Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 01:14:11 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 468 »
621  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 02:34:12 PM
Someone is trying to sell Merit.

1 Merit=1$

Only some persons who are real altruists will vote for other posts and not to sell Merit for money.

They are not “trying” to sell merit, they’re already doing it in Turkish subsection thread.

Well, i guess there will be red and ban going over the forum right now.


Yeah, I guess. It’s almost impossible for mods to catch everything happening on this forum though. When you start talking about all the various language boards it becomes completely impossible.

A perfect example would be the Korean thread. MatthewNWright was a semi-respected troll on this forum that became the mod for the Korean thread because he was an expatriate living in Korea and was fluent in Korean. He ended up banned because he didn’t know when to shut his mouth and fucked up a few times. I can see Matt ignoring the sale of sMerit and no one would know it was happening.
622  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 02:23:22 PM
Someone is trying to sell Merit.

1 Merit=1$

Only some persons who are real altruists will vote for other posts and not to sell Merit for money.

They are not “trying” to sell merit, they’re already doing it in Turkish subsection thread.
623  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 02:17:18 PM
I saw someone had a gold member under their name. What does that mean?

That hilariousandco he a moderator so can set anything he wants as a custom title. In this case, he is keen for theymos to add additional ranks to copper so it's a way of bringing attention to the idea.


Ah, got it. Thanks
624  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 02:16:03 PM
I just realized something, the ath last year means Goat paid nearly a million dollars to be a VIP member of this forum only to have a tantrum and leave to start a forum that failed. That would have bought him a few more Lamborghinis. If I was theymos I’d be laughing my ass off. LOL
625  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 02:02:02 PM
You report all the spams accounts you created from your main account and there you have Merit points for reporting spammer.
Merit points are awarded for good posts, not for valid reports to moderators.
The problem is non-existent as the reward is non-existent. You didn't understand how the system works.
Read the OP again.

Hey dude, what’s a Copper Member and more importantly what’s a:



Being a legendary member, you should know what is copper and gold member. Users can buy these special tags by paying some fees.

Check it out for your reference.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2385104.0



Thanks! No, I never read that thread. Hey, I donated 2 btc to the forum long ago so I should be a copper member. LOL

I saw someone had a gold member under their name. What does that mean?
626  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can Bitcoin scale to become a major payment network? on: January 25, 2018, 01:55:06 PM
If you follow what real core developers are saying like Van der Laan (don’t listen to Gavin “Wright is Satoshi”  Andresen), it will take many years, likely decades, for bitcoin to scale to anywhere near a major payment network.

In order for bitcoin to compete with just the ACH Network it would need to move $43 trillion and 25 billion electronic financial transactions each year. That’s roughly 125 times more transactions than bitcoin is currently doing very poorly. There is a backlog in the mempool so it can’t even keep up with what it’s currently doing.

If you look at the transactions processed by the major credit brands (Visa, MC, Discover, etc.), it appears to be around 100 billion transactions. That’s 500 times more than bitcoin is currently processing poorly. Now we’re up to 625 times increase in transaction volume for bitcoin.

Pure EFT transactions (debit card) is around 50 billion per year. That adds another 250 times more transactions worldwide than bitcoin is currently doing poorly. We are now at 875 x current number of transactions that bitcoin is now doing horribly at keeping up.

It’s safe to say that at minimum it will take many decades before bitcoin can be made to effectively scale enough to just replace the ACH Network. It could possibly take the entire lifetime of the youngest bitcoiner on this forum before to could scale enough to take over all major worldwide financial transactions. If it could be made to handle that kind of volume, bitcoin would need to change from its current 5 or less transactions a second to 56,000 transactions a second and the blockchain would fill up the New York public library.

Yes this is like trying to play Farcry 5 on a DX2-66MHz ... there is evolution everywhere. Lightning will take care of Microtransactions and the Blocksize was never intended to be 1MB. Satoshi implemented it and left a paper how to lift this. Why it was not done yet on mainnet is what? Politics? Strategy? The future miners will bring more cpu capacity to the network while saving energy - Internetspeed doubles and SDD cost nothing. So there is no reason to be worried about "decades". When DX2-66Mhz and then DX4-100 came out nobody was aware that computer speed will double each year ... so let us wait and see ..

