|
Wow. Just wow. Liquid cooling is definitely the way to go with Ryzen 9.
I was not confortable with that 85ºc CPU temp, so I picked up a AIO CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240.
Temps went from 85ºc to 63ºc and clock speed was up to 4,14 Ghz with 21 threads running.
Very surprised with the Masterliquid 240 (not lite, not pro). Amazing performance for what it costed.
|
|
|
|
i got 3 3900x rigs and 1 3700x
i got some of the noctua coolers the huge sink dual fans at 1.3v or higer they cannot handle the heat to get above 13000h/s so i think you are right u need water cooling. anyone know of a good water cooler for my next build?
Evga two fan. 120mm 65c Corsair two fan 140mm 58c Look for sales . The Corsair is impressive. I use ram clocked to 2666 it does 3000 stock Both builds use 32gb ram. H110i? H115i? |
|
|
|
Just upgraded a Ryzen 7 1700 to a Ryzen 9 3900X.
What a beast. Cryptonight R went from 480-490 H/s to 1500 H/s.
It definitely is. Wait for the November algorithm change and see this beast mining XMR like crazy. I am still rocking R7 1700 and Vega 56 in my workstation rig. Vega 56 does 2100 H/s with SBR miner and Ryzen 7 does 510 H/s (3.85 GHz OC - all cores @1.23v) Yes, I just benched it and it does > 10 kH/s... However, it'll be a severe blow to my 2 vegas and 4 Ellesmere's. I don't know what to mine with them after this fork... 3900x runs a bit hot using the retail cooler. It goes up to 85ºC, guess it could be a lot better. That's with the case open and ~20ºC ambient temperature. |
|
|
|
Just upgraded a Ryzen 7 1700 to a Ryzen 9 3900X.
What a beast. Cryptonight R went from 480-490 H/s to 1500 H/s.
Yeah my 2 ryzen 9 3900x do 1398 and 1475 on cryptonight These pc's will run a pair of evga's 1660 each and while they are not making a fortune I have yet to use my heat this fall. So they are pretty good as space heating units. Less can be more. Optimal number of threads, for me, is 22. 24 give less hashrate. In the end of the day, I lowered to 21, it just looses 50 h/s, and it runs a bit cooler. I'm using DDR4-3477, tought. |
|
|
|
|
Just upgraded a Ryzen 7 1700 to a Ryzen 9 3900X.
What a beast. Cryptonight R went from 480-490 H/s to 1500 H/s.
|
|
|
|
|
Will all CN coins migrate to RamdomX?
I don't think so.
|
|
|
|
amd drivers 19.9.1 have sorted Navi mining issues
54mhs on Eth at 105w
And how about XMR hashrate? |
|
|
|
Im not sure exactly what you are saying change? Am I changing the numbers to what was posted in the link you provided? Thanks I basically have the same problem as lncm for cnvr. But with Powercolor Vega 64s. Samsung memory. No matter the undervolt wont go under 950mv. No cards are being used for the monitor. I have 9 cards. 1442 core clock and 1105 mem clock but voltages don't stick. Side note, every blue moon I may be able to "trick" the voltages to stick by running a ppt table with 950mvs then running the miner for a second then running the actual voltages that I am trying to run. But majority of the time over the course of days itll get too many errors and ill have to restart and not be able to recreate the same results. Also, I cant run anything over version 0.4.5. Any version over that the first card hashes extremely slow. I dont know why. Any help would be appreciated.
Hi there I solved it with this PPT https://pastebin.com/udajhiG9Credit to GKumaran that posted this link on TRM Discord. I just changed [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4d36e968-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0003] to \0000] and it did the trick, the misbehaved card now is @ 865 mv after a reboot. Power consumption went down 30W just from this undervolting. Yes, that's the order of the cards on the registry. \0000 is the first card an so on. Pay attention that's a ppt for Vega 56. |
|
|
|
I basically have the same problem as lncm for cnvr. But with Powercolor Vega 64s. Samsung memory. No matter the undervolt wont go under 950mv. No cards are being used for the monitor. I have 9 cards. 1442 core clock and 1105 mem clock but voltages don't stick. Side note, every blue moon I may be able to "trick" the voltages to stick by running a ppt table with 950mvs then running the miner for a second then running the actual voltages that I am trying to run. But majority of the time over the course of days itll get too many errors and ill have to restart and not be able to recreate the same results. Also, I cant run anything over version 0.4.5. Any version over that the first card hashes extremely slow. I dont know why. Any help would be appreciated.
