This ^ Thanks Graham! and for only gapcoind and gapcoin-cli (without QT/GUI and UPNP) ... Example; cd depends
make NO_QT=1 NO_UPNP=1
cd ..
./autogen.sh
./configure --without-gui --without-miniupnpc --disable-tests
make
--with-incompatible-bdb etc., |
|
|
|
Hey minerja, Remember that we are very much between historical Bitcoin builds in terms of Gapcoin releases at the moment. Running Gapcoin and mining on Ubuntu 18.04 LTS would currently be my recommendation.However, I will get around to testing / adding updated build instructions for Ubuntu 20. Have you tried building the Berkley DB for yourself ? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=822498.msg54524230#msg54524230Bear in mind that the current repos might need fixes for Ubuntu 20.10 sudo apt-get install libdb-dev sudo apt-get install libdb++-dev The above will install the current Berkley DB for your OS (a higher / incompatible version e.g. BerkeleyDB 5.1 or later), so be careful and ... Always backup your wallet.dat and your private keys! |
|
|
|
Who finds any of this acceptable ? Just lock the threads already ! |
|
|
|
Watch out! You are only luring him...  ...snip... What, this guy ? ...snip...
You are an OG Bitcoiner. What do you think is Craig Wright’s main motive for doing this? I believe it’s more than money, anything material, or notoriety. It’s something else with him. I believe he simply wants to see something good burn, and destroyed.
Indeed. It would appear that he has narcissistic tendencies and delusions of grandeur. I feel he really needs some professional help! He has commenced on a path to 'hijack' Bitcoin and he is failing. It is truly "do or die" for him now and by that I mean he succeeds (in some way) or (more likely) goes to jail for perjury and/or other crimes. ... "Like I said, the Jonestown phase of Craig #Faketoshi Wright has begun.
He will go down in flames, and take everyone around him with him."- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1352960746154557441 ...  ...  Generally, folks who advocate violent extremism against others, don't succeed.  |
|
|
|
...snip...
You are an OG Bitcoiner. What do you think is Craig Wright’s main motive for doing this? I believe it’s more than money, anything material, or notoriety. It’s something else with him. I believe he simply wants to see something good burn, and destroyed.
Indeed. It would appear that he has narcissistic tendencies and delusions of grandeur. I feel he really needs some professional help! He has commenced on a path to 'hijack' Bitcoin and he is failing. It is truly "do or die" for him now and by that I mean he succeeds (in some way) or (more likely) goes to jail for perjury and/or other crimes. ... "Like I said, the Jonestown phase of Craig #Faketoshi Wright has begun.
He will go down in flames, and take everyone around him with him."- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1352960746154557441... ... Generally, folks who advocate violent extremism against others, don't succeed. |
|
|
|
...snip...
OK, then he, Craig Wright who is “Satoshi Nakamoto”, created Bitcoin and everything with it, including the white-paper, under an MIT license, and also he “Satoshi Nakamoto”, is claiming he didn’t place it under an MIT license? Call me confused.
Indeed. CSW is often providing historically inaccurate and/or conflicting information, mixed up with some facts for good measure. Perhaps the only person he really needs to be suing is himself. ... I've updated the post I re-posted in this thread relating to the known Satoshi PGP Key; - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311202.msg56151514#msg56151514These clowns are unbelievable! I'm not sure all of this is ever really worth my time and effort, but I won't stand for this BS any longer. |
|
|
|
"The Streisand effect is a social phenomenon that occurs when an attempt to hide, remove, or censor information has the unintended consequence of further publicizing that information, often via the Internet." - Wikipedia...snip... This^ The
Sauce(s)
Make the
Difference!Duck Sauce - Barbra Streisand (Official Video) - https://youtu.be/wWhtcU4-xAM |
|
|
|
Therefore, CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.
I think we all agree on that (with exceptions of course). Whilst I support free speech ... must we continually tolerate fraudulent and abhorrent behavior, against Bitcoin (BTC), the developers and this community ?
