According to conspiracy theory, Is it possible that the bitcoin was created by governments to gain financial strength in the modern world?
Possible but very unlikely. If perhaps they did create it, it wouldn't make sense to not support your own work. Also, the government has substantial amount of influence on banks. So if the assumption they created bitcoin were true, they just shot themselves in the foot since we all know that on of the main reason for bitcoin's existence is for decentralization to prosper. the decentralization that I saw referring to the conspiracy was that they made other plans if the capitalist economic model continued to experience distrust. I believe that and they offer different things to plan b and that will eventually lead to regulation that benefits them even in crypto. like promotion, they used a lot of sweet things first until the time came to legitimize ironically. |
|
|
|
|
now there are many telegram/discord groups that appear specifically to discuss trade, if you can, then follow almost everything in stages and continue to measure what is discussed with the conditions of the market analysis mentioned, in the end you will find 1-2 groups that correspond to your style and comfortable joining there.
|
|
|
|
|
if the market does not improve gradually, then saturation will appear and will turn into regret. You have to stay active or you will suffer if the assets you manage cannot return to bounce/developers are no longer active, think more optimistically because market trends keep changing. hold is not a completely correct option.
|
|
|
|
In reality when governments make regulations on bitcoin, it's because to gain more control on it, not actually om bitcoin but how much user does exchanges have, where goes money and so on. In any way, if it's really beneficial or not, doesn't matter because it will happen anyway. At first there were no regulations because it had few users, news around bitcoin and crypto weren't loud and important.
To directly answer your question, for us regulation isn't good, because bitcoin is meant for protecting privacy and to be decentralized.
a big impact on the addition of active users and investors together with agreements that were immediately understood as yellow lights. But what happened next was a lot of irrefutable rules. But how much debate arises that there is no denying that regulation must exist to make greater speculation. The market will respond in their own way. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin prices are very influential on the ICO because every ICO uses Bitcoin, ETH or other coins for payment, so when the price of Bitcoin rises automatically the funds collected are also easy to get a lot, and vice versa when the price of Bitcoin or other coins drops it will greatly affect the acquisition of funds
It will affect in so many various ways, bitcoin moves the entire industry, by looking right now mostly you will se cheap value of existing coins thats due to effect of bitcoin was also cheap, so for sure ico's will not be exempted, while bitcoin suffer the entire market will also experience the same that's include the ico community. when bitcoin prices rise, there is not always a reactive impact for ico, investors will prefer to follow the bitcoin trend. price reference is also incorrect. actually if ico isn't too much, investors will focus and synergize with promotions from developers. So the effects that occur must also be in line with trusted ico. Bitcoin prices are just one of the boosters. |
|
|
|
What makes a coin dead? I would say when it has no active nodes, no trading volume and no development, in that order. Anyone have a different definition?
My second question, why does CMC still list these coins!?!?!?
When project team member going to offline and when regularly there are no update publish about which project. All of the Investors and hunters day by day selling their asset and never buy again that's why one day trade voulme going to empty. Coinmarketcap fault is they didn’t remove dead coin but in the other hand crypto exchange remove dead coin from their listing. the elimination of coins from the exchange market which is considered CMC as an active reference is used as the decision maker to delete them, on the other hand, the clarity of project development is also an active determination, for example belugapay coins which are suddenly removed by CMC. but they are also imperfect and lose a lot of things from monitoring their list of coins. Dead coins have two essence where they also still have active volume and not. |
|
|
|
|
BitTorrent has been a hot topic for one week, Justin Sun seems to be actively increasing market sentiment. although there is a slight correction today, it does not eliminate its potential for the next few weeks. Binance is also a good mediator for the initial development of BTT. various signals still discuss it.
|
|
|
|
It seems to me that only a certain control over ico companies will be able to protect the investor and the entire ico market of companies from fraudsters. Today it is a really big problem. Perhaps one of the reasons for the fall in the cryptocurrency market.
The loss of the Escrow usage model makes the ICO movement more wild and erratic. matters relating to investment also need to be protected by clear guarantees. many developers are finally caught up in obscure situations by continuing to postpone many important things, there needs to be clear rules or one day the ICO perspective will be equated with a systematic mode of fraud by selling hope. |
|
|
|
If you are fine with Kyc then are some good project out there where you can invest and as many of them list their token regulated exchange so it is good way to protect investor money ,then it is fine to invest in those project to get cheap token but if you are going for general ico then it is better to buy them after they hit exchange as after manipulation price will dump.