Changes to even national systems take decades to slowly take hold and transform the finance systems of a country.

Western Union, in 1914, began issuing purchase cards to select customers. Then, in the 20’s a number of oil companies began issuing out proprietary cards that were designed to create customer loyalty. These cards were accepted at the merchant that issued them and only in certain locations. Gas stations started issuing cards that could be used to make fuel purchases; some gas stations even started accepting competitor’s cards.

Department stores were next to jump on the credit card bandwagon. Department store cards were originally a marketing device, designed to increase the number of customers the store had. It turned out that customers really appreciated the “buy now pay later” aspect of the cards; the stores liked that there were limits to the repayment period. Department store credit cards gave rise to what’s today known as credit history as good customers that paid on time gained a reputation.

The 1930’s and 40’s saw the rise of revolving credit. This began when stores started to let customers pay debt off over months, getting rid of repayment periods by requiring that all debt be completely paid before any new purchases could be made. Customers could now actually carry a balanc eon their cards that wasn’t due within a specific period of time. This is also when credit card companies really began to make money from interest and fees associated with cards.

In 1946 the first bank card was introduced by a banker named John Biggins: this card was called the Charg-It. When a customer used their Charg-It card for a purchase the bill was forwarded to Biggins bank. Next, the bank reimbursed the store. Transactions could only occur locally and cardholders were required to have an account at Biggins bank. The first bank credit card came five years later, showing up in New York’s Franklin National Bank.

It took roughly 80 years for credit card systems to become what they are today. Not just because of technological advances but because users need time to accept the new systems and integrate them into their lives. Bitcoin is totally foreign to today’s banking citizens. It will be necessary for overlays to be built on top of the bitcoin network (like BitPay) to increase adoption. It will also be necessary to have professional developers (not the ragtag group of volunteers and corporate shills we have as devs now) to begin working on blocksize increases and chain pruning.

The short and sweet answer: it’s gonna take a long fucking time dude. You aren’t going to be around to see the end of it.
627  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 01:31:32 PM
You report all the spams accounts you created from your main account and there you have Merit points for reporting spammer.
Merit points are awarded for good posts, not for valid reports to moderators.
The problem is non-existent as the reward is non-existent. You didn't understand how the system works.
Read the OP again.

Hey dude, what’s a Copper Member and more importantly what’s a:

628  Economy / Digital goods / Re: This is the official Sell Your sMerit Here thread - I'll start with my 200 sM .. on: January 25, 2018, 01:22:57 PM
Fuckin Bruno, LOL!

I should have known you would be the first one selling sMerits. You crack me up dude.

no we did before please check time local boards turkish :  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2819169.0

but this guys make a system for sellinng and he have got some stocks acc. about use the sending merits Cheesy

But the difference is that this sales thread is a joke thread and your sales thread is really selling sMerit.

Unless, of course, you think Bruno is serious about selling 200 sMerits for a million dollars. However, he is willing to throw in a ball cupping with the sMerit so maybe it’s worth it.
629  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 06:30:54 AM
Ok, i get the system, but isn't it a little bit harsh for people waiting for levelling up next week?

New sr member and 1 week away from hero member got the same merit now and it doesn't make sense.

Also, can i buy merit points or make a raffle for merit points. For example, i will make a raffle who sends me merit and give 0.20 eth to winner such a thing.

Currently, there is no rule for it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2818511.msg28871541#msg28871541
630  Economy / Digital goods / Re: This is the official Sell Your sMerit Here thread - I'll start with my 200 sM .. on: January 25, 2018, 06:24:30 AM
Fuckin Bruno, LOL!

I should have known you would be the first one selling sMerits. You crack me up dude.
631  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can Bitcoin scale to become a major payment network? on: January 25, 2018, 05:55:35 AM
If you follow what real core developers are saying like Van der Laan (don’t listen to Gavin “Wright is Satoshi”  Andresen), it will take many years, likely decades, for bitcoin to scale to anywhere near a major payment network.

In order for bitcoin to compete with just the ACH Network it would need to move $43 trillion and 25 billion electronic financial transactions each year. That’s roughly 125 times more transactions than bitcoin is currently doing very poorly. There is a backlog in the mempool so it can’t even keep up with what it’s currently doing.