If you want speech to truly be free, you have to protect speech that you don't like; that's offensive; and may not be true. Anything else is just censorship, and I think any claims that BSV is bitcoin or that CSW is Satoshi should be countered with facts (or requests for proof in the case of the former). I don't think any censorship needs to be employed here--and remember, this is a forum where outright scammers aren't even banned, much less bald-faced liars. I did not call for the BSV threads to be deleted. I called for them to be locked. Archived to history is not censorship."Self-preservation keeps the crowd alive". The forum mods do already ban forum accounts and delete other peoples on-topic posts here. |
|
|
|
CSW has provided zero valid cryptographically assured proof, to date, whatsoever that he had anything to do with the creation of original Bitcoin (BTC). He has presented a plethora of invalid, fully debunked, refuted claims, outright lies, forgeries and untruths ... The Faketoshi Fifteen (Times Two)
Craig Wright’s most epic lies, frauds and forgeries 2013 — 2020- https://mylegacykit.medium.com/the-faketoshi-fifteen-times-two-76e8060905b4- https://seekingsatoshi.weebly.com/fraud-timeline.htmlTherefore, CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto and BSV is NOT Bitcoin. Whilst I support free speech ... must we continually tolerate fraudulent and abhorrent behavior, against Bitcoin (BTC), the developers and this community ? CSW Nonsense AGAIN - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311202.0So, you want to get sued by a scammer? - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311388.0Starve the beast - CSW - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311468.0Agreed. Where possible, boycott everything BSV related ASAP. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BoycottExcerpt: "A boycott is an act of nonviolent, voluntary and intentional abstention from using, buying, or dealing with a person, organization, or country as an expression of protest, usually for moral, social, political, or environmental reasons. The purpose of a boycott is to inflict some economic loss on the target, or to indicate a moral outrage, to try to compel the target to alter an objectionable behavior."De-list BSV now! IMHO this de-listing should include the bitcointalk moderators locking all of the BSV threads in the altcoin section of this forum.This is the bitcointalk forum, originally created by the real Satoshi Nakamoto ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5Are Theymos and others not yet convinced that CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto ?!? ... Iron Maiden - The Number Of The Beast (Official Video) ... - https://youtu.be/WxnN05vOuSMYes or no ? |
|
|
|
Agreed. Where possible, boycott everything BSV related ASAP. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BoycottExcerpt: "A boycott is an act of nonviolent, voluntary and intentional abstention from using, buying, or dealing with a person, organization, or country as an expression of protest, usually for moral, social, political, or environmental reasons. The purpose of a boycott is to inflict some economic loss on the target, or to indicate a moral outrage, to try to compel the target to alter an objectionable behavior."De-list BSV now! IMHO this de-listing should include the bitcointalk moderators locking all of the BSV threads in the altcoin section of this forum.This is the bitcointalk forum, originally created by the real Satoshi Nakamoto ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5Are Theymos and others not yet convinced that CSW is NOT Satoshi Nakamoto ?!? ... Iron Maiden - The Number Of The Beast (Official Video) ... - https://youtu.be/WxnN05vOuSM... EDIT: "Petition: Lock the BSV topics in the altcoin boards ... ?"- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5311515.0 |
|
|
|
I've updated this with a new most excellent section that was substantially contributed by Arthur Van Pelt using supporting documentation provided by xtraelv. h/t xtraelv, @MyLegacyKit (twitter), nutildah (for the forum topic https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.0 ) and to all who continually refute and debunk CSW's claim to be satoshi, as he has not provided any valid cryptographically assured proof, to date, whatsoever, whilst remaining abhorrent towards original Bitcoin (BTC), the developers and the entire cryptocurrency community. We were ready for this. Truth and justice must prevail. I'm guessing around a 0.00000001% chance that Craig Wright will actually waltz off with any Bitcoin related Intellectual Property in this case. Craig Wright is not satoshi and he had nothing whatsoever to do with the creation of Bitcoin. Dave Kleiman is not satoshi either and he had nothing to do with the creation of Bitcoin. One of Dave's hard drives contained a text note which stated "Is this a Satoshi address ..." (in a recent court doc.) ... he was a digital forensic investigator ... Which is why I recall this ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4359615.msg42180805#msg42180805... Craig Wright attempting to obtain Bitcoin related Intellectual Property through this court case (now a total farce) is quite clearly the 'end game' to justify his means. He has tried to 'hijack' the Bitcoin project, although he has only provided proven fabrications and circumstantial evidence to date, and therefore he will fail. The only winners in this case are already the lawyers, which is usually the case! ... The patents that both Craig and nChain 'hold' are completely worthless i.e. Prior Art ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5216304.msg53820493#msg53820493Highlights ... "Worthless and unenforceable patents !?
