Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 05:58:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »
61  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: Should I start? Heres my specs! on: December 12, 2017, 08:49:55 PM
Sorry buddy you missed the boat.  Bitcoin is exclusively mined by ASICs now.
62  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin fees on: December 12, 2017, 08:39:04 PM
Hopefully there will be new miners :X ... you can watch the unconfirmed transactions out there here https://blockchain.info/charts/mempool-count , at least for now the amount seems to shrink a little and so should the fees.
Adding miners doesn't really help.  The network is designed to have 1 block mined about every 10 minutes and the blocks are only 1M long.  The max bandwidth is pretty much fixed.
63  Economy / Economics / Re: Beside Cryptocurrenices where would you invest? on: December 12, 2017, 07:39:02 PM
  • Real estate
  • Index option spreads
64  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Two major cryptocurrency exchanges suffer outages on: December 12, 2017, 07:31:51 PM
By coincidence Bitcoin unconfirmed transactions and mempool size are hitting highs again:
https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#2w
65  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: December 12, 2017, 04:55:43 PM
Please verify and quate, thanks in advance

Adress
Quote
17tn5h2BdrrdmwJUPv2NRrK3Cfr1Bpf7Yn

Message
Quote
This is biletskiy, today is 12 of December 2017

Signature
Quote
H+HoFexu4NPuPmu3RsGu9nbCFZzOeggd6db3L0Cj0Pg0DBagcwYPINlAumcfcM187Ca9TvUZmn9FQR6RJAXTYW8=

Verified:
http://coinig.com/?adr=17tn5h2BdrrdmwJUPv2NRrK3Cfr1Bpf7Yn&msg=This+is+biletskiy%2C+today+is+12+of+December+2017&sig=H%2BHoFexu4NPuPmu3RsGu9nbCFZzOeggd6db3L0Cj0Pg0DBagcwYPINlAumcfcM187Ca9TvUZmn9FQR6RJAXTYW8%3D
66  Economy / Web Wallets / Re: Which online wallet for bitcoin is safer? on: December 12, 2017, 11:55:57 AM
Guys, client apps don't have different fees.  Clients like Electrum and Mycelium have different algorithms for automatically choosing a fee based on market conditions.  If the fee seems high it's not the client but the network's current conditions driving it.  You can in fact override the suggested fees (at least on Electrum) and enter anything you want.  But keep in mind that entering a lower fee will potentially cause your transaction to take days or weeks to be confirmed.

Bitcointalk is full of threads with people crying the blues about stuck transactions who entered a fee that was too low for conditions.
67  Bitcoin / Mining software (miners) / Re: OFFICIAL CGMINER mining software thread for linux/win/osx/mips/arm/r-pi 4.10.0 on: December 11, 2017, 07:50:34 PM
I had similar problems with getting a Gekkoscience 2Pac running. I needed to use the cgminer version from the Gekkoscience 2Pac thread.

The Jalapeno is directly supported by CGMiner.  I just fired up mine a couple weeks ago for giggles with CGMiner 4.9.2 and it worked fine.

So I would try it on a Linux or Windoze machine for a test to make sure the hardware still works then move to the RPi.
I dusted off my old Jally and fired it up a while back myself.  It made me sad for old times.  Cry
68  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Are my Bitcoins clean? on: December 11, 2017, 03:35:20 PM
Something else to consider: Paper currency is regularly removed from circulation as it deteriorates and replaced with new notes.  The supply of paper money is effectively infinite.

Bitcoin on the other hand is definitely limited to about 21 million.  As the blockchain ages, Bitcoins will increasingly become "tainted" until nearly all are.

What is more, once you're paid you can't just decide to not take some of it because it's tainted.
69  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Are my Bitcoins clean? on: December 11, 2017, 03:04:56 PM
US $20 bills are supposedly contaminated with cocaine residue.  Would any reasonable person stop using them because of that?
70  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: HARDWARE WALLET - ITS YOUR MONEY PLEASE SECURE on: December 11, 2017, 02:59:02 PM
You don't need a hardware wallet for maximum security.  99% of people getting ripped off are keeping all their BTC on a web wallet or in an online trading account.

Following these rules will eliminate most Bitcoin rip-offs:
  • Stop using web wallets
  • Don't keep all your BTC in your trading account (if you trade)
  • Store your Bitcoin using a method where you have possession of your private keys.  You can use the bitcoin-core client if you're willing to download 150GB of data.  Or you can use one of the thin clients.  Electrum is a good example:  Make a new wallet with a deterministic seed phrase, print it and keep it somewhere safe.  If your computer is stolen or destroyed you can regenerate the wallet from the passphrase.
  • Stop using Windows.  The Windows world is full of viruses and trojans that can steal your wallet.
  • Use a Linux computer with whole-drive LUKS encryption for Bitcoin.
  • Practice good internet hygiene.  Don't download porn or torrents on the same computer as your Bitcoin.  Keep your Bitcoin on  a separate computer.  Bitcoin is money and it's serious business.
  • If you're a profitable trader move your profits from the trading site to your secure wallet.  Don't keep all your eggs in 1 basket.
71  Economy / Speculation / Re: Do you check Bitcoin price everyday? on: December 10, 2017, 04:56:15 PM
I use the Simple Bitcoin Widget app on my Android phone.  All day, every day.
72  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: All about "stuck" transactions and what you can do to fix them on: December 10, 2017, 12:42:48 PM
My transaction has been stuck for 4 days....I transferred from one exchange to another, paid the fee that the exchanged asked me to paid.

