Just a few hours after the opening there has been lots of action here. As of expected from ndnhc 42 bet slips already ( this guy is always good with gambling and such ). If you are reading this post DirectBet, would be nice if we can bet for the winner of this competition as well ( putting my money on ndnhc to be top three if he is available to bet on  )

It would be nice if you would read the few older post before posting this again. Just because the cards repeat doesnt mean something fishy is going on , simply just note down the hashes before you play and verify it after you play ( which obviously takes less than 10 seconds to do so ). However it is quite unlike for the exact same cards for both dealer and player to be dealt again ( the 4 first card could be the same however the next one after that would obviously be different )

Sad truth , this happened to me as well


The other sad fact is that not everyone are going to hold their BTC which they bought at higher range with the current dropping range. Few weeks ago due to the greece hype, the price was over $300 but now it is settling in $230~ and I would assume that some has sold their BTC to minimalize some of their lost ( now imagine that there will be alot more that sell some of their stash when they bought at $500+  )


Depends on what your point of view is, for a mere trader then this waves would be the important thing to get some profit but if you are setting your point of view from the side of mass adoption the price stability is one of the key factor to achieve that. Due note that most people loves gold because of its stability as mass is afraid of "holding" a thing which price might change every day

No problem


It is indeed another form of gambling. To be exact you can call it "EV+ gambling" . Although there is "no chance" for you to lose because you are siding with the house and that gives you the edge over the player (theoretically , if there isnt any foul play ) but some variance could kick in and the house could be losing . In the long run, the house will recover only if there are some people that wager there ( and ofcourse lose )


Im not 


Goodluck !

Obviously nope, why would I be shilling here? If you are a regular here then you would obviously know which site that I support 


Which? Obviously I put in references based on your post. If you think I am misrepresenting it then simply make your post clearer ( which I think Im not )


Very funny, just because someone is not in the same boat with your opinion doesnt mean that the person is a shill  . Not ignorant comments but simply against everything of yours

Also I have made my stance clear here as I will see how things turns out

References :


Yes and correct but you have repeated this few times already and I am aware of this. Now you leave the important part of my previous post

References :

Obviously disclosing this will not give you any disadvantages as Im not asking on how you get it but merely the number for it 


Obviously it is a fault from CoinRoyale and out of my league, so this has nothing to do with me


Numbers? are you merely pointing this "numbers" to the edge that you are claiming or that I missed something else? If this "numbers" actually refers to the edge that we are discussing about then it is safe to assume that

"you had no idea about how many edge that you have due to this bug but keep insisting that you got the edge? "

P.S : Again, not a shill comment whatsoever just merely interested with this "numbers" 

One should never expect anything from a site that uses a coindice script. The moment that someone open a dice site with coindice script then the person has started to dig a grave for the site. A custom script still has a hard time to get some market due to the older dice site presence which then makes you think what can someone do with a common coindice script

P.S : Mind my opinion as I am always skeptical towards a dice site with coindice script


Perhaps , or could be a glitch

Obviously it is you that is not


It seems you do , based on the references below that you keep on insisting that there is a bug that give an edge to the player but you are getting more losses then wins. If you simply dont care about this then there is no point in discussing this further isnt it? but the fact is that you keep insisting that there is a "problem" .

If you will enlighten the conversation here, how many percentage of edge are we discussing about? Either way there will be two scenarios later , the former will be that there is an issue with CoinRoyale shuffling method and the later is that there is no bug that you give you an edge . I am merely more into the later option though Im eager to see how this turns out 

References :

Yes I had (not anymore )


Nothing is safe. The truth is that investment in a gambling site is just another form of "gambling". Instead of gambling against the house, you are gambling with the house against the player to lose. Your profit will be depending on your stake of the entire bankroll which means that you share the profit and the loss of the site proportional to it which incase there are one or two lucky player to win huge there then you are losing a portion of your investment as well

Due note that there are alot of risk regarding "investment", not to mention that the operator might steal the funds (obviously you dont know who is behind the site )or that play as a player to drain the bankroll

P.S : so far there isnt any complaint regarding the investment there ( Im not vouching , Im stating the fact so do not quote me on this as a vouch )

For more references : http://dicesites.com/safedice

His rating pretty much wont affect any of your trade as his rating is about crypto-games.net which to my knowledge you are not the owner of crypto-games.net . Moreover, having a negative trust does not mean that you will have no ability to trade or that none would want to trade with you because as long as you use escrow then everything will just be fine


Trust isnt moderated and anyone could leave feedback to whoever at his own will


If it is so then take this case to meta though there is nothing to be done even if you take it there.

