|
How did you loose them? Never had a problem with coinpot, even if 'till now I had not many withdrawals, under ten maybe.
|
|
|
|
Guys I'd like to transfer some BTC I've on Cryptopia to Freebit.co.in but I would like to avoid to burn 0.00100000 BTC on the crazy Cryptopia withdraw fee, we'are working on breadcrumbs of bitcoins here, 100K satoshis it's a lot of coins to put togheter up again.
Any method you can suggest to bypass or reduce this crazy fee? I thought on passing via DOGE or LTC and Coinpot, but due to the non optimal conversion rates of Coinpot it's still a big loss, way worst than the Cryptopia fee.
Any idea on how to do this?
What about choosing slow payment option for 400sats? I don't see that kind of option on Cryptopia exchange, from where I can choose that? It would be perfect 400sats. |
|
|
|
|
As for the reCaptcha problem, I "partially" solved switching back on Mozilla Firefox browser for the faucets-like-sites only. It looks like Google reCaptcha V2 is less aggressive and stupid there rather than on Chrome, where it was really unbearable and I was near to break mouse and keyboard.
|
|
|
|
|
Guys I'd like to transfer some BTC I've on Cryptopia to Freebit.co.in but I would like to avoid to burn 0.00100000 BTC on the crazy Cryptopia withdraw fee, we'are working on breadcrumbs of bitcoins here, 100K satoshis it's a lot of coins to put togheter up again.
Any method you can suggest to bypass or reduce this crazy fee? I thought on passing via DOGE or LTC and Coinpot, but due to the non optimal conversion rates of Coinpot it's still a big loss, way worst than the Cryptopia fee.
Any idea on how to do this?
|
|
|
|
We have been a bit delayed with sending out the last few physical reward redemption requests but they are going out now. Also, sending rewards countries other than the USA and UK takes longer since we first need to order the items from Amazon.com to a shipping forwarder who then sends it out to different countries. Previously we just used to refund physical gift requests from other countries but we are using this new system now so that users from most countries can receive their gifts even if it costs us quite a bit more to do this.
You run an amazing service, keep up good work! |
|
|
|
|
Damn quotes on this forums do look like HUGE pyramids
|
|
|
|
|
After almost 6 days since my first successfull mint, I still can't see minted PoS on etherscan.io
MEW is perfectly synched instead.
|
|
|
|
Well, more or less I am in the same situation, like everyone else who is trying to squeeze some money from this faucet. At least for personal piece that I didn't totally waste my time.
I am at 86% withdrawal, and there is no more winnings even with thousands of spins. Obviously they are a scam site.
At the other hand I am wondering how they do it. I did try several things to 'cheat the cheater'- none of them worked. It is not the cookies that give them my ID- I deleted them during play, I modified them, I blocked them... It should be the script that tells the website- if balance>=??? win % =???. I deleted it, deleted all the external http addresses (it works until you refresh the page), and still in a non winning streak. As soon as I log in with low balance wallet- satoshies are coming... I am sure there should be a way to bypass the id recognition- because at the end it is just a way of communication between my browser and their server. I don't have the knowledge to do it- but some of the people here might figure out a way...
I don't understand what you were trying to accomplish by modifying stuff on your pc. This is a server-side driven game, they know all about your account, identified by your BTC address, it has the associated balance and they can drive the outcome of the spin by simple mathematical function on the balance. IN the most simple way they measure the distance betwenn 0.03 and you balance with asimple subtraction: distance = 0.03 - balance the smaller the distance, they make very small or null odds of winning, simple as that. |
|
|
|
^^^ Do you see that message often? Have you tired lowering your -h value?
That I don't see anymore. H/s 450-480 looks low |
|
|
|
SCAM
PENDING PAYOUTS 12 hours
It seems selectively pays
My dad received his first Sunday payment yesterday, no scam. |
|
|
|
Optimal settings for a AMD Sapphire Dual-X R9 270X? Core Clock oc @ 1100MHz Mem Clock oc @ 1500MHz  Windows 10 64bit Catalyst 15.12 Right now using Claymore's 10.2 default settings. Any help greatly appreciated, thanks. |
|
|
|
I minted with the auto-send technique of any amount of POS (I put 1) and it seems it worked because I can see the new quantity of POS in MyEtherWallet increased exactly by the quantity that was given me by the pos calculator.
