Btw your title declare this loan as a risky one but you say that is more than sure that nothing will happen. A bit confussing, don't you think? Op is a self-contradictory person where s/he, him/herself told riskily but asking that one. OP has the fund on a bank but not want to invest where s/he wants to give interest.
|
|
|
I think that is easy to understand that the user has tried to build a trust by take and pay little loan, with the hope to gain trust : now he is arrived at the end of the scheme, and he asked bigger amount for scam.
You have mentioned a valid point. I just noticed that bill gator revised his positive trust to neutral. And base on the rank which has made by default (only 4 earned merits), don't deserve such a loan also has two negative trusts by reputed members.
|
|
|
What a clairvoyant. 2020 vision. Was it necessary to write such an obnoxious reply?
We have to write to know as many information as possible to save the community. No collateral, no loan.
Overall agreed, though there should have few exceptions.
|
|
|
I won't be abandoning this forum account, not some random newbie seeking a $10 quick buck loan scam. A random Legendary with 2 red tags (from Mitchell and BadBear, both former Staff members) seeking a $1000 quick buck doesn't make it any better. You are absolutely right and also there are two active loans. Also I guys he is promoting Ponzi which is showing on his signature.
|
|
|
I'm just curious, how much you can rate my account in case I will apply for a loan?
Someone may give you 1 BTC or more. At first glance, I may take a risk about 0.1 BTC for you rest depends on your post history, post gaps time, recent merit, post quality etc. I won't be abandoning this forum account, not some random newbie seeking a $10 quick buck loan scam.
A lot of hero/legendary leaving away by taking only 0.03 BTC there are a lot of proof see on lending board. You are wrong about the "he will be a scammer" part.
Also never heard that lenders cannot be borrowers, ahhhh traditional banks just cannot be!
If I am wrong then that will be good for the community. It is not a traditional bank. It is a virtual place just a forum where I have not seen anyone who gives a loan and takes a loan at the same time except you. A lot of your negativity stems from "feeling" I'm a scammer.
I think if you get that loan you will obviously scam. I have not yet seen when marco posted it, if it's recent then marco can't be trusted. As Ponzi promoter is a scammer. Soon I will check it. Edit: Just checked and seen the image posted by nutildah that you are promoting ponzi. So, you can't be a trusted person. I think you should be tagged immediately for promoting ponzi. Archive for reference
|
|
|
Sorry you do not know what is staked adress, anyway, also I do not need that now as you already got negative tag. Sorry but your loan reuest has been rejected. @Kisleav Do you read the term before apply? good luck, btw He had applied before tagged.
|
|
|
Snip Can you please provide the link of the staked address so that I can verify easily? And also please create a fresh post without quoting previous posts.
|
|
|
That clearly means to me that you are judging him already and I think there's no need to ask for other's opinion on this matter. I'm sure you'll dissaprove his loan request the moment he will apply a loan on you.
His trust level to me is/was up to 0.03 BTC. And you are right I would not or will not approve too much. Few days ago he took 0.02 BTC loan from another lender and then asked me for another 0.02 BTC then I had not approved that. And also I never allow any loan if there is any active non-collateral loan. I have faced a few problems (loan defaulted) where I sent earlier then another lender gave more. Result: Loan default and I lose my fund with the new lender. didnt know its good for help community
It must be helpful for the community. For example, I can trust you to lend 0.05 BTC but I will not trust you 0.1 BTC. In this case, if I see you got already 0.05 BTC loan then I will not give any loan to you.
|
|
|
It is possible his financial situation has changed from when he was managing the coinsbank(?) signature campaign, and may be willing to scam for $500 today when he was unwilling to scam for $20k years ago if he is now desperate for money. It is also possible, he is trying to engage in many trades so he can gain additional reputation, so he can have additional business opportunities, such as managing campaigns.
On that time the managing or getting campaign/bounty and current time I do not think the same also I think marco also think the same. Also, I do not think comparing with that time with the current time is the same. That time people traded account without any problem now it will be tagged immediately. Then the earning amount of a bounty hunter is more than a bounty manager/campaign manager now. So, forget the previous reputation. Try to understand its recent reputation and behavior.
|
|
|
Loan Amount: 0.02 BTC Loan Purpose: fix my taxi Loan Repay Amount: 0.023 BTC Loan Repay Date: 18 March 2019 or earlier Type of Collateral: No Escrow profile Link: Na Bitcoin Address: 1N9CdQYQXAmVwVE2KbUiHB3C1sScUjM7WA I agree with all new terms of shasan
Can you provide any staked address or unedited post where you posted your bitcoin id and also can you sign a message with that bitcoin id?
|
|
|
although I would not be surprised if he posted it somewhere and the logic is convoluted.
