Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 02:40:47 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 1225 »
601  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: [Boxing] Mike Tyson vs Roy Jones Junior [PPV on Nov. 28] on: October 31, 2020, 01:04:08 PM
So Holyfield backed out from his similarly hyped fight with Mike, right?

That's what I expected since Evander is no one's fool as you wouldn't really believe Tyson's words that he is a different person now (and neither is Holyfield, for the record). So Mike found another victim, not quite of his league but still. What's next or rather who's next once Jones wisely bows out at the last moment? Is he going to fight Floyd Mayweather then or what?
602  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Mind Blown Gambling Facts on: October 31, 2020, 08:17:49 AM
The growing number of online and offline casinos means that many people are discovering gambling by now. More people are engaged on the internet which a tool that helps them to find gambling and have them feel good and relaxing while staying at home or anywhere. And I expecting more casinos to open in the public in the years to come

I'm not sure about the number of "offline" casinos growing up

In these times of continual lockdowns and quarantines it is hard to expect the number of regular casinos to rise. Rather, we are going to see many of them shutting down. Online casinos, however, are certainly to see a boost, and this is kinda inevitable as the number of gamblers remains more or less the same, no matter the circumstances. Even in the case of an all-out war or some other global disaster, there would be enough gamblers sticking around and ready to roll. Let's call them career gamblers
603  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is DeFi really a threat to centralized finance? on: October 30, 2020, 08:32:43 PM
Point is that DeFi was here for longer time than ICOs and all that offering BS. People saw it because it was hyped recently.
I have seen threads regarding DeFi in this forum well before the hype started to explode but was not aware that it was here much longer than ICO and if that is the case the hype was methodical to align it along with the bitcoin halving this year and then reap the benefit that comes with it. Either way the team or the group of developers behind these are brilliant so that they could create the hype just in the moment of an expected rally

That depends on your definition of DeFi

Do stablecoins count as DeFi? Pretty much, if you ask me. Does decentralized trading count as DeFi? Same as well. But there is value behind these endeavors even if there is some hype in it too. There are probably other fields of DeFi that have substance after all. It is like calling all cryptocurrencies shitcoins and ICOs scams, which is not correct. Even if true for the most part. Time will separate the good from the bad as it always happened in the past

That depends on your definition of DeFi

Do stablecoins count as DeFi? Pretty much, if you ask me.

Stablecoins like Tether obviously aren't. They are centrally issued, redeemed, and controlled. Tether can freeze and blacklist USDT, etc

I meant decentralized stablecoins, obviously
604  Other / Off-topic / Re: The Pun & Fun Thread on: October 30, 2020, 07:11:02 PM


I'm not very good at push-ups or pull-ups, but when it comes to fuck-ups...
605  Economy / Economics / Re: btc value and currency inflations on: October 30, 2020, 06:49:40 PM
And you are completely right on your observations, a currency that can be inflated at will is something that benefits governments because they can tax you without having to pass any laws and what is even worse is that this is a tax against your wealth and not your income, which in my opinion makes it the worst tax governments can levy against their citizens, the rich benefit from this as well as most of their wealth is not on fiat money but on the form of properties and stocks which go in value with inflation, bankers benefit as well because people have to live on credit just to get by, but you know who does not benefit from this?

Well, some clarifications seem invited

First of all, inflation is generally useful for people living on credit. I'm personally aware of a few cases when a sudden, unexpected surge in inflation rates helped people to pay back their debts with cheaper money. Indeed, it is not always the case, but in general inflation is good for borrowers and bad for lenders, especially the type which can't be easily envisaged in advance and still more so for long-term loans

