Unfortunately the game ended with both teams sharing a point. I think it's was a brilliant result for Arsenal but wasn't for Manchester United. Arsenal arw now sitting at the fourth position on the table while Manchester United at the 10th. Aubameyang never disappoints seems he knew he wasn't offside guess that's why he comported himself to score the goal. Arsenal truely deserve a results from the game.

Disappointing week @FJ majestic 7, although great week to be a Chelsea fan, we finally got our home win and clean sheet, 😁

Initially, the high ranked members criteria should have given them less spam compared to when they did allow lower ranked users and beside they have hired a well reputed manager with years of experience to tackle the quality of post of the campaign although one factor they refused to put into consideration was the minimum merit earned by users been accepted into the campaign this would had prevented dormant account from enrolling.

Best method to prevent or reduce spam would be to give the signature manager the ability to accept quality participants into the campaign that way spammers won't be given the opportunity to spam and get paid.

You guys don't get, just as the altcoin board is left to drown in spam and all we do is complain upon complain with very few users doing the needful to sanitised the board, same fate is what signature campaign has on the forum. Something has to be done, maybe the suggestion been aired by forum users aren't the best (but in our defense we're just trying to help). The adminstrators should give the sector some attention. Leaving it unsanitised isn't helping matters.

Concerning your suggestion, although I don't buy into the idea of restricting any individual to a maximum number of post he/she can make on the forum daily. Still, those abusing the privilege should be severally punish that's the kind of sanitation I'm referring to. Deleting of spam isn't making much of an impact instead it's just increasing the number of posts made by spammers to meet up post count incase previous spams are deleted.

It's a norm on poorly managed campaigns especially when such post avoid detection by reporters and not been deleted by moderators. On this campaign, they won't get paid for such post (the manager will do the needful when he's chance). If you observe, that account wasn't very active (this year) until few days ago after the launch of this signature campaign. Those are the type of users the manager was employed to tackle which he's doing a good job. Probably an alt ranked up through spamming during the days of just activities to rank up on the forum.

Question directed at OP, is there probably a maximum participates capacity as I observed participates are almost 300+ and any idea of the duration of campaign, just inquiring as I assume you might have more information than the average information out there.

Since it's a private deal, it's best we leave it that way although he's getting paid for just signature ads (could be more, same or less). You can try tracking transaction from the host wallet (campaign fund) and match it with other addresses on the spreadsheet then the additional wallet receiving payment could be his but after identifying his payrate what'll be the benefits? Just waste of your time.

About his posting numbers, that's true, he posts alot although (reverse comment 😁😁), here's a confirmation;
If you need more stats on others visit: Active users, top posters and most active topics in the past 1h, 24h and 7d

@OP, I love how you count weekly post, just observed it via speedsheet almost considered leaving campaign but I gave it a second thought, keep up the good work.

Mehn this sucks, so I'll be losing my yellow cap 😭 thought Liverpool, Manchester City and Chelsea could score more goals but they all disappointed anyways I'm grateful we got our first clean sheets and Lampard's first home win although I didn't predict a clean sheet but hopefully many more of those will come our way.

Seems lot of users got exact scoreline in this round, congrats on that. I just got one exact scoreline right, not a great week for me as usual 😁. This round wasn't the usual walk in the park for Liverpool and Manchester city. It was fun seeing them struggle to get a win, it makes the race more interesting and captivating to watch.

I was just going through the comments again then realized I haven't replied to this post. You're right, feels like the market capitalization move opposite to bitcoin dominance Irrespective of bitcoin gaining some price value. When the dominance is high, total market capitalization of the industry reduces. That simply means Investors are taking money out of the market which proven my point once again that the industry can't survive without altcoins. Not just because of the utilities they contribute to the industry but also because of the wealth (inflow of money) they bring into the industry.

Just have to assume you're asking a genuine question without any bad intentions. There isn't an officially list but  unofficially you can identify them through this thread; [TOP-200] The most generous users giving merits. Merit sources are highlighted in bold letters. There could be few mistake as some merit source are yet to be identify while other smerit generous givers could be mistaken for merit sources nevertheless, the list is 99% accurate.

I don't think the adminstrators or members of Bitcointalk has a problem with this, they aren't scared because in the past, similar platform have tried dethroning Bitcointalk but couldn't success. The problem they should be concerned with, is the level of spam they'll be tacking over the couple of few weeks this campaign will be active. I just went through the list of signature participants and I must say, I'm not impressed. Maybe in the coming few weeks more quality members will engage with the campaign without spamming the forum.

What make a signature campaign stand out apart from the obvious which is their payrate, is the level/number of quality participants participating in that campaign. The campaign already have a quality, well reputed manager, what's left now is quality of posts from participates.

I did a post sometime ago titled; {Facts} Disadvantage of promoting signature campaigns that encourages spamming. I recommend you go through the thread then if you're comfortable participating in the campaign genuinely without causing any nuisance then go ahead. Remember the campaign doesn't mandate you meet maximum post requirement daily therefore if you participating in the campaign won't turn you into a spammer then go ahead. The issue is that most users use this opportunity to spam the forum while getting paid but if you can post that much or even more amount of posts daily and they still turn out to be quality or atleast reasonable posts then i don't see an issue with that. We have members capable of making 20+ posts daily and still maintaining their quality standards. If you're one of them, then wearing any signature is a privilege, do what suits you.

