That rate's ridiculous, 0.00002BTC/post for members and above?
Yes , it seems very ridiculous payRate . I suggest to the OP : fix it.
|
|
|
Meme time :
|
|
|
Hey,
I've voted for : Buy a lot amount of bitcoin . It is the best choice when (or better "if") the price will drop.
|
|
|
Salve gente, qualcuno qui ha voglia di condividere il suo sapere con una guida alla creazione di un faucet? La seguirei molto volentieri
Nella sezione inglese ce ne sono diverse, ci sono anche diversi utenti che dicono di farlo gratis al posto tuo (poi non so se è vero). Io dopo 2-3 tentativi ho lasciato perdere Ho trovato questa guida : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=886132.0 magari vi è utile.
|
|
|
I've left a negative feedback for security . Is it a problem for you ?
|
|
|
Amazing ! I'm watching where is the pop-corn? Please provive a valid collateral .
|
|
|
Exactly he tends to get my work almost for "free" .
You still do not get it. You could have asked for monetary compensation, instead you asked for trust. If everybody gives out trust and saves on money then it breaks the trust system. It may be possible that you have been asking others too for the same. If i'm not wrong positive trust is left when the deal is successful .In our case he could received the code and me positive trust and everybody could be happy instead of this "show" And you can be sure that this was my first and last time when I'm asking for trust as a favour instead of my services . I've told you : I would rather make a donation to you , instead of left you a positive feedback. You didn't mention this when we was chatting Because you didn't ask me a donation , but a positive feedback.
|
|
|
...
Just because someone is not on DefaultTrust doesn't make their feedback discountable and it is still seen under 'untrusted' which doesn't mean 'worthless'. A person can always get put on the default trust at a later date as well which will instantaneously make their feedback 'green'. Feedback is always worth something and can help you make up your mind about a user. If people can see you have done many trades this could also help people in deciding whether to put you on the default trust list themselves.
I know , but a lot of users don't think like you. Exactly he tends to get my work almost for "free" .
You still do not get it. You could have asked for monetary compensation, instead you asked for trust. If everybody gives out trust and saves on money then it breaks the trust system. It may be possible that you have been asking others too for the same. If i'm not wrong positive trust is left when the deal is successful .In our case he could received the code and me positive trust and everybody could be happy instead of this "show" And you can be sure that this was my first and last time when I'm asking for trust as a favour instead of my services . I've told you : I would rather make a donation to you , instead of left you a positive feedback.
|
|
|
Jeez tantamount to trust buying? I assume you're not known with how hard BB are made. All I asked was a small favour in return to one of my secrets
It does not matter if it was hard or easy. You asked for trust in exchange for something. That is equivalent to trust buying. redsn0w should be commended for bringing it to light instead of agreeing to it. The problem he has asked me a positive feed. but I'm not in the defaultTrust list so at the end my "feedback" doesn't count anything and especially "it is not seen". However thanks for your opinion . I was pointing out that you could have gotten the code for "free". What does the wink mean? Exactly he tends to get my work almost for "free" . I would rather make a donation to you , instead of left you a positive feedback.
|
|
|
Not forbidden no, but people tend to distrust those that engage in that sort of behavior though, and neg them for it.
Oh ok , thanks for the reply. At the moment I would like to know another thing : is it against the forum's rules that type of comportment through PM ?
There are few things forbidden on this forum, I would venture to guess that the PM itself is not forbidden. But if you actually went through with it, I would think it would be a misuse of the trust system. Yeah you're right. ... I was pointing out that you could have gotten the code for "free".
What does the wink mean?
At the end I don't want anymore the "bb_code" , and the wink doesn't mean nothing ( it is only an emoticon).
|
|
|
Jeez tantamount to trust buying? I assume you're not known with how hard BB are made. All I asked was a small favour in return to one of my secrets
It does not matter if it was hard or easy. You asked for trust in exchange for something. That is equivalent to trust buying. redsn0w should be commended for bringing it to light instead of agreeing to it. The problem he has asked me a positive feed. but I'm not in the defaultTrust list so at the end my "feedback" doesn't count anything and especially "it is not seen". However thanks for your opinion .
|
|
|
I believe this is tantamount to trust buying. I had loanees who requested me to give positive trust, and not only I refused their request I warned them of the possibility as being marked as trust buyers. ....