- https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/5960/can-i-patent-open-source-project
"You can not patent code. You can only patent an invention which is implemented in your code. An invention is a new and unique way of doing something..."... "... Most of all, it must be something nobody did before. If anyone used the same technique which you describe in your patent, that's called prior art and invalidates your patent..."... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5149062.msg52932888#msg52932888Quote: "The bitcoin whitepaper was first distributed by Satoshi Nakamoto on the Cypherpunks mailing list. The mailing list has a Cypherpunks anti-License. http://cypherspace.org/CPL/ ... "... "Background ...
The CPL is written from a mindset which derides the very concept of Intellectual Property restrictions as being incompatible with a free society ..."... "... Cryptographically assured anonymity and anonymous use of Internet resources mean that denizens of cypherspace can ignore copyright, licenses attempting to control use and distribution of works, and patents on ideas..."... "... It is not possible to enforce IP laws by calls to government legal systems when the flaunter is strongly anonymous. ..."... "CSW's and nChain's patents are likely Prior Art i.e. worthless and unenforceable without said cryptographically assured proof."... Returning to the OP ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5250960.0CSW has provided zero cryptographically assured proof, to date, whilst others have cryptographically proven him to be a liar and a fraud. ... satoshi, in many respects, was Hal Finney. Nakamoto, the originator, was/is someone else entirely ... N+1 - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5155191.0... For Whom The Bell Tolls ... - https://youtu.be/eeqGuaAl6IcGood work gmaxwell! (and of course to the the real Satoshi Nakamoto for being so prescient in this regard!) |
|
|
|
...snip...
Cøbra from Bitcoin.org said that Bitcoin was released under MIT license and can be freely distributed.
...snip...
It's true ... |
|
|
|
Isn't it poignantly entertaining how easily people will cave to copyright trolls if they reside in unfree places and/or aren't anonymous?
Great to see that at least Cobra won't allow himself to be intimidated.
This^ However (whilst we are here), could someone kindly explain to me why Cobra renamed the known Satoshi Nakamoto PGP Key here; ... - http://www.bitcoin.org/satoshinakamoto.asc (this historically incorrect link will download the key) whilst - http://www.bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc (this historically correct link will not download the key) It's not currently where satoshi left it you see ... The presence of the whitepaper on bitcoin.org is historically relevant, although (it seems currently) that the correct presence of the corresponding PGP key for the gmx email address in the whitepaper is not? Talk about taking liberties! This inconsistency is not helping the cases of hodlonaut or Peter McCormack in the 'fight' against CSW's claims either.
|
|
|
|
Why is Satoshi Nakamoto's PGP Key not currently on bitcoin.org ?- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5284596.0... One day, perhaps sometime soon, people will head some of the things I ramble on about ... "Regarding CSW and the Bitcoin Whitepaper"- https://bitcoin.org/en/posts/regarding-cswYesterday both Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org received allegations of copyright infringement of the Bitcoin whitepaper by lawyers representing Craig Steven Wright. In this letter, they claim Craig owns the copyright to the paper, the Bitcoin name, and ownership of bitcoin.org. They also claim he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, and the original owner of bitcoin.org. Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org were both asked to take down the whitepaper. We believe these claims are without merit, and refuse to do so.
