That is a page of lies and bullshit from a bunch of scammers and their supporters like you.

Maybe we could help spread or prevent scam by posting on threads made/commented by those suspicious accounts, just in case some members don't make an account and there's no flag yet on those suspicious users. This might be covered by the first changes unless the user who tags the account is not in DT list (cmiiw).

Of course, we should start flags too.

I figure the orange colour is intended to mean "warning" as opposed to a red colour which would imply "avoid". Since the negative trust counter is just that (a counter), and cannot take into account the actual reasons left behind, then orange seems appropriate as a warning, and it is down to each of us to go into the trust page of a given profile and read through the Trusted/Untrusted feedback + Active/Inactive flags to get a proper understanding of the numbers on a case by case basis.

The example you’ve provided is well known on the Forum, but asserting he is a scammer is not, as far as I know, correct. His profile's feedback provides information that does not imply the account being a scammer, whether we like the user or not. The new system would vouch from now on for a red trust flag to be used if this were to be a fact, with the necessary support.

Nevertheless, it is good that you mentioned here that the trust system has changed quite a bit today, as most people do not visit Meta, and therefore miss out this type of information concerning forum updates. I've just read through the, so far, 11 pages of posts on the core thread, and still need to grasp a few user case scenarios that are not completely clear yet.

Ideally there shouldn't be a case of "i don't like this new system" becasue, it was just implemented some hours ago and we all should give it sometime to understand the system. Theymos has done the needful and we must commend him for this change and not be sabotaging the system.

Basically, Newbies quiet understand the difference between Positive(+) and Negative(-), and the Orange goes with the Negative(-); meaning that, there's a problem with such profile and opening the account profile give the written letters in RED, and he/she will not trade with such user or if he/she will do; he/she will be more extremely careful.

I didn´t like this new system very much....

A yellow color like this looks much more like a neutral trust than a negative trust. This Color should be bold red.

A new user logging on is going to need a 4yr college degree to  figure out what all the =+#-1=2 mean.  I REALLY think this has been overthought and overly complicated especially for someone just logging in to buy a fake gift card from a scammer who they found on Google.   IMO only (no personal offense intended to anyone) I think this is a mistake.  The ONLY people who will benefit from this are the scammers.

^^ probably laudas alt ^^^

who has ever heard of this nothing poster before. Just randomly shows up munching ass.

LFC is that you?

Hey moronpigsnoz do you not understand that the flag system is not pushing for a fair and transparent system? where only REAL scammers can be flagged?

You don't want a transparent and fair system? you want to keep retain a system where PROVEN and VERIFIABLE liars and scammers like lauda you kitty kat master can still brand those that whistle blow on him as scammers?

Yep plenty of bottles of cristal are going to pop tonight I'm sure. Even more when your favorite kitty cat gets black listed. Meow.

The warning above threads started by such users is also gone. Those two things combined make them worthless.

You will need support or oppose from DT members if I get the idea correct.