BCH has seen its peak. Still plenty of buyers, but each pump will have a successively lower high and each dump a lower low. Will take up to a year to drop 75% against BTC, so there is time to get out. So $900 is all time all time high? That is my opinion, yes. There will be a long period of trading in ranges, so the trend will not be easily seen, but it seems most likely it will be slowly down, with lots of nice pumps, giving plenty of chances to get out. We will see , look again in a years time. Nice to see someone calmly nail their colours to the mast. In the short term I'm betting against you but, then, we will see. Unique circumstances on the horizon. |
|
|
|
BCH has seen its peak. Still plenty of buyers, but each pump will have a successively lower high and each dump a lower low. Will take up to a year to drop 75% against BTC, so there is time to get out. So $900 is all time all time high? |
|
|
|
Today BCH price 600$ or 400$
What do you think
Both! |
|
|
|
im shorting the shit out of this garbage since 90. what a clown show disaster this shit cash is  It's becoming obvious that real people don't get their trading advice on this forum... I think it's time to learn Korean (and no, I don't mean the language that Kore speaks). All of these fucktards on here so butthurt that BCH is working. Trading volume almost surpassed BTC in the last 24h, and somehow BCH is still a shitcoin, woww! Anyone with a chart in front of them could have made that short call... out of interest is it still open ? |
|
|
|
Maybe next will be CatCoinPlus, because I can't to convince CAT owners add PoS for security. (and I am number 2 in CAT richlist)  Oh no you got the CATs back up too... Might have something to do with your Ferengi approach  rule of acquisition number ... 1001 don't piss off the stake holders till after you got their money Anyway .. all things aside, you know I think you're going about this badly but you are going to make me a lot of free shit coins so all power to you. Theme of 2017 "Fork it,I'm bored. Lets have a civil war" |
|
|
|
OK
But why 250 addresses?
what about holders who's wallets
contain a large number of addresses?
Why not just snap the chain that is easily the fairest way and cannot be biased. (without investment)
Seems like some people will miss out.
You also have massive sell walls on the exchange so stand to profit pretty well from this little endeavour.
Top 100 addresses is 94,8% of total supply. Top 250 is sufficient. Everyone holding caps will benefit from this if it becomes worth anything. Place your own sell orders 1 satoshi below OPs if thats a concern. current supply: 194,927,402 premine and distribute to top 250 wallet : 94.8% Handy left over premine 10.1 Million coins Seriously, try to read what I wrote once more. Top 100 is 94.5%. Top 250 is probably closer to 99%. Yup sorry my mistake Go here http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CAP/richlist.php?count=250hover your mouse over the pie chart on the segment "remaining supply" As in addresses above 250 ... they are all labelled up to 101- 250 .  Oh yeah ... that's right no one has a clue .. -5% apparently So doing the math off presstab.pw 250 it looks like there is 203,886,511.83 caps in 250 wallets and only 193 M supply ... I'll leave that problem with you to manually transfer somewhere. |
|
|
|
Do you guys code? I am curious to know if the memory problem can be fixed soon. Why does it take more memory than other wallets? Growthcoin has a similar problem but it also uses more CPU than most, which isn't a problem with Bottlecaps.
I can code well enough to examine wallet source for shenanigans. I don't have what I would call enough skill or experience to dev a coin. (My standards are high, I'd do a shoddy job) To be honest I'd quite like to but it's a serious undertaking, which requires time. (hats off to Tranz et.al.). The memory and cpu issues are inherited from the original code base they were cloned from. Back in 2013-14 people were literally just tinkering with block reward / times POS rewards etc ... real copy paste stuff ... and launching a "new" coin. They were all clones of something, ones with good, interested devs have evolved. Others survived, most perished - until this year when everything is creeping back out of the wood work. Proof that crappy alts are like cockroaches, never quite dead enough. The point is the original code base never really considered what happens 5 years later. Compound that by folks deciding 30 second block fast coins were a great idea ... massive "emoty" blockchain interesting video Shame in the video they didn't lay down some ground rules .. exoected % stake rate , reliability etc. Caps is a solid coin in terms of reliable staking, it's been long forgotten in the hype /shill / pump your stash leagues but it's chugging along nicely. I'll always have a big bag of caps, if only just for fun. |
|
|
|
|
Rule of acquisition no 239.
