Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 11:07:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 [298] 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 ... 487 »
5941  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Cryptopia - ONLINE ARTICLES related to hack & theft of funds 2019 (non discussion thread) on: January 28, 2019, 12:18:45 PM
Is 'First come first serve' legal or not?

No, it's not.

It's trading while insolvent.


@xtraelv

By your own admission you are not an employee of Cryptopia; your comments here are both disruptive and no longer welcome.

Both @xtraelv and @an00b please take your discussion to the Cryptopia Cryptocurrency Platform Services and Development https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1669443.0 thread which is an open discussion about Cryptopia started by one of the founders of Cryptopia, TripleHeXXX.

This thread is for documenting ONLINE ARTICLES related to hack & theft of funds 2019 and as such further outbursts by either of you will be reported to the moderators of this section.
5942  Economy / Reputation / Re: Legendary account seller on: January 28, 2019, 03:44:43 AM
OK, the feedback left by Lauda and actmyname speaks louder than the discussion we've had here--henceforth, no exceptions to account sellers being negged will be made.  I'm not in total agreement with that, but I do understand the need for consistency and avoiding even the appearance of not playing favorites--even though I have no relationship with grtthegreat and didn't stand to gain or lose anything if I negged him.  My problem is that I can see both sides of the argument, and each side has valid points.  That's why I'm conflicted.

However, if this is the community standard that we're going to adopt I can live with that.  No one should be selling accounts in 2019 and should know that buyers & sellers of them have been getting tagged since 2016 and should be familiar with all the reasons that have been given as to why account sales hurt the forum.

My apologies for waffling on this, and I'm glad marlboroza made this thread so that we can all give our opinions.  I, for one, am thankful for everyone who chimed in.

Are you going to revisit old account sellers, or, draw a line in the sand and adopt a "from this point on-wards" attitude?
5943  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - V 0.15.2 Mandatory Upgrade! Merge-mining! on: January 28, 2019, 01:59:52 AM
Both although, i read back through the posts on this topic and its seems it was rectified, just a bit uneasy after what happened at Cryptopia.

I'll see if I can find a thread for either so you can take your worries directly to the operators.
5944  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - V 0.15.2 Mandatory Upgrade! Merge-mining! on: January 28, 2019, 01:13:28 AM
No issue i was just wondering, i was abit worried about the security at Nova thats why i asked, and i had read a few posts before of complaints

Are you referring to complaints before the exchange was bought and trading suspended while they upgraded their systems, or in the two or three weeks since they restarted operations?
5945  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [SXC][NSFW] Sexcoin - V 0.15.2 Mandatory Upgrade! Merge-mining! on: January 27, 2019, 11:08:18 PM
::Notice::
be.sexcoin.info and be2.sexcoin.info are experiencing a recurring bug which prevents them from loading the blockchain correctly. This is a bug in the explorer software, not the blockchain. These two explorers will not be reliable until we can get a fix in.

https://github.com/bitcoin-abe/bitcoin-abe/issues/77

Anyone wanting to use a SexCoin explorer can use this one: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/sxc/

Has anyone any experience with novaexchange or the other smaller exchanges sxc is listed on?

Also are they on the correct blockchain etc?

AFAIK LiveCoin.net is on the correct block chain.  I haven't had any reports about Nova - what seems to be the issue?
5946  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: [H] 1000$ + Paypal [W] Bitcoin (Everyday trader is also needed). on: January 27, 2019, 10:40:01 PM
Still buying here guys. BTC is needed.

Beware of PayPal and other reversible transfer services - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14632.0
5947  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: [WTS] PayPal and [WTB] BTC/LTC/ETH/ETC on: January 27, 2019, 10:37:19 PM
Beware of PayPal and other reversible transfer services - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=14632.0

5948  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: January 27, 2019, 10:25:57 PM
It'll be interesting to see if the DT manipulators scoff at your research, or decide to cherry pick you off of their totem poll.
What does that mean? All of them are not tagged yet, can you tag them if you think the evidence is clear enough?

I always advocate that the person submitting a known alts submission form should be the one who does the primary tagging and if any other person wishes to reinforce the tagging with their own is welcome to do so.

Right now I am looking at the evidence and will tag the accounts according to the valid proofs mentioned in the case. At the same time I will try to find a link between fakegurutu and these accounts.

Thanks for the update.
5949  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: January 27, 2019, 08:25:30 AM
@timelord you're like a great working bee. but please don't steal the forum as it happened here: The bee world lol

Don't bee silly, bees aren't from another planet... (not all of them)...
5950  Economy / Reputation / Re: Legendary account seller on: January 27, 2019, 07:24:57 AM
Not really, no. There is a certain risk if it falls into the wrong hands - someone could probably do some damage with it, so I'd like to avoid that. But as far as monetary value it's $0 to me. I can start tomorrow as a noob and be just as happy trash-talking in Meta and mining Grin and doing whatever else I've been doing here. Probably even happier without the drama that comes with the "positions of power" LOL.

