It would be nice if a bunch of people had their wallets open. I haven't even been able to sync, let alone send any Silkcoin anywhere. I am also still waiting on 1000 SILK from ttoroie to post to the Weaver as well... this has all become really frustrating.
I can imagine, this will be moving up on the agenda. |
|
|
|
I don't mean to be disrespectful here. However, it has now been 4 full days and I have not seen the SLK I sent over to my SLK ICO account on the SlikNetwork credited. I have not received a single response or update from any of the team members telling me what's going on. There was no problems in withdrawing the SLK from the SLK ICO address I sent it over to within 2 hours after the ICO ended, but yet, it still can't be credited to my account? I understand that everyone is busy, but I would appreciate even a simple update or response that it is still being processed or looked into?
i feel you. i sent some silk to weaver from the old chain to test. it got lost and i haven't seen it. I keep getting told to talk to the community. Been like 20+ days i missed the ICO because the bulk of my silk is stuck on the old chain.. considering I used to be top100 and here since the beginning and ran the silkpool for a while. It shows you where you stand in the big picture. We will make sure that everyone that still has Silkcoin will be able to swap to Silk. As mentioned many times before, the blockchain confirms that transactions have taken place and that coins are credited to your weaver address. If it shows up on the chain then you will be credited. |
|
|
|
Do we have a guide how to setup a stormnode?
There will be a tutorial available before launch  |
|
|
|
Snip
All in all, I can say that Silk team paid the price for being so greedy and convoluted. They raised less BTC than what they would have raised if they had a fair and simple ICO.
You have some dark goggles my friend, try wearing the rose-coloured ones they paint a far better picture and would lighten up your mood  . Sorry for the most boring question in the Bitcoitalk history, but why does not my SILK wallet (64bit) sync? Never had problems with wallets before, My Silk wallet does not have a single connection.
Thnanks in advance
Are you running the latest version 1.0.1.1? So is the SILK wallet new? Also is the DSLK wallets available yet or not???
The OP contains download links to the latest wallets DSLK wallet will be available after launch |
|
|
|
Did you end up being credited your SLK that you sent over for the ICO? Mine still don't show up on weaver after two days. On the blockchain, it shows them as received and also withdrawn by someone shortly after the ICO ended.  If it shows up on the block chain that it will be credited to your account. Until now there has not been a case where one did not receive his belongings. I see my SLK in weaver, in the SLK (ICO) position listed. But I didn't see the amount of DSLK I'll get. Can somebody tell me how to look for in a blockchain explorer? SLK was accepted at $ 0.01 DSLK price was set at $ 0.25 Just divide your amount by 25  |
|
|
|
Did you end up being credited your SLK that you sent over for the ICO? Mine still don't show up on weaver after two days. On the blockchain, it shows them as received and also withdrawn by someone shortly after the ICO ended. If it shows up on the block chain that it will be credited to your account. Until now there has not been a case where one did not receive his belongings. So it seems the first week set the price. $0.25 for each DSLK? When will you guys credit investors's accounts with DSLK. Everything will be processed via the Weaver if I recall that correctly.
Just please make sure to implement automatic withdrawal.
You are correct the price was set at $0.25 for each DSLK. Investors will be credited after the chain becomes active, which should be Nov the 5th. |
|
|
|
I can not understood why I participate in ICO DarkSilk, if I can buy a coin (SLK) to Bittrex! Who can answer me in what is now take benefit of participating in the ICO SLK and DSLK are two different coins, two seperate chains. Both tokens are good to have. If you want to buy SLK use Bittrex If you want to buy DSLK you may use the price advantage at Bittrex, else buy at Weaver up until a price of 1570 sat for Silk it would be beneficial to buy and swap SLK for DSLK. |
|
|
|
Where is Darksilk to be traded? I cannot find reference to the market anywhere. I am following but this thread is confusing! ;-)
Bittrex |
|
|
|
The truth does not fear questions... I don't know what fud you are talking about.
Who said anything about .5btc... This community's attitude as a majority has already alienated and kicked many investors asking questions..
