 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 »
|
Reasons not to use Microcash (as I recall them):
1) The creator is an immature, insecure, greedy little fuck. He's already created multiple failed versions of Solidcoin which ripped directly from the Bitcoin source code without giving credit to it as instructed by the MIT license.
2.) Development team has consistently claimed that their currencies are decentralized when they aren't. In the past, they would not publish the code as open-sourced. When you ask them specific questions about the technical aspects of Solidcoin/Microcash, they respond not with an answer, but rather by 1) insulting you or 2) insulting Bitcoin.
3.) I did the math in a previous post -- Coinhunter had about 1/8 of the coins in the entire network based upon the amount of money that he stated he had invested in it. How's that for decentralization?
4.) There's really so much more I could write, but I don't want to look up any specific posts as it would be a waste of my time.
Seriously, if you use MicroCash, you deserve to have every bit of your investment stolen. Every Solidcoin version to date has been pumped and dumped to hell, this version will be no different.
One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Coinhunter is the reason we have abortion.
I asked why Microcash is a scam. 1, 2, 3, 4 are not valid reasons. 3.) I did the math in a previous post -- Coinhunter had about 1/8 of the coins in the entire network based upon the amount of money that he stated he had invested in it. How's that for decentralization?
How does having any amount of coins relate to the decentralization of the network? Mt. Gox has a large percentage of Bitcoins in their wallets, you don't see people complaining how that harms the security of the Bitcoin network. 2.) Development team has consistently claimed that their currencies are decentralized when they aren't. In the past, they would not publish the code as open-sourced. When you ask them specific questions about the technical aspects of Solidcoin/Microcash, they respond not with an answer, but rather by 1) insulting you or 2) insulting Bitcoin.
I believe the source code is freely available on their website. Although it was a concern in the past, it is not one right now. 1) The creator is an immature, insecure, greedy little fuck. He's already created multiple failed versions of Solidcoin which ripped directly from the Bitcoin source code without giving credit to it as instructed by the MIT license.
These versions are iterations of the ongoing development of SolidCoin. They are not separate entities from each other, just like new Bitcoin releases. What defines a version as 'failed'? Having no users running the specific version? I'm sure there are older Bitcoin versions which have have zero users. Okay I agree with you on the MIT license.  The source code for the original Solidcoin v2.0 was never released. Only v2.04 was released. Microcash is still a mystery Trying to claim the time and time over proven scam history of the developer is unrelated to the platform is.....so Coinhunter like. ~BCX~ Sorry I wasn't aware of that. I don't think the codebase of 2.04 is far off from the major release of 2.0. I'm not going to argue with that.  |
|
|
|
I'm legitimately interested in why you think anyone who disagrees with Microcash being a scam is Coinhunter. Please, I'm dying to hear.
When enraged, you made the same grammatical errors and used the same insulting language the Coinhunter account used. A telling lapse, but not proof. Purportedly Microcash will have mechanisms built in to enrich the largest SoiledCoin accounts (currently controlled by Coinhunter) at the expense of others. Of course, it does not yet exist so any discussion of what it is would be a waste of time. If Microcash broke cleaning from the SoiledCoin chain, it would cease to be a scam. Then we would have to wait until it was implemented and the source released before passing judgement. As is, Microcash is just a vehicle to preserve and extend the ill gotten gains of SoiledCoin and it's tyrant nodes. That's the most assinine argument I've ever heard. Grammatical errors? Are you sure those instances of my 'grammatical errors' were not me trolling, just like others in the same topic? It's shit hard to get something through some of your skulls it's sometimes not worth the effort to respond coherently. The usage of "purportedly" means there is lack of proof of the observations following it, and usually signifies the presence of FUD nearby. I'll be willing to talk to you once Microcash is released. |
|
|
|
Reasons not to use Microcash (as I recall them):
1) The creator is an immature, insecure, greedy little fuck. He's already created multiple failed versions of Solidcoin which ripped directly from the Bitcoin source code without giving credit to it as instructed by the MIT license.
