Too bad that I get information from my doxes from 100% public sources, and watching for small little details that give me hints as to the RL identities of users. None of my doxes use any information learned as a result of shipping a package from someone else.
Highly doubtful at best. I don't actively retain shipping information of those that I ship to unless I have shipped to the person many times, and expect to continue doing so -- I may also remember some details about some that I trade with such as their first name and general area of residence in order to have a more personable relationship with those I have traded with.
Minerjones on the other hand allegedly maintains a list of identities that he has traded with in the past by keeping information provided to him in confidence. This is non-public, confidential information that he is collecting.
Which is pretty much the same thing.  Minerjones on the other hand apparently is willing to release private information to his "buddies" who have not been harmed financially in any way, nor have the person in question done anything wrong except gotten on the wrong side of one of Minerjones's friends.
No. This is a bullshit claim made by Canary, who is as trustworthy as your local robber waiting at the next corner. |
|
|
|
You need a licence for each exchange (although the 2nd and 3rd licence are half the cost).
There are no more second-type licenses . All licenses are at the same cost, more or less with discounts .... but the "0.05 btc for a secondary license" special offer is no more . Oh yeah, I totally forgot about that change. You are correct, and I've updated my post. Thanks. |
|
|
|
yeah I also want a bittrex license, where can I get it with the discount if still possible?
Read this: can I use the gunbot for both exchanges or must I buy two licenses?
You need a licence for each exchange. |
|
|
|
Why is collecting dox necessarily a bad thing?
There is actually no real good reason to do this. It usually gets used for malicious purposes (e.g. defcon23 blackmailing others). Or why does someone not have a right to do that?
Common sense. Public info is public, unless you're talking SS#s and whatnot.
The connection between an username and a public profile is usually not public, thus the information itself is not. Am I crazy here or what?
You are. |
|
|
|
Hello Gunthar,
interested to buy your bot for poloniex, is it still available?
Yes. See this post: I have a VPS server, Ubuntu 14 and 16, is it possible to get linux version?
You can download GunBot for any OS that you want. An Ubuntu 16 VPS is a good choice though. |
|
|
|
Lol, my my, how can you actually accuse me of an ad hominem attack when you make statements like that.
This isn't ad hominem. You are wearing the DeepOnion signature and defending it left and right, which factually makes you a shill. Exposing you for what you are is not ad hominem. Some people here just can't face reality. |
|
|
|
I am saying again, that Bitcoin ABC, and Bitcoin Classic are sharing the current BTC block chain past the fork, including up to TODAY.
They are not forked, they are not split from BTC, they are using the same current BTC block chain in wallet software intended only for BCC. Very alarming.
No, that's wrong. Something is broken on your end; maybe you are using an old version of their clients (I do not know). I have tested Bitcoin ABC, and it follows the BCH chain. Please go pack to my screen shot, I don't want to flood with a repeat picture. It shows proof that ABC and Classic are on the BTC blockchain past the fork on my system. A complete fail of the one and only purpose of those wallets.
Again, issue on your end. I am not going to pay someone to rip me off.
Paying someone to do something that you obviously are not able to do = getting ripped off? Man you're a piece of work. I won't help you; good luck. Thanks Lauda.
The only thinking behind sending to exchange as opposed to installing a new wallet is that the latter requires downloading the entire chain again, saving it in a separate folder etc. Sounds like more hassle. Or am I seeing this wrong?
Edit: Or should I install the second qt in a new folder but point to the same datadir ?
The edit does not make any sense. The Bitcoin QT is just a GUI version of the software. The wallet is called "wallet.dat" and you can have an infinite* number of wallets in the install. Just rename the old wallet to "oldwallet.dat" (or whatever). If you run QT again, it will generate a new wallet.dat (thus a new wallet). If you want to switch back, do the renaming again. Just make sure to backup everything and not get confused (e.g. do not try to rename "oldwallet.dat" into "wallet.dat" if there already is a "wallet.dat" file present in the directory). |
|
|
|
DOX:ing is against the rules here, so im not sure what happens to the thread.
Bullshit spam from you, again. Doxxing is not against the rules if it isn't solely used for trolling. You are allowed to obviously discuss the act of doxxing itself, especially when it's relevant to the users of the thread. You are also allowed to share the doxx privately (obviously, who could prevent that). However, if one wanted to post a DOXX it should be done in the Investigations section. |
|
|
|
Next time use a service to archive the posts, such as: https://archive.fo/. I'd expect you to know this by now.
Tagged. |
|
|
|
Well, we can agree on one thing..
Yes, that you're a paid baboon. bitcoin was once called a scam.
False equivalency. deeponion is another great type of coin which is backed by community development, technology and anonymity.