I have found it on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=147773 (trust page of marcotheminer.) you may have a look from there. IIRC, in the past, he was entrusted with ~50BTC to run a signature campaign (worth ~$20k at the time), and to my knowledge he paid out appropriately
There is a long gap and earlier he was a lender but now he is a borrower also then how was a manager but a few days ago I saw he tried to join on a campaign where he has not been accepted. So totally opposite from earlier, in the meantime, anything can happen.
|
|
|
After looking at the post history and password change lot,the account might changed hands on 2018 or in Feb 2019,so as you said this may be an act of big scam attempt but tagging an user based on suspicious is not a right way.
Might need more suggestions from other DT members.
Anything might happen which we don't know but we may guess. Check the sent feedback by VOD then you will get clear understand how s/he thinks the borrower might be a scammer or default a loan.
|
|
|
I don't know how can you label a person risky before he has done any shady work
Came back on the forum long after and then asking non-collateral loan is one of the shadiest work. Almost all the cases it caused scam. Eg: loan default, account trade or something else.
|
|
|
In the meanwhile time he was not active in this forum,anything may happened to him like he lost all his savings on bets or to the borrower who got never paid or whatever the reason maybe.For that calling him as a scammer is not appropriate until he did that.He is in need of money looks like because he only asked for loans on his recent posts.
I suggest you to not to give any loans for him until the already lend money gets repaid,because he might not be able to repay them in my guess.
He is not posting anything except asking loan, which refers to something wrong too. His recent days passing only by asking loan. No legit user take loan such a way where the first small amount then increases the amount. If you can find out 100 people like this then you may find out at least 95% loan default.
|
|
|
So my point is, you only call it a scammer once he failed to comply with the agreed terms in case you approved the loan.
I am not calling scammer, but I am telling e may scam base on my above points. Not for this single point. Please read all point. and also this point indicates scamming which happen at least 80% time for point number seven.
|
|
|
I think marcotheminer is/will be a scammer. Need opinion from experts. The reason for thinking it: 1. He came back on bitcointalk after a long gap. 2. He was a lender and now he is a borrower. 3. He is trying to only take loan after came back. He is not contributing anything on this forum. 4. He was active lending service as well as borrowing (we told several times then he locked his lending service). 5. The first time he trying to take about 0.04/0.05 BTC loan when failed tried to take small loan once repaid the small loan to bill gator received positive trust then again took a loan from Pamoldar, o.o4 BTC and then again took loan 0.033BTC6. Now he has two active loans and trying to take another loan 0.33BTC loan. Where all loans are non-collateral. 7. When a borrower took multiple loans without collateral are usually scammer. 8. According to Timelord2067: There is also an old suggestion marcotheminer u=147773 is an alt of balanghai u=143158 and 9. He asked loan from another person on the 6th march on PM archive.Why I am Posting: 1. As marcotheminer has positive feedback few people who do not know research may allow the loan which happened for the second loan. The previous lender did not give a 2nd loan because he knows the risk but new lender gave. Also the 2nd lender didn't give any neutral trust. 2. Trust can be changed for a different amount. For example, I may not scam for 0.05 BTC but I may scam for.2 BTC3. I know "prevention is better than cure", so want to keep him away from taking the loan as want to stay him away from scams. 4. I have posted here as scam still not proved but I highly believe that it will be scammed. Let me know if I am wrong.
|
|
|
Thanks shasan. i forget to say, can you remove the neutral trust from my account? Regards
Done, sorry I forgot to remove. Thanks for reminding me. You are always welcome, don't hesitate to let me know if you need any more help, thanks.
|
|
|
Xmlx I respect the right not to accept. Unfortunately, I don't have a different sub-currency right now, so I accept the invalidity of this loan request. sorry for taking your time unnecessarily. Thanks again.
You are always welcome. Repayment confirmed in full with interest earlier than repayment date. Thanks for the fast repayment.
|
|
|
|