The issue with posting much is it deprived you of point No.6 on the thread although If you can balance both posting and learning simultaneously then you're good. The campaign has a high quality manager which will be bringing in some discipline to the campaign. The issue with most high maximum post paying campaign is that, they're poorly managed which result to participates spamming and still getting paid but @Yahoo's involvement in this campaign changes everything.

This isn't happening anything soon, the diversity between the dt members is what makes the system interesting and less centralized. If this was to be the case then the system won't be as decentralized (to some extent as theymos had intended).  I'll go with @ThePharmacist reasoning on this as farming of account (back when it was still ok to do so), was mainly done for one reason, which was to join a signature campaign but currently, farming of accounts are done for various untrustworthy reasons which includes; farming trust, farming merit, scamming and obviously cheating signature campaigns.

When you consider this recent development toward account farming, you'll understand why there's an unwritten rule towards discouraging it. Using your common sense, If a new rule is passed, you don't go punishing old offenders that commited that offense when it was not yet a crime.

@Yahoo is a good and reputed manager so I trust his judgement. We haven't worked together although I wish we do that someday. Cryptotalk isn't Yobit exchange, from my understanding they're just using yobit advertisment management service to promote their forum which happen to be through Bitcointalk forum. Just like any other projects out there using Google AdSense to promote their business that doesn't give the project same reputation as Google, vise versa. Bitcointalk has been a host to numerous scams through project ANN, signature ads etc that doesn't make Bitcointalk a scam platform.

Judge Cryptotalk as Cryptotalk, if Yahoo managing the campaign will reduce the rate at which spam posts are been paid for then, that's a positive news. Only wish he was given more privileges like been in charge of acceptance of members that would had been a more positive news.

No idea what's the dispute between @Vadi2323 & @Royse777 is all about but I hope you guys resolve your issue soon and yes @Royse777 is part of this campaign. He's on a private deal, you can verify that from this thread: [Signature Sold Out] Avatar Available On average 15 to 20 posts DAILY

You mean since you have been loging in to pick your scorers for the last 3 game weeks, you haven't seen the free 30mbtc🤔 that's kinda hard to believe nevertheless congrats on your win. I always thought no one have won the free bets until I saw your post. The highest I have achieved and seen others achieve is 4 correct scorers prediction, your post just gave me more motivation to keep aiming for the grand prize.

Opinion on Chelsea vs Brighton game; Lampard will record his first premier league home win as a Chelsea manager, I have this feeling we'll be scoring 5 or more goals. Just feeling too optimistic

Exactly, I'm not discouraging anyone from joining any campaign of their choice, joining a campaign is a privilege and if you can handle that privilege without abusing it then you're free to go ahead joining any campaign of your chosen. The current yobit associated signature campaign now have a reputed manager in the person of @yahoo62278 which is a positive signs since spam will now be moderated by him.

I just used this thread as an opportunity to highlight some disadvantage you should definitely consider before joining any campaign, If you can handle posting high number of posts without spamming then you can go ahead.

You got that right and those we should stop sending smerit to because all they do is hoarding the smerits😁.
/Joking

Took me quite some time to understand the list too but seriously, those repeating names making the list almost every month what's there deal they don't encounter meritable posts or just greedy. 🤔

To my understanding, the diversifying strategy works better with different investment vehicle e.g investing in real estate, precious metals, cryptocurrency, stock etc. Investing in multiple altcoins with the mindset of diversifying is just like hiding your money at different locations in your house with the mindset of keeping them safe. What then happen if your home catches on fire just like when the cryptocurrency market experience bear market. In the house example, you lose all your money while in the bear market example you're be at lost, so then, what was the point of diversifying in that manner in the first place?.

There are other investment vehicles out there so, do as @mjglqw have suggested. When diversifying, invest in a manner your investment in one vehicle won't be affected the moment the other investment choices aren't doing so well. Cryptocurrency as an industry is one investment vehicle.

The smart ones could easily change their telegram username as there isn't any limitations to that. Also creating a new email isn't that big of a deal so they could easily change their email too. Having this details on the list won't make much of a difference and would only put more workload on the OP since the scammers can easily bypass them. It'll only be useful when dumb ones try creating alts with same contact details to continue their scammy activities on the forum which if they get linked to accounts above they'll find alternative measures to avoid detection.

Forum users just have to be self cautious as not much can be done by the forum itself to prevent scammers from finding a way to scam others. OP kudos to creating & keeping this list updated, saw this sometime ago on the scam accusation board & was about recommending you move it to a board that it'll be more useful like what you have just done. Kudos.

Gave the accused some number of days to defend himself but i guess he isn't interested, already left a negative feedback before now but just supported the flag and made it active. The accuse isn't showing any concerns towards resolving the issue, he has been active but has intentionally refused to respond to the thread irrespective of the PMs sent by others as indicated above and negative feedbacks already visible on the account.

To OP and other affected users, I'm sorry for your lost of time invested into translating for this user (project). You just have to move on now. You have done the best you could do, that's bringing this to the attention of the forum.

Have you tried reporting the PMs and no action was taken to caution the user? If not then try using the report to moderator button and in the comment section, you can input your discomfort with the PMs. Probably since there's an option to stop receiving PMs from certain users you can used that option. Occasionally, i have seen users recieving temporarily ban for PMs don't know if same fate applies here but you can give it a try. Report his multiple PMs and watch out for the outcome.