I'm in favor of two solutions: a new board, and a rule that bans all of them. I'm more favorable of the latter. Yeah, it's called the trashcan.
Yes. It's more trouble than it is worth it and they often generate a lot of spam in the process. The signature guidelines thread should also be changed into strict rules and any campaign not following them or running a poorly managed campaign should have their entire threads trashed and their accounts banned. Maybe then people will start looking after their campaigns but if we continue to let them get away with doing absolutely nothing then they will.
How many times do we need to scream at theymos before he does something about this? |
|
|
|
I wasn't trying to compare the products (milk to multisig/security/etc), I was comparing the point.
You do not understand the concept that you think you do. Ok so for you - you need to be told No. I would also say, that would be up to the other person whether or not they even wanted to say no/yes. Because again, you are asking something of someone. They don't have to answer.
Again, you are arguing something that nobody claimed/that did not happen. Sure, there are things that I haven't received an answer for (theymos ignores a lot of PMs). In this specific case, multisig is the right way to go. You see, I gotta big problem with anyone or anything trying to force/"suggest" anyone or anything to do something.
Forcing someone to do anything and suggesting that they do something are very different actions. From the response I have read, I understand OP has reasons of making sure the forum purse is deregulated but the way you are going about it, makes its seems a personal vendetta which I am sure quite a number of people are seeing through and for that reason are willingly not supporting and moreover, the poll does not confirms anything if theymos does not support it. It will be a mere academic exercise and test of popularity.
They are both doing things against each other in this "personal vendetta". No surprise there. |
|
|
|
2 - They have set a reserve price.
Stealthy placed, and likely non-realistic (not that it can't be reached), reserve price.  |
|
|
|
Site https://masternodes.pro/ states that each masternode will earn over $900 at current BSD price. This must be an error in calculation as my masternode only earns 20 BSD a day and on some days it earns 40 BSD max. The total number of masternodes is false (they may not count individual masternodes on the same IP and/or have other errors in their data). It states on that website that the total number of masternodes is 84, but in reality there are around ~300. Use this website for proper calculations: https://www.mybitsend.com/masternode.php. |
|
|
|
Lord, here let me get more specific: The word fallacy is used in Philosophy Equations. The word fallacy is used elsewhere as well. (is that better for you? or am I missing something?)
Better, but not quite. The comparison was not valid; at least it wasn't an attempted equivalency I guess. So do you need to be told flat out "NO" in order to have things ended?
If you disagree with a suggestion/proposal, then you are supposed to say 'no' to it. This has happened before, but not related to the multi-sig one. It is not related to this suggestion. It's an example of how you are "suggesting" something to someone, they don't have to do it. That's the beauty of being a free human. We make our own choices good or bad.
Yet nobody claimed that they have to do it. Why are you arguing a point which has not been made (unless I missed someone's post)? |
|
|
|
- Experience: I have been on this forum for almost 2 years and over that time I have picked up some valuable skills and learnt the rules of the forum.
In other words: Zero or near zero experience managing campaigns, correct? - Great Rates: My rates are negotiable and competitive. Most of the time it will be lower than the big managers. Bitcoin is preferred but I accept some altcoins.
Which is not a good sign. It is generally those that are very incompetent that lowball on rates, and the forum ends up being flooded with spam from the campaigns managed by such managers. I suggest that you do not do this. |
|
|
|
It's not a fallacy. A fallacy belongs to philosophy and the equations there..
Which is absolutely untrue. OK so your "suggestion" change was "warmly welcomed" how many times you gotta "suggest" the same thing?
I usually had to bring up a single subject several times, over a longer period of time (and this was when I was a staff member). I had only brought this up once (I believe) in 2016. Let alone this thread.
Which is not related to me nor my suggestions. |
|
|
|
You think my mailman has right to question/suggest to me?
False comparison fallacy. You made your "suggestion" it obviously was declined.......move on.
Which is a lie. The change was warmly welcomed, and even planned before I've mentioned in my talk with theymos. As with everything that he does, it is just going to take an unusually long time to complete. I have no intention of "moving on" from any beneficial proposals, regardless whether they are denied or not. I do not think you are familiar enough with theymos, otherwise you wouldn't make nonsensical statements such as "say once and move on". |
|
|
|
why my account got banned after i joined waves signature campaign?
You've likely been spamming. i post reasonably constructive post (about 4 to 5 lines ) and my post has a time interval every two to three hours.
Neither of which has anything to do with constructive posts.
How about you post the link of your main account in order for us to check it out? Also, you've already committed the act of ban evasion by posting outside of this section whilst being banned: campaign application. |
|
|
|
This is the month of max FUD. Not everyone gets to survive.
It does seem like it, doesn't it? UAHF, Bitcoin ABC, Bitcoin Cash, Alphabay and Hans seized, Bitmixer gone, BTC-e suddenly down.  And Bitmixer ceases operations with some "weird" statement like he has just now realized that mixers are bad for Bitcoin.
Something is happening... not necessarily a bad thing though.
"Something". Anything centralized and illegal which grows that big eventually will get found and shut down. That's for sure. However, this is a non issue with the rise of decentralized solutions, e.g. JoinMarket and Tumblebit. They are superior to mixers anyways. Speculation like that often only leads to panic. It is possibly as the story would fit, but I wouldn't place any bets on it yet.
I wonder how much BTC-e going down has affected the price. |
|
|
|
If there some trolls build a group, they can put down every thread heavy. These people are only go fo cofrontation.
