|
My username is still vlees
|
|
|
|
What's up with all the sockpuppets? o.o
Zaih got accused for being a sockpuppet several times by different people so he changed his avatar to a sockpuppet. Then others followed. My reason: The first time I saw his avatar I had to laugh so hard that I thought: let's get my own sockpuppet avatar. |
|
|
|
WHY? Now I can't recognize you anymore ._.
Just remember his new avatar  |
|
|
|
|
I registered on your previous URL a few days ago. Today I went in: username deleted.
|
|
|
|
|
Just tried it.
Somehow when I went to a bar my game just closed...
Also all games give "provable fair" links except for Slots, but where can I see the hash for the next game?
|
|
|
|
My motive for winning the auction will be disclosed 7 days from now.
7 days and 1.5 hours later... I'm curious now! |
|
|
|
Gelukkig hoeven we het ook niet uit te leggen, hoe enthousiast we ook zijn..het moet gebruiks vriendelijker gemaakt worden, net als email, weinigen weten of kunnen uitleggen hoe een email protocol precies werkt, wel weten we allemaal hoe we email kunnen gebruiken en vertrouwen erop dat het bij de juiste persoon aankomt, ik leg meestal alleen uit wat de voordelen van btc zijn en niet hoe het minen, de blockchain, verificaties, fees ect precies werken omdat de gem. Nederlander totaal niet weet wat wij wel weten... Houd het simpel..is mijn advies  Ja maar Bitcoin is "nieuw" en "eng" en daarom moeten mensen precies begrijpen hoe Bitcoin in elkaar steekt. Ik ben nog niemand tegen gekomen die niet vraagt hoe het werkt als ik over Bitcoin begin. Ze moeten het allemaal exact weten en begrijpen voordat ze er aan beginnen. Dat is raar. Dat heb ik persoonlijk nog niet meegemaakt en is het meer net als uitleggen hoe email werkt (wat voor de meeste mensen er op neer komt: je pakt een ontvangend adres en typt je bericht en het komt aan; net als met de post maar goedkoper en sneller (en wie vraagt er nou hoe het postsorteersysteem werkt voor dat 'ie een brief verstuurd)). De enige vraag die ik een enkele keer kreeg was: waarom heeft het waarde. Maar dat gaat niet om de specifieke technische implementatie op het deel dat geld niet te kopieren valt en een bovenlimiet heeft na (en dat is dan ook meer economie dan techniek). |
|
|
|
Am I being stupid here....
We could work on finding a gentler word for it if you like? if I bet 0.25BTC and roll 50.50 that's 2x payout, yeah which is 0.5 so how come my balance only increased by 0.25 each time?
You're effectively betting on a coin flip. Half the time you win, half the time you lose (let's ignore the house edge for the purposes of this - in reality you win slightly less than half the time). You bet 0.25 each time. When you lose, you're down 0.25. When you win, you're up 0.25. So in the long run it balances out. If you made 0.5 profit each time you won, and only made a 0.25 loss each time you lost, the site would soon go bust. In short, the '2x' payout includes your original stake. You bet 0.25 and get 2 times that back when you win, so you get 0.50 back, which is your 0.25 bet plus your 0.25 profit. When you win, you double (2x) your money from 0.25 to 0.50 - a profit of 1x your money. Get it? Or the short version: You have 10 BTC. You bet 1 before you flip. Now you have 9 BTC. You win! You get 2 BTC back -> You now have 11 BTC. |
|
|
|
I don't think Stunna is abusing it, but that's serious enough to not just be a top priority of things to do.
I posted ~2800 random rolls, all with the same client seed ("0"), and the outcome was just below (as in ~49.9x%) 50% win ratio. A sample I did before that gave a 52% win ratio (both with "roll higher than 50.50"). So it does not seem as they are exploiting it, as is possible ( http://v20.nl/primedice ) |
|
|
|
|
No idea what my game hash is, but it wants me to pay to 13Bp6ytDR4J3v734y14ytSXFS76K7JfzD5.
The wallet you may send the 0.1 BTC to is 1QtHuSHkeMyZnKFHhf7UeEs4NusVnrVQq
EDIT:
Also from first post:
Experience ZERO House Fee during testing!
How about a 50/50 game where you actually do something
Your task is to find the Red Ace! It's a 50/50 chance which is provably fair. We use true random numbers from random.org. If you choose correctly your coins are DOUBLED (less 1.9% house fee).
-----
So what is it?
|
|
|
|
What is the problem with the sentence? I was quoting myself to show you the problem AND ROFLMAO THE CLIENT SEED ISN'T BEING RANDOMIZED WITH CRYPTOGRAPHICALY SECURE ALGORITHMS CLIENT SIDE?!?!?!
Way to protect the noobs vets.
Yeah, it's fine. I was just confused who was saying what there. As I understand it, the player is responsible for setting the client seed, but I'm not sure. Did you think the client seed was being randomized client side? If so, how would your original criticism have been valid at all? From their verification page it sounds like the user gets to choose both client and server seeds, which is weird. Here's my post about it, with their answer not far below: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=208986.msg2195522#msg2195522Just for the fun of it. I present, the unfair dice game: http://v20.nl/primedice/ |
|
|
|
Well, that's exactly what I did. Use the official driver remove tool. Restart. Install CCC 12.8 with its old driver. Restart. Run oclvanitygen: same error as with 13.1 |
|
|
|
I never got oclvanitygen to work on my GPU (only CPU which gets 750kkeys/s) so I read here that I should downgrade to AMD Catalyst 12.8. So I did that, but still oclvanitygen does not work on my GPU: Device: Cayman
Vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (1002)
Driver: 1084.4 (VM)
Profile: FULL_PROFILE
Version: OpenCL 1.2 AMD-APP (1084.4)
Max compute units: 22
Max workgroup size: 256
Global memory: -2147483648
Max allocation: 536870912
OpenCL compiler flags:
Compiling kernel, can take minutes...LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x549e808: i8 =
setcc 0x5494840, 0x5499070, 0x549a188 [ID=20]
0x5494840: i32 = AMDILISD::ADD 0x5499070, 0x54997e0 [ID=19]
0x5499070: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x418c8d8, 0x5499428 [ORD=166] [ID=15]
0x5499428: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3]
0x54997e0: i32,ch = load 0x418c8d8, 0x54948c8, 0x54928b8<LD4[getelementptr i
nbounds ([8 x i32] addrspace(2)* @modulus, i32 0, i32 0)]> [ORD=165] [ID=18]
0x54948c8: i32 = Constant<192> [ORD=164] [ID=13]
0x54928b8: i32 = undef [ORD=165] [ID=2]
0x5499070: i32,ch = CopyFromReg 0x418c8d8, 0x5499428 [ORD=166] [ID=15]
0x5499428: i32 = Register %vreg33 [ORD=166] [ID=3] Anyone knows how to fix this? |
|
|
|
|
Klopping is normaal zeer inaccuraat en verdraait feiten geheel zodat er niets meer van klopt. Dus het verbaast me dat jullie ineens bevestigen dat hij het redelijk goed uitgelegd heeft.
|
|
|
|
|
I noticed I forgot to change the price before putting this online.
Price for a single hat now reduced from 0.005 to just below 0.0035.
|
|
|
|
|
Still interested?
I have over 15 years experience with programming and over 10 of those with web-development.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