Never be afraid to mislabel a product.
|
|
|
|
1. I do not have sell order on cryptopia, now only buy, two orders 3 an 5 sat.
2. 250 from richlist, because I can't see more in blockexplorer and I need send to all addresses manually in wallet.
3. Old blockchan take many resources on hard drive and in memory.
4. New blockchain not destroy old CAP, it is like Bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash.
1. irrelevant really you are massive holder for sale or not. 2. I'm concerned about your technical ability 3. do what you like to it after it has forked formally and fairly 4. Obviously won't destroy anything. but nothing like BCC(H) either that forked at a block as I suggested. manually send from wallet ... lmao really  |
|
|
|
OK
But why 250 addresses?
what about holders who's wallets contain a large number of addresses?
Why not just snap the chain that is easily the fairest way and cannot be biased. (without investment)
Seems like some people will miss out.
You also have massive sell walls on the exchange so stand to profit pretty well from this little endeavour.
Top 100 addresses is 94,8% of total supply. Top 250 is sufficient. Everyone holding caps will benefit from this if it becomes worth anything. Place your own sell orders 1 satoshi below OPs if thats a concern. current supply: 194,927,402 premine and distribute to top 250 wallet : 94.8% Handy left over premine 10.1 Million coins |
|
|
|
|
Doesn't make difference to me, you are all just coming over really scammy here.
The completely fair, incontrovertible, way of doing this is to call a block number guesstimated for Jan 2018 sometime.
release the wallet for scrutiny weeks prior to the fork
Allow the wallets to run along and subsequently break away from the caps blockchain at the predetermined block number.
It's been done before, everybody won ...
If there are technical reason for not doing so please explain them but "sufficient" and "sell your coins" are not credible answers to valid questions
|
|
|
|
|
Well there is not much to be done about it but it speaks volumes about the little Ferengis motives.
He's chosen a bloody good avatar / handle to be fair to him
No self delusion there .lol
So first I'm going to apologise to you guys, seems I might have given the liitle guy ideas.
But true to his nature he's not going to say, Oh Hi community I have found a problem and here is the solutions ... etc etc
He's going to rinse it for every bean he can get out of it and not mention it on the main thread. OK so excellent Ferengi role play
---------------------------------------
As a side note I've been considering running my addresses through as many alt chains as I can find just to see where
a coin has been quietly forked without informing the originating chains community.
Good way to cut out a large holding of POS coins by simply not letting anyone know there is a new chain / wallet , as time passes even the biggest holders
become insignificant as they no longer stake.
I'd be gob smacked if I'm the first to think of this but also hope I haven't inadvertently started "Scam 3.0 Ghost chains" or something.
|
|
|
|
[CAPP] BottleCapsPlusBecause original CAP was abandoned and users not want any change and protect old coin, I create new coin, with fresh chain, advanced protected code (Novacoin or Hyperstake) with parameters almost like in HYP. All balances will be premined and send to first 250 users from Richlist. http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CAP/richlist.php?count=250Start time, January 2018. Additional parameters will be later. If you want participate, keep yours CAP on address within first 250 in Richlist on 1 January 2018. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2329756.new#newNot bothering to mention that here though. |
|
|
|
|
OK
But why 250 addresses?
what about holders who's wallets contain a large number of addresses?
Why not just snap the chain that is easily the fairest way and cannot be biased. (without investment)
Seems like some people will miss out.
You also have massive sell walls on the exchange so stand to profit pretty well from this little endeavour.
|
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we should vote to hard fork with some extra code to choke off the wallets of known POS cheats.. Ehh it's a thought
Anyway feel free to take a leaf from PressTab book and hard-fork a new chain, make it significantly different and fix the (cough) bug.
