200 BLOCKS LEFT!!!!
So are we extending PoW or are we going to the original final target?
|
|
|
yeah price is looking good, new orders keep coming in and seems trading is starting... a few more orders and it will be shown under the "hot coins" section. i want to buy a bit more, but not many sell orders We are doing good, maybe we can get even more trading by one of us doing some promotion in the C-cex troll box
|
|
|
Total coins?
Estimated max coins after ending of PoW = 180k Give or take, yes.
|
|
|
GREAT NEWS:
I've hired a Andriod App designer that will create games that use RISK as payment method!!!!
BUY RISK NOW THAT IT IS STILL CHEAP!!!PS: Nice move. Interesting whose wall ? Gentlemen, join me . Very great news! By the way, what kind of games are we looking at? This could be big
|
|
|
What everyone should do now is leave wallet open, stake so that PoW will start quicker!
Isn't this what was being advised before so the PoW would end quicker? Ironically, yes. In fact, it is what caused PoW to end, but the bug has been fixed now, lol.
|
|
|
In 3.5 hours 60 blocks were generated.
that means 420 blocks in 24 hour.
make it 4500.
I would tend to agree. Not something too soon but not something too late.
|
|
|
The more I think about it, I am in favor of the fork (I voted for no fork at first).. So make it 4:6 instead of 5:5 if that makes a difference in the outcome
|
|
|
PoW is effectively over. There is a bug in GetNextTargetRequired which creates negative targets for PoW blocks which are not allowed in CheckProofOfWork when the block is submitted. This was triggered by 10 PoS blocks in a row with no PoW blocks. int64 nTargetSpacing = fProofOfStake? nStakeTargetSpacing : min(nTargetSpacingWorkMax, (int64) nStakeTargetSpacing * (1 + pindexLast->nHeight - pindexPrev->nHeight)); int64 nInterval = nTargetTimespan / nTargetSpacing; bnNew *= ((nInterval - 1) * nTargetSpacing + nActualSpacing + nActualSpacing); bnNew /= ((nInterval + 1) * nTargetSpacing); nTargetTimespan is hard coded to be 15 * 40 = 600. nTargetSpacing is being set to nTargetSpacingWorkMax which is 12 * nStakeTargetSpacing = 720. nInterval = 600 / 720 = 0 (because it is defined as an int, it is rounded down to 0) bnNew *= ((0 - 1) * nTargetSpacing + nActualSpacing + nActualSpacing); <<< From this point on, bnNew is negative because it is multiplied by -1 CreateNewBlock assigns nbits to a negative target. ProcessBlock will never accept the block because the CheckBlock fails when it calls CheckProofOfWork. Altering the nbits won't work because ProcessBlock will fail when it calls AcceptBlock and nBits != GetNextTargetRequired. Well, at least PoS works.. I think the community should vote to keep PoS going like this or fork and continue with PoW until the original block target.
|
|
|
Last blocks found on our pools was an hour ago.
According to the client wallet, we are still active on PoW, so it's strange what's going on... very strange To prepare for the worst, we need to split coins as much as possible to ensure a steady flow of PoS blocks.
|
|
|
I mean, this isn't a bad thing really, but it's just not as things were planned...
|
|
|
There is nothing but PoS blocks right now.. did PoW end early or something?
|
|
|
5 POS blocks in one row and 3 of them are mine 9 PoS blocks in a row now..
|
|
|
Finally mined my 1st POS Block.
I already have 40 POS blocks! But i move my coins from the pool directly to my wallet in blocks of 10, i hope that it really will have a huge impact on the number of POW blocks Thos 40 blocks from me already decrease POW number of coins by 700. If you don't mind me asking, how many coins do you have? And just to clarify, you've POS mined 700 total coins in 24 hours? I have just over 500 coins mature at the moment and another 300 maturing tonight but have only earned 1.1 +/- coins from staking in 24 hours. Just want to compare and see if I need to split them differently. I don't know how many coins he has, but he's saying he's prevented 700 new coins being mined by PoW as a result of his PoS blocks, not that he's made 700 coins.
|
|
|
I haven't bothered to split up my coins; is it worth doing so, and is 10 the magic number? (heck, that's going to be a lot of wallet addresses if it is...)
I have my coins split with 16 addresses, so we'll see how that works
|
|
|
That difficulty though.. 1254
|
|
|
Finally mined my 1st POS Block.
Congrats! PoS blocks are coming in faster and faster, and the more we have the less PoW blocks and coins we are going to have. We are already looking like we will be under 200k coins by the end of PoW
|
|
|
Let's hope so! It seems that it's on the way back up again, at least... Well either miners or the multipools are dumping hard on us.. We can make it though, it is still very cheap with everything considered. If you can get coins for the rate they're selling at, it's a steal.
|
|
|
Under 30k is still very cheap.
With this supply and dev and nice hashrate it can surpass 100k, 100% sure.
That is very likely, and there is still a lot to come
|
|
|
35 Gh/s !!
What is that supposed to mean ? It means that if this hashrate would stay 24 hours that someone spend more then 10 BTC on it to mine RISK. Very good investments coming in through mining..
|
|
|
hashmaster1 and paycum - I'm here too NAV soon will be No.1 RISK is OK too Hehe hi guys! You bought in this ico as well? Yes, for 0.55 btc and mining now... Ah nice, small world I was in NAV at the beginning when it was SUM2, good times those were..
|
|
|
|