I note that at the moment most ICOs have implemented Kyc for their investors, but the potential is almost no different than before, I prefer to join the current coin voting list and continue to monitor ICO that is directly connected to the big market. If emphasized in general, ICO must also remain realistic about the market situation. |
|
|
|
|
there will still be a long correction because traders will still play safe. stimulants in the past few days are also still susceptible to correction, but for some perspectives it can pump hard because the support line enters effective limits compared to selling orders. At least there must be big rumors to enlarge the reaction that is still in the midpoint.
|
|
|
|
|
it is still a long way to go because the government still does not vote with the regulation of crypto currencies.
But actually they can examine several important parts to at least guarantee economic processes that are not dominated by fraud.
their job is to protect the security of user investment and it is true that the ICO must be prioritized for the initial draft regulation.
|
|
|
|
|
there are some intentions from those who try to find a solution even though it is not possible, they do not question the flow of transaction funds because it is difficult to prevent, but extreme intentions arise that they try to apply the Kyc formula to the blockchain wallet.
I don't feel this can work, but in fact the main stigma is that they also respect crypto, far from being dislike that has become a widespread rumor.
|
|
|
|
Despite the fact that some project teams are so strict about kyc, making bounty hunters to also do the same, many still use fake IDs. I am just trying to wonder, because it seems there is nothing that cannot happen online. I was even thinking that those who ask for KYC, have their special ways of detecting fake and original ID cards.
now it is more complicated that the Kyc requirements for face recognition are more fundamental for dealing with biometric lines authentically for users in a particular project, this option appears as the last condition after uploading documents and of course can minimize false data. developers also only need to cooperate with applications that already have a reputation, we can already see it in the Kyc process for the blockchain wallet. |
|
|
|
Those are traders who want to buy some cheap tokens or coins and sell it to a higher price in other exchanges. And some new investors are also buying if the project have a great potential to become big in the future. Some investors buy back their tokens at the cheapest price and hold them and wait for project to be fully developed.
traders with large capital are involved in this after evaluating the trend technically on the coins they are targeting. good volume conditions make them sure to buy at a low price. This is also done by their followers who only believe in the signal given. of course the traded coins they believe are still on a good track in the market. |
|
|
|
Well, i don't agree with this but if it is working to raise the price of Bitcoin then its a good thing. The bitcoin powers the cryptocurrency and if it goes up, the whole crypto market goes up so all i can say that whatever the reasons may be, the bitcoin should keep going up.
The problem is safe or not, I think USDT is a new standard for uncertain market balance. And of course many things will be supported. I don't think it always makes bitcoin go up, for the long term they will take the bitcoin volume ratio every day. USDT will actually be the successor to Bitcoin in the next few years. |
|
|
|
Most of what I know today, apart from the information I have been able to acquire from this forum, were gotten through the study of white papers.
Reading white papers is nothing that easy, most especially reading those with large number of pages.
If only one can devote that time with patience, there are so many lessons in them.
the most complete data is a whitepaper, if we often read various projects, we can find out which ones are really good and original, and just copy paste. The originality of the project idea will be easier to understand than other methodologies and this has become a standard obligation in each project. |
|
|
|
|
I always thought developers would not be able to do the right thing under current market conditions, some could create a stable community with various updates and additional incentives, and the rest simply resigned and seemed to be able to throw coins into small markets without significant development.
I think the ICO must also be divided into several categories to save projects that have great potential with serious developers to bring the maximum things.
|
|
|
|
|
at least the long-term mindset can be more realistic because it is not intended to be 100% of all assets owned. we are required to trade optimally with the best possible profit because the bear market does not promise anything in a certain period. But actually in the present conditions, I have become more familiar with many altcoins, this is unprecedented.
|
|
|
|
|
my address : ScBsaNgHsh6YjDXRu7icnujwiDVSNWVsqL
|
|
|
|
Trading without losses is not possible because every successful trading system would not possible without loss. Firstly all trading system face to losses but next time he may be get profits.
optimal trading is divided by focusing on a few coins, one coin with another will determine the various possibilities and cover each other for a loss of coins This variation can minimize total losses with the estimate that some of them must be able to become reserves to cover capital losses for other assets, the total calculation of all traded assets will be profitable if we can manage them. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