If he/she is actually trolling and constantly posting off-topic messages, then they would be breaking the forum rules and you could report them. Otherwise, if their opinions are valid and coherent with the threads that they are posting them in, you can not do anything. If you are starting your own thread(s) and want to avoid certain members, then make sure to make it self-moderated. |
|
|
|
You should know but here it is again - my CAPS or fonts etc are not yelling. Just emphasis. I don't follow "internet etiquette" Well it should go read up on what a "Donation" is. First off, in the USA DONATIONS BELONG TO THE DONEE. They are free to do as they wish with it, burn it, piss on it, whatever the DONEE wants to do. It's NOT YOUR BUSINESS. Lastly, you are not on that list, so you even if you were couldn't ask shit about it. Yet you are sooooooooo concerned about the funds OG holds as Treasurer You are soooooo concerned if he dies the funds are gone. So why the hell do you care? NOT MINE it's NOT YOURS...... Which is ridiculous. I've questioned several of theymoses decisions, both publicly and privately. I have also suggested several changes, some of which were rejected and others which were accepted. Just because it is "his business", that does not mean that I need to keep quiet. I have not, and do not plan to. ...
I like how you made a 180* and started siding with the least favorable forum members. 
These disputes put aside, fact is: Multi-sig is a no brainer and should be implemented (with or without OgNasty). |
|
|
|
Since multiple accounts are allowed,and there is no punishment from the staff if they abuse a campaign, I wonder if this would get the owner in any sort of trouble if reporting it. And not only him but others who do the same.
If he/she/it/they is talking to himself using multiple accounts, whilst wearing a paid signature (et. al.), then they would surely get banned. Twitter accs looks absolutely the same, similar followers, identical tweets. I guess BTC talk accs should get red trust because there is obviously just 1 owner for all these accs, who was stupid enough to register at the same time.
That is circumstantial proof at best. You need something better in order to get me to tag them all. I'd have to look into each account, which would be a huge waste of time and even then it would not be adequate without some sort of stronger connection between them. Personally, I have no trouble believing that this is a positive hit.
I responded as requested. |
|
|
|
PS : I'm wondering what account could be sold for 1.5 to 2 btc  Not sure if OGNasty escrows those kind of trades. There is absolutely no way that an account is worth >= 1.5 BTC. The only possibility that I see is a combination of the following: 1) DT2 account. 2) Donator/VIP. Then again, the OP might not be talking about a Bitcointalk account to begin with.
What kind of account are we talking about? |
|
|
|
I am afraid none of the experienced campaign managers will be interested in doing work for earning tokens. If you want professional hands, it's better you offer them to pay in bitcoins or some other top altcoins. As you have just seen, one of the most successful managers just is not interested because of you paying in tokens.
We are looking for the helpers, not the full management. There are many requests from participants and we want to give them full support they deserve That's just another way of stating: "You will work a lot, but we do not want to pay you the amount that you should be paid.". Stop being cheap by offering payments in currencies backed up by vaporware and start offering payments in Bitcoin. That way, you might actually get a professional/experience campaign manager to help you. i have recomended use reputable management like jamal
Have you been living in a cave? Jamal is one of the worst managers on this forum. |
|
|
|
Enrolled.
No more users will be enrolled in the current period. If you apply now, you will be enrolled for the following period. |
|
|
|
Any of you right now online?
Because i want to use your escrow services.
I am sorry that I couldn't help you with the trade. Reversible payment methods are quite risky. You can always check whether we are around by clicking our profile links. |
|
|
|
IF you are NOT a DONOR you do NOT have any say. IT'S NOT YOUR BUSINESS.
That does not make sense. @Lauda I use to think you were impartial, you were not. There is something for you to gain. IF this "multi-sig" has something to do with adding you on it? Never should you be allowed anywhere near that fund.
Exactly what did I state which was not impartial? Has someone sent you some false information via PM? Read my posts again. I had suggested multi-sig (obviously not myself, nor OgNasty) to theymos long before I had any direct interaction with TMAN, OgNasty, et. al. or their dispute came into being. I think he used CET as an example of a much safer setup, because we use multi-sig for our major funds. Whether someone wants to endorse or protest CET is not up to me. Switching over from single key holders to a multi-sig setup for the forum funds is a no brainer, in every context. Tman and Isoneguy are not buddies, they are in collusion/associates/they are connected.
I know TMAN to a certain extent, and have never heard of the other guy which is why I do not believe they are connected in any way. If two people share the opinion on a certain issue, does that mean they are in collusion? I think not. After all this shit tossed at the guy......I TRUST HIM MORE AND YOU ALL LESS. I'm betting I'm not the only one either.
There is a lot more to all of these stories, but most of that was never publicly released. Blind faith has never led to any good. I suggest that you add a grain of salt and skepticism when dealing with, anyone. |
|
|
|
Reserved Turkish translation if need.
Stop spamming and read the damn thread. Thread Note: I have posted an uncensored version of the ANN thread (which is self moderated) as requested by nemgun; a thread where this project can be discussed freely and where criticism is not censored. I do not have any opinion on this project at this time, thus do not bother me about it. I have scaled down the fonts and the images. The content of the thread is not edited in any way of form. |
|
|
|
Thread Note: I have posted an uncensored version of the ANN thread (which is self moderated) as requested by nemgun; a thread where this project can be discussed freely and where criticism is not censored. I do not have any opinion on this project at this time, thus do not bother me about it. I have scaled down the fonts and the images. The content of the thread is not edited in any way of form.
Thread archived as the founders promised not to censor anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