Then, rich people profit from inflation not so much because their wealth is in solid, inflation-resistant assets (as this can be equally true for simple people too) but mostly because they are the first to receive the money before it starts to lose value. Simple people, on the other hand, are the last to get their hands on the newly printed shekels and thus unwillingly become the target of inflation and have to bear all the nasty consequences of it
606  Economy / Economics / Re: The Real Situation :( on: October 30, 2020, 04:37:32 PM
Well, there is a simple analogy that environmentalists use and I love it; "humanity is like a virus for earth, right now earth is having a fever and its getting bigger, by the time she has a big enough fever the virus' (us) will die and she will get better" and I think it makes perfect sense

It doesn't actually make any sense

Okay, people are hurting Mother Nature. But our impact is incomparable to global disasters of entirely natural origin like a supervolcano erupting and freezing Earth for enough years to kill 99% of existing species (think Yellowstone). And I'm not even speaking about dangers of an asteroid smashing Earth to pieces. Ironically, in this vein humans can be considered a safety net or insurance for Earth as we won't let that happen even if right now we can't do much. In other words, the price paid is definitely worth it by any prudent investor's measure (read, such rhetoric is typical environmentalist bullshit)
607  Economy / Gambling / Re: WOLF.BET - $1,000 Daily Race! 30% Rakeback! Advanced Dice Game 2.000 Bets/s⚡ on: October 30, 2020, 10:29:07 AM
Of course you can stop it and do it manually but if you want to have the autobet run at night it could be a helpful addon

Are you afraid that something bad happens to your gains?

Or you will have a change of heart in the morning and feel like you want to continue playing? If I remember correctly, to move funds to the Vault, you need to provide your password, and I'm not sure it is a good idea to bypass this check as your proposal implicitly assumes. So you would still be stuck at this point
608  Economy / Gambling / Re: WOLF.BET - $1,000 Daily Race! 30% Rakeback! Advanced Dice Game 2.000 Bets/s⚡ on: October 30, 2020, 09:09:47 AM
Yesterday I was playing with the autobet settings and trying different strategies. There are a lot of options for autobet but I miss one option. It would be great if we could transfer an amount to the Vault after reaching an x amount of profit. This would give the user an opportunity for not losing all profit after a bad streak

Maybe I'm missing something

But can't you just stop the autobet session after reaching the desired amount of profit? Then you can safely transfer your winnings to the Vault or even withdraw them altogether. As I see it, in that way you would be able to squeeze even more satisfaction and pleasure from your string of lucky breaks. First you win, then consciously move your coins to the Vault enjoying every moment of it
609  Economy / Economics / Re: The Real Situation :( on: October 29, 2020, 08:44:24 PM
1.How the hell is going to pay for all the covid madness ?

We are fine, everything is going to be ok.

Just hold your bitcoins while the governments print more of their fiat altcoin to pay the bills Wink

1.2 million people died worldwide coz of this covid19 disease and you are saying we are fine? you might be fine as an individual but the world and other people are not fine. a lot of people lost their loved ones. and even a lot more than that lost their jobs and starving for a piece of bread

It's an excruciatingly complex matter

So don't jump to conclusions prematurely. For starters, do you know how many people would die instead of those who died of Covid-19 if it hadn't come about? I mean, road accidents that didn't happen and similar stuff? We don't know that. But what we do know is that the death toll of road traffic crashes is approximately 1.35 million people per year on average. The point is, we should tread lightly here
610  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Is DeFi really a threat to centralized finance? on: October 29, 2020, 08:07:38 PM
The you think defi a a threat to the future of centralized finance? What's your opinion?