Saving Bruno's account kind of blew up in your face though.
5951  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: January 27, 2019, 06:59:33 AM
Even if it means Red Painting TM a Global Moderator - hilariousandco and his sock puppet hilariousetc ?
Being a moderator doesn't matter. If he were a scammer he should be tagged without hesitation. If you're implying he is then say so.
It's very strange calling "sock puppet" a secondary account he's explicitly informed is his alt account to be used in unsecured environments.

I've corrected my grammar to read:

Quote
Even if it means Red Painting TM a Global Moderator - hilariousandco and his sock puppet one of many alts ie hilariousetc ?

given Hilarious has at least two alts that he admits to...  Roll Eyes
5952  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: January 27, 2019, 06:54:16 AM
@Chris! Thanks for your good wishes, I've always found the currency exchange section is a laugh scam a minute barrel of laughs.  When my spider senses start to tingle (bet you didn't know us Timelord's had spider senses - we got them from the Planet of the Spiders Metebelis Three) I can sniff out a scammer and the proof fairly quickly, it's the writing the reports up that takes an hour or more to archive and submit.
5953  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: January 27, 2019, 01:11:03 AM
And I did some more research:

Both accounts edited their messages 30 minutes later:

originally posted:

sham100899:    January 22, 2019, 03:01:52 AM
fakegurutu:      January 22, 2019, 03:06:36 AM

less than 5 minutes difference

last edited:

sham100899:    January 22, 2019, 03:34:39 AM
fakegurutu:      January 22, 2019, 03:33:45 AM

less than 1 minute difference


It'll be interesting to see if the DT manipulators scoff at your research, or decide to cherry pick you off of their totem poll.
5954  Economy / Reputation / Re: Legendary account seller on: January 27, 2019, 12:48:17 AM
It is the easiest way to avoid a scam. But few people who really need a loan and doesn't have valid collateral (the only altcoin is valid collateral according to me), lenders usually consider that (I think). I have seen several Reputed members even DT1 took a loan without collateral. And maximum reputed members are very honest. For example: actmyname asked for a loan of 0.25BTC without collateral where 2 people send so total received 0.5BTC. actmyname refunded 2nd sender. And repaid early to the first person. I also gave actmyname a loan of 0.25BTC without collateral and repaid on time as usual.

Didn't master-p (*) get an unsecured loan then walked away with the funds?

* (I know one of those "trusted types" did - just trying to recall who it was)
5955  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: January 26, 2019, 11:30:47 PM
Or how would you decide?

I'm of the opinion that if A, B, C and D are alts, even if only A and C are found to have scammed, then I'll give A, B, C and D Red Paint TM for being alts of each-other who are known to have scammed.

I started this thread a while ago, some comments worth considering: When leaving trust for known Alt's of other users feel free to vote too)
5956  Other / Meta / Re: Mutual Merit Givers on: January 26, 2019, 10:34:57 PM
I've come across multiple entries that look like this: ( http://loyce.club/Merit/history/131361.html )



Curious I've been clicking on them and they all come up eg this one:

[quote author=suchmoon link=topic=3174975.msg33099894#msg33099894 date=1521949305]
So now we're doxing people who swear a lot?

Go fuck yourself with a bag of rusty nails, you quickscamming piece of shit.
[/quote]

This

[quote author=The Pharmacist link=topic=3174975.msg32953941#msg32953941 date=1521783608]
[quote author=Quickseller link=topic=3174975.msg32953761#msg32953761 date=1521783350]
[quote author=chronicsky link=topic=3174975.msg32950955#msg32950955 date=1521778576]
Also it was clear that the mentioned was a failed sting rather than scam.
[/quote]You need to read up on what a sting operation is.
[/quote]Just like you need to read up on what "escrow" means.
[/quote]

and this

[quote author=The Pharmacist link=topic=3174975.msg32944571#msg32944571 date=1521765303]
A fellow salty New Englander, owlcatz is.  No wonder when he first responded to something I wrote a couple of years ago, it was a "fuck you" post.  I'll never forget that, though I've totally forgotten when or exactly what he wrote.  I've never known him to be a scammer on bitcointalk, despite Quickseller's repeated beatings of that dead horse that no one cares about except him.  I don't know Owlcatz, and we haven't had any interaction on this forum or anywhere else, and I'm not in his "clique" but I think it's generally accepted that what QS keeps referencing was not a true extortion attempt, but a failed sting operation. 

And if I recall, even Lauda admitted it was a mistake to do that.

