Bitcoin Forum
June 24, 2024, 02:15:18 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 ... 349 »
5921  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Transactions with identical hashes on: November 17, 2010, 07:35:51 PM
The network can't do it for you.
Yes it can. The network should demand that valid blocks have the block number hashed into the coinbase before accepting the block. The way that hashed transaction values are used in bitcoin demands that reasonable effort is made by all parties to ensure that they are unique. Clients already make a number of checks before accepting blocks and this should be one of them. Of course the onus really falls on the mining clients to check previous blocks. All the more reason why it should be easy to make your own highly optimised mining program without having to worry about keeping the network healthy by ensuring your software performs adequate checks. There should be a mining interface to the current vanilla client.

ByteCoin

What if you modify your client so that the coins are sent to an address for which no private key was generated? Is the network still at fault?

I don't know enough to have an opinion of this particular situation, but obviously to some extent custom miners need to make sure they understand how the network works.

If somehow it was said or implied that what they were doing would be fine, then obviously that should be fixed or made clear.
5922  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Using mathamatical proofs as currency backing on: November 17, 2010, 07:30:45 PM
Impressive how people are so concerned about "backing" money with something... you're missing the point.

And by the way, nothing has inherent value. Wink

The point of backing the bitcoin with proofs is that it is a digital "product" and thus totally anonymous.  As of now, I would not use bitcoins because I can't exchange them for anything of value without risking breaking the law.  However a completely digital exchange can be done with much better security.  Unfortunately, proofs don't have much of a market right now.   

I don't know where you live, but it hardly matters. You cannot live any kind of life whatsoever without guaranteeing that you will break the law at some point.

Even if you pay taxes on that haircut that you bartered with you your neighbor you are probably in violation of zoning laws.
5923  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Possible anomaly with the recent $0.50 peak on: November 17, 2010, 06:52:46 PM
This is silly. "Extremely large scale speculation"? How am I not seeing the billions of dollars of BTC derivatives?

Wait, i meant "extremely large" on bitcoin scale, not on world scale. This is relative.

It's strange to have a problem with someone thinking bitcoin is going to be huge and puts their money on it. Anyone buying is "speculating" that it will work out well for them.

Actually, by "speculation" i mean repeatedly buying and selling large amounts of bitcoins in a short amount of time.

Don't hold your breath for 'stable' BTC/USD either. It probably won't be stable until you can't get 1BTC with all the worthless dollars ever printed.

Agreed here.

Okay, I was a little over the top.

If you go to the market and buy a bunch you push the price up for yourself, and then when you sell them you push the price down and you lose money.

If anyone is doing this then they are just giving money away, which is fine.

What is actually happening is that people "make the market" by offering some for sale and offering to buy some. If they offer the best deals on both sides and other people take those deals then they make money. They are getting paid for offering the 'service' of a lower spread.

And this decreases volatility compared to what it would be otherwise. I realize it doesn't look this way. When ever the prices move a lot it is true that speculators trade a lot, but the price would have moved more if market makers did not have those offers out there.

Do a little thought experiment. Look at the order book and imagine what would happen if 20k worth of market orders for coins suddenly came in, how high would the price go? Now remove from the order book which ever asks you consider to be "speculative", how much does the price move now?
5924  Economy / Marketplace / Re: MtGox Matrix on: November 17, 2010, 06:43:40 PM
It's really weird at this point to still not have the whole order book at mtgox. Not to mention that it is always skewed toward showing more asks than bids.
5925  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: New to bitcoins, but still kind of confused on: November 17, 2010, 06:11:14 AM
wallet.dat is the only file you need to save. If you have the newest version 100 addresses are "premade" and stored in your wallet which means you have a buffer and don't have to backup every time. Previously, you would need to backup after every SEND because the change would go back to you at a new address which wouldn't be in your backup.

An SD card is smart. I don't know why I didn't do that before, I'm going to do it now.
5926  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Rethinking Bitcoins on: November 17, 2010, 06:03:52 AM
Unless I'm badly mistaken there is no reason 95% of people agreeing to accept generates of 50BTC forever requires the remaining 5% to do so. Smart merchants will insist on the limited chain and those finite coins will hold value while the others will decay. Some people will change their mind and use the limited gen chain and as the value diverges the new chain people will probably decide they aren't generating fast enough and increase to 1000/block and beyond. And this fireball of stupidity will probably last less than a month since there won't be an army and swat teams to enforce acceptance of the dummy chain.

If this happens, which it likely won't, it'll look like the collapse of any fiat currency played out in extreme speed.

edit: I'm not say the bad chain is fiat, only that their collapses will look similar. I think it would happen faster because it isn't fiat, it's just straight inferior with no force propping it up.
5927  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Possible anomaly with the recent $0.50 peak on: November 17, 2010, 05:55:00 AM
At the moment, bitcoin prices are not governed by free market, but by large speculators.

