|
I'm not an expert (just an average Joe that uses armory) in offline signing so I can't help you with that. I'm sure someone will get in here to help you if you are not able to run a node in the background.
|
|
|
|
make a copy of your wallet (not perse needed but better safe then sorry) C:\user\appdata\roaming\armory\wallet file you should get the latest version from this thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1896808.0 it is a sticky in this forum. Then install bitcoin core from their official page, let it sync, that will take a while and takes about 150G of disc space atm. After it is sync'd start armory (in armory file>settings> uncheck "Let armory run bitcoin core/bitcoind in the back ground) and let armory sync. It is gonna take a while depending on your set up, but once done you are good to go. |
|
|
|
|
Have you installed bitcoin core too? Armory needs that to work properly.
Edit to say Armory can be used offline as cold storage or online with the use of Bitcoin core as hot wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
So I tested the site yesterday,
Registration went well (missed the part of registering with an email though);
Deposit went ok, came through after one deposit but i had to refresh the site for that;
The site looks a little bright, a darktheme or nghtview would be appreciated;
Dice plays simple and easy, barely waiting times, so much better then on chain;
Forex had opening times 23:10-20:00 so i wasn't able to play at that moment (maybe post the opening times plain and clear to see before someone want to place a bet?);
withdraw had an issue, i needed to register an email first (would be handy with the sign up to do that though), once done and verified the email, after a refresh i was able to do so;
I wanted to withdraw all my coin, so a minor issue is that i needed to subtract the fee of my balance to get the amount i need to withdraw to get my whole balance, a simple max button makes that much easier;
Withdraw was instant after that, with a respectable fee it confirmed fast.
All in all it looks good and will probably spending some time here.
Can you make the option to play anonymous as I can see everyone his name and bets in the list and i can imagen not everyone wants that.
|
|
|
|
|
Ohw that sucks Directbet gone.
Anyway thanks for the winnings and losses.
And Good Luck with your new adventures
|
|
|
|
|
snipped because I'm to dumb to press a button named binary options lol
But i like the idea so far, it solves a lot of issues with the on chain betting.
Would you consider a dark theme too? It is kinda bright to watch.
|
|
|
|
lmao busted! Its people like you that doublespend that ruin secondstrade fast payments for us! What the hell are you talking about? That transaction is not from me, or associated with any transaction of mine in any way. What did you do, just search for a doublespend then claim it's mine? You must have because the only way that transaction is related to me is by your comment. Now why in the hell would you do that? What's your motivation? I've never even bet on anything but the 5seconds games, period. I'll refrain from saying it, but I think you're just an asshole. well I guess I did say it, oh well. I have no clue why he connected those two tx. Besides that you play for a while here having multiple tx questioned for payouts that got granted. So unless he can link those tx it makes no sense at all. Meanwhile more apache errors and forex offline it is going downhill fast. |
|
|
|
Their reasoning was that this site is old and most people by now who are gambling on it should be at least junior members or older. He had the most double spenders try and get their BTC back usually with newbie accounts. Since there is no email or support ticket on the website, only way to get a hold of the admin is to make a new account on Bitcointalk and make a post in their thread. In my opinion its not fair either. I agree, addresses that are being used over and over again are clearly not double spending. While the double spending is still going on with the ever changing addresses |
|
|
|
Apparently RBF was broken in 0.96 and we didn't notice. Try using 0.96.1-testing build. It should be fixed there.
I will check that next couple of days, Thanks |
|
|
|
Different question. Can someone ELI5 me on how to use RBF in armory? I tried to make a tx with RBF enabled, that worked. It shows the tx with the comment *Right click to bump fee*. 0 conf When I right click it a pop up appears but when i press "bump fee" in that nothing happens. When opening "send bitcoins" again and RBF control enabled (it shows description: *RBF subset*) and recreate the same amount to the same address just with a higher fee I get the message "Coin selection failed with error: "Invalid spend value"  2017-05-18 11:11 (ERROR) -- Traceback (most recent call last):
File "ArmoryQt.py", line 3340, in showContextMenuLedger
File "ArmoryQt.py", line 5891, in bumpFee
File "ui\TxFrames.pyc", line 1295, in prefillFromBatch
File "ui\TxFrames.pyc", line 1342, in prefill
KeyError: 'change' |
|
|
|
Just a short simple question.