Unfortunately, without consulting us, Bitcoin Core developers scrambled to remove the Bitcoin whitepaper from bitcoincore.org, in response to these allegations of copyright infringement, lending credence to these false claims. The Bitcoin Core website was modified to remove references to the whitepaper, their local copy of the whitepaper PDF was deleted, and with less than 2 hours of public review, this change was merged. By surrendering in this way, the Bitcoin Core project has lent ammunition to Bitcoin’s enemies, engaged in self-censorship, and compromised its integrity. This surrender will no doubt be weaponized to make new false claims, like that the Bitcoin Core developers “know” CSW to be Satoshi Nakamoto and this is why they acted in this way.
The Bitcoin whitepaper was included in the original Bitcoin project files with the project clearly published under the MIT license by Satoshi Nakamoto. We believe there is no doubt we have the legal right to host the Bitcoin whitepaper. Furthermore, Satoshi Nakamoto has a known PGP public key, therefore it is cryptographically possible for someone to verify themselves to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Unfortunately, Craig has been unable to do this.
We will continue hosting the Bitcoin whitepaper and won’t be silenced or intimidated. Others hosting the whitepaper should follow our lead in resisting these false allegations.
Posted to the Bitcoin.org Site Blog on 21 January 2021 by Cøbra
EDIT: Updated (additional): 22nd January 2021 Here is CSW talking about the known 'satoshi' PGP public key ... 1. The Original Website - Satoshi Nakamoto - Dr. Craig S. Wright & Ryan X. Charles. - Jan 4, 2021- https://youtu.be/_E7iuVM4CIA?t=5140He is trying to claim that the satoshi PGP key linked at the base of the page was supposedly changed by core devs who later controlled bitcoin.org - https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/ - Earliest snapshot 31st Jan, 2010 He is asserting that because the earliest snapshot in the web archive of the very same known PGP is from 28th Feb, 2011 that it is not his PGP key. - https://web.archive.org/web/20110228054007/http://www.bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc See the OP. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5284596.0Does Craig Wright not actually understand how PGP and cryptography works ? He most certainly does not understand how identity works in Bitcoin. This has nothing whatsoever to do with robots.txt 'hiding' information. A false claim. The known satoshi PGP Key (timestamped 2008) is signed with the email address in the f*cking whitepaper, which he is currently trying (and failing) to claim ownership of. ... So, where is Craig's own copy of his 'Satoshi Nakamoto' PGP Key then ? A 'PGP Key' was most certainly present on the website he claims to be his ! How about a signed message of proof ? "A catch-22 is a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations."- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)Not your PGP key; Not your whitepaper; Not your domain name.... "No they have not.
Earliest http://bitcoin.org snapshot Jan 31st 2009 ...
- https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/
Scroll to the base of the page and click the PGP Key link ...
"Satoshi Nakamoto
satoshin @ gmx .com
PGP key"
It's the same PGP key."- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_XBT/status/1352252043239555074... "It does not matter what you try to assert.
The PGP key in question belongs to the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
I saved a copy of the original PGP Key in 2010.
This is me ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188
I will testify to the above."- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_XBT/status/1352253734865285124... ...snip...
|
|
|
|
One day, perhaps sometime soon, people will head some of the things I ramble on about ... "Regarding CSW and the Bitcoin Whitepaper"- https://bitcoin.org/en/posts/regarding-cswYesterday both Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org received allegations of copyright infringement of the Bitcoin whitepaper by lawyers representing Craig Steven Wright. In this letter, they claim Craig owns the copyright to the paper, the Bitcoin name, and ownership of bitcoin.org. They also claim he is Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin, and the original owner of bitcoin.org. Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org were both asked to take down the whitepaper. We believe these claims are without merit, and refuse to do so.
