Anything new or any news going on with this coin? I don't see much in the way of chatter in this forum? Is Dev still active?
The android wallet app at http://www.woodcoin.org/files/woodcoin-wallet.apk(sha256sum d95d15ac04321ebf0d697152bddb08e323a02142e9ecfbc0e2e77748a951b591) has been updated. Now includes exchange rates for fiat currencies and the not-send-without-restart bug has been fixed. This is being added to app stores as we speak. Development continues on native token implementation on woodcoin as described in: http://woodcoin.info/2018/05/09/no-fork-native-tokens/
|
|
|
Great idea and great project. I hope this project will be successful. Always keep up the great work! Good luck
Thank you Belinda2589! Your kind words are much appreciated. In other news, also fixed for openssl 1.1 compatibility is the woodcore wallet: https://github.com/funkshelper/woodcorehttps://github.com/funkshelper/woodcore/commit/c531f448855833715e6761fc3f71ba4c631a7a25That should be all the wallets / nodes that use openssl updated. The wallet does not compile with libssl 1.1, i get a pretty long error message, which starts like this: CXX libbitcoin_common_a-ecwrapper.o ecwrapper.cpp: In function ‘int {anonymous}::ECDSA_SIG_recover_key_GFp(EC_KEY*, ECDSA_SIG*, const unsigned char*, int, int, int)’: ecwrapper.cpp:85:28: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘ECDSA_SIG {aka struct ECDSA_SIG_st}’ if (!BN_add(x, x, ecsig->r)) { ret=-1; goto err; } ^~ It works with libssl 1.0, but that is not an option on my home PC, since it would break other things. Would be nice if devs would fix this. Sorry to post this here, but the issue section on github was removed. Any other coders researching openssl 1.1 compatibility issues (I see a lot of teams struggling with this) might be interested to read this https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/OpenSSL_1.1.0_ChangesAlso useful is tpruvot's bignum.h
|
|
|
The wallet does not compile with libssl 1.1, i get a pretty long error message, which starts like this: CXX libbitcoin_common_a-ecwrapper.o ecwrapper.cpp: In function ‘int {anonymous}::ECDSA_SIG_recover_key_GFp(EC_KEY*, ECDSA_SIG*, const unsigned char*, int, int, int)’: ecwrapper.cpp:85:28: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘ECDSA_SIG {aka struct ECDSA_SIG_st}’ if (!BN_add(x, x, ecsig->r)) { ret=-1; goto err; } ^~ It works with libssl 1.0, but that is not an option on my home PC, since it would break other things. Would be nice if devs would fix this. Sorry to post this here, but the issue section on github was removed. I fixed these wallets so they now compile with the most recent openssl: https://github.com/funkshelper/woodcoin.githttps://github.com/funkshelper/woodcoin-minimal.gitPlease try them out for a spin and let us know how they compile. Anybody fixing other wallets please let us know. Stay strong all comrades in the struggle for sanity, sound money on middle earth, and a return to the wealth of the kindom of Dain.
|
|
|
The wallet does not compile with libssl 1.1, i get a pretty long error message, which starts like this: CXX libbitcoin_common_a-ecwrapper.o ecwrapper.cpp: In function ‘int {anonymous}::ECDSA_SIG_recover_key_GFp(EC_KEY*, ECDSA_SIG*, const unsigned char*, int, int, int)’: ecwrapper.cpp:85:28: error: invalid use of incomplete type ‘ECDSA_SIG {aka struct ECDSA_SIG_st}’ if (!BN_add(x, x, ecsig->r)) { ret=-1; goto err; } ^~ It works with libssl 1.0, but that is not an option on my home PC, since it would break other things. Would be nice if devs would fix this. Sorry to post this here, but the issue section on github was removed. Thanks for reporting flowjob; which source repo is this coming from? github.com/funkshelper/woodcore.git or github.com/funkshelper/woodcoin.git or other?
|
|
|
Difficulty ATH at 2680 ! ...
|
|
|
Nice work stuff0577! Put a LOG donation address in there too
|
|
|
New all time difficulty high! Diff = 2551
Wow, nice work LOG miners!!
|
|
|
As much as I love Woodcoin for a very long time, the main problem I have with it is that people can't solomine it with traditional miners (method not found). And being such a small coin that it is, solomining I think should be essential. You see, many coins sort of blindly updated their wallets to the newest Bitcoin wallet codebase which removed getwork that was required for solomining and was replaced with getworktemplate - which is STILL not supported by virtually any ccminer fork. It makes sense to remove solomining in the default Bitcoin wallet, but many many altcoins followed suit without acknowledging the consequences and without releasing a compatible miner that's capable of solomining with getworktemplate and coinbase, ignoring that decentralization should be paramount. Then again, I don't mean to be too harsh on Woodcoin, there are way bigger offenders to this idea, but still, this should be fixed in one way or another. I'm curious how AMD miners are doing with modern wallets. The good news is that you can still use version v1.0.0.0-unk-geo and solomine as if nothing happened because the newest version (v0.13.2.0-e0c070a) is fortunately not mandatory. Bathrobehero, I think you're exactly right here. In fact I think this same issue was responsible for contention on BTC as well - and kept a lot of miners off the segwit/core codes for a while. Getting rid of getwork was a very odd move that required a lot of work for miners. As you point out github.com/funkshelper/woodcoin.git still has getwork, and in fact dominates the network if you look at versions that nodes are reporting. Re-adding getwork to the core codebase was more difficult than I thought and I don't know of any coin that has done so. Because the original woodcoin still has getwork I haven't put much effort into it. If you can think of any way to address this please let us know!
|
|
|
Hmm I see l8nit3-miners hasn't solved a block in 9 days, but miner-control.de has 6 miners totally 11.7 GH/s, 12 blocks in the last hour.
|
|
|
Heads up for folks running a lot of coin nodes:
"Bitcoin Gold" also chose port 8338 for default port and so will cause problems when running on the same box as a woodcoin node.
|
|
|
|