Would it be possible to make in 0.96.1 in wallet properties when I click on balances, comments, tx count or addresses and so it would order them (highest, alphabetical, etc)? It doesn't seem to work right now and i'm searching my ass off when i look for a particular address or balance.
Thank You for considering
Will think about it. In case someone else was searching for a particular address or so... I found a way around it for now. When opening "Send Bitcoins" > "Address book" I can organize on tx, addresses, comments and balances. |
|
|
|
Yeah, when I do child pays for parent, I always do $2 and that way I get it pretty fast, usually within an hour. It's the only way, otherwise i'd probably have to wait over a week lol.
As far as the manual check goes, I get that. But I don't think they get THAT many bets throughout the day. Surely a manual check shouldn't take more than 24 hours? In this case it was a week.
I just checked. the unconfirmed tx that are nested before all of mine are about 7000 b. An average 1 block confirmation fee is about 271 sats/b . To get them confirmed pretty fast i would have to pay a fee of 1897000 sats  And that is just because it is nested deep. low fee player > low fee internal tx > etc > low fee payout. I wouldn't mind paying for one tx with CPFP but this is just too deep and to expensive as I don't bet 1 btc at a time Even if you are a large better and don't mind paying $2+$2 for fees its still a huge waste of potential profit taking away from the site. If it weren't for these feeds maybe they could improve their coding and website.
Plus, most people don't have 1000 BTC in their wallet and when they make a large bet, they need it to come back first before they can use that BTC to bet again. That is exactly the reason why secondtrade should use a marktconfirm fee and don't spend unconfirmed bets from other users, businesswise it would make more sense. But probably we won't here anything from them about this issue Well looking at todays fees.  Pretty much have no idea why this website is still in business. Even if you send less than 450 Sats/byte, it would take hours and hours to confirm and most likely you would get bored and go back to gambling with regular dice. Since LTC protocol is very similar to BTC, the site should temporarily use LTC Todays prices are ridiculous. To CPFP that 7000b i would have to pay 0.033 BTC fees for a tx. (it is 480 sats/b while I type this) They should use LTC yeah. Or with a login and on site coins, although I understand the security issues that come with that. But fair fees and not using unconfirmed balance would have prevented a lot of waiting time. (I only suggest that because it is a minor change, compared to implementing LTC or whatever) Anyway for now we wait. |
|
|
|
Yeah, when I do child pays for parent, I always do $2 and that way I get it pretty fast, usually within an hour. It's the only way, otherwise i'd probably have to wait over a week lol.
As far as the manual check goes, I get that. But I don't think they get THAT many bets throughout the day. Surely a manual check shouldn't take more than 24 hours? In this case it was a week.
I just checked. the unconfirmed tx that are nested before all of mine are about 7000 b. An average 1 block confirmation fee is about 271 sats/b . To get them confirmed pretty fast i would have to pay a fee of 1897000 sats And that is just because it is nested deep. low fee player > low fee internal tx > etc > low fee payout. I wouldn't mind paying for one tx with CPFP but this is just too deep and to expensive as I don't bet 1 btc at a time Even if you are a large better and don't mind paying $2+$2 for fees its still a huge waste of potential profit taking away from the site. If it weren't for these feeds maybe they could improve their coding and website.
