The genius of ETH and other ICOs is it can raise millions of dollars without issuing stocks. Basically a way of raising money without pesky shareholders. You own the company 100 percent and owe nobody. Meanwhile the token holder owns something that is the equivalent of "that's not worth the paper it's printed on".
Once you have received the money you can pursue any agenda you're interested in. With no actual shareholders to be accountable to or any regulation there is no one to stop you.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2135456.new#new <<< Just a thought.... WARNING!!! - Shittcoin - How to deal with it? |
|
|
|
I'm interested on how many new accounts with the only intent to get free shitcoins via spreading scam via their signs was made since that scam started to give airdops... 100 - 1000 -10.000 accounts? Some can share insights?  I see heavy increase on non related replays, short and worthless... broken English, no clue about nothing... The hole thing is abusing the signature concept of this forum if you ask me... (well not by rules tho) |
|
|
|
This year everyone want to launch ICO, so we must be accurate with the investings.
Yes that true! The hype is getting bigger! But lets stay on topic and provide points to the starting list! Thx |
|
|
|
what does it "Mainstream Investors" mean?
did the previous ICO were created by non-mainstream investors?
so again, how to actuall define mainstream investors?
"mainstream investors" = jumping on a investment train with usually no own brain or own research done, helping to pump or dumb the value of something....? @LakeBTC <<< 2 links - was reading them. Good luck for your ico! |
|
|
|
Yeah I mean you actually canīt loose anything, but the marcet cap droped 33% within the last 24h and big volumes got tradet.
With the "you have to hold 90% rule" i canīt imagine the volume is from people trading their 10%.
If I had to guess, I would say the dev is a millionaire by now.
Weīve seen 2.5 million in transactions.
So all the little sheeps made a scammer rich and think they are so smart.
Itīs sad how easy you can use people to your advantage.
You can clearly see the drop is coming from people infringing the 90% rule. Check http://deeponion.info/. 1/3 of the airdrop participants moved more than 10%. That is a lot of people, than won't receive any airdrops in the future. A drop of 33% is not much in comparison to that. Specially in comparison to the run in the last month. And the drop is also not spectacular in comparison to the current volume. Since there were only 6 airdrops, they aren't many coins in circulation. Please explain me that I am dumb (sorry) 1/3 of the airdrop participants moved more than 10% <> That is a lot of people <> Since there were only 6 airdrops, they aren't many coins in circulation lot of people = lot of coins <<< NO??? Sorry for being dumb! |
|
|
|
I have a look at their thread. nothing special but at least it free. how scam?
You should read THIS threat from start, than you could answer your question yourself! |
|
|
|
|
***UPDATE***
List might be the wrong attend!
>>> The current thought is community driven audit of coins and icos to prevent scam! Example: Before some1 issues an ico he could ask for audit and if the audit passes he could get a a badge... something like that, to increases trust.
1. There should be a committee democratically voted with min. 20 persons (to avoid corruption)
2. Applying for audit is based on the free will of an issuer
3. There are no hardcore regulations and no legal aspects
4. Its something like a professional opinion from chosen community members that adds extra trust and adds a little process to "separating wheat from chaff"
Well all very theoretically and for sure contains many problems in it in that state...
|
|
|
|
|
I added another list that might help:
Tools and services to use for starting an ico:
|
|
|
|
why you btt usename is VTS but this project name is LICENSIUM?
you know,you can create a new account named your project,
but you use name is not the same as the project name ,
I think it's a immature project
Thx for your impulse! Why would a username be same as a project name? I do not see any reason. I'm a user here having projects... Can you elaborate your thought about this please, maybe I miss something. As already written in the FAQ - This project is early stage! You probably overread it. Can happen! Anyways, thank you for your thoughts! |
|
|
|
Another very valuable info from a DeepOnion sign carrier... Promote your crap somewhere else! |
|
|
|
You are getting all of the coins for free. I do not know why people still make accusations.
