those two people I have no issue. Edited: I have tried 3 sites which price is on average or on above average of them 2 doesn't support my country and one has disabled deposit fund. So, can't take it, thank you very much for your pm.
Your rate was enough good.
|
|
|
Yobit maximum profit from investbox is 7% (only specific coins). And yes this is obvious PONZI scheme. I am suspecting Yobit might run out with investor's fund eventually. Might be I would wrong, but its highly suspicious. Their current promotional strategy isn't indicating that they are trying to build their reputation once again. Most likely they are targeting new users to invest or trade on their platform. Users should aware about their shady activity and I believe most of bitcointalk users know that. On the other hand current discussion about Yobit increase more awareness about their shady activity.
Investbox is obviously a Ponzi scheme. On there all most all the coins are the shit coin. They listed only BTC, etc, doge and eth which are real. Other coins on Investbox are shit. If they ran away then they will be able to scam these investbox coins but more important is that they will be able to scam all the funds which are deposited on their site.
|
|
|
You have received message or post from scammer not from the yobit (though many people think yobit is scammer too). But the message or post are not from yobit. There investbox plan is: https://yobit.net/en/investbox/invests/Never Believe any information from unofficial person or post. Edit: If you want to say them scammer then you can call for their investbox plan, lsiting shit coin, running fake ico like https://yobit.net/en/trade/PLUTO/BTCAnd few others but your accusation is totally from wrong side. It cant be scam accusation. If you want to make aware about yobit then it is ok.
|
|
|
Oh, really sorry I can't see the transaction on my receive wallet as I think it requires 1 confirmation to show. Note: It is an exchanger.
Then, you can't use ChildPaysForParent (CPFP). FYI, the balance will reflect after 3-6 confirmations. What was the wallet that you've used to send the transaction?If you're lucky enough and using a wallet with a turned-on ReplaceByFee (RBF) by default, do a RBF to the transaction in the history ( for the sender). Also, consider changing the fee estimation from " blocks" into " mempool" ( ex. 1mb from tip) since I find it more accurate and reliable than block estimation. I am using electrum and it usually had parent pays for the child. But can't see this option for the transaction. I have already made mempool.
Now I can't see the transaction on https://live.blockcypher.com/But showing on the blockchain.com
|
|
|
You can do CPFP by spending the freshly generated (unconfirmed) outputs in a new transaction with a fee which is high enough to pay for both transactions.
Choose the unconfirmed 'coins' as input and set a relatively high fee to perform a CPFP.
Or - if the transaction is marked as 'replacable' - right click on the transaction and choose 'increase the fee'. But this requires you to have more funds 'in this wallet' (which i guess is not the case here).
Oh, really sorry I can't see the transaction on my receive wallet as I think it requires 1 confirmation to show. Note: It is an exchanger. I saw parent pay fees for other transaction and also just now saw for another transaction but I can't see it for the transaction which I am facing the problem.
|
|
|
I have tagged them for ban evasion. Now you are happy? Do you still think they don't deserve a negative tag? What theymos said has nothing to do with what you're quoting. It is very likely that you are abusing things via alts as well. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I also think that.
|
|
|
Setting 'block confirmation within X blocks' is just an estimation based on the current mempool / fees.
I know. If there are going to be more transactions the next hours, it means that it will take longer until it gets confirmed.
Yes, but it is taking more time than usual. Already 132 blocks confirmed but not mine. It seems you are the sender, so in this case you have 2 options to 'speed your TX up': - CPFP: If you didn't spend the whole inputs, and still had change coming back to you, you can spend this change with a very high fee (enough to pay for both of your transactions)
- RBF: If you have the RBF-flag set (default in electrum, i think; btw, which wallet are you using?), you can 'replace the fee' of the transaction and increase it.
I am sender and receiver. I mean I have sent from 1 wallet to another. The balance was empty I had deposited again and then sent fund to another address. that has been confirmed on the instant block but the previous transaction still unconfirmed. I am using electrum and there I saw parent fee but now I have no option like that. I have marked on RBF but can't see increase fee option. If it is not urgent, you could simply wait until it confirms. Based on your statement you have chosen a fee below 10 sat/B, right ? If you take a look at the amount of transactions waiting to get confirmed in the mempool, it still could take some time. Not urgent but waiting too long is boring. Yes, the fee was below you mentioned. Fees estimation was: ETA now selected mempool. you must use CPFP or ask the sender to use RBF.
