|
I've seen gogreenlight mining blocks for some time now. I believe I did a calculation of their percentage of the network for an earlier post I made. I'll see if I can dig it up. This isn't "news" per se.
|
|
|
|
Good day to you!  The time has come such a thought, You can create a pool for mining currency. Buy Power steering nicehash. And send all your pool. For example for 30 MIN. I think the probability that you will find a huge block It remains to create a pool, and calculate profit))) How do you like the idea? It's too expensive and the odds will kill your idea quickly. Better to buy yourself a miner and use it on a solo pool. At least that way you can heat a room with it while you wait to strike it rich. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is no different than any other technology, because it still favors the rich. ^hmmmmmmm^
sadly this is what has happened to this technology lately. and it is mostly because bitcoin is littered with politics, and people who want to take control of it and also many who want to make more money from it. That's why Dogecoin was invented. I'm okay with Bitcoin being for the rich and famous  i doubt there are many bitcoin users like you! I'll be more than willing to sell the rich and famous my bitcoin when the time is right. |
|
|
|
That's why Dogecoin was invented. I'm okay with Bitcoin being for the rich and famous |
|
|
|
Vanitygen PLUS!
Still working on finding time to finish fiddling with opencl in my vm to compile oclvanitygen properly currently just cpu vanitygen and updated keyconv on windows
linux fully supported with both
VanityGen Plus gives out about 215KKeys/sec on my system, am looking forward to a GPU update when ever it arrives. You can always use vanitygen and the version code for the coin for which you want to generate an address from the table on this page: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/List_of_address_prefixesto create addresses at GPU speeds. I'm on my phone right now so I can't test the command line syntax to tell you exactly what to type but I've been doing this for a while now to generate a variety of coin addresses using oclvanitygen. |
|
|
|
I made a transactions over 48 hours ago and it is unconfirmed. I have been buying BTC since early 2011 at $7. I've never had an issue with unconfirmed transactions and, I'm not sure what to do. I used Electrum to send my coin as I have many times. I see that I messed up and sent all my BTC which left a tiny fee. I'm not sure how to backup Electrum and pseudo double spend my coin. Can anyone with experience help me cancel this transaction? https://blockchain.info/tx/b84e73ee4e76362c2a950077a94191819ed0713fb5418fd50cafd3d5aa08001d It already has 11 confirmations. Are you taking the piss? |
|
|
|
Given that the minimum transaction size is 547 satoshis or 0.00000547 BTC, there would be a theoretical maximum of 3,839,122,486,289 units of Bitcoin available for spending
the minimum amount of bitcoin to send has changed a couple of times but last time i checked it was 5 thousand something (5400?) satoshi also to my knowledge this minimum changes based on price of bitcoin and it is there to prevent spamming of 1 satoshi transactions. in other words in a world where everyone is spending bitcoin, price is much higher and if we are about to spend all the units available this minimum will be 1 satoshi (the samallest amount) this makes the maximum theoretical amount equal to 2,100,000,000,000,000 (ignoring all the lost coins) My understanding is that this minimum you speak of is set by miners using the fee-filter which can be altered without making changes to Core. what i am talking about is called "Dust" and it is set in the protocol (although i am not sure whether or not miners can change it though!) but wallets will reject it. it has changed a lot, and i am not so sure how it is calculated right now it has changed quite a bit ( https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/2760) but i think it is now a different way and it is based on minrelaytxfee not a fixed number! https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/policy/policy.h#L43-L48and i guess you were right about the 547 (or 546 satoshi according to this topic: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1214993.0;all) Well thanks for looking into that. I was unable to find a reference to the minimum transaction before I had to run some errands so I was beginning to wonder if I hadn't made something up! |
|
|
|
|
You don't have a selection for those of us who neither have nor ever will visit the IMDb forum.
I vote meh.
|
|
|
|
Given that the minimum transaction size is 547 satoshis or 0.00000547 BTC, there would be a theoretical maximum of 3,839,122,486,289 units of Bitcoin available for spending
the minimum amount of bitcoin to send has changed a couple of times but last time i checked it was 5 thousand something (5400?) satoshi also to my knowledge this minimum changes based on price of bitcoin and it is there to prevent spamming of 1 satoshi transactions. in other words in a world where everyone is spending bitcoin, price is much higher and if we are about to spend all the units available this minimum will be 1 satoshi (the samallest amount) this makes the maximum theoretical amount equal to 2,100,000,000,000,000 (ignoring all the lost coins) My understanding is that this minimum you speak of is set by miners using the fee-filter which can be altered without making changes to Core. |
|
|
|
|
Given that the minimum transaction size is 547 satoshis or 0.00000547 BTC, there would be a theoretical maximum of 3,839,122,486,289 units of Bitcoin available for spending which probably would not be enough for the world's commercial requirements. Also, the number of transactions per second is limited by the block size and confirmation time to something like 7 transactions per second. I did some math but I'm getting more like 6.5 TPS. This isn't anywhere close to the rate required by world commerce.
I believe this invalidates your question but I will continue:
1) Commerce would cease
2) People worldwide would not be able to obtain the basic requirements of life
3) Rioting and chaos would ensue
4) Zombie apocalypse
|
|
|
|
|
Good to know you found a work-around but I'm still wondering what could have caused that strange behaviour. There must be someone else on this forum who has experience something similar.
|
|
|
|
|
If I were you, I would move any coins I put into that wallet asap.
|
|
|
|
|
The thought of stealing your coins didn't even cross my mind. My parents raised me to respect the property of others.
|
|
|
|
|
Well I took my resolution down to 1024X 600 in both IE and Firefox and even zoomed in but I couldn't replicate the problem.
What browser do you use?
|
|
|
|
|
Uhhh.. is that a CRT?
What resolution are you using?
|
|
|
|
|
Where's the story here? Brazil is an impoverished, festering shit-hole. It has been for a long time. There were nearly 58,000 homicides in Brazil in 2014 and nearly the same number again in 2015. There was a lot of talk about this before the Olympics last year. What has changed? Fifty-eight thousands deaths in a year translates to 159 each and every day for a year! Between 1980 and 2010 there were 1 million homicides - that's an average of 33,333 per year or 91 per day - every day for 30 freaking years and increasing yearly.
What's changed that we need to call it a "Purge" now? This is status quo.
|
|
|
|
|
I don't get to watch many movies but I did see Daddy's Home (2105) with Will Ferrell and Mark Wahlberg and I laughed so hard in some places I had tears.
|
|
|
|
|
Los Angeles is replete with fraudsters - pick a place like Denmark or Switzerland; though if you were to do that, you would also be a scammer. If a meme causes me to chuckle, it is not pathetic but they may not be for everyone. Glad you got your funding; hope your brother is in good health.
|
|
|
|
Yeah difficulty increased on Feb 3rd by about 7.5% so seeing a reduction in pps/TH by 25% doesn't seem right.
It could just be bad luck on the part of the pool as well - give it a couple of days.
PPS is Pay Per Share, which pays a fixed BTC amount per share that your miner submits. The variance is entirely on the pool owner, so whether you have good luck or bad luck, you make the same amount. Damn! I knew that but I was looking at PPLNS at the same time and I got confused ;( Thanks for pointing that out. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah difficulty increased on Feb 3rd by about 7.5% so seeing a reduction in pps/TH by 25% doesn't seem right.
It could just be bad luck on the part of the pool as well - give it a couple of days.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