There is NOTHING free in this world! And for sure not deepOnion coins! Or you give them away as a social project, help poor people  Luckily Im to old to fall in this crap, but many others are not.... DeepOnion mentality reminds on drug dealers giving away free drugs to build up their new profitable clientele... |
|
|
|
Good project need experienced technical team to realize, I hope you can get big project development
Thank you! We do have a small team working on it, tho we could really need more coders that is the reason why we need early stage funding and also we need to probably run an ico. But NOT a "get rich in 3 days ico" and collecting $10.000.000 funds... Much smaller amount will do. Our lead developer made the rule that Licesium coins will be not pre-mineable and we gona need to stick with it and hope it won't distract investors ... |
|
|
|
Its not shitcoins we need to be worried about, there are tons already with no volume and garbage market caps.
Its the phony ICO's that need to be dealt with, warnings to the community need to be done. Raising of capital for bogus projects need to end.
agree! ^^^ coins and ico's |
|
|
|
I think it would have to be a team of people that run their own site and that is ALL they do. They'd have to basically write essays with comment threads allowing people to counter-argue and they'd have to implement this into their research and even then, it could still be considered an opinion. I think that this isn't a bad idea though- I'd like to go to one third party place where people write basically essays explaining why they think a coin is a scam. I don't think they should say a coin ISN'T a scam, and just keep their energy on trying their best to find the evidence that a certain coin is a scam. If there isn't evidence that it is a scam, that doesn't mean that it isn't. I think that having a single place to go to could actually be a thing, though. scamcoins.net?
as long as it is run by a punch of reputable community members that get somehow voted from the crowed in the committee that evaluates coins or better said give an opinion scamcoins.net or coinreview.org >>> is worth a deeper thought... |
|
|
|
great project sir, i think it can be success project. but i see, the images are not available. may be, you must repair it.
Thx! I do see the images when clicking on the link tho, I'm not able to embed them, cuz of low member status... |
|
|
|
If you can't tell shit coins on your own, you should not trust a list. Shall we also then buy up the coins the list does not list? You will have a list of more than a thousand coins if it is honest. No one wants to do all that research to help others. There are regulatory lists by governements and banks that have Bitcoin on them. Shall we trust that list?
Well the word "LIST" is not the correct term to be used (that was just a trigger in my brain) As explained later, a trust seal on free will base, issued by community committee that requires some kind of audit... just an extra trust factor not regulation! |
|
|
|
We are seriously looking for skilled and experienced people that see potential in Licensium and Trusted Nodes and are willing to join us. We will offer tokens that will represent shares in return for your services or participation, but we are also open to other paid by success models.
hello what kind of skill and experience do u guys need ? i think i can help u out cheers What kind of skills and experience do you have? You can also send a pm if its more comfortable for you  |
|
|
|
I think the whitepaper is minimum to get some credibility about your project, without it the thread does look sketchy.
If you refer to "technical" white paper, the thread is a start, we will update it with info! Step by step. |
|
|
|
We used to have this stuff back in the day of only PoS coins and it was pretty much the same. People freaked over premines and the coins basically died right there. Nowadays nobody cares. Premines, ICOs, shady developers, all of it used to be much less troublesome in the past, but now people simply want to just only whatever hot new thing there is and mine or try and profit from it. Meanwhile the ones who are raking it in are the devs who hold huge bags and just dump out their premines once their coin gets traction..
I believe a solution is needed, urgent, no? Just ignore it and see where its going? Just asking... Ignorance is not a solution, mocking is. Mock the stupid ones, the shills, report the obvious and we should be fine. Crypto was about honesty some years ago, it still is for a bunch of people like myself. As long as we live, honesty will live with us in this crazy wild west. How to "Mock the stupid ones, the shills, report the obvious and we should be fine" if more and more icos and crypto projects gets realized outside of this forum, never participated here?... It is somehow possible to do that within the forum, but outside I do not see a way... |
|
|
|
We used to have this stuff back in the day of only PoS coins and it was pretty much the same. People freaked over premines and the coins basically died right there. Nowadays nobody cares. Premines, ICOs, shady developers, all of it used to be much less troublesome in the past, but now people simply want to just only whatever hot new thing there is and mine or try and profit from it. Meanwhile the ones who are raking it in are the devs who hold huge bags and just dump out their premines once their coin gets traction..
I believe a solution is needed, urgent, no? Just ignore it and see where its going? Just asking... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