DeFi is not like cryptocurrencies

Fiat and cryptocurrencies cannot live (well) together, and in this manner, it is possible to say that cryptocurrencies are threatening fiat (even if purely hypothetically). But financial services are just services rendered by one or another company. If they are now providing them in a decentralized fashion, the same services, can we then claim that there is some kind of threat involved? Personally, I don't think so. It is not correct to speak in terms of threat or danger here. It is the same stuff but done in a different way, yet another different way as there can be many, actually dozens
611  Economy / Economics / Re: btc value and currency inflations on: October 29, 2020, 05:26:20 PM
If currencies (especially the US dollar) are highly devalued, it wouldn't have anything to do with Bitcoin and that means Bitcoin will be worth more in dollars, and those who bought at the early stage before that happens will benefit more from it

In fact, that remains to be seen

If the dollar depreciates and Bitcoin appreciates proportionately, there will be no real gain. Yes, Bitcoin will be worth more in dollars, but will it be worth more in real terms? To actually benefit from holding your funds in Bitcoin, it should rise faster than the rate at which the dollar loses value. Only in that case you can say that it is worth the effort compared to other investment assets which are going to outperform inflation (stocks, whatever)
612  Economy / Economics / Re: Will the Digital Yuan makes China even more powerful? on: October 29, 2020, 04:49:47 PM
The USA has great power in this case because USD is considered as a major, global currency and is the most accepted one

And you have just explained how it can make a country more powerful without even making its economy any better. In other words, if the digital yuan turns our more convenient than the non-digital dollar, this alone will make China more powerful on the international level. It won't necessarily make the yuan stronger than the dollar on its own, but it will certainly make the dollar weaker. And from the Chinese point of view, that may be a great deal already, a big step forward

As the saying goes, well begun is half done
613  Economy / Economics / Re: Will the Digital Yuan makes China even more powerful? on: October 29, 2020, 03:11:38 PM
China has been testing the Digital Yuan and soon the Digital Yuan (DCEP) will be implemented soon. Will this move make China even more independent and more powerful? And what are the consequences for the world trade

The short answer is, it depends

If this currency is used only within China, it is not going to change anything. Well, if it turns out more efficient, it may help China a little, of course, but I don't think that much. On the other hand, they are developing not only the digital variety of yuan but also a kind of regional currency. This is a different matter, and since many Asian countries such as Japan and Korea have already expressed their favorable attitude toward such a currency, it may be a game-changer for this corner of the world (read, the dollar domination may be undermined)
614  Economy / Gambling / Re: WOLF.BET - $1,000 Daily Race! 30% Rakeback! Advanced Dice Game 2.000 Bets/s⚡ on: October 29, 2020, 08:32:48 AM
But, i saw on wolf.bet, minimum bet for flash bet is quite high so it can make us busted ASAP when we have many red streaks losses

Yes, you are right

I checked doges, and for me the basebet is 0.38 doges for flashbet. It basically proves that martingale is a statistically winning strategy on a finite timeframe that could be used to drain casino dry if a lot of people started to use it wisely provided certain conditions are met (like very small basebet amount). With that minimum bet, martingale becomes less than useless. Flashbet enables such use, so it is rendered innocuous by a high minimum bet amount. Actually, I wrote about that too, many times in fact, that no casino would allow to profitably use this strategy en masse
615  Economy / Gambling / Re: WOLF.BET - $1,000 Daily Race! 30% Rakeback! Advanced Dice Game 2.000 Bets/s⚡ on: October 28, 2020, 09:19:04 PM
I really like the style and design and colors of your site, wolf.bet

The only small problem is that there are not many games that are available. At this moment, I only see 3 games, is that correct or do I miss something?
Dice, limbo and hilo.
Wolf.bet is a dedicated dice site and that's why you don't see that much games in it

I don't think this is the case with Wolf.bet

And if I remember correctly, there's a discussion somewhere in the bowels of this thread on the matter, with some feedback from the casino. In short, they are not a dedicated dice site as they simply lack enough resources to build more complex games and keep up the high standards they seem to follow. In other words, they go for quality over quantity, and this is a good thing if you ask me. Were they the first ever to come up with flashbets and how many other casinos have implemented this feature by now?
616  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Card Counting in Blackjack on: October 28, 2020, 08:40:55 PM
I don't believe that card counting would work in such a game. Never tried this while gambling alone, will try to do it but I guess that after seeing some comments here, I shouldn't really try it as it may get me banned.  Undecided
I'm not a blackjack player, and I don't know card counting but it takes a lot of concentration to do this, I don't know is this possible because the card is shuffle so fast and it takes a big amount of concentration and if you can follow how the card is shuffle, obviously they will caught you by just looking at your reaction and your eyes.
^ Card counting has been discussed in the forum multiple times and it is a traditional technique, but most often blackjack players could not resist doing it for it is one of the best strategies to win and recover losses