2.) Development team has consistently claimed that their currencies are decentralized when they aren't. In the past, they would not publish the code as open-sourced. When you ask them specific questions about the technical aspects of Solidcoin/Microcash, they respond not with an answer, but rather by 1) insulting you or 2) insulting Bitcoin.
3.) I did the math in a previous post -- Coinhunter had about 1/8 of the coins in the entire network based upon the amount of money that he stated he had invested in it. How's that for decentralization?
4.) There's really so much more I could write, but I don't want to look up any specific posts as it would be a waste of my time.
Seriously, if you use MicroCash, you deserve to have every bit of your investment stolen. Every Solidcoin version to date has been pumped and dumped to hell, this version will be no different.
One definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.
Coinhunter is the reason we have abortion.
I asked why Microcash is a scam. 1, 2, 3, 4 are not valid reasons. 3.) I did the math in a previous post -- Coinhunter had about 1/8 of the coins in the entire network based upon the amount of money that he stated he had invested in it. How's that for decentralization?
How does having any amount of coins relate to the decentralization of the network? Mt. Gox has a large percentage of Bitcoins in their wallets, you don't see people complaining how that harms the security of the Bitcoin network. 2.) Development team has consistently claimed that their currencies are decentralized when they aren't. In the past, they would not publish the code as open-sourced. When you ask them specific questions about the technical aspects of Solidcoin/Microcash, they respond not with an answer, but rather by 1) insulting you or 2) insulting Bitcoin.
I believe the source code is freely available on their website. Although it was a concern in the past, it is not one right now. 1) The creator is an immature, insecure, greedy little fuck. He's already created multiple failed versions of Solidcoin which ripped directly from the Bitcoin source code without giving credit to it as instructed by the MIT license.
These versions are iterations of the ongoing development of SolidCoin. They are not separate entities from each other, just like new Bitcoin releases. What defines a version as 'failed'? Having no users running the specific version? I'm sure there are older Bitcoin versions which have have zero users. Okay I agree with you on the MIT license. |
|
|
|
Ever heard of 'personalized search'?  I regularly delete my browser's cookies, and it doesn't accept 3rd party cookies or Adobe cookies. Even if (or especially if) they track my IP and have a bunch of other tricks up their sleeve, then I would assume the bitcointalk link should be right up there on page one because I've been using this site a lot lately. Whereas I had never even heard of Wired until the discussion in another thread about a leaked FBI document. Not suspicious at all. Older sites get higher rank due to age and because more people are likely to be linking to an older article than to something new. Then there is the ranking of the site itself, Wired is a popular site with a high rank.
Source: over 9 years experience at SEO
Rank based on... what other criteria? This site has been around for a lot longer than 5 months. Wired has a higher page rank than this forum. Therefore their results will show up above those of this forum. You must be new to the giant world of SEO. There are tons of factors that search engines take into account when deciding your page rank. It's too big on it's own to explain here. I suggest you look here. Please, if you want accurate results without personalization, disable cookies or disable personalized search with disconnect.me. |
|
|
|
I'll play along with you Coinhunter
I'm legitimately interested in why you think anyone who disagrees with Microcash being a scam is Coinhunter. Please, I'm dying to hear. The answer:
It is a scam because no matter how you slice it, dice it and spin it, it's main function is to enrich the developer at expense of the people who use it.
That's why.
