To make this work you're gonna need a couple of 250-merit accounts. And you don't need more than eight 10-merit votes for each pair of 250-merit votes. But don't get me wrong, I thoroughly enjoy watching how you morons waste your merits in this scheme.

Sorry, for late support but I am also a victim of the trust abuse in the past. You can check my case on my trust feedback. It was a total harassment by DT and especially Lauda on me to put me down and out of this business.


A contribution from my side would be a bunch of merits, as per the discussion in this thread merit is one of the most important part to vote for the DT and change it. I have some smerits to award for all the trust abuse supportive here.

You need 10 earned merits to vote right?

I can provide you with that to be eligible for voting. Not many but some of the supportive and abused, Jr.member and newbies can vote because of my help which is an honour for me.

Deena is Trusted by:
Thule (20 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
endlasuresh (3 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
DutchFinity (2 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Danica22 (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
ac2eugenio (1 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
mr.creampie (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
chickinini (11 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
cryptorgasm (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
TinaMoran (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Pablojob (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PiningGarcia (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PingGermoco (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
NilaMutac (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
cryptopov (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
poypototoy (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
BRAHN (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Zin-Zang (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
H8bussesNbicycles (5 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
gwsukabokepjepang (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Thank you for pointing this out bud, I would award some merits to all the members in this army!  

where is peloso?

You can't win against abusers and by the way very few persons on DT are not trust abusers , this is a well known fact since 2016. I think you can spend your time more wisely rather than dealing with trust abusers. Just my two cents as a victim of trust abuse.

Two wrongs don't make a right. Lauda is a proven scammer in so many ways; escrow, trust, merit; you name it. And being such a scammer Lauda can never be proven right, exactly because the opposite, his wrong doings, have been proven. Lauda's simply the biggest scammer on this forum and thus has to go first. The rest is small talk.

Look don't pretend I did not already say this to your face in meta it's not like I am talking shit about you behind your back. I am not at all happy to see someone who was a keen supporter of bruno who highlighted and fought HUGE SCAMS not these little pesky scammers that just pop back up next day under new accounts. Who now turns to the total dark side and support liars that red trust people for telling the truth about them and who ~ bruno himself I notice.

You can not support proven liars and trust abusers on one hand (whom themselves ~ BRUNO) and support Bruno at the same time.

Anyway do as you wish, I understand it takes a lot of courage to do the right thing.

me
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5103988.0




keeps track of who to vote for and puts ~lauda users on dt1
 
reminds me i should add laudas personal list too in inverse   <- done

As promised, I have removed my false trust and replaced it with correct trust. You're welcome.

I have never seen anything like this before in Reputation.

Account Deena woke up after 5 months, and from where are all these newbie accounts coming from...

Dammit, I miss digaran, it seems he was the sane one...nah, just kidding  

Basically trading trust votes between themselves so a bunch of scammers/scumbags get into DT1.

But hey, Lauda is the abuser

Doesn't seem quite consistent with what you're telling me. It's supposed to only be about how to remove Lauda!

If discussion is exclusively for the removal of Lauda, then what of this?

I still don't think that an echochamber conveys your message better than well-reasoned thoughts.

It's interesting, I might say. (10 posts by 8 users with 5 merit deleted.)

Bit of confirmation bias innit.

Despite the narrative you're aiming to push it seems rather unlikely for any real progress to be made, especially since all those that have replied on the thread have a negative DefaultTrust rating.

It's not misinformation that I'm spreading. You're trying to get "big players" into your plan. Most users that have earned merit aren't those that have heavy negative trust.

I believe the real misinformation is pushed by those that are attempting to create a one-sided discussion.

If the crux of your beginnings are stemmed in censorship, then what kind of state are you pushing for the new DefaultTrust to become?

Regardless of the number of threads, adding self-moderation and deleting every new reply that isn't in accordance with your beliefs is blatant censorship.

It just seems like an incontinent display of needless indignance: to resort to absolute control of the thread in a way as to isolate any opposition reduces perceptions to a guaranteed victory.

Derailing your thread? By adding in a differing opinion?

I suppose that's one way to consider it.

Aren't these ad-hominem attacks, these deletions of dissent, these attacks on differing opinions exactly the kind of thing that you would typically want to avoid when it comes to intelligent discussion?

Hey guys anyone can easily understand whats going on here. Its completely against the rules of bitcointalk. You guys are trying to manipulate the whole DT selection system. This subject should be discuss on Meta section & i am going to do it as a forum member.

If the thread is not for discussion then why open it to replies? Perhaps a locked thread would be of more substance, aye?

Then, if you offer only options of discussion to those that you permit, isn't it truly a one-way discussion? After all, if you're conversing with other members, that's a discussion by definition.

I don't think I'm trolling. Would you like to have the moderators determine the validity of that claim? Just leave this post up.

Any discussion about not removing Lauda from DT is relevant to the removal of Lauda from DT. It's just P and (not) P.

Half the names you have on your trust list cancel most of the other half out with cross negatives of each-other.

Is he the guy who reckons he took the "r" out of Bitcoin Crash?

Bitcoin is not going to crash by the way, but you must expect a few skids if you push the limits in the icy conditions created by the banking elite. Fortunately we seem to have some good drivers in control, and the transport mechanism is being improved all the time. Lightning is even giving us a new fast motorway.

Then we are in agreement. You can lock this thread now.

Since i always demanded these DT members to be excluded from DT since the community has no trust in them at all ,only some leading DT members i will adopt that list into my trust setting to activly push Lauda and its cult out of DT.

How exactly?

Are you just a troll?

You have no idea of the finances of this forum

shut the fuck up

I don’t think anyone from the cult of the witch would agree with that.

YOU are the only one who doesn’t have idea of the finances of this forum.

The forum has at least 500 BTC being escrowed by OgNasty. Not only that, but theymos gets a pretty good amount of money from ad slots (~0.5 to almost 1 BTC per week). If you think over $1.5 million + ~$2-3k a week is not enough, you are dumb.

If OgNasty is trusted to hold that much in escrow, should I add him to my trust network. I haven't done it so far because of his aggressive posting behaviour, but shouldn't trust really be about (dare I say it ) "trust".