I'm sure we'd all be happy to get duplicate coins on another chain which we can trade ...on .. .
..... Ah I see .. easy to buy cheap coins on an abandoned (allegedly) chain and suggest (hijack) development when the coin has long standing listings on exchanges....
Harder to get new coin listed. Doesn't that come at some cost ??
No, go with the PressTab.. created something new and respectfully left the old chain to get on and succeed on it's own merits.
No muss, No FUD, no BS
Ferengi vs Jedi .. I'm Jedi all the way MoFo. This ain't the coin you're looking for. It's a question of manners and politeness, you know, good breeding.
I think most people in CAP are happy with Tranz and not overly concerned that we are or are not making MASSIVE PROFIT but enjoying the vibe all the same.
*OK I just re-read that and think I've found my signature*
|
|
|
|
|
Ever since someone derisively called HBN "homo nipples" ( guess I did chortle at that )
I have insisted on thinking of my wallets as "she"
They are all ladies to me.
Treat them well and, they'll .... we'll, who knows what the'll do right!
|
|
|
|
|
So lets get this straight.
We are considering a voting system weighted by size of holding om a proposal from someone who brags about holding ~10% of current supply
That same person admits to be using a supposed exploit only he can fix to cheat the community and unfairly gain coins....
On principle you can go take a running jump.
I wouldn't trust your code anyway
|
|
|
|
I just want give users equal opportunity for stacking. And if most not agree, I continue use PoS percentage cheating, because only me know how increase PoS rate to 200% when necessary. You d be better off explaining to the community how to fix it before everyone else with any holding decides its a broken scam and leaves Seeing as there is only 0.2 btc on the buy book at cryptopia I'd think twice about spreading FUD and get with community instead of being an ass hat and showing off. Anyway we all game the percentages, its part of POS hodling |
|
|
|
I vote No to any of the proposed changes.
The core functionality of CAPs is fine as it is. The current 200% max; variable with difficulty along with the maximum stake reward/block functions just fine.
The only complaints against Bottlecaps with any type of regularity are that the wallet uses too much resources. Any development should focus on this type of improvement not on changing the fundamentals.
Also, even though the current split/combine thresholds were set by Tranz at the low value levels for a valid reason no one typically leaves there blocks at these sizes and consequently spend a lot of time in coin control managing their block sizes (ie most people manually make their blocks in the 5000-6000 range). I think for user 'quality of life' having these values be able to be set at whatever a user wants easily would be a nice change. I changed these for myself in the source code and as a result just leave my wallet running 24/7/365 never having to even bother with the hassle/waste of time of managing blocks in coin control...it's great.
I'd agree with that Coin control split-block . goodness even a sum of value when you filter the transactions list. First things first before we screw with things that aint broke. -- Holding .. more than enough that it feels obnoxious to shout about. |
|
|
|
Wait so this is dead for real?
As dead as a dead zombie - for real So you mean it is lurching about, moaning, and eating peoples brains? That is still better than dead and buried.  Dead and buried - that was a great movie, don't make em like that anymore. It seems some people have dumped their monies on Clam without any due diligence or plan to trade .. sorry no sympathy. Crypto moves and you can't be bleating about dead coins and ahhh where is my money two weeks after a correction. A correction I might add, some of us were considering and planning for. Go draw a couple of lines on trading view, any layman would tell something was about to happen 2 weeks ago Especially if you look at the long term history. Any of us who average in and out with the market and bother to do some reading around are ignoring you and setting up trading plans. For better or worse, right or wrong, but we are not crying over our choices. For what its worth my trading view lines suggest something is about to happen again probably before the 29th Are we reaching a resistance line? ( go have a look) make a choice, with some evidence, be happy with that choice. I'll do my best to call it right .... good luck to everyone else who is trying to do the same. Ogh and happy staking |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