How to use CPFP ? That's why it has been stuck for a long time. On 2017 I saw 1 transaction confirmed about 2 months later. Have you tried using antpool: https://www.antpool.com/user/prioritiseTransaction.htm?m=savePrioritiseTxI used it last year to get my transactions with 5sats/byte confirmed and they confirmed within 10 mins. Fortunately this year I've never had or heard any problem with low-fee transactions and hence you won't find much posts about this issue. If antpool doesn't work, you can try contacting Quickseller as he used to help confirm transactions first for users. Not yet checked I will check within a few hours if not get any better solution also I may contact with Quickseller as per your suggestion.
|
|
|
I had set up default block confirmation within 25 blocks. But 117 blocks passed and still no confirmation. That's why the fee was low. And I have seen a lot of post like this created on before 2018. But there is no post like this in 2018 and 2019 that's why I am creating this post. I have tried to use https://pool.viabtc.com/tools/txaccelerator/But they are showing either limit exceed or low fee. In this case what to do? Any suggestion?
|
|
|
You are unresponsive, working only for a signature campaign, Liar and probable scammer. -snip
Calling someone a probably scammer based on nothing is not a great idea. I don't think tyz is a scammer, and I don't think he's posting only for a signature campapign, No need to get aggressive over one post. Save those words for when they're true If not then why s/he told we are posting to increase our post? Where s/he has not sent me any pm and not responded to me on my pm. And why s/he told a lie? A liar cant be a probable scammer?
|
|
|
I'm still looking for someone who is interested to buy. The two previously, obviously just wanted to increase their post count instead of having serious interest.
You are unresponsive, working only for a signature campaign, Liar and probable scammer. You replied on your thread after a long time, and when you replied by saying to pm you I sent you PM within 37 minutes. You have still not responded and it is 2 days passed. So, how dare you tell that we are posting to increase our post instead of trading.
See how many trades we (shasan and condoras) done on this forum. And without any response, you are telling we are trying to increase post only it seems to me that you are trying to scam. Because people will think we are not responsive or not eager to trade than lower ranked people will contact you and you will ask upfront and lastly you will scam them.
I have made an additional 50% post last week than my post requirement.
|
|
|
Let me know if you can confirm it for free: 6dab85b7cbc4ec13b70281c7a2d84003bc7a8f371ddebb000fcfdb21db46ae06
Seems like some ninja guy is using native segwit address to save fees . It isn't fair to add 1 sat/B fee in a transaction worth $5k ? Anyways, it can not be done for free . I can only give it a shot . Okay, if you cant, no need. Thank you.
|
|
|
Let me know if you can confirm it for free: 6dab85b7cbc4ec13b70281c7a2d84003bc7a8f371ddebb000fcfdb21db46ae06
|
|
|
17600 new posts have been made in the last 24h (total, across the whole forum). 13660 new posts have been made in the last 24h outside of Bounties (Altcoins). Yobit spam is ~20% of all posts, or ~26% of non-bounty posts. Another way to look at this: they're creating nearly as much shit as bounty reports but it's spread across the whole forum and pretends to be non-shit. I think this calls for a new Yobit board and banning of Yobit signatures elsewhere ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) I suspect Yobit will cut a lot of these participants, I don't really see them spending this much on bitcointalk advertising.
I'm guessing we'll see "scam accusation" threads when shitposters realize they're not gonna get paid. I'm sorry but I think the script is not working properly. Many members have already left the campaign since yesterday or saturday and there are still in this list. For example Fortify left the campaign since one or even 2 days now from what I've seen and its trust score is 136. But we can see him as a participant with a trust score of only 30 in the list... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Trust score can vary person to person for including/excluding people on/from your trust list.
|
|
|
By any chance, can I apply for a full member spot?
Yes, you can but 2 conditions: 1. First, earn merit 2. Wait for the announcement.
You have earned 0 merits this year. Which is not accepted on this campaign. Your last earned merit about 7 months ago. Source
|
|
|
Sorry for off topic. Why low ranked members are also wearing the yobit signatures? maianh09They said only Sr.member and up. Either they are getting paid for the bug of yobit or they think they will get the payment or they are just trying to spam.
|
|
|
FoBoT Used personal text ★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange instead of ★YoBit.Net★ 1400+ Coins Exchange to hide themselv from auto search but caught. Archived for future reference. Many people will try to hide from the auto search by various ways.
|
|
|
[REQ] (0.015BTC)(#Eugene, Oregon USA)(Payment of .020BTC on 4/26/2019 before6pm)
Looking to build credit with a lender willing to take a chance with me having no collateral. I will provide any verification documents and phone numbers for employment and income verification as needed.
Wallet Address 3PH9iXGYLDH7B8hDzYRWxdEc7z9DwsCwzr
"No collateral no loan"
|
|
|
|