I was a starter of one such thread not so long ago

Here it is, for the inquiring minds. As the poll results there have shown, in order to be a decent Blackjack player, you must count cards (apart from it being a legitimate skill). Given this and with respect to the land casino environment and circumstances, it all eventually comes down to how good you are at both card counting and hiding your mindwork from the casino



Put differently, now you should master two skills instead of one
617  Economy / Economics / Re: btc value and currency inflations on: October 28, 2020, 08:03:51 PM
Why then will you choice gold over bitcoin? Sounds so unreasonable especially as you must have been enlightening on the advantage of bitcoin over gold. The digitalize of bitcoin, it's finite supply and decentralized nature, just to mention a few is enough reason to consider it a more favorable investment option

There are many reasons why people may prefer gold over Bitcoin

Bitcoin largely remains a speculative asset while gold is a genuine store of value, although some consider Bitcoin a store of value too. Physical gold is better as a store of value partly because it doesn't rely on anything other than physical laws which are unlikely to change in the foreseeable future and turn your precious gold into useless lead. Bitcoin, along with its cryptocurrency brethren, on the other hand, is much more vulnerable in this regard, and anyone who is seriously going to challenge that point should first check their sanity and intelligence scores
618  Economy / Economics / Re: The Real Situation :( on: October 28, 2020, 04:36:44 PM
If more people are still not going to wear a mask and go out to the public without social distancing, the crisis will really take more than years, I watch a prediction was that it will extend up to 2024 before we can contain it all

On the other hand, it will give a boost to healthcare

Sooner or later, people will find a way to live with this virus even if it won't be possible to eliminate it completely (which seems to be the case). Somehow, we now live with HIV, and given that the amount of damage that the coronovirus causes doesn't take years to pile up, it is rather sooner than later (we simply don't have choice). Personally, I tend to think that 2021 won't be a lot better in terms of economic development because the effects are long-term
619  Economy / Economics / Re: The Real Situation :( on: October 28, 2020, 03:07:56 PM
Seen about the news today that another crazy virus that’s worst than Coronavirus was discovered again in Wuhan, I am just hoping that is not true. Covid19 already caused a lot of madness this year and that’s enough.

Everyone in my country was saying that 2019 was the worst year then, we never knew that 2020 was going to be more than just a crazy year until it arrived. Now a lot of people are praying for this year to pass lol, we are hoping for a better year in 2021

Yeah, they say that hindsight is 2020 but who saw this coming?!

Other than that, a great deal of things require time to develop. And what adds insult to injury here is the fact that some changes go completely unnoticed all the way down the road, and then, boom, here comes a quantum shift and you find yourself in an entirely new, sometimes alien world
620  Economy / Economics / Re: Cryptocurrency Adoption: A Breakthrough? on: October 28, 2020, 10:00:44 AM
My interest in a debit card is to allow me to incrementally CA$H-OUT of Bitcoin during price spikes.  In 2017 I was able to do this by buying gold, but there is still not a convenient way to cash-out for, well, cash.

You are on the right track

Though not still there. You should sell not just the amount you need for your everyday expenses, but a somewhat bigger portion of your stash so as to be able to buy back at pullbacks. When you eventually get the hang of it, you could live entirely off the volatility in the cryptocurrency of your choice (and while we are at it, Litecoin seems to be the best choice). Now add strong fiat inflation to the mix, and you will see how you can use it as a leverage or multiplier
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 [31] 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 ... 1225 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!