Hi there I solved it with this PPT https://pastebin.com/udajhiG9Credit to GKumaran that posted this link on TRM Discord. I just changed [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Class\{4d36e968-e325-11ce-bfc1-08002be10318}\0003] to \0000] and it did the trick, the misbehaved card now is @ 865 mv after a reboot. Power consumption went down 30W just from this undervolting. |
|
|
|
Changed monitor output to the other card, reinstalled drivers, applied settings and it's the same, the sapphire card still won't go down from 950 mv... It's not monitor output related.
Wow, seems like it's limited in the bios or something then. I need to check with the pros myself, will send you a DM as well. The plot thickens, but now I've reached a balance that's satisfactory to me. With 19.8.1 and using AMD Memory Tweak XL only to set memory timings, I've made some experiences on Wattman Global in AMD drivers. I've left core speeds intact and only applied 825 mv to all voltages, memory included. This is the result:  It's faster than before and it draws the same power from outlet as 1202 Mhz on both with 825/950 voltages. The faster card is hashing above 2100 which is great. I can live with 900mv with core @ 1450 Mhz. I have no idea why these settings previously stuck it @ 950 mv, but hey, as long as it works... I'm checking for stability, speeds seem a little low on pool side, but it's running only for 35 minutes. Only one reject because of expired block. Let's see. |
|
|
|
|
Changed monitor output to the other card, reinstalled drivers, applied settings and it's the same, the sapphire card still won't go down from 950 mv... It's not monitor output related.
|
|
|
|
So, no ideias how can I undervolt this stubborn card?
Personally I haven't experienced anything similar. I guess you don't have any iGPU that you could switch to, freeing that cards from monitor(s)? Next, have you tried switching the monitor(s) to the other card that does downvolt ok? How does the driver behave then? Also, have you tried switching the slots for the two gpus? I'm curious if the issue is related to the card/monitors/pci slot. Last, are you willing to downgrade to 18.6.1? That's really the driver version that I continue to use myself unless I have a VII or 5700xt in the rig. No guarantees it will work, but my experience is that you will have a smoother ride. I tried 18.6.1, same behavior. I'll try what you said. |
|
|
|
Hi there. Please help me here. Great, awesome tool, makes my vegas do 2050 H/min @ 1200 core / 940 memory. However, I can't change memory settings with CLI, only GUI version. Making a bat file and giving permission to run as administrator to WinAMDTweak.exe does nothing to memory timings, running from an administrator command prompt gives something about a missing or can't open EIO.DLL file. GUI does work, just more tedious to load values and apply to 2 cards but I'm setting the clocks and voltages with this too, so no problem. Cards are MSI Airboost and Sapphire Pulse. This is the config file for both: <?xml version="1.0"?>
-<values maxtemp="85" tdplimit="0" zerorpm="False" timing="0" rfc="248" ckestag="2" wrdata="1" rdlat="14" wrlat="4" rddata="16" cke="6" cpded="2" xp="6" stag="7" rfcpb="128" cksrx="8" cksre="8" pd="6" xsmrs="6" xs="216" mod="12" mrd="8" ref="15600" rdwr="17" wrrd="1" wrwrscl="3" wrwrsc="1" wrwrsd="2" wrwrdd="3" rdrdscl="3" rdrdsc="1" rdrdsd="2" rdrddd="3" rrefd="7" wr="13" wtrl="7" wtrs="3" cwl="6" faw="14" rtp="5" rrdl="3" rrds="3" rppb="12" rpab="12" rcpb="44" rcab="44" rcdwr="5" rcdrd="12" ras="28" cl="17">
-<mem>
<p0 vddc="800" clock="167" enabled="0"/>
<p1 vddc="800" clock="500" enabled="0"/>
<p2 vddc="900" clock="700" enabled="0"/>
<p3 vddc="825" clock="940" enabled="1"/>
</mem>
-<core>
<p0 vddc="800" clock="852" enabled="1"/>
<p1 vddc="800" clock="991" enabled="1"/>