But in Etherscan.io I'm still seeing the old number in the token tracker select menu, is that normal?
Yeah it's normal. Thank you sir, you're a fine gentleman. |
|
|
|
|
I minted with the auto-send technique of any amount of POS (I put 1) and it seems it worked because I can see the new quantity of POS in MyEtherWallet increased exactly by the quantity that was given me by the pos calculator.
But in Etherscan.io I'm still seeing the old number in the token tracker select menu, is that normal?
|
|
|
|
Hello, I wanto to start mining XMR for a couple of weeks and see how it goes. Did some research and stumbled across so many miners (sgminer-gm, wolf miner, xmr-stack xx, claymore, ...) and pools, I got so confused that I almost gave up. I don't know which tool is deprecated, which new, which is performing better with "modern" or not-so-old hardware. So I realized it would be better to ask someone expert to avoid wasting days of unprofitable or not optimized mining. Could anyone suggest me the optimal miner and/or the configuration very briefly for the devices below? I'm not completely new to mining so I need just some heads up for november 2017 tools. (a) 1 linux servers with " Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v2 @ 3.00GHz" there is currently cpuminer-opt ( https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt) at work pointing at pool " http://minexmr.com/" (b) 1 linux servers with " Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v5 @ 3.50GHz" here too, there is currently cpuminer-opt ( https://github.com/JayDDee/cpuminer-opt) at work pointing at pool " http://minexmr.com/" (c) 1 pc with " Intel i5-4690" and Windows 10 64 (no GPU) (d) 1 pc with " Intel i5-4670" and Windows 10 64 (no GPU) (e) 1 pc with (CPU) " Intel i5-750 2.66GHz oc 3.20GHz" and (GPU) " AMD R9 270X". Which miner? Are Catalyst 15.12 still a must? Thank you. |
|
|
|
Question from an eth/pos/smart-contracts newbie: how much GAS/ETH do I need into an address capable of mining about ~1.2 POS as stated by the official calculator in order to do the minting once by following the above guide? Thank you. -- edit: sorry, I see this question has been made a million times, but didn't catch up with all the replies. Gonna try to go backwards now  |
|
|
|
Thanks for promo Myfe. As for Shit reCaptcha V2, I don't know why nobody from google or website admins tell anything about this, I guess they all think that we do use some sort of bot and try to bypass the captcha. But instead the issue IS REAL, it takes a look on the Googe reCaptcha (un)support forum to see to how many people is making the life impossibile. I hope it gets sorted out soon. It has been nearly unusable for me the past few days. Each captcha is taking up to 5 minutes to solve, and often I am just quitting. I've tried from different IP addressed (my phone, my home connection, the library connection, etc) and the captcha is insane at all of them and much more insane than on any other site (including freedoge.co.in, where it is easy to solve) Try to switch to Firefox, this simple thing did the trick for me. It looks like I'm recaptching like the first time I started using it. On Chrome it looks like it's more harsh in marking you as a bot and than applies all kind of frustrating things: slow tiles, multiple slide challenges, random retries, captcha fails. On Mozilla, even if I have to restart it every couple hours or so because it's became a shitty and laggy bloated browser, at least captchas seem working normally. |
|
|
|
|
I got that sometimes too, it has to do with some jQuery error, for $ not being defined. I can suppose jQuery library fails to load or whatever. But strangely yes, reloading the page 4-5 times usually fixes it.
|
|
|
|
Good to read you got it working. You should check that the compiled SW features match your CPU architecture for best
performance. It should already, because it was compiled in the real machine, or it should not? edit: in you opening post there are some minor typos here? (CLAGS is CFLAGS? obvious for an advanced user but deadly for a novice if it's the case, I'm the second type) Users with openssl 1.0.1 (Ubuntu 14.04) may get better perforance by adding "-DUSE_SPH_SHA" to CLAGS. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