It is a shame the ico is lower then expected by great proportions but it is of your own devices. Calling someone like me a liar with the assumption I am a poor investor about sums things up.
And you are right, we dont fear any questions. But also take into account that this project has been long coming and that certain questions are less kindly received. Personally to me the ICO wasnt that much of a let down. The product is sound, let the public judge by things that they can clearly see. Once they have received thats when demand would've picked up, switching gears by rebranding will probably dampen this effect a bit. Regardless... we look to the future with great expectation  . |
|
|
|
Okay. But it is not SLK or DSLK. Hence the confusion and the problem.
You have names you're not saying, partnerships you're not disclosing for the name change, and a marketer to come when previously stated finalising new year and now I'm told I'm pulling words out of thin air? I quoted the exact reference to the new year. I'm not making things up.
You guys ask for money for an ico and then decide to change the name after you take the investors money. A little more care and concern for investors would be appreciated.
Your concerns have been noted. The DarkSilk technology will be presented after the ICO as planned. It is easy to find ways to create cognitive dissonance with your investment. Try our Silk wallet, read into DarkSilk and know that this will soon be launched, nothing will be thrown aside. Also join us on slack and spend some idle time, this is something i would advice all. Give a voice to your investment and interact with your fellow members, see you there . |
|
|
|
That there will not be adequate promotion of the project until the rebranding is finished, already a low liquidity market and a few months more indecisiveness will likely kill it. More a question of, likely good time to sell to wait for this coin to choose its path? The new year is a long ways away to wait for final direction and can't advertise something that doesn't exist.
The Silk project has been underground for a long time but progress has always been made. At a 25:1 rate we off a swap for those that want to switch from SLK to DSLK, DSLK being released Nov 5th. DSLK with the Stormnode reward structure might attract more liquidity and could be a great opportunity. The future of SLK as stated before is tied to the success of DSLK. No matter the outcome of the rebrand this will remain. Investors do need to take into account that SLK is a long term investment. |
|
|
|
Hi,
Could i still participate for some bounty like twitter follow for example?
Does the team have a TW bonus plan? There is no bonus plan in effect. Members are free to contribute and support the project. Be proactive, join slack and have fun! |
|
|
|
Care to elaborate on this question? What is it that you are asking or pointing to? |
|
|
|
Well, I just voted and you all can guess where I put my vote. Hmmm, mine made it 60 / 40 in favor. Yes, I agree with "Revolution is something of the people, by the people and for the people", however I disagree with "The sense of urgency and haste don't resonate with me either". Blockchain technology is moving the fastest it has been for quite some time. I can tell you very little from my day job, but it is being looked at and considered for many "official" adaptions. The sense of urgency is there and any hesitation in action will be detrimental to the future of this project.
I also want to make it clear that I am not a member of the team, they are light years ahead of me in what they are coding. My only involvement is / was setting up and running some DNS seeders. That and investing in the project because I truly believe they are taking it in the right direction.
I wouldn't disagree with the fast paced environment, or the necessity of speed, they are. I also agree that hesitation in action is detrimental, therefor I can only wish the best for this new direction. But looking back, this decision was reactionary and not spontaneous, more based on fear of missing out then on the courage/desire to create. Personally I like to leave it at that, the focus should indeed be on the future. |
|
|
|
Can you make an objective pros and cons list so we know exactly what to consider in voting on the poll?
We think it is quite obvious as to why the rebrand is happening. Bad connotations, unable to carry out business, constant questions about Silk Road and the projects name..... EDIT: We have spelled it out. The question is leading... The pro's could be brand recognition, steadfastness in direction/vision or continuity (in a way that trancends team efforts). Bad connotations could be overcome by proving the world wrong. To me business should be secondary. Revolution is something of the people, by the people and for the people. A less rigorous form of rebranding would've been preferable to me, so I voted no, i.e losing 'Dark', while maintaining 'Silk'. The sense of urgency and haste don't resonate with me either. |
|
|
|
|
So let me break down the 44Million to you all.