<p2 vddc="800" clock="1138" enabled="1"/>
<p3 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p4 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p5 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p6 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p7 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
</core>
-<fan>
<p0 fan="31" temp="30"/>
<p1 fan="42" temp="44"/>
<p2 fan="70" temp="55"/>
<p3 fan="100" temp="70"/>
<p4 fan="100" temp="72"/>
</fan>
</values> One card runs superb with 825 mv Vcore. However, the Sapphire card doesn't get lower than 950 mv and I can't figure out why.  Tried drivers 19.7.1, 19.8.1, 18.6.1. Same thing. Tried a custom PPT but then this card refused to do more than 500 Mhz memory. The Vcore seems to be locked to Vmem in some way. If I set 1000 mv in P4 memory setting, the core gets to 1000 mv also, and then it doesn't get lower unless you reboot. I really can't figure out this crazyness in Vega's voltage/speed control. Please help. |
|
|
|
|
So, no ideias how can I undervolt this stubborn card?
|
|
|
|
|
I really can't get it right with that card.
I think this voltage is linked to memory voltage.
I'm on 19.8.1 now, and it doesn't get lower than 950 mv.
I played around with PPT reg files and both cards couldn't do more than 500 Mhz memory...
If I set 1000 mv in P4 memory setting, the core gets to 1000 mv also.
The other (MSI) is playing well @ 1200/825 mv, that's great.
I really can't figure out this crazyness in Vega's voltage/speed control. It drives me crazy.
|
|
|
|
No, I didn't change ppt table or did any reg hack.
I'm happy with the hasrate. I prefer 1200 Mhz @ 800 mv than 1450 Mhz @ 866 mv.
I can try higher clock speeds later.
But for now I really can't figure why core voltage setting sticks on one card, but ir doesn't on the other.
Hi! What driver version are you running, scrolled back but couldn't find it? I'm guessing the driver might be stubborn with the monitor GPU. I actually don't think I've tested the miner at all on Vegas driving monitor(s) under the newer Adrenaline drivers. Also, have you tried disabling p7 and running in a lower p-state? Just curious if that mechanism for pushing down clocks/voltage works. For your AMD memtweak issues, I'd start with a Administrator command prompt, not a .bat file allowed to elevate privileges. Just find Command prompt in the start menu, right click and choose "Run as Administrator". Then, cd to your dir with the AMD mem tweak and run if from that prompt. If it works, it's something with the rest of your .bat file setup. If you still get the missing EIO.dll issue, well, is the EIO.dll file really stored in the same dir then?  . Driver is 19.7.1. |
|
|
|
|
No, I didn't change ppt table or did any reg hack.
I'm happy with the hasrate. I prefer 1200 Mhz @ 800 mv than 1450 Mhz @ 866 mv.
I can try higher clock speeds later.
But for now I really can't figure why core voltage setting sticks on one card, but ir doesn't on the other.
|
|
|
|
Here: It's the Sapphire Pulse where the voltages settings doesn't stick. It's driving the monitor. Tried ODT 0.2.8 and it's the same. Not really sure what's hapenning. |
|
|
|
I'm having some issues, though.
I can't change memory settings with CLI, only GUI version.
Making a bat file and giving permission to run as administrator to WinAMDTweak.exe does nothing to memory timings, running from an administrator command prompt gives something about a missing or can't open EIO.DLL file.
GUI does work, just more tedious to load values and apply to 2 cards.
2x Vega 56 (MSI Airboost and Sapphire Pulse) both do 2050 h/s @ 1200 core / 940 memory, that's nothing short of amazing.
However, I'm don't know if I'm failing to set voltages properly. Power consumption went down 50W applying these voltage settings (same for both cards), HWinfo shows one card @0.8 vcore and other @0.925 vcore.
