Aaaaaand.... Last Place.

Phew! You made my heart skip a beat.

It seems like this would create an incentive to keep your coins in an huge number of wallets, so when you get randomly picked you only lose a small fraction of your value. 

I don't think having users spread coins between hundreds of wallets is your intention.

Watching.  Good luck SD!

Thanks for keeping us updated! 

Shouldn't Bitcoin100 stop working on pledges and work harder on getting new charities to accept? 

Has there been more than one charity yet?  (Strep B is the only one I saw) Can we post the charities that are accepting bitcoin in the OP?

I'm sorry, but this project seems to have turned into a huge circle jerk.  There are 50 pages of pointless crap!  Seems like Bitcoin100 is working harder to promote its own brand than it is to actually accomplish its mission. If people only posted here when there was a new charity, I'd read every post, but now I just completely ignore the thread and don't really care about this anymore.  Posting pictures of impoverished people does not help them: you are using them to promote yourselves.  I find it repugnant. If nothing changes, I'll probably withdraw my name.

What sets are they from?  Could you take some pics of their condition?

If they are decent, I probably know some people who would take the whole bunch off your hands.

Great article.

A payment systems expert doesn't understand Bitcoin?  Shocking! 

Seems like an interesting idea.

Sigh...

Can we just keep Phinneas and his inane, pointless, off-topic posts locked in the Newbie section forever?

Sorry newbs, it's not always like this.

I deleted all bitcointalk peers on Retroshare because some of them were sharing sketchy porn (filenames indicated possibly underage), and I didn't want to be any part of that.  Retroshare is only intended (and only makes sense) for you to add people you already trust.

I second this motion.

Sounds interesting.  Watching.

JonNikopol is his reddit username.

This is his Reddit account:
http://www.reddit.com/user/JonNikopol

That might be his real name...?  
Hope he is alright.

So, everyone has to invest into it at a $5,400,000 valuation, before it has grown above 1Gh/s...  You need to rethink your model.

Also, why do shares represent 0% of company assets.  This is odd.  You have outlined what happens during a liquidation event, what about an acquisition event?  The way you have written your offering, seems you may be able to legally sell all company assets to a third party, pocket the cash yourself (you are the only shareholder who owns assets), and leave other investors holding shares in an empty company with no assets or operations.

I don't think you are trying to be deceptive, but with shareholder agreements, you should very explicit and describe every possible case, so there are no misunderstandings.

... or deceiving lenders into thinking you are creditworthy*.

*I do not condone this.

I think this is a brilliant idea, and you could make a lot of money doing it.

Atlas, sometimes tyranny is better than the alternative.