Armory doesn't show my outputs from P2Pools generation transactions. Is this related to the "strange" output script that always appears first in these transactions?

You still haven't mentioned what the problem is. That said, you shouldn't expect modern hardware and software to operate painlessly on your legacy system. I don't see any Linux users demanding 2.4 support, which was the kernel version at the time WinXP was released.

I finally went through the hassle of building Armory on my Gentoo x86_64 workstation. Well, it turned out to not be any hassle at all. Ridiculous nice work, etotheipi! Consider yourself donated to.

Only issue I had was when manually importing multiple keys to the same wallet. Transactions was only scanned for the first entry, but restarting Armory caused every key to be refreshed, so it was no show-stopper at all. Looking forward to standalone connection handling.

Bitclown approves.

About time we had another BTC scam. And as usual there's no shortage of gullible users. "Of course it's too good to be true, but if we all chip in with small amounts we can still make this scam successful".

Reminds me of the forex scheme "Maria" was running here a few months ago. "Just deposit $1000 and run this random binary for guaranteed 20% weekly profit. Sorry guys, the system failed. Balance: 0."

Luke can print out my hashes and use it as toilet paper if he want as long as he sticks to his fair reward scheme and pays in virgin generation txs. It's just random numbers.

Last time the price began accelerating it caused the number of user to grow massively. Unfortunately the majority of these users were just kids who wanted free candy money from their graphics cards and couldn't care less about the revolutionary properties of the system. The users who actually put money into the market were led to believe that Bitcoin usage was exploding. So I agree, too steep price increases makes mining too profitable for the market's own good.

Thanks, but I've decided to settle on Lunar Time for now.

2012-01-12 04:45:10.028 GMT

proudhon realized the distinction between being realistic and being an asshole, nagle finally got bored of waiting for the ask price to reach $0.0000, but Edward50 is still raging about how Bitcoin have failed because Mongox support/resistance is asymmetrical. The forum climate is approaching pre-June temperatures and some cool block chain uses are discussed in the dev and alternative clients forums. I'm bitclown and I like bitcoins.

Last time it was repeated change from a 500k Mongox wallet. I guess it isn't all withdrawn quite yet.

What were the announcements?

Rebuild your client with debug symbols and post the stack tra... Oh. Format and reinstall should do.

2009 called and wanted their platform back. They also kept going on about this bitcoin thing. Not falling for that one.

It's just change from these inputs, which ends up in small amount txs, just like an exchange would make cold storage coins available for online automated withdrawals. Are there any public available tools for analyzing tx graphs? Should be fairly easy to cross-check with known Mt. Gee deposits/withdrawals.

I thought it was funny.

The bid was placed on 2011-05-25. This chump[ette] probably abandoned Bitcoin months ago. Also, [s]he is Australian.

The config script now checks for bdb 5.1, but 5.1 is not included in the list of versions checked at m4/ax_berkeley_db_cxx.m4:60.

The Gentoo ebuild should pull it in a slot:

Oh, and ridiculous nice work by the way!

Namecoin was hacked together to claim the enormous BitDNS bounty. The bounty holders forgot to require a clean implementation, well-maintained code and user friendly tools.

I mined my first coins on CPU when it was not profitable, so I guess I'm an enthusiast. My first purchase was 10 BTC @ $0.8 from CoinPal.