~BCX~
Thanks for the concise response, but can any of this be backed up and not just be FUD? And if so, does this relate to your answer? |
|
|
|
Ever heard of 'personalized search'? |
|
|
|
Ł
What does everyone think? Kind of like how ฿ is used for BTC sometimes.
the slash on the L kind of looks like a t, hence LTC
I don't think any symbol should be associated with Litecoin until it gets more popular. Its much easier to recognize a 3 letter acronym than a symbol if you're a newbie. "Hey, what's Ł?" v.s. "Hey, what's LTC?" I prefer the latter for now. |
|
|
|
lol, you obviously don't understand keeping threads bumped != more/less seo influence. At the moment, the only content being created about Microcash is here in this forum. Since this content is very negative and you are creating more of it, you are ruining the SEO for microcash. Should be pretty hilarious on launch day when people google it for the first time and find this. P.S. You are even worse at doxing than you are at SEO. That pic of me is still the only one you can find? My face is literally plastered all over the web. Come friend me on facebook or something, I don't have to hide from people on the internet since I don't scam.  hey look it's mister SEO genius!The only negative content I see are you trolls eating your own shit when you've been starving for months! Rinse and repeat! Its fresh! Typical Coinhunter when he starts to lose it LOL I was just over on BTC-e demonstrating DDoS on SLC24 to your followers. Getting ready for when you launch for real. ~BCX~ that he can't win so he DDoSes sites to make himself feel better. It's okay dude.  |
|
|
|
lol, you obviously don't understand keeping threads bumped != more/less seo influence. At the moment, the only content being created about Microcash is here in this forum. Since this content is very negative and you are creating more of it, you are ruining the SEO for microcash. Should be pretty hilarious on launch day when people google it for the first time and find this. P.S. You are even worse at doxing than you are at SEO. That pic of me is still the only one you can find? My face is literally plastered all over the web. Come friend me on facebook or something, I don't have to hide from people on the internet since I don't scam. hey look it's mister SEO genius!The only negative content I see are you trolls eating your own shit when you've been starving for months! Rinse and repeat! Its fresh! |
|
|
|
...2005 Digital Point...
Yep, I see you there often trying to get help SEOing your IM e-book sites! How's your $1 goal / day going? |
|
|
|
I am ruining the SEO for microcash.
We know. That is why we keep these threads bumped. lol, you obviously don't understand keeping threads bumped != more/less seo influence.  maybe you should get your harry potter friend to approve your talk |
|
|
|
i'm a pretty nice looking guy
10/10 agree. You should share some pics sometime. thanks |
|
|
|
|
Ok so I succesfully uninstalled 12.4 and installed 11.12 and cgminer works flawlessly!
Here's something for people having problems in the future:
Downgrade ati driver 12.4 to 11.12 and you should get no BSOD with cgminer.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm moving to 11.12. I searched the forum and most people are happy with that version.
|
|
|
|
So I didn't look at the link as I'm not interested but I do believe that it is bad practice to just leave "scam". You (gweedo) seemed to justify yourself a bit. But I guess everyone else can decide for themselves.
I've noticed that the community here is skeptical about everything. |
|
|
|
Transactions done up to today are only the beginning. Are we really going to drag around 2, 3, 4... years of transactions? WHY?
Because my coins are there, and I really want to keep them. I don't want my coins to evaporate because you can't spare a little hard drive space. What sort of crap system do you have? Even my phone can run a Bitcoin client just fine. If SLC has figured out, how prune this massive "transaction list", we better copy this or BTC/LTC become useless faster, than any of us wants to imagine.
It's already been implemented in some of the Bitcoin clients. This guy is clearly being paid minimal wage because he can't spare less a cent a day! |
|
|
|
Hi guys, I got excited with bitcoins and decided to mine some! But I hit a roadblock, I downloaded the most recent driver (the ati 12.4) and I get a blue screen of death as soon as I enter the last details of the pool in cgminer. I have a 5830 and I use MSI afterburner to clock them to 950:1000 (gpu:ram). I'm not sure whats wrong, does anyone else have problems with this driver? Thanks!!  |
|
|
|
cheers
heh, i love his username. |
|
|
|
The wallet contains a list of private keys for each of your bitcoin addresses. As long as you control the private key of an address, you can sign a transaction and send bitcoins to another address. People can send you money, if you give them an address.
The bitcoin client lets you send and receive money (bitcoins). This is only one of the functions of a bank.
Could you explain what a private key is? |
|
|
|
|