16.44M are in user-wallets
11.44M Staking
5.0M non-Staking (of which at least 1.8M is ICO receivables)
11.4M is at the Bittrex exchange
16.16M is at Weaver
this is Silkcoin collateral or
SLK collateral for future use.
This means that 63% is converted Silkcoin
of which 41% is actually staking.
Your SLK amount /
11.44M Staking competition *
Yearly increase 986,175 SLK = ...
Your projected yearly increase.
|
|
|
|
Same thing happened to me. I sent coins from my old silkcoin wallet and they dont show up in the online weaver??? I am glad I only sent a small amount to test it out. disappointing that it was not a quick smooth transaction as it steals confidence in the system. This needs fixing asap. Hi,
Is old Silkcoin transferred to Silknetwork supposed to be showing up in the online wallet yet?
Is this something I should be doing now or waiting to a later date?
Sorry if this was addressed recently, I scrolled through a few pages but couldn't find anything.
Do you experiment with send coin to the trading market? https://bittrex.com/home/marketsNo, I meant sending Silkcoin to my Silkcoin wallet at Silknetwork.org. Transaction shows up in blockchain explorer but not in the online wallet balance. Sorry, understanding errors, you are using SILKCOIN ICO it? If Silkcoins are picked up on the blockchain, then this means that they've arrived safely. The push to the Silk Network site is still a manual process, it will be visible once Matthew makes the push. A little bit of patience is necessary  Is Weaver an independent platform, or will there be other developments in the future?
Weaver is an inhouse developed platform aimed to provide service to the Silk Network. |
|
|
|
All in all, an ideal figure would of been around 700BTC, however at the rate of the ICO and the time left, we are looking at hitting between 100-150BTC.
Does this mean that after the ICO the rest of the 1528000DSLK will be available at least at $1? If that's so, you should be considering burning them, the distribution leaves already too many coins on dev's hands, 944k + 584k + 944k + about 1.2M not sold from the ICO, and only about 300k in the hands of investors. This is probably the main reason why you might end up with 100-150BTC instead of the 700BTC that you were hoping for. Welcome kaene, first thing that needs to be understood is that DSLK is not like any other crypto asset. We are positioning it as a crypto currency, the first of its kind. This means that supply management will always be a concern. The $1 mark might be discounted later on, who knows, but the fact remains that a lot of DSLK will be left over, this is by design. If you want to know more I would suggents to read the OP & brochure thoroughly or get connected to Slack(link is in my signature) and have a direct conversation. Also, if the monthly emission is around 65971DSLK (((1+0.382)*1350*30) + 10000), being 10000DSLK of those for the budget, it means a bit more than a 15% of the monthly emission for the proposal budget, don't you think that's a bit too much? Specially compared to DASH's 10%
That's all relative my friend. Also, one question, the "944000DSLK as collateral for Weaver operations, running Stormnodes as a service"... who gets the reward of those Stormnodes?
Those who have ordered the service |
|
|
|
Maybe send Poloniex an email. Since Silk is being delisted that is.
Silkcoin(SILK) is being delisted and we have messaged them, without reply. We no longer support Silkcoin(SILK) and simply offer a swap 1:1 from the old Silkcoin(SILK) to the new Silk(SLK). All further communication will be carried through the user SilkNetwork. Please message the user SilkNetwork for questions aimed at the Silk Network and these will be relayed through to the relevant department. So this is a relaunch of another coin? But I also see on the website that something like 69 BTC have been invested. Does that mean those who invest will share the coins with the holder of the other coin? 69 BTC and 1,800,000 SLK has been invested into DSLK. DSLK is a new coin that will co-exist with SLK. SLK has been relaunched. DSLK has yet to be launched. These chains will both be autonomous. |
|
|
|
1800000 SLK cap for another 27 BTC so it would 69 plus 27: so current funding is more or less equal to 100 BTC which is not bad at all. Hungry camels wait for stingy scorpions Agreed and we are only halfway into the ICO |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
