["Risky" Loan] borrower [marcotheminer]

[mirakal]

didnt know its good for help community

It must be helpful for the community. For example, I can trust you to lend 0.05BTC but I will not trust you 0.1BTC. In this case, if I see you got already 0.05BTC loan then I will not give any loan to you.

It's really good to do some background investigation prior approving a loan.
It would be nice if all the regular lenders in the forum will share information about their borrowers and just summarize it in a list so it would be easy for the lenders to check the status of the applicant, and that includes loan history.

Actually in real life we have that, it's called credit bureau where we can log in into a system and checks names on the list, it's very convenient and we can avoid lending people outside his capacity to pay.


I'm just curious, how much you can rate my account in case I will apply for a loan?

[marcotheminer]

Oh boy more forum drama for no reason! Let's how many hours we can waste running around in circles.

I'll get to some replies shortly, short on time now.

[nutildah]

In marco's signature:

May or May Not be a Ponzi. Use at own risk: https://t.me/Arbitrage_ETH_Bot?start=e3utse4680. Arbitrage could still be slightly profitable in my opinion.

Oh man. Now you are advertising a Ponzi telegram bot in your signature? Not a good look man.



That's a Ponzi scheme, or else straight up scam. There's no doubt about it.

Really as a Legendary member you should know better.

Screenshotted:



Now I'm beginning to feel like you're a scammer too. Why else would you advertise this bot?

[shasan]

I'm just curious, how much you can rate my account in case I will apply for a loan?

Someone may give you 1BTC or more. At first glance, I may take a risk about 0.1BTC for you rest depends on your post history, post gaps time, recent merit, post quality etc.

I won't be abandoning this forum account, not some random newbie seeking a $10 quick buck loan scam.

A lot of hero/legendary leaving away by taking only 0.03BTC there are a lot of proof see on lending board.

You are wrong about the "he will be a scammer" part.

Also never heard that lenders cannot be borrowers, ahhhh traditional banks just cannot be!

If I am wrong then that will be good for the community. It is not a traditional bank. It is a virtual place just a forum where I have not seen anyone who gives a loan and takes a loan at the same time except you.

A lot of your negativity stems from "feeling" I'm a scammer.

I think if you get that loan you will obviously scam.

May or May Not be a Ponzi. Use at own risk: https://t.me/Arbitrage_ETH_Bot?start=e3utse4680. Arbitrage could still be slightly profitable in my opinion.

I have not yet seen when marco posted it, if it's recent then marco can't be trusted. As Ponzi promoter is a scammer. Soon I will check it.
Edit:
Just checked and seen the image posted by nutildah that you are promoting ponzi. So, you can't be a trusted person. I think you should be tagged immediately for promoting ponzi. Archive for reference

[LoyceV]

I won't be abandoning this forum account, not some random newbie seeking a $10 quick buck loan scam.

A random Legendary with 2 red tags (from Mitchell and BadBear, both former Staff members) seeking a $1000 quick buck doesn't make it any better.

Right, in my mind I consider the first two "repaid" (funds to be put immediately aside to cover when needed).

I'm pretty sure the other party doesn't consider it repaid until it is actually repaid.

[shasan]

I won't be abandoning this forum account, not some random newbie seeking a $10 quick buck loan scam.

A random Legendary with 2 red tags (from Mitchell and BadBear, both former Staff members) seeking a $1000 quick buck doesn't make it any better.

You are absolutely right and also there are two active loans. Also I guys he is promoting Ponzi which is showing on his signature.

[Zerbis]

I think that is easy to understand that the user has tried to build a trust by take and pay little loan, with the hope to gain trust : now he is arrived at the end of the scheme, and he asked bigger amount for scam.

[shasan]

I think that is easy to understand that the user has tried to build a trust by take and pay little loan, with the hope to gain trust : now he is arrived at the end of the scheme, and he asked bigger amount for scam.

You have mentioned a valid point. I just noticed that bill gator revised his positive trust to neutral. And base on the rank which has made by default (only 4 earned merits), don't deserve such a loan also has two negative trusts by reputed members.

[unibitcoinist]

I think that is easy to understand that the user has tried to build a trust by take and pay little loan, with the hope to gain trust : now he is arrived at the end of the scheme, and he asked bigger amount for scam.