Either way, I don't think a doxxing is going to accomplish anything.  It's not going to keep the fine people of Montpelier, VT any safer, as though Owlcatz was a fucking sex offender or something.  Just give it up, QS.  No one gives a shit about this accusation anymore.
[quote author=owlcatz link=topic=3174975.msg32944616#msg32944616 date=1521765452]
Thank you, you are spot on man. I admit I swear a lot.
[/quote]LOL.  All has long been forgiven, and I don't blame you for being abrasive with me in the first place.
[/quote]

Is this a glitch, or, is it because they are in a protected area?



[quote author=LoyceV link=topic=5101199.msg49382359#msg49382359 date=1548248781]
Local rules
no spam
no trolls (bye cryptohunter)
[/quote]
Self-Moderated.  Undecided
5957  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: January 26, 2019, 09:57:24 PM
2 Accounts Connected:

sham100899, hisori

Hi @Master of Shitcoins and welcome to our corner of the forum, nice catch there BTW.

I'm a little uncertain about mutual merits that are for one merit point per perit instance given.  Why I say that is because I've read threads where an issue has been discussed and persons with green trust have given each other merits for posts.  You'd have to go back and read through their mutual merits and see if they were for Shit Posts TM or not. (same goes for trust wall posts)

OTOH as read in conjunction with the other evidence it certainly helps give a clearer picture.
5958  Economy / Reputation / Re: Legendary account seller on: January 26, 2019, 09:05:36 AM
This was reported to me by another member, and I PM'ed grtthegreat asking him to delete the selling posts, as this is a situation much like the one with iluvbitcoins where I don't think the member is deserving of a neg in the face of a lot of other positive trust.  I explained that I wasn't going to tag him but that other DT members might feel differently.  In his last PM to me, grtthegreat said he was done accepting accounts as collateral and done with account sales.

I'll probably get shit for this either way, but I tried to make a fair call on this one and not repeat the mistake I made with iluvbitcoins.  The account that got bought is another story, however.  I'm going to have to wake up and drink coffee and reread this thread.


Hmm... delete the evidence... I see...

Archived for future reference. http://archive.fo/d8Yzj#selection-2865.47-2865.105
5959  Other / Meta / Re: DefaultTrust changes on: January 26, 2019, 08:41:31 AM
After not being active for a while and trying to understand the new default trust I'm just to the point where it doesn't really matter. I'm just going to keep on doing what I've always done. If you're a scammer you'll get red tagged and if you're genuine and trustworthy you'll be green. Simple.

Even if it means Red Painting TM a Global Moderator - hilariousandco and his sock puppet one of many alts ie hilariousetc ?

Literally you won't get tagged until you are cheating same campaigns with multiple accounts.

What's the source of this information before you mislead someone into doing this and end up getting all account red tagged. From what I read theymos only meant for opinions that users don't want associated with their main account. Participating in different campaign with alt account isn't that abuse of the system since you're taking advantage of alt account and can possible lead to spamming the forum just to meet up posts counts?
You want source?

One of the global moderator hilariousandco wearing signature for stake.com and his alt account hilariousetc is in the Chimixer campaign,so he is participating in two different campaigns because it is allowed.

Theymos never mentioned about multiple accounts in signature campaigns but if you go through rules of every campaign you can find that
Quote
No alt accounts allowed. If you've been found out of enrolling with an alt you'll be removed without payment.
which is untrustworthy behaviour and DT members will tag you for that.

So it means you can participate on different campaigns with your two different campaigns. Wink

http://archive.fo/5czSU#selection-557.0-861.3
http://archive.fo/y0yk2#selection-571.0-911.21
5960  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q1) on: January 26, 2019, 08:22:24 AM
Literally you won't get tagged until you are cheating same campaigns with multiple accounts.

What's the source of this information before you mislead someone into doing this and end up getting all account red tagged. From what I read theymos only meant for opinions that users don't want associated with their main account. Participating in different campaign with alt account isn't that abuse of the system since you're taking advantage of alt account and can possible lead to spamming the forum just to meet up posts counts?
You want source?

One of the global moderator hilariousandco wearing signature for stake.com and his alt account hilariousetc is in the Chimixer campaign,so he is participating in two different campaigns because it is allowed.

Theymos never mentioned about multiple accounts in signature campaigns but if you go through rules of every campaign you can find that
Quote
No alt accounts allowed. If you've been found out of enrolling with an alt you'll be removed without payment.
which is untrustworthy behaviour and DT members will tag you for that.

So it means you can participate on different campaigns with your two different campaigns. Wink

http://archive.fo/5czSU#selection-557.0-861.3
http://archive.fo/y0yk2#selection-571.0-911.21
Pages: « 1 ... 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 [298] 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 ... 487 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!