If you look at the transactions processed by the major credit brands (Visa, MC, Discover, etc.), it appears to be around 100 billion transactions. That’s 500 times more than bitcoin is currently processing poorly. Now we’re up to 625 times increase in transaction volume for bitcoin.

Pure EFT transactions (debit card) is around 50 billion per year. That adds another 250 times more transactions worldwide than bitcoin is currently doing poorly. We are now at 875 x current number of transactions that bitcoin is now doing horribly at keeping up.

It’s safe to say that at minimum it will take many decades before bitcoin can be made to effectively scale enough to just replace the ACH Network. It could possibly take the entire lifetime of the youngest bitcoiner on this forum before to could scale enough to take over all major worldwide financial transactions. If it could be made to handle that kind of volume, bitcoin would need to change from its current 5 or less transactions a second to 56,000 transactions a second and the blockchain would fill up the New York public library.
632  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 04:37:56 AM
ok all admins/mod please read this , if you find it helpful then implement it -

solution to make sure smerits get distributed on daily basis to most of eligible members without any fraud -

1. increase smerit supply first .

2. to check fraud implement these rules -

a. A person can give only smerits to max 5 members per day .

b. a member cant give smerit to same person again until he give it to 5 other different members .

c. any member who shared his smerit to less than 5 members in a month , reduce few merits from his account . bcoz he is like inactive member of forum .

d. a member can give only maximum 20 smerits to other member in a month . it will help in stopping grey market .
OR if a member have 100 smerits then he cant send more than 20% of his merits to same guy in a month .

e. will think more and edit the same post .

That’s not really fair. If someone like Stephen Gornick was still around he would probably get all of my sMerit all the time. He was the most truly helpful and unbiased person on this forum. He would have deserved to get more than others and more from one person.

Oh, don’t tell me Stephen Gornick is still here, he’s not.

This person: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2811617.msg28777253#msg28777253
Is not this person: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=109741.msg1193039#msg1193039
Unless he was in a car accident and had half of his brain removed.

where is the proof for what you say about Stephen Gornick  Huh or he is just your friends. You say he is helpful but why he has this warning "Warning: Trade with extreme caution!"

The real Stephen Gornick either sold his account or left the forum forever and his old account was hacked. This new person ain’t him.
633  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 04:35:21 AM
ok all admins/mod please read this , if you find it helpful then implement it -

solution to make sure smerits get distributed on daily basis to most of eligible members without any fraud -

1. increase smerit supply first .

2. to check fraud implement these rules -

a. A person can give only smerits to max 5 members per day .

b. a member cant give smerit to same person again until he give it to 5 other different members .

c. any member who shared his smerit to less than 5 members in a month , reduce few merits from his account . bcoz he is like inactive member of forum .

d. a member can give only maximum 20 smerits to other member in a month . it will help in stopping grey market .
OR if a member have 100 smerits then he cant send more than 20% of his merits to same guy in a month .

e. will think more and edit the same post .

That’s not really fair. If someone like Stephen Gornick was still around he would probably get all of my sMerit all the time. He was the most truly helpful and unbiased person on this forum. He would have deserved to get more than others and more from one person.

Oh, don’t tell me Stephen Gornick is still here, he’s not.

This person: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2811617.msg28777253#msg28777253
Is not this person: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=109741.msg1193039#msg1193039
Unless he was in a car accident and had half of his brain removed.

ok so you guys (lutpin too) think giving many smerits to few members is ok than giving few smerits to many people .

you talk like those icos who limit their minimum whitelist investment to 10 ether or 1 btc . favoring whales ..

always remember if some one gave you something precious then divide that carefully , its not about whom you like most or who helped you , here you are doing it for community , smerits are not for showing you love to dear ones .

and also , even if you give 1 extra smerit to same guy , then remember there will be one more guy who will miss that 1 smerit which you could have given to him .


I just see it differently. I see it as a system that allows you to reward quality posts. Some people will never get any and others will get a lions share. The worst trolls on this forum sometimes post something that’s really helpful or new and interesting so even they will end up with some. Or, maybe I’m missing something.
634  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 04:17:58 AM
ok all admins/mod please read this , if you find it helpful then implement it -

solution to make sure smerits get distributed on daily basis to most of eligible members without any fraud -

1. increase smerit supply first .