Speculators always need to sell eventually, which guarantees the "little guy" a chance to buy in.

Yeah, but that time is not the case at the moment.
We need the "little guys" to come in and buy out enough of bitcoins - only then the extremely large scale speculation will decrease and prices will stabilize.

But i guess that's completely natural with every rising market/currency.

This is silly. "Extremely large scale speculation"? How am I not seeing the billions of dollars of BTC derivatives?

People are buying however many bitcoins they want at the price they find, you think there should be more "little people"? So, what. I think there should be more Jews and midgets.

It's strange to have a problem with someone thinking bitcoin is going to be huge and puts their money on it. Anyone buying is "speculating" that it will work out well for them.

Don't hold your breath for 'stable' BTC/USD either. It probably won't be stable until you can't get 1BTC with all the worthless dollars ever printed.
5928  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Using mathamatical proofs as currency backing on: November 17, 2010, 03:04:21 AM
Proofs are cool for sure. But I don't see how they can be money since you still have them after you 'spend' them.
5929  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin GALORE! Contest Judging. (40 BTC prize) on: November 17, 2010, 02:57:23 AM
Anybody can vote, except the prize sponsors of the bitcoin GALORE! meme contest

This does not seem fair. They are providing the money, yet they can't vote?

I vote for #2.

Why does it matter if they vote or not?

I vote for #2
5930  Economy / Economics / Re: Return of generating coins vs electricity used. on: November 17, 2010, 02:54:53 AM
Electricity is included in my rent, so the marginal cost is zero, but I don't generate anymore anyway. A GPU would heat the place up and I don't have AC. Other people with my arrangement and different weather would be printing money.

Do you think that you would generate during winter, or do you live in the tropics?

Tropics, but I'll move eventually. I would generate if the gpu stuff was easy to set up.
5931  Economy / Economics / Re: Return of generating coins vs electricity used. on: November 17, 2010, 12:56:06 AM
Electricity is included in my rent, so the marginal cost is zero, but I don't generate anymore anyway. A GPU would heat the place up and I don't have AC. Other people with my arrangement and different weather would be printing money.
5932  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Special Coffee for Sale - automatic ordering - dynamic pricing on: November 16, 2010, 06:24:46 PM
It is good. It was delivered promptly. I highly recommend.
5933  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: People complaining about how hard it is to generate on: November 16, 2010, 08:27:20 AM
like the starter kit we get from paypal, or liberty reserve, or moneybookers?

Actually, That was part of PayPal's origins.   Before being acquired by PayPal, Elon Musk's x.com was giving each new account $5 seed money.  This was marketing genius and one of the first "viral" growth stories on the Internet.

I just learned about Bitcoin the other day, and hope to build up my Bitcoin wallet a little by selling some stuff on BiddingPond: http://www.biddingpond.com/active_auctions.php?user_id=103


That is a lot different though. PayPal had investors, and the currency they were using already had value to people. Also they required you to prove who you were to get the $5, that would break a major advantage of bitcoin.
5934  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Rethinking Bitcoins on: November 16, 2010, 06:05:35 AM
I suppose that is the reason to continue to "mine" coins even if the value earned from the mining activity is zero.  Under the current system, the value "earned" from mining work units is eventually going to get to zero.

There are transaction fees which were designed for that.

And no, there is just no way I'll buy a currency whose total amount is constantly growing, no matter how slow is this growing rate.  I don't want to spend days and days watching a total amount number on my computer, wondering if I should or not sell the corresponding currency.


"Total amount" is either a known finite number or it is not. If "total amount" changes it never was and still isn't the "total amount".
5935  Economy / Economics / Re: Quantitative easing explained on: November 16, 2010, 06:00:31 AM
It's so good.
5936  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Letter to the EFF on: November 16, 2010, 05:58:52 AM
Lol, I read the article earlier and it didn't strike me as overly ominous. But hearing it in that voice is scary! The first 30 seconds sound like a warning.
5937  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Which method do YOU use to buy Bitcoin for cash? on: November 16, 2010, 03:07:34 AM
I'll let you know when my brother comes back to NYC. Cash in his hand, bitcoins from me, just one step.
5938  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: HUGE Donation Opportunity for Epic Change on: November 15, 2010, 11:44:33 PM
Or..... just leave them in Bitcoin.... and watch the value grow.

So... epic change later on?  Tongue
5939  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: People complaining about how hard it is to generate on: November 15, 2010, 08:02:19 PM
Also you should copy your post to Bernanke, he's into this sort of thing.

edit: not the "give to everyone" aspect. But if you want to create the coins out of air, he might have some tips.
5940  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: People complaining about how hard it is to generate on: November 15, 2010, 08:01:04 PM
You should give out your coins to strangers. I'll keep mine for myself, my family, and my friends.
Pages: « 1 ... 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 [297] 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 ... 349 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!