anyone please help PLEASE! Kiss

Transaction ID

7cbf0bbdaad69e0b0e19649f6b456afbf3f6af0a73f834ba496390ee64cf22c7

Thanks a lot

The whole point of the post at the beginning of this thread is for you to be able to do this yourself:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1802212.0

Your transaction has 45 sat/byte fee which is kind of on the low side.  Check out the "Fee per byte" field:
https://blockchain.info/tx/7cbf0bbdaad69e0b0e19649f6b456afbf3f6af0a73f834ba496390ee64cf22c7
You might consider increasing the fee using the suggestions here:
https://bitcoinfees.earn.com/
You can replace the transaction using the double-spend method.

You can also request a miner to give your transaction priority which is easy, doesn't cost anything and you can do it yourself.  Nobody in this thread has magical powers to do this, in spite of appearances.
73  Economy / Service Discussion / Re: should I insert my bitcoin wallet seed here? on: December 10, 2017, 01:51:37 AM
Obviously a scam.

I mean, this is just stupid.

Dont even click the link people.
I'm gunna.
74  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: December 09, 2017, 05:17:34 PM
Please Quote:

----BITCOIN ADRESS ----

1P8ZrWKQuQeV5MwKJ8k1ciLVj1rPsJbK8n

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Today is 09.12.2017 bitcointalk account tekimebounty (u=1246611) belongs to this address.

-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----

SIGNATURE INyFOee/cTeXbNp03bk0vZKP5UagqH9ausTCVmS2RBCRbbslfukKZ+/DK8SXR6dgK7n2xu8q1aJIop4/+lay+x4=

Proof: http://www.coinig.com/?adr=1P8ZrWKQuQeV5MwKJ8k1ciLVj1rPsJbK8n&msg=Today+is+09.12.2017+bitcointalk+account+tekimebounty+%28u%3D1246611%29+belongs+to+this+address.&sig=INyFOee%2FcTeXbNp03bk0vZKP5UagqH9ausTCVmS2RBCRbbslfukKZ%2B%2FDK8SXR6dgK7n2xu8q1aJIop4%2F%2Blay%2Bx4%3D
There ya go dude. Cheesy
75  Other / Meta / Re: Stake your Bitcoin address here on: December 09, 2017, 11:57:57 AM
Please Quote:

----BITCOIN ADRESS ----

1MeuPRxvayhXtMFSYnQnC9nsPpwQv5KhaT

-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Today is 9.12.2017 bitcointalk account floopfloop (u=30229) belongs to this address

-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----

SIGNATURE IJz0IKBfHL60E73Gv4Yalv8a0rU1uD9iCt/NOSaEG4fwZZHEnGFbTSAfbnABLo7xD91zgvsZVejWLpWi2wGMJwI=

Proof: http://www.coinig.com/?adr=1MeuPRxvayhXtMFSYnQnC9nsPpwQv5KhaT&msg=Today+is+9.12.2017+bitcointalk+account+floopfloop+%28u%3D30229%29+belongs+to+this+address&sig=IJz0IKBfHL60E73Gv4Yalv8a0rU1uD9iCt%2FNOSaEG4fwZZHEnGFbTSAfbnABLo7xD91zgvsZVejWLpWi2wGMJwI%3D
Quoted!
76  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The First Ever Ethereum Sweatshirt Will Be Sent to Space on: December 08, 2017, 08:28:25 PM
Guys this a shit-post from a 10 post newb trying to create buzz.  There is nothing to OP's claim.
77  Other / Off-topic / Re: #morewomenincrypto on: December 08, 2017, 04:54:45 PM
More women in Crypto . what do you think about that guys ?
Only if it's a crypto sandwich. Cheesy
78  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin fees are ridiculous at the moment, will they go down soon? on: December 08, 2017, 02:57:40 PM
The fees are not "ridiculous" or "unreasonable" at all.  More transactions have entered the Bitcoin network than can be stored in blocks.  The miners all have the historically largest transaction backlog to work through.  If you want to get your transaction added to a block you have to compete with other transactions and that's done by paying a higher fee than the others.  It's economics in action.

https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#2d
79  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Transaction stuck, i pay **500 dollar Tip** on: December 08, 2017, 02:46:17 PM
I doubt you can get it "unstuck" without increasing your fee to some unacceptable level.  There are currently 211,000 unconfirmed transactions:
https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#2d
80  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Unconfirmed Transactions --> Over 200,000 --> That's the death of Bitcoin on: December 07, 2017, 07:40:16 PM
Nah, it's not the death to Bitcoin, just a wake-up call.
The Core devs need to get serious about the block size issue.  2 recent opportunities to address this were rejected.  I think it's time to revisit the issue and adopt one of the solutions.

So Bitcoin is centralized then?
Who are the "core devs"? They are the decision makers for Bitcoin?

Thought Bitcoin was de-centralized.

You're absolutely right.  The *core* devs can't seem to address the block size issue but the 2 hard forks *did* address the issue.  Unfortunately the miner community seems resistant to shifting to one of the hard forks.  So they stick with core bitcoin which has no good path forward.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!