2. to check fraud implement these rules -

a. A person can give only smerits to max 5 members per day .

b. a member cant give smerit to same person again until he give it to 5 other different members .

c. any member who shared his smerit to less than 5 members in a month , reduce few merits from his account . bcoz he is like inactive member of forum .

d. a member can give only maximum 20 smerits to other member in a month . it will help in stopping grey market .
OR if a member have 100 smerits then he cant send more than 20% of his merits to same guy in a month .

e. will think more and edit the same post .

That’s not really fair. If someone like Stephen Gornick was still around he would probably get all of my sMerit all the time. He was the most truly helpful and unbiased person on this forum. He would have deserved to get more than others and more from one person.

Oh, don’t tell me Stephen Gornick is still here, he’s not.

This person: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2811617.msg28777253#msg28777253
Is not this person: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=109741.msg1193039#msg1193039
Unless he was in a car accident and had half of his brain removed.
635  Economy / Speculation / Re: What determines bitcoin’s price? on: January 25, 2018, 04:01:11 AM
If you can figure that one out you’re my hero. I’ve been mining, buying and selling btc for seven years and I can name at least 20 things that act on the btc/usd exchange rate but how much and when is still a mystery to me.
636  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 03:48:33 AM
Hi Andrew,

How do you tell how many sMerits you have to give? Do you click into that +merit link on the side of the post?
Go to: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit

Ah, cool. Thanks
637  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 03:44:30 AM
May I ask what the point of the merit system is to give to legendary members?  Doesn't that just reduce the supply for everyone else making it even harder?
Not at all. Merit is not given out or transferred. Only sMerit is given out (giving sMerit means that someone will get both merit and sMerit, and you will lose sMerit). The supply that matters is the sMerit supply, not the merit supply. The reason legendary members get merit is so that they meet the requirement for their rank.

Your points are only valid if they are seen and "merited" by a select-few members of this community.
"select few" A few hundred thousand members of the community got sMerit, not just "a select few".

Doesn't anybody else see the mile-long list of potential issues that may arise from this?
Issues, yes. Mile long, no. Perhaps you could enlighten us and list your mile long list of issues.

Hi Andrew,

How do you tell how many sMerits you have to give? Do you click into that +merit link on the side of the post?
638  Other / Meta / Re: Merit & new rank requirements on: January 25, 2018, 03:24:32 AM
With this new function, i think that only member that are already member rank or higher before today get Merit point because it's free one time Merit point. and the other with lower rank will never get enough Merit point to up level.

From where I stand I'm equally likely to merit a noob or a legendary... as long as the post is worth it.

What will happen if use all the sMerit I have? Do I get more?

0.5 for each merit you get.

yeah a new function and you got 1000 Merit point without doing anything. cool

Don’t feel bad, Bruce Wagner has 250 merit, cablepair has 500 merit, cypherdoc has 1000 merit, MagicalTux (aka Mark Karpeles) has 500 merit, Inaba (aka EclipseMC, Butterfly Labs, his trust rating is the worst I’ve ever seen -9999: -15 / +4p) has 1000 merit.

I don’t think it matters what your merit is unless you want to jump ranks and be able to make signature money. This might help the mods out by cutting down on the meaningless posts aimed only at post count. Hopefully “merit” will succeed where “activity” failed miserably. It will be interesting to see how Merit is gamed. I can definitely see account sales increasing now.
639  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: today's bitcoin value on: January 24, 2018, 04:24:23 PM
Bitcoins exchange rate is right at $11,000 today. By years end it will be different. How it changes will be the result of speculator activity, government involvement, media announcements and fud.

If this thread goes to 100 pages this will remain the only 100% correct answer here.

640  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why aren't there more women in Bitcoin? on: January 24, 2018, 03:45:18 PM
I think it is because most here is sharing your thoughts and a kind of taking the risk when you make an investment where in a women is not expert.

Maybe because most women are afraid of taking risk.  Especially if they were housewife, they will not gamble into bitcoin.  They will not buy some and let your house do not have anything.  And it is all because there are seldom women who plays or always at the front of computers.


Stupid risk maybe. There’s nothing wrong with being conservative. Conservatives have all the money. I think women choose to go out and live life instead of existing inside of a fantasy world created behind a glowing screen. Just another example of how women are smarter than men.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 [32] 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 468 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!