Personally I would go with the actual Antiminer S7 purchase, over any type of cloud mining website, since you lose full control over your investment if used in a cloud mining website but when you have the actual product, it won't and can't vanish all of a sudden. Also Amph question and point is correct and necessary on this case plus there were few cases in the past that people had unpleasant experiences while using genesis mining, so you might want to take that into consideration as well.
|
|
|
Yes, old miners are being sold always, mostly after the ROI and to help gather funds for newer and more efficient miners instead. If I were you, I would sell all four of your S3's and then purchase one of those $100 off coupons for an S7 that many are selling lately for cheap and go buy an S7 instead in which you mentioned, you don't have a free electricity, it would be the right thing to do since their the most efficient plus their price has dropped hugely on recent times.
|
|
|
In regards with centralization being the key for stopping BTCitcoin, I do agree but couldn't agree with other points made. Although at the moment BTCitcoin usage isn't the ideal case for everyday purchase of coffee, I don't think it would stay like that forever and surely things will develop along the way that will make this happen and honestly couldn't see any other crypto-currency that would do it better than BTCitcoin. Surely it has it's flaws but there's developers in the back-end that constantly try to find solutions to problems, even though there are clear differences (it's just matter of time).
|
|
|
Honestly, I think prices are on the high range as opposed to other similar sites and yet you've stated as buy cheap in the title which is not true, specially for the desktop chassis and laptops mentioned. Could you provide how you assessed those prices? Also in regards to electronic gadgets, it would be better that you put their specs so it would be easier for users to check it out and see if it's worth it or not.
|
|
|
Good options you mentioned there but the most realistic ones are number 2 and 3 only, with number 2 needing a bit of modification since I would think just because the halving, brings less rewards upon each found block, it should be expected that BTCitcoin value will double as well, but sure enough there will be an up trend afterwards.
|
|
|
I voted for a No on this one. It's too soon to rise on that level without a pump at this moment. Sure enough will exceed that level upon reaching the halving phase but to go beyond what we are now ($415ish), can't see it happening unless other factors would come into place, in which can't see anything else to come also, so were going to stay in a range we are now for some more time than you predicted upon reaching 12/4.
|
|
|
Base on your 2nd comment of the thread, there isn't a way to use other website to advertise on them and get paid as well, It's always the other way around and while you rend an ad slot on their page, you have to pay accordingly. Another thing that might interest you is, to try PTC sites in which the more referrals you get under yourself (that will view others website), the more income you get to accumulate over time.
|
|
|
There are two different ways that could somehow fall on the safe zone category in which they are: 1: Try to be an exchange platform for those in need, like exchange alt coins to BTCitcoin and vice versa and you could ask for some percentage (2% would be fair), Although this methods requires you to have some certain amounts on each alt coins before you could begin doing it. 2: Learn any type of online skill that you could offer to clients and get paid in BTCitcoin.
Anything aside from these two, has enormous chances of you, losing more than you could earn.
|
|
|
Is there an actual proof of the BTCitcoin hacking? As most medias keep on saying BTCitcoin was used for this attack and that attack and in the end the results shows another evidence, so all I see is, another fake news that would spark some attention. Don't get me wrong, I did some digging (I just found about Anonymous today), and they seem have some good intentions and our real but I think whatever their doing now, is to get as much as attention as they could, no matter the collateral damage they do (in this case to BTCitcoin image).
|
|
|
Thanks for counting of posts Lutpin and an advance thank you to the person that will process payments later on Update:Thanks to DogecoinMachine for processing of payment
|
|
|
This auction is over and SFR10 has won (as Lutpin's bid was placed after 23:59). Please pay to the payment address in the OP and message me your address.
Hybridsole did notify me about the fact that the New York time was incorrect. I will not post it in the future as there already is a link to a page where you can see the current time run Amsterdam.
Thank you, everything has been sent (in terms of payment + my address) and it should be confirmed soon. Kindly let me know if any other information is needed as well. Best regards ~SFR~
|
|
|
Earlier, I tried to claim on your other faucet (BitcoinTime) and got to receive the 1004 Satoshi but right after going over to this faucet (BTC Dark Side) of yours, I keep on getting the following error: "This faucet exceeded it's safety limits!" Not sure if it's due to me claiming on the other one or is another complication, kindly double check this problem.
|
|
|
Personally (back in the days, I mined using GPU's only and mostly after ROI, I would have mined for another 3 to 4 months before I sold them and invested in better GPU's) but now as you have pointed, those who are after good amount of profits (professional and serious miners), by new mining rigs in large quantities (the moment it's on the market), and start to mine with them and regardless of ROI (which for most new miners would fall something between 3 to 4ish months with difficulty increases - assuming they got the most efficient ones), until they have surplus the ROI and have some profit all up to few months before a new mining rig be released (sometimes there's news of upcoming new rig or new chips, so that helps out).
|
|
|
Most likely I hold whatever amount I have and try to buy as much as I could so I could make a lot of profit when it starts to go back up and then sell those that I only bought and hold my initial amount prior to drop itself, so it still somehow a win-win but in a longer manner in which depends on the time scale of recovery.
|
|
|
Good article that would mostly put newbies in trap, mainly numbers 1,2 and 3 and number 4 could have more of a general scam effect which happened to me in the past due to a good exchange fees, I went in and tried to exchange small amount that I never got converted back and sent to the other payment option I wanted and it's not just that, some turn out to be scams after some times (which many already knew this).
|
|
|
Those days, really miss the time were there was a hype of mining with GPU's and we used to post our modified computers that we used for mining (it was a lot more fun than mining now, as a whole). Aside from these it was on it's first few years and few only knew and when there was some group meetings, it was very exciting, specially when there was a speaker at events. In regards to being excited, it never went away and until now, every single day, I have that excitement like the first day, I get to know how cool BTCitcoin is. There's more hype now compared to around 2011 and more attention is given to it, specially from medias around the world.
|
|
|
Personally I'm against this in a way that criminals could go ahead and just buy $25 in BTCitcoin whenever they want and do it in numerous ways. The idea itself is really great though (to introduce new users to BTCitcoin) but it would be better to somehow track each buyer (we never know when those informations could come in handy and help protect someone from as a result of criminal funding). So my saying is, regardless of the amount, their identity should be provided instead.
|
|
|
Although you seem to have an interesting theory, I sort of doubt it would have any significant damage into property prices since it will surely need a lot of self driven vehicles to make this happen which we know it won't happen that fast therefor the change in someone's property won't be that much affected and prices would surely keep on pumping (unfortunately). On the other hand, self driven cars won't come cheap so there's even a lesser chance of someone acquiring them (unless their rich enough).
|
|
|
I would like to inform everyone that 0.1 BTC is in escrow now and just to be fair I wouldn't join the contest as well (due to holding the funds myself): -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is SFR10 from bitcointalk.org and today is 3/24/2016. I would be acting as escrow provider for "Eclipse Logo Contest". 0.1 BTC has been sent to my address: https://blockchain.info/tx/c2ed38f8540269ed091fa11357de55e22ced0b1d42ae5d592886c3a4645cc6dc -----BEGIN SIGNATURE----- 1Gm5K2H2fjD2oiTn4rWC5GwQMn2xMUBc5g IGmA/Bo3sJXSwvF6Ztl99KqebhFN3G5OEtUMINxS2jeBP+0Yu2NDkW92KddPOvQ88BZ4U1L5UcYZRTpU+/D/8Eg= -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
|
|
|