|
Thanks for the Update PBMining. Sounds you're dealing with your initial problems the right way. Looking forward to your next update.
|
|
|
|
I was concerned when I couldn't get on the site. Double concerned when I tried emailing you only to get an instant failed delivery email back. Must admit, the uncomfortable thought that you could've disappeared off the face of the earth with my 202gh/s worth of btc did cross my mind.
Sucks that the site was attacked, seems like it was finally getting polished up and everything was going smoothly.
I was concerned too because there isn't any address, no personal data, anonymous registered domain and so on.. And as I know it from OMM, it always starts with downtime and DDOS (ddos seems to be very common for every problem). Admin could pay out shares from income and then run off. But I see it as risk capital, perhaps it works, perhaps not. The same for http://minershare.net/ (but there is more personal data, I think it depends here if they get the hardware and if yes, when). I've diversified my bitcoins. Hold 1/3 as BTC (sold today at 1008$/btc), 1/3 is invested in hash power at pbmining and 1/3 at minershare. |
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the update. Split pool from stats-viewer (are you meaning this when you talk about a "db viewer"?), then there isn't a lot exposure and potential attackers can't do anything against it. Any ETA for the new host?
|
|
|
|
you have to trade in €/BTC for better volume  Oh I see... Thanks for the hint  |
|
|
|
 Perhaps I'm wrong but where do you see the 420BTC? Also the last trade is 2h ago. I know it's a tight border. But doesn't it make sense? If the price drop more than 3% (limit) I speculate that it drops more in future and rebuy BTC then and speculate on a long(er) time raise. |
|
|
|
And this little piggy went hashing! Entry number #12 Payout: 1AD9qyGUYxT5fD13QsCiF5YD6q9nhmrMLW Thanks a lot |
|
|
|
|
Perhaps a stupid question, but do you think the market at Kraken is large enough to go with a trailing stop limit of 4%/3% and a volume of 2.3? Or do you think when the limit is hit, there isn't enough need on the market to fullfill such a "large" order (24h volume was about 26 BTC)?
|
|
|
|
|
Got the same Problems as others here. I've transfered some BTC to Kraken. Now I've got 17 confirmations and still no funds. I'm Level 3 veryfied.
EDIT: Now my funds are available.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm mining too.. (standalone). But today I got the checkpoint warning again and I didn't close the client so this seems to be a bug.
|
|
|
|
I understand, it's important to have a little bit security, but isn't this a little bit too extreme at your pool?  |
|
|
|
|
But its true, for "normal" solo-miners its worthless already because the big boys entered the networks. I'm now mining with about 500mh for more than 1h no block found. When I read of the hundreds or thausands mined coins it doesn't make sense atm - and this coin was released today.
|
|
|
|
|
I solved my problem with uninstalling Bitgem-Client and deleting the content of the data-directory beside bitgem.conf and wallet.dat. Now it works. It seems to be that the database were corrupt, but I didn't close the client by killing it and never had this with any other cryptocurrency.
Now there seems to be another problem: The client download link doesn't work atm because dropbox blocks it because of too much traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
5476 blocks.
Checksum:
cfe59759d08f1d3e91428f368bbc13ff *bitgem-qt.exe
|
|
|
|
When I start the BitGem Client after downloading all blocks I get the message: WARNING: Checkpoint is too old. Wait for block chain to download or notify developers. Is this normal or do I have to notify really the developers? EDIT: I've downloaded the client today. EDIT2: Screenshot:  |
|
|
|
|
I'm waiting now since 4 days too. It's the same account where I sent my fiat a long time from. And of course on the same name. Also the fees for international payouts are quiet high especially if you can't withdrawn more than 1000$.
|
|
|
|
|
And they earn shitloads because people get in panic and trade and trande and trade... Mt.Gox is the most unprofessional player with that much power, related to IT I ever saw. If they don't have enough manpower, they should be able to recruit 100s of IT professionals. It's again only the damn greed which makes it worse for everyone.
|
|
|
|
Are you still open for the wager Evan? What/who would you propose to use as escrow? If omgitsmehehe isn't betting against you, I'm open for it. (but need a little bit sleep now, GMT+1 ) |
|
|
|
What we need to do is build a fast, robust, extremely secure, open-source exchange, with a standardized API that traders can plug into to easily arbitrage. That's what Ripple will be. So far, only the client has been open-sourced, but the server will follow. Great idea, and technically it shouldn't be difficult - but the difficulty is taking/receiving fiat payments... Ripple does that by trading in IOUs between nodes in a trust graph, with credit limits on each edge in the graph, and leaving settlement to individuals that have a trust relationship. I got your point, but in my opinion, it shows very detailed how unprofessional they handle at least this technical stuff (I'm an IT guy too, this wouldn't so hard to handle...), I'm feeling very bad about the security of my bitcoins at mtgox. I think it's much saver to hold the most by my own wallet and if I need to trade, I choose localbitcoins or something like this. |
|
|
|
|
I'm getting all my funds back this moment. MtGox is too unprofessional at all (tought they've learned their lesson when they got hacked). I'm damn sure I can protect my funds better than they are able to. I'm wondering how long payouts are possible... A lot people will do the same I think.
|
|
|
|
|
Huge Sell -> Price Drop -> Panic Sells + DDOS -> Price Drop -> Someone who cashed out can now buy back and make huge profits.
Conclusion: Mt.Gox is fucking unprofessional, I'll hold my coins and only trade it in future at localbitcoins.com
And yes, too many stupid trolling kids which increase the panic.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