Plus, most people don't have 1000 BTC in their wallet and when they make a large bet, they need it to come back first before they can use that BTC to bet again. That is exactly the reason why secondtrade should use a marktconfirm fee and don't spend unconfirmed bets from other users, businesswise it would make more sense. But probably we won't here anything from them about this issue |
|
|
|
Thanks for finally paying out. So is it going to take a week every time we want to be paid out now if we do bets over $100? This has happened to me a few times now for my bigger bets and it makes it not worth doing if i have to wait a week to get paid.
it takes ages this way with the 60 sats/b especially because payouts are made from a lot of small ones that use unconfirmed balances. They should use at least double as bare minimum, but when I send I use between 3x or 4x as much so I don't see why they can't. I don't mind the low fee they pay us out with, you could just do child pays for parent to get it faster (although, yes you are right! I am paying usually $1 in fees, they could do the same). My issue is that the actual pay out process for bigger bets, it takes them a week to verify and send the winnings back. If i do small bets of lets say $20 or so, they always pretty much pay me my winnings "instantly" but when I bet over $100, my bets sometimes disappear and then I have to contact them here and wait for them to check it out before they actually pay me. Sometimes they are quick and take a day, other times like for my last win, I had to wait a week! I haven't got one of those server errors in over a month now lucky me. But child pays for parent only seems to get me my payments less slow, but still slow. Now I am still waiting for a tx to confirm the unconfirmed balance before that is 5 tx deep. I pay a fee so I can get a confirmation in one or two blocks so it shows it is legit and not part of double spending what so ever it would suit them if they provide the same service to their customers. @adaseb Network fee is just what it is. $2 or whatever, it sucks yeah I know, but without any changes ready to be made they could at least be markt confirm. That is why is said: How about mimicking the fees users use to send to you? High fee placed bets get paid by high fee payouts so both transactions will confirm quick. Same for low fee placed bets, they will get low fee payouts and thus are slow in both ways So the players themselves can chose what fee to use, instead of being too expensive for small bets or too slow for bigger ones |
|
|
|
Thanks for finally paying out. So is it going to take a week every time we want to be paid out now if we do bets over $100? This has happened to me a few times now for my bigger bets and it makes it not worth doing if i have to wait a week to get paid.
it takes ages this way with the 60 sats/b especially because payouts are made from a lot of small ones that use unconfirmed balances. They should use at least double as bare minimum, but when I send I use between 3x or 4x as much so I don't see why they can't. |
|
|
|
Can you up the fee and/or make sure you don't payout from unconfirmed balances? Waiting for days to get a tx to confirm is not a thing that should be happening at a betting site 60 sats per b is way too low. (I would suggest checking the average on https://bitcoinfees.21.co/ and make the fees right for at least the bets above 0.01 BTC and let the bets pay the real fee instead of the 0.0002 that it is now, as you would lose more $$$ waiting for a days old tx if btc drops from $1800 to $1700 then a higher fee would have cost) And digging around to accelerate tx that need to be confirmed before the tx that is coming to my payouts is not fun either. (this can be easily solved by not spending unconfirmed balance) Thank You. (Please don't consider it, just do it lol) Just another brainfart.... How about mimicking the fees users use to send to you? High fee placed bets get paid by high fee payouts so both transactions will confirm quick. Same for low fee placed bets, they will get low fee payouts and thus are slow in both ways |
|
|
|
|
Just a short simple question.
Would it be possible to make in 0.96.1 in wallet properties when I click on balances, comments, tx count or addresses and so it would order them (highest, alphabetical, etc)? It doesn't seem to work right now and i'm searching my ass off when i look for a particular address or balance.
Thank You for considering
|
|
|
|
|
Looks good. No issues with 0.14.1 so far.
Goatpig, Achow101, Droark and others, you should really have a donation address so that we can at least buy you a few beers for your hard work, much appreciated.
|
|
|
|
I am unfamiliar on how to extract my private key. I can't seem to see any options in armory.
Wallet properties => backup this wallet => export key lists |
|
|
|
Odd-EvenExpiry time is 4 seconds. If you select "UP", when expiry price + entry price = Odd number , you will win , at this time reward will be 198%If you select "DOWN", when expiry price + entry price = Even number, you will win , at this time reward will be 198%7Secondsthe expiry time is 7 seconds. If you select "UP", when expiry price >= entry price, you will win If you select "DOWN", when expiry price <= entry price, you will win at this time, the reward is below.  These two haven't been working for a while now. So you should either reactivate them or remove them from this post. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