The fact is that trust isnt moderated and you will have to leave it as it is or deal with him to remove it. Plus that you cant call him abusing it because he is not in the Default trust list and his trust feedback pretty much wont make any impact to your account. Suggestion for you would be to leave it as it is though ( I even got mine as well from some butthurt user )

P.S : Besides that he seems to misspell the site's domain

Consistency? dont even think about it. Either you win or lose that is all but if you keep on betting like nuts then you are indeed a degens


Alot has proven this to be not impossible

Hint : use google to search


You need to differentiate between a gambler and a beggar


This isnt right at all. formula/ strategies or whatever isnt only applicable in dice though you can always try to use it in any other game. The bolded part is correct though as most people gamble only to win therefore the simplest form of gambling would be dice which is fast and no suspense whatsoever

Ahh okay then It is just a misunderstanding then as both points are correct because of the 1x kelly so everyone bear the same amount of risk depending on their stake of the bankroll. If we are merely discussing about the amounts then Ryan is indeed suffering the most because of the highest stake  .


The lock feature is kinda funny . I just locked myself out for 1 day without investing anything and it seems yes that you can invest while being locked but just cant divest for the X period of time


It seems this one got a very nice luck then


It could be months to achieve this unless some other player like luthic wager at Moneypot but then the "luck factor" need to shift back to the investor

---

At the time Im writing this, another whale is betting huge in sharp dice currently (3.1 BTC profit )

https://www.moneypot.com/users/johnny1985

Not sure what you mean though but If you are grouping the other 70 % investor as a whole then yes the whole pack suffered alot more but I based my opinion on each single investor so yes individually as an investor, Ryan suffered the most because of him having the biggest stake though 

Moreover as we are discussing about investor here, some live action in dustdice at the moment. Luthic came back and just lost another 5 BTC . It seems variance is slowly shifting to the investor again 


P.S : mind my stupidity sometimes I cant think clearly it seems lol

So far none yet. The last week run was pretty much interesting and shocking at the same time. Goodthing that this extra BTC for wagering promotions will last indefinitely or until someone hit it so there is actually no rush for it. The 5.5 BTC is merely 27.5 % rakeback from the wagered amount ( which is huge if you are wager alot )

P.S : I havent seen you lately Dank, are you playing with an unknown new account now? 


It is now 3.27 BTC . Player Luthic won huge at Moneypot 


Notified and has told lobos regarding this, perhaps you can PM him your alt account there so he can do some check up

Yep the investors, in this case it will be Ryan as he has over 30 % of the bankroll stake though as I told you before he is the biggest investor there. So practically he suffer the most here due to this crazy luck by luthic ( Im merely stating Ryan as investor and not Moneypot's owner in my previous post and I should have made it clearer to avoid confusion I think  . Although I personally think this huge lost of the investor is something good for promotional purposes as people are always crazy about success story in a gambling site which is pretty rare nowadays


Pretty much agree with you on this 

It seems there is an issue before when the site is approaching the 500 millionth roll ( references below ). Im not literally sure about the references though as there are only two user that reported that , would be nice if someone could clarify about this ( or that if the two quoted user could clarify more about this ) . Again Im not accusing things, just stating my skeptical opinion though  Cheers

References :

---

Everyone are free to put their opinion in a non moderated thread though including QS so yeah there is no point to be "angry"

He actually "think" that he found a bug ( atleast this is my impression is ) but it seems he is having more losses rather than win which is why he is accusing things to be not fair here ( again this is my impression judging from the whole conversation ) which means that either there isnt any "bug" at all in the firsthand or that he is having a very bad run. Eitherway this whole conversation wont be happening now if he is winning the game


Some dice site even has 20 BTC max payout and some other site advertized over 60k BTC jackpot without providing any proof of cold storage as well. If CoinRoyale is a new site around here than I would agree with you it is better for them to show proof of their cold storage but so far there they have seem to be able to maintain their reputation here

P.S : do note that my opinion isnt mean to take their sides as Im merely neutral in this case and I am merely stating my opinion

I may be skeptical about this but if the downtime was actually not caused by DaDice then there are outsiders that tried to make the site down. The reason could be that to hit the 750 millionth bounty, by causing the site to go down then it will force people to leave the site temporary which means that once the site is up again then the person would have higher chance to hit the 750 millionth bounty as the number of people rolling will be slightly lower than usual

P.S : this is just a skeptical thought of mine though Im not accusing any party about this ( I mean no harm whatsoever  )

P.S 2 : wasnt that the same thing happened before? something about the site down or the roll getting slower when the site almost hit 500 millionth roll

Depends on what your definition of "fair" actually is. Some people never bother a site when they win and do the opposite when they lose. Fair doesnt mean that you wont be losing and always win though and it seems the definition of fair in your mind is kinda vague.
The fact is that DirectBet is using provably fair and you are shown with the hashes before you send your bet and you can use that hashes to verify your bet to see if it is rigged

For more references : http://www.directbet.eu/Rules.cshtml


Read above as well

Due to this circumstances it seems Ryan will keep on sacrificing his moneypot's share of profit back to the investor until everyone back to green again ( was the previous promotions from Ryan over) (?) Too bad but Ryan is the one that suffer the most because of this huge win though , plus that this luthic guy is betting for max win which means there isnt any share of profit for Moneypot

One or two variance is pretty much needed here as there hasnt been any huge winner yet in Moneypot and with investor's profit taking a huge dip down then this is a good time to "gamble" in investment as the variance might soon shift again to the investor's side ( or that luthic could come back to dip more of this  )


or he can win more . He got some pretty nice luck though