Any ideas?
if you see EIO.dll error you must restart comp adn not start srbminer. srbminer block amd mem tweak if not use --disabletweaking. if dont work after restart you must go dell folder CACHE in srbminer folder. Your card have hynix mem=? hynix on CNR have 2100+ HR Try this setings and chg mem clock after test: 6*hynix-12500+HR - 1050W WinAMDTweak.exe --RAS 24 --rp 14 --rc 35 --rfc 168 --rrds 4 --rrdl 5 --rcdrd 19 --rcdwr 7 --REF 15600 teamredminer.exe -a cnr -o stratum+tcp://monero.miner.rocks:5555 -u ADRES -p Livada2 -d 0,1 --cn_config=14*14:BAB,14*14:BAB --bus_reorder --watchdog_script=restart-cnr.bat ODT: Name=CNR5 GPU_P0=852;800;0 GPU_P1=991;801;0 GPU_P2=1084;802;0 GPU_P3=1100;803;0 GPU_P4=1125;804;0 GPU_P5=1150;805;0 GPU_P6=1350;815;0 GPU_P7=1360;840 Mem_P0=167;800;0 Mem_P1=500;800;0 Mem_P2=800;801;0 Mem_P3=929;860 Fan_Min=1700 Fan_Max=3300 Fan_Target=56 Fan_Acoustic=2400 Power_Temp=70 Power_Target=0 My cards have Samsung memory. I'm happy with 2050 @ 1200 Mhz core, no point in having it @ ~1400 for 50 h/s more. I rebooted / load defaults and didn't run srb miner. But I actually prefer the GUI mode because it can handle all, timings and P states. My problem is with undervolting. One card seems to run fine @ 825 mv core, reported in HWinfo, power consumption went down, but the other is still @ 925 mv after applied same P states to it. That's where I need help. |
|
|
|
I'm having some issues, though. I can't change memory settings with CLI, only GUI version. Making a bat file and giving permission to run as administrator to WinAMDTweak.exe does nothing to memory timings, running from an administrator command prompt gives something about a missing or can't open EIO.DLL file. GUI does work, just more tedious to load values and apply to 2 cards. 2x Vega 56 (MSI Airboost and Sapphire Pulse) both do 2050 h/s @ 1200 core / 940 memory, that's nothing short of amazing. However, I'm don't know if I'm failing to set voltages properly. Power consumption went down 50W applying these voltage settings (same for both cards), HWinfo shows one card @0.8 vcore and other @0.925 vcore. <?xml version="1.0"?>
-<values maxtemp="85" tdplimit="0" zerorpm="False" timing="0" rfc="248" ckestag="2" wrdata="1" rdlat="14" wrlat="4" rddata="16" cke="6" cpded="2" xp="6" stag="7" rfcpb="128" cksrx="8" cksre="8" pd="6" xsmrs="6" xs="216" mod="12" mrd="8" ref="15600" rdwr="17" wrrd="1" wrwrscl="3" wrwrsc="1" wrwrsd="2" wrwrdd="3" rdrdscl="3" rdrdsc="1" rdrdsd="2" rdrddd="3" rrefd="7" wr="13" wtrl="7" wtrs="3" cwl="6" faw="14" rtp="5" rrdl="3" rrds="3" rppb="12" rpab="12" rcpb="44" rcab="44" rcdwr="5" rcdrd="12" ras="28" cl="17">
-<mem>
<p0 vddc="800" clock="167" enabled="0"/>
<p1 vddc="800" clock="500" enabled="0"/>
<p2 vddc="900" clock="700" enabled="0"/>
<p3 vddc="825" clock="940" enabled="1"/>
</mem>
-<core>
<p0 vddc="800" clock="852" enabled="1"/>
<p1 vddc="800" clock="991" enabled="1"/>
<p2 vddc="800" clock="1138" enabled="1"/>
<p3 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p4 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p5 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p6 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
<p7 vddc="825" clock="1202" enabled="1"/>
</core>
-<fan>
<p0 fan="31" temp="30"/>
<p1 fan="42" temp="44"/>
<p2 fan="70" temp="55"/>
<p3 fan="100" temp="70"/>
<p4 fan="100" temp="72"/>
</fan>
</values> Any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