Unfortunately, without consulting us, Bitcoin Core developers scrambled to remove the Bitcoin whitepaper from bitcoincore.org, in response to these allegations of copyright infringement, lending credence to these false claims. The Bitcoin Core website was modified to remove references to the whitepaper, their local copy of the whitepaper PDF was deleted, and with less than 2 hours of public review, this change was merged. By surrendering in this way, the Bitcoin Core project has lent ammunition to Bitcoin’s enemies, engaged in self-censorship, and compromised its integrity. This surrender will no doubt be weaponized to make new false claims, like that the Bitcoin Core developers “know” CSW to be Satoshi Nakamoto and this is why they acted in this way.
The Bitcoin whitepaper was included in the original Bitcoin project files with the project clearly published under the MIT license by Satoshi Nakamoto. We believe there is no doubt we have the legal right to host the Bitcoin whitepaper. Furthermore, Satoshi Nakamoto has a known PGP public key, therefore it is cryptographically possible for someone to verify themselves to be Satoshi Nakamoto. Unfortunately, Craig has been unable to do this.
We will continue hosting the Bitcoin whitepaper and won’t be silenced or intimidated. Others hosting the whitepaper should follow our lead in resisting these false allegations.
Posted to the Bitcoin.org Site Blog on 21 January 2021 by Cøbra
EDIT: Updated (additional): 22nd January 2021 Here is CSW talking about the known 'satoshi' PGP public key ... 1. The Original Website - Satoshi Nakamoto - Dr. Craig S. Wright & Ryan X. Charles. - Jan 4, 2021- https://youtu.be/_E7iuVM4CIA?t=5140He is trying to claim that the satoshi PGP key linked at the base of the page was supposedly changed by core devs who later controlled bitcoin.org - https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/ - Earliest snapshot 31st Jan, 2010 He is asserting that because the earliest snapshot in the web archive of the very same known PGP is from 28th Feb, 2011 that it is not his PGP key. - https://web.archive.org/web/20110228054007/http://www.bitcoin.org/Satoshi_Nakamoto.asc See the OP. - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5284596.0Does Craig Wright not actually understand how PGP and cryptography works ? He most certainly does not understand how identity works in Bitcoin. This has nothing whatsoever to do with robots.txt 'hiding' information. A false claim. The known satoshi PGP Key (timestamped 2008) is signed with the email address in the f*cking whitepaper, which he is currently trying (and failing) to claim ownership of. ... So, where is Craig's own copy of his 'Satoshi Nakamoto' PGP Key then ? A 'PGP Key' was most certainly present on the website he claims to be his ! How about a signed message of proof ? "A catch-22 is a paradoxical situation from which an individual cannot escape because of contradictory rules or limitations."- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catch-22_(logic)Not your PGP key; Not your whitepaper; Not your domain name.... "No they have not.
Earliest http://bitcoin.org snapshot Jan 31st 2009 ...
- https://web.archive.org/web/20090131115053/http://bitcoin.org/
Scroll to the base of the page and click the PGP Key link ...
"Satoshi Nakamoto
satoshin @ gmx .com
PGP key"
It's the same PGP key."- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_XBT/status/1352252043239555074... "It does not matter what you try to assert.
The PGP key in question belongs to the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
I saved a copy of the original PGP Key in 2010.
This is me ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188
I will testify to the above."- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_XBT/status/1352253734865285124
*Satire* Team America: World Police (10/10) Movie CLIP - Dicks, Pussies and Assholes (2004) HD *NSFW*- https://youtu.be/32iCWzpDpKs |
|
|
|
1BTC can't equal 1BTC even in a span of just 24h.....
Lest we wouldn't be having the green +(so and so percent) or the red -( so and so percent) on the 24hr price change charts....
Am I making a sense
No. The market moves up and down because Bitcoin is fungible. 1 BTC = 1 BTC See above post. ... Which one is heavier ? A ton of feathers or a ton of lead ? ... |
|
|
|
The price is always the price. 1 BTC = 1 BTC $1 = $1  ...  Word. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