So at the end is it forbidden ? I feel like I am being tricked to look at a signature advertisement ... it's not very hard to replicate his signature. At the moment I would like to know another thing : is it against the forum's rules that type of comportment through PM ?
|
|
|
Hey guys, I would like to know if this comportment is forbidden or not ?
|
|
|
Non credo sia possibile "chiudere" un indirizzo bitcoin
ciao, mi sono espresso male, intendevo chiudere la transazione associata a quell´indirizzo. Dopo 24 ore ancora mi risulta in sospeso.. Ciao, puoi postare l'id della transazione ? Grazie.
|
|
|
I've sent you a pm , can you check please ? Thanks.
|
|
|
what about 0.01BTC for per 1K stellars?
No , I can give you 0.00625 btc . If you want send me a pm .
|
|
|
...
Looks like the Dev has gone awol..I think as an esxcrow you should give a Dev a deadline and also the choice for unhappy investors to get their money back. Obviously something is wrong here with the lack of communication. Especially right at the launch of this coin.
Read the PGP message over your post, I think you guys are thinking that I'm the responsible but please wait these 14 days and after I will start to repay all the investors ( if it will not met all the terms).
|
|
|
I'm not saying anywhere you're responsible for the technical side, where do you read that? As an escrow, you are responsible for refunding people when ICO terms are not met. If terms would be met and dev abandons this coin, that's our risk and I get that. But terms are not met and there is no communication from devs. So refund should be possible if complete terms aren't met in a week from now for example. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I'm redsn0w and I've signed this message for say :
I will give another 14 days to the dev team of ebolaShare (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=853242.0) after these days I will start to repay all the investors.
The deadline is : 22-12-2014
Cheers, redsn0w.
08-12-2014 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Keybase OpenPGP v1.1.6 Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto
wsBcBAABCgAGBQJUhXDZAAoJECQNASzkL4DPeYAH+wZDOa3ZgKkUHE2FGsidkvMl mTN9Jkmep3aWdqtumIj2/cjfcFwkS6PsacAt/04zlIQzG1WgnclWWMftc/CLTi+J MrcxZUZmWPUSVFsvLMvt1MzLO2pLND056YTcNuTziDXOGjXr7Kq+6K7MLReXel0/ wPAGFGlXNtUxtshbhuqaMh6ikMyeQdVgaxJimLwFkkZ4QypHSvAYSVqReyaRuC1A cYQqZfStiyUjoKmvHa3G6bUr1P5Mm1CiYt9mM+Y8SEcM52S5XUPT2zJ8+SbhOaJg SBLr33bO//2zIrLD+US1Lo/odMKeUt5ajQopvQ6LulHfFxCE+Qj6M0uEPO93lME= =B/l/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
|
Hi redsn0w,
The dev of Ebolashares isn't responding anymore or updating anything. A lot of people are not happy as they didn't fulfill what they needed to do. I suppose that all funds are still in your possesion? I think it's time to create some kind of deadline because me personally, I lost faith in this dev. Communicating a lot before launch and after a half launch, almost no communication at all.
Regards,
Michaelb87
Hey , I'm sorry for that but I'm not responsable of the fault of the dev team. try to send a PM to their and ask him a deadline. I'm sorry again ,have a nice day. See above my PMs with redsn0w, what is this for kind of answer? The whole reason of an escrow is holding funds untill terms are met. Which are not! I think we are getting screwed over here guys https://blockchain.info/address/13vaDT59Z6zPX1SRXWNmebt86ffVqLkuka I'm only the escrow , I'm not responsable of the "technical" side because I am not part of the team. I'm still holding all the funds until all the terms are met.
|
|
|
I'll do it. PM me the info to the Hitleap account and I'll send you the coins once I've transferred the account.
Why is my post being ignored? Coz i think he wants the BTC first n then the account transfer.! Yeah I think he want first the btc and then he will send you the "collateral" *pay attention guys* .
|
|
|
|