Not necessarily true, I used to take loan for couple of months, I was forced because of my bad financial condition. marcotheminer was a lender back in the days and has turned into a borrower now. Probably he is passing worst days now. I am not vouching anyone here. Never give a loan without a valid collateral. And all of the borrowers giving a valid collateral must think of collateral scammers.
At the end of the day, always using a trusted escrow is the best deal.

[shasan]

Not necessarily true, I used to take loan for couple of months, I was forced because of my bad financial condition. marcotheminer was a lender back in the days and has turned into a borrower now. Probably he is passing worst days now. I am not vouching anyone here. Never give a loan without a valid collateral. And all of the borrowers giving a valid collateral must think of collateral scammers.
At the end of the day, always using a trusted escrow is the best deal.

On your post history, I can't see any loan. I think you might have taken a loan from your well-known person or from a bank. Take a loan from a well-known person and a bank is not the same to take a loan from here.

[unibitcoinist]

On your post history, I can't see any loan. I think you might have taken a loan from your well-known person or from a bank. Take a loan from a well-known person and a bank is not the same to take a loan from here.

I know how things go here and I have borrowed from this forum. Leave that part. You would definitely lend money to Suchmoon/LoyceV/Vod if they asked, you would not even think what happened with them. marcotheminer was not active doesn't reflect that he is scammer. You probably have missed my points here. I am not trying to prove marcotheminer is honest.
LoyceV has a point here although. imo, marcotheminer was tagged for shady activities which is why he should not be trusted.

[Slow death]

Let me know if I am wrong.

the guy disappears for a while and comes back and does this post and then starts ask for loan and wants to participate in the signature campaigns and promotes MLM, not a good sign. Something is not right. So you are right

[bill gator]

This thread has brought actions to my attention that give me the impression that marco is too high risk for me to leave a positive trust, especially with the context of my feedback. I thought the user had just come back after some time away from the forum, but the switch from lender to loan-requester is a strange one. Then having multiple active loans that the user "considers repaid", despite them not being repaid and asking for another third loan that is an order of magnitude higher than previous requests; all while offering strange explanations, no collateral and following the pattern of a loan-scammer.

I've changed my feedback to a neutral and am still considering changing the wording, because at this point I have my doubts.

[shasan]

am still considering changing the wording

If you remove that one and give a new one then if there is any positive word then that might misguide. I saw after a few moments that you have changed your feedback though according to the current situation seems positive. You may give any type of feedback you want. But right now there is another case "Ponzi Promoter Trying to take multiple loan (Non-collateral)". Already tagged by two DT for promoting Ponzi.

[bill gator]

I had just copied and pasted the feedback and changed it to a neutral, but you are correct; stating "Would happily loan to again." is not how I feel anymore, given these circumstances and I feel that it gives the possibility to lull an unsuspecting lender into a sense of security. I have updated my feedback and thank you for bringing this to our attention as a community.

The part that really bothers me is marco stating he considers those loans repaid. That's just not a normal thing to say.

[shasan]

I know how things go here and I have borrowed from this forum

I am sorry but could not see any post on lending thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2542493;sa=showPosts so if you took the loan from the forum then that is from your another ID. Okay, leave it.

I have updated my feedback and thank you for bringing this to our attention as a community.

Thanks for updating the feedback.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Oh god!
You guys painted him red already? I hope I get my repayment today. I left him a PM. It will be safer for him not to ask anymore loan once he pay my payment and other ones payment. If he pays back then give him a break.

Thanks

[shasan]

Oh god!
You guys painted him red already? I hope I get my repayment today. I left him a PM. It will be safer for him not to ask anymore loan once he pay my payment and other ones payment. If he pays back then give him a break.

Thanks

He was painted previous two DT and new 2 Dt. I do not think he would pay you if got another loan also I thought he will default the loan as already got more than his desired. But might repay to take more and you could lose more money. I can't remember probably you lend money where I wanted to lend after taking money from you asked me again and I refused to give. I never give any loan if I see any active loan.

[marcotheminer]

Great way to have discussion on this forum: attack and slander. 2 thumbs up.

[nutildah]

Great way to have discussion on this forum: attack and slander. 2 thumbs up.

Its actually libel since it was written. But uh, you didn't address the point of why you are advertising a Ponzi in your sig. Care to take the opportunity to do so?