Community of shills? Yes. Community development? No. Technology? No. Anonymity? No. |
|
|
|
1. You call the developer shady, and accuse them of trust farming.
They have been trust farming, and this has been independently reviewed and confirmed by at least 2 other DT members. 2. You claim to have debunked a fallacy that the "airdrop" is not truly an "airdrop".
It is not an airdrop, it is a signature/avatar campaign. I'm fairly certain, though I am biased towards my own opinion, that I have been truthful in my observations and accurate in my analysis.
Neither have you been truthful nor accurate. In order for you to do that, you first have to drop the shilling. -snip-
Discussing my past which has nothing to do with this, i.e. carrying out the act of ad hominem just shows how weak your argument truly is. Point of information on that, if you type ~Lauda into your trust settings box, and remove the default trust there, then magically crypto-rainbow no longer has a negative trust.
Removing the default trust from your settings is similar to putting your head into the ground because you don't want to see the reality. **I see in your last post that you have chosen to use ad-hominem attacks in place of serious reasonable debate.
What I've written does not even closely resemble ad hominem. Shills nowadays; accuse you of doing something in the same post in which they do the thing that they're accusing you of.  |
|
|
|
Just so I understand this right... Would this procedure sound ok:
1) send my BTC from my core wallet v0.14.2 to Bittrex
Don't send to an exchange. Create a new wallet and transfer to it. 3) download, install and sync BCH wallet (which one is most likely not to cause any issues btw?) onto a separate PC
Electron Cash or Bitcoin ABC. 4) import private keys into new BCH wallet... will my BCH appear automagically upon restart/sync?
They should. 5) download, install and sync new BTC core wallet onto main PC and transfer the BTC previously sent to Bittrex
See my suggested change at step one. There is no reason to send BTC to Bittrex. |
|
|
|
Waaaaiiitttt a sec, lol. Please verify this for me, because I can't have understood you correctly. If YOU claim something it is so, because you say so, if we claim something it isn't so just because we say so?
You've made claims to which you've provided no logical reasoning nor substantial evidence. Every claim that I've made is backed up by either one or both. That's the difference which your lack of intellect doesn't seem to be able to comprehend, then again it could be just the money that you take for shilling. |
|
|
|
Lauda, that is exactly the point, and NOW you are exactly right. Just because you claim it (DeepONION) is a scam doesn't make it so.
Of course it does. Unlike the paid shills, like yourself, I've presented evidence of: 1) Fake advertising and destroyed the concept of the fake airdrop. 2) Trust-farming from the shady developer.
This got to be one of the worst attempts at an altcoin. Keep drinking the kool-aid though.  |
|
|
|
The thread seems to now be gone. Can't only a MOD delete? Why didn't I hear anything from a Mod?
If the thread gets trashed (not deleted), there will be no notification of anything. I posted a detailed scam accusation in Metagame.io's ICO thread.
Open a new thread in the appropriate section: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=83.0. |
|
|
|
do not give red trust later I do not get paid from blog bounty, I will make sure if address to received payment changes on spreedsheet I will immediately report it to bounty manger to ignore and provide of proof if my account got hacked
The account may be used for scamming et. al., and it would be tainted afterwards. Are you sure that you do not want me to tag it? -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- My account syarifbitcoin has been hacked/lost. Please reset the email to akunghost13@yahoo.co.id. The current date is August 16 2017. -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- BITCOIN ADDRESS: 1LUZrbwv8Keh62TXdhpXwWbsi8wQDVCixw SIGNATURE: H+PARk5pgGmERj8FDvg+aAD+EZIXghGe0d4tcq1L3YaAYOTE9LV/G9TiZlTkkAUakS0m63M5B54fqXqMzBfUa/8= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- Verified with Bitcoin Core. |
|
|
|
What should i post here?
Signature and wallet? Or what
The signed message that you've sent to the admin(s). |
|
|
|
already follow intruction sir, just waiting respond from Theymos and hope my account will come back  You should post it here so that I and others can leave a negative rating on the account. why bitcointalk database can leaked ?
You probably haven't changed your password since the old leak or have been compromised otherwise (e.g. phishing attack). |
|
|
|
but i can sign message with new address [1LUZrbwv8Keh62TXdhpXwWbsi8wQDVCixw] because that is my own wallet i can sign message with that address
Sign with that address and follow this format: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0. Post the signed message here and PM the admins with it as well. |
|
|
|
Either someone knows something or this is just the usual movement. Correction over with a low of $3800? If we break $4.4k this time, expect $5-$7k to be the next top (if not more). My $4k (evil this time) gif (late): 
Bitstamp | There are currently 1337.2975 bitcoins offered at or under 4500.0 USD, worth 5883234.75649 USD in total. | Data vintage: 12.2518 seconds
Leet number of Bitcoins till